a_rackowski
Footballguy
1)Antonio Gates
2)Alge Crumpler
3)Tony Gonzalez
4)Todd Heap
5)Ben Watson
2)Alge Crumpler
3)Tony Gonzalez
4)Todd Heap
5)Ben Watson
GatesHeapWittenTroupeCrumpler1)Antonio Gates2)Alge Crumpler3)Tony Gonzalez4)Todd Heap5)Ben Watson
Todd HeapAntonio Gates (new QB will hurt his numbers)Alge CrumplerJeremy ShockeyHeath MillerTony Gonzo1)Antonio Gates2)Alge Crumpler3)Tony Gonzalez4)Todd Heap5)Ben Watson
Don't you watch ESPN and get your FF strategy from them? Rule #10 - Don't draft Tony Gonzalez!(Yes, I'm kidding about ESPN, but I do happen to believe TG won't be top 5 this year.) Watson certainly looked good yesterday, and as the other poster said, if Branch doesn't sign, Watson will be the main target.1)Antonio Gates2)Alge Crumpler3)Tony Gonzalez4)Todd Heap5)Ben Watson
Forgetting Shockey? Gates, Shockey, Crumpler, Gonzo, Witten, Heap, then WatsonTodd HeapAntonio Gates (new QB will hurt his numbers)Alge CrumplerTony GonzalezHeath Miller1)Antonio Gates2)Alge Crumpler3)Tony Gonzalez4)Todd Heap5)Ben Watson
Yup, I forgot Shockey. I replaced him with Gonzo (I edited my post). I think Gonzo could be a bust this year...Forgetting Shockey? Gates, Shockey, Crumpler, Gonzo, Witten, Heap, then WatsonTodd HeapAntonio Gates (new QB will hurt his numbers)Alge CrumplerTony GonzalezHeath Miller1)Antonio Gates2)Alge Crumpler3)Tony Gonzalez4)Todd Heap5)Ben Watson
LJ Smith might just challenge for top five also
He's always injured though...can't put up numbers when your not playing.LJ Smith might just challenge for top five alsoThis guy knows what he is talking about!
gbill2004 said:He's always injured though...can't put up numbers when your not playing.hydroxybear said:renesauz said:LJ Smith might just challenge for top five alsoThis guy knows what he is talking about!
Says the man with Heap at #1?gbill2004 said:He's always injured though...can't put up numbers when your not playing.hydroxybear said:renesauz said:LJ Smith might just challenge for top five alsoThis guy knows what he is talking about!
No McMichael?GatesCrumpHeapShockeyGonzoCooleyWittenLJ SmithWatsonWatson will crack top 10.
Whoops... updated rankings:GatesCrumpHeapShockeyGonzoCooleyMcMichaelWittenLJ SmithWatsonWatson is #10.No McMichael?GatesCrumpHeapShockeyGonzoCooleyWittenLJ SmithWatsonWatson will crack top 10.
All these players plus McMichael and Gonzalez were gone. I had Watson last year and couldn't let hom blow up on someone else's team this year. I was contemplating LJ Smith who went a couple of picks later in our TE mandatory leagie but chose Watson.I totally forgot CooleyI'd rank him 4th, maybe 3rd, bumping Watson to 6thGatesHeapShockeyCooleyCrumpler
I'm also surprised there hasn't been more mentioning of Troupe. The team may not be that good again, and could be throwing a ton. Plus, none of Bennett, Givens or the other guys is a true go-to receiver, which could make Troupe that much more of a preferred target for Volek/Young.I'm telling you right now that Ben Troupe will be a top 5 TE this year. Mark it down.
Logic would say that he has a better chance of making the top 5 WITH Branch in the lineup, deflecting some of the coverage.TomPSI think Watson has a great chance to break the top 5 this year, even if Branch returns.
Forget someone?GonzoShockeyHeapWatsonCrumpler
No, I think McMichael and Cooley will just miss. Read this.Forget someone?Gonzo
Shockey
Heap
Watson
Crumpler
I think he's referring more to Gates than to McMichael and Cooley...ETA: That I see what you mean with your added link...No, I think McMichael and Cooley will just miss.Forget someone?GonzoShockeyHeapWatsonCrumpler
I do not think that is true. Gates, Gonzo, Heap, Crumpler all have showed in previous years that being the best receiver on a team as a TE can mean big fantasy numbers.Logic would say that he has a better chance of making the top 5 WITH Branch in the lineup, deflecting some of the coverage.TomPSI think Watson has a great chance to break the top 5 this year, even if Branch returns.
Gates #8????No, I think McMichael and Cooley will just miss. Read this.Forget someone?Gonzo
Shockey
Heap
Watson
Crumpler
He might squeak into the top 10. Depends on how well Winslow, Clark, Troupe, Miller and Wiggins do.Gates #8????No, I think McMichael and Cooley will just miss. Read this.Forget someone?Gonzo
Shockey
Heap
Watson
Crumpler
If Watson is in your top 5, let's say #5, and the top 4 TEs are gone, and you take Watson, you are taking him too early most likely.But I think Watson has just as good of top 5 potential as Witten, Cooley, McMichael, Smith, Gonzo, Crump....which is why he is a great pick when about 10-12 TEs are off the draft board. And if you miss out on him, get Winslow.
I think so. Plus, a healthy McNabb will throw alot of TDs - I dont see Reggie Brown and WR2 (whoever that turns out to be) getting a ton of TDs, so they have to go somewhere. If McNabb throws in the neighborhood of 22-26 TDs, where are they gonna go?? WR1 could get 6-7, wr2 maybe 4 or 5, Westy will get a few, and that still leaves anywhere from 6-12+ to go elsewhere. I like LJs chances to get 6+ of them.As a sidebar, why exactly is everyone so high on LJ? Always looked like a nice player to me, but ahead of Shockey? Is it simply the reciever hole in Philly?