Redskins coach Joe Gibbs admits Ladell Betts is likely to get more touches than Clinton Portis against Miami.Betts, who also plays on third downs, is a decent flex play. Portis is looking riskier, although he will start the game and could get goal-line tries.Source: Washington Post
From the Washington Post, via Rotoworldwas this on ESPN
From the Washington Post and Rotoworld.not sure where this quote was taken from, but its NOT correct. I've listened to several interviews on Redskins.com and Extremeskins.com that say just the opposite.
Rotoworld's source for this "news" is by that Jason LaCanfora guy. THe only guy who thinks Betts whould get more carries. And here is the exact article they get their source from:How Many Carries for CP?If it's me and I am facing this defense in this heat in this game, I am riding Betts. He was the second most productive back in the NFL in the final 7-8 weeks of last season and he's in great shape and worked hard all preseason.I'd use him as my workhorse and use Clinton to spell him. But Gibbs is married to Portis as his starter, however nominal the title may be - becasue he also admits that Betts will probably rush more times than the "starter" - so, what do you guys think CP can handle?Do you ease him into the game - especially with a guy like Betts right there - or do you believe that he's the CP of old and can run 20-25 times?Will be interesting to see.
He did say throw this in the article:becasue he also admits that Betts will probably rush more times than the "starter" Id like to see his source for thatCan someone change the title of this thread, it was not Gibbs but some Portis hating beat writer who stated these OPINIONS. Ridiculous that this kinda stuff gets put out on gameday right down to the wire.
Big mistake.Took Portis and Betts yesterday in my local, benching Portis 2day. Want to start him, but got to believe the workload's divided today.
Work load will be divided every game..he's still a go in my book.Took Portis and Betts yesterday in my local, benching Portis 2day. Want to start him, but got to believe the workload's divided today.
Me too. Figured at worst theyre all in a RBBC anyway. Might as well go with Portis.So there's only one piece of information in that article, and he doesn't attribute a quote or source to it, and it happens to be the only thing quoted in Rotoworld, which in turn makes it the title of this thread? I'm still starting Portis (over Betts, Peterson, and Chester Taylor).
Ditto. It's week 1 and I would rather suffice to Betts outplaying Portis on my bench than take a risk and start the WAS RB2 who doesn't outperform the WAS RB1.Here's the link to the quote and yes, as the poster above me mentions, it's from his blog:
Jason La Canfora's Blog
Based on the comments made in this thread about this guy, I'm ignoring him and continuing to start Portis.
He was never quoted at all.So, was Gibbs misquoted?
He was never quoted at all.So, was Gibbs misquoted?
jurb26 said:Big mistake.Bears_Man2 said:Took Portis and Betts yesterday in my local, benching Portis 2day. Want to start him, but got to believe the workload's divided today.