What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Pre-Free Agency Mock (1 Viewer)

Zimm

Zimm

Footballguy
Here is my 2 round mock draft, And i will be working on all 7 rounds after the big Free Agents are signed. (Packer fans i am sorry but i still have you taking a RB.)

Mock Draft

 
I had the trade with Seattle not Arizona and for some reason didn't put in Brockers there. (Hungover) :football: And Why not the bears have a huge need at TE. Mr.Interception looks like he could use a security blanket besides Forte. And i think getting the in my mind the top OL in the draft to sure up that poor OL would be great for the Titans!!

 
I would be surprised to see all of the skill people fall as nicely as this. Fantasy footballers would love it though.

 
'Zimm said:
Here is my 2 round mock draft, And i will be working on all 7 rounds after the big Free Agents are signed. (Packer fans i am sorry but i still have you taking a RB.)

Mock Draft
Click to expand...
I don't mind this draft for the Vikings: Kalil and Reuben Randle. Randle had a disappointing combine but he is good fit for the Vikings offense.
 
Also like the Fleener pick at 34 to the Colts. It actually something that has happened more than once in the NFL. Stafford and Pettigrew. Ponder and Rudulph.

I have to add: I haven't seen Konz fall in many mocks. Konz would be a more practical pick than Fleener since they lost Saturday and center would be a bigger need.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
'Zimm said:
I had the trade with Seattle not Arizona and for some reason didn't put in Brockers there. (Hungover) :football: And Why not the bears have a huge need at TE. Mr.Interception looks like he could use a security blanket besides Forte. And i think getting the in my mind the top OL in the draft to sure up that poor OL would be great for the Titans!!
Click to expand...
Kendell Wright in the first round but not Jeffery? Overall very nice mock i look forward to the full 7 rounds
 
I like that you have Reiff falling here. As an Iowa fan I think he is a solid mid 1st rounder but not top 10. Buluga was IMO a better player for the Hawkeyes. IMO Reiff is more of a lt than Buluga. Also people are seriously under valuing Marvin Mcnutt. He will be a good pro.

 
I don't like St. Louis passing on Blackmon or Tannehill getting out of the top 10, and I don't think that Richardson will go top 5.

Nice job though. These are a lot of work and I appreciate anyone willing to post their ideas out to the world.

 
You can apologize to Packer fans but I think you are still wrong. I don't think Green Bay has drafted a RB in round 1 since Brent Fullwood maybe? They need a pass rush and the history of the present group in charge says they will draft either OL, DB, DL in round 1. I would really expect it to be one of those positions. They have Starks and Green and probably can bring back Grant if they want to or can sign another free agent. I would lean towrd them bringing Grant back after he tests the market and finds little interest.

 
'Warhogs said:
You can apologize to Packer fans but I think you are still wrong. I don't think Green Bay has drafted a RB in round 1 since Brent Fullwood maybe? They need a pass rush and the history of the present group in charge says they will draft either OL, DB, DL in round 1. I would really expect it to be one of those positions. They have Starks and Green and probably can bring back Grant if they want to or can sign another free agent. I would lean towrd them bringing Grant back after he tests the market and finds little interest.
Click to expand...
Starks,Green, or Grant isn't the answer at RB
 
'Zimm said:
'Warhogs said:
You can apologize to Packer fans but I think you are still wrong. I don't think Green Bay has drafted a RB in round 1 since Brent Fullwood maybe? They need a pass rush and the history of the present group in charge says they will draft either OL, DB, DL in round 1. I would really expect it to be one of those positions. They have Starks and Green and probably can bring back Grant if they want to or can sign another free agent. I would lean towrd them bringing Grant back after he tests the market and finds little interest.
Click to expand...
Starks,Green, or Grant isn't the answer at RB
Click to expand...
Green Bay's problem isn't their offense, it's their poor defense. You are mising the boat here.
 
'Zimm said:
'Warhogs said:
You can apologize to Packer fans but I think you are still wrong. I don't think Green Bay has drafted a RB in round 1 since Brent Fullwood maybe? They need a pass rush and the history of the present group in charge says they will draft either OL, DB, DL in round 1. I would really expect it to be one of those positions. They have Starks and Green and probably can bring back Grant if they want to or can sign another free agent. I would lean towrd them bringing Grant back after he tests the market and finds little interest.
Click to expand...
Starks,Green, or Grant isn't the answer at RB
Click to expand...
But adding a pass rushing DE/OLB will help out a horrible defense in 2011 much more than a RB will help a top ranked offense.
 
'pantherclub said:
You think St Louis will pass on black Mon?
Click to expand...
It wouldn't surprise me at all. Last year, most mocks had Julio Jones or Blaine Gabbert going to San Francisco at 7 like those were the only two choices. Next to no one was predicting Aldon Smith even though he fit their scheme perfectly. There are so many mocks that are limiting St. Louis choices to Blackmon and Rieff. Yet there are so many good players that could help them including Richardson and Claiborne. I believe St. Louis could go in a number of different directions and having the extra picks could make even more options open to them. Sorry for the rant.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
'benson_will_lead_the_way said:
'Zimm said:
And Why not the bears have a huge need at TE. Mr.Interception looks like he could use a security blanket besides Forte.
Click to expand...
Cutler has thrown 36 TDs to 23 INTs the last two seasons...get a life.TE is not a huge need in Chicago. They have larger needs, much less in the second round. No thanks.
Click to expand...
'Warhogs said:
'Zimm said:
'Warhogs said:
You can apologize to Packer fans but I think you are still wrong. I don't think Green Bay has drafted a RB in round 1 since Brent Fullwood maybe? They need a pass rush and the history of the present group in charge says they will draft either OL, DB, DL in round 1. I would really expect it to be one of those positions. They have Starks and Green and probably can bring back Grant if they want to or can sign another free agent. I would lean towrd them bringing Grant back after he tests the market and finds little interest.
Click to expand...
Starks,Green, or Grant isn't the answer at RB
Click to expand...
Green Bay's problem isn't their offense, it's their poor defense. You are mising the boat here.
Click to expand...
Im not here to argue....It is a mock draft no need to get bent out of shape because you don't like the picks, its all in good fun. Do you know how much it sucks to be an Eagles fan and Mock the team Worthy and Zeitler in the 2nd round? I don't care for either player, but it makes sense. I know the Packers have bigger needs then a RB, but there are 6 other rounds and the team is good enough to go BPA each round.
 
I appreciate that you are willing to do a mock and put it out there to be discussed. I didn't know anyone was getting bent out of shape? I thought it was sharing opinion to better formulate what teams or most likely to do?

 
'Warhogs said:
I appreciate that you are willing to do a mock and put it out there to be discussed. I didn't know anyone was getting bent out of shape? I thought it was sharing opinion to better formulate what teams or most likely to do?
Click to expand...
I wasn't referring to you when i said getting bent out of shape.
 
'Warhogs said:
You can apologize to Packer fans but I think you are still wrong. I don't think Green Bay has drafted a RB in round 1 since Brent Fullwood maybe? They need a pass rush and the history of the present group in charge says they will draft either OL, DB, DL in round 1. I would really expect it to be one of those positions. They have Starks and Green and probably can bring back Grant if they want to or can sign another free agent. I would lean towrd them bringing Grant back after he tests the market and finds little interest.
Click to expand...
Darrell Thompson in 1990, I believe. Another bust.
 
'Zimm said:
'Warhogs said:
'Zimm said:
'Warhogs said:
You can apologize to Packer fans but I think you are still wrong. I don't think Green Bay has drafted a RB in round 1 since Brent Fullwood maybe? They need a pass rush and the history of the present group in charge says they will draft either OL, DB, DL in round 1. I would really expect it to be one of those positions. They have Starks and Green and probably can bring back Grant if they want to or can sign another free agent. I would lean towrd them bringing Grant back after he tests the market and finds little interest.
Click to expand...
Starks,Green, or Grant isn't the answer at RB
Click to expand...
Green Bay's problem isn't their offense, it's their poor defense. You are mising the boat here.
Click to expand...
Im not here to argue....It is a mock draft no need to get bent out of shape because you don't like the picks, its all in good fun. Do you know how much it sucks to be an Eagles fan and Mock the team Worthy and Zeitler in the 2nd round? I don't care for either player, but it makes sense. I know the Packers have bigger needs then a RB, but there are 6 other rounds and the team is good enough to go BPA each round.
Click to expand...
You mention their RB's and say they aren't the answer so you must think David Wilson is, so it's a needs pick. And here you say they're drafting BPA. Which is it? Do you really think David Wilson is BPA here?
 
'Donnybrook said:
'pantherclub said:
You think St Louis will pass on black Mon?
Click to expand...
It wouldn't surprise me at all. Last year, most mocks had Julio Jones or Blaine Gabbert going to San Francisco at 7 like those were the only two choices. Next to no one was predicting Aldon Smith even though he fit their scheme perfectly. There are so many mocks that are limiting St. Louis choices to Blackmon and Rieff. Yet there are so many good players that could help them including Richardson and Claiborne. I believe St. Louis could go in a number of different directions and having the extra picks could make even more options open to them. Sorry for the rant.
Click to expand...
'scrumptrulescent said:
'Zimm said:
'Warhogs said:
'Zimm said:
'Warhogs said:
You can apologize to Packer fans but I think you are still wrong. I don't think Green Bay has drafted a RB in round 1 since Brent Fullwood maybe? They need a pass rush and the history of the present group in charge says they will draft either OL, DB, DL in round 1. I would really expect it to be one of those positions. They have Starks and Green and probably can bring back Grant if they want to or can sign another free agent. I would lean towrd them bringing Grant back after he tests the market and finds little interest.
Click to expand...
Starks,Green, or Grant isn't the answer at RB
Click to expand...
Green Bay's problem isn't their offense, it's their poor defense. You are mising the boat here.
Click to expand...
Im not here to argue....It is a mock draft no need to get bent out of shape because you don't like the picks, its all in good fun. Do you know how much it sucks to be an Eagles fan and Mock the team Worthy and Zeitler in the 2nd round? I don't care for either player, but it makes sense. I know the Packers have bigger needs then a RB, but there are 6 other rounds and the team is good enough to go BPA each round.
Click to expand...
You mention their RB's and say they aren't the answer so you must think David Wilson is, so it's a needs pick. And here you say they're drafting BPA. Which is it? Do you really think David Wilson is BPA here?
Click to expand...
You really never know how the draft is going to unfold because teams try really hard to hide who they are really targeting, and i do think the Rams pass on Blackmon....Also i don't see Richardson falling past the Rams. And yes i do think Wilson is the BPA and also happens to fit a need.
 
'Zimm said:
'Donnybrook said:
'pantherclub said:
You think St Louis will pass on black Mon?
Click to expand...
It wouldn't surprise me at all. Last year, most mocks had Julio Jones or Blaine Gabbert going to San Francisco at 7 like those were the only two choices. Next to no one was predicting Aldon Smith even though he fit their scheme perfectly. There are so many mocks that are limiting St. Louis choices to Blackmon and Rieff. Yet there are so many good players that could help them including Richardson and Claiborne. I believe St. Louis could go in a number of different directions and having the extra picks could make even more options open to them. Sorry for the rant.
Click to expand...
'scrumptrulescent said:
'Zimm said:
'Warhogs said:
'Zimm said:
'Warhogs said:
You can apologize to Packer fans but I think you are still wrong. I don't think Green Bay has drafted a RB in round 1 since Brent Fullwood maybe? They need a pass rush and the history of the present group in charge says they will draft either OL, DB, DL in round 1. I would really expect it to be one of those positions. They have Starks and Green and probably can bring back Grant if they want to or can sign another free agent. I would lean towrd them bringing Grant back after he tests the market and finds little interest.
Click to expand...
Starks,Green, or Grant isn't the answer at RB
Click to expand...
Green Bay's problem isn't their offense, it's their poor defense. You are mising the boat here.
Click to expand...
Im not here to argue....It is a mock draft no need to get bent out of shape because you don't like the picks, its all in good fun. Do you know how much it sucks to be an Eagles fan and Mock the team Worthy and Zeitler in the 2nd round? I don't care for either player, but it makes sense. I know the Packers have bigger needs then a RB, but there are 6 other rounds and the team is good enough to go BPA each round.
Click to expand...
You mention their RB's and say they aren't the answer so you must think David Wilson is, so it's a needs pick. And here you say they're drafting BPA. Which is it? Do you really think David Wilson is BPA here?
Click to expand...
You really never know how the draft is going to unfold because teams try really hard to hide who they are really targeting, and i do think the Rams pass on Blackmon....Also i don't see Richardson falling past the Rams. And yes i do think Wilson is the BPA and also happens to fit a need.
Click to expand...
The Rams are desperate to get Bradford a playmaker and while there are some good WR's in this draft they could get in the 2nd round the Rams can afford to take Blackmon. They are going to have a tough call to make because any of Blackmon, Claiborne, Richardson or Reiff will be a big help to them.
 
'ExaltedOne said:
I don't like St. Louis passing on Blackmon or Tannehill getting out of the top 10, and I don't think that Richardson will go top 5.

Nice job though. These are a lot of work and I appreciate anyone willing to post their ideas out to the world.
Click to expand...
Even though I think RB is the most replaceable position in the NFL I'm leaning towards the Browns taking TRich and here's why:- They aren't going out of their way to re-sign Hillis and the backfield is pretty barren without him.

- Richardson could start week 1 and take a lot of pressure off of McCoy, crucial if he's going to develop.

- The team has lacked an identity for a very long time and Richardson would be the kind of impact player they wanted out of RG3.

 
Question about the Jags pick - why Ingram over Coples?

He's either getting pressure on the QB, getting double teamed or Miami is forced to rely on the short passing game.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
'cstu said:
'ExaltedOne said:
I don't like St. Louis passing on Blackmon or Tannehill getting out of the top 10, and I don't think that Richardson will go top 5.

Nice job though. These are a lot of work and I appreciate anyone willing to post their ideas out to the world.
Click to expand...
Even though I think RB is the most replaceable position in the NFL I'm leaning towards the Browns taking TRich and here's why:- They aren't going out of their way to re-sign Hillis and the backfield is pretty barren without him.

- Richardson could start week 1 and take a lot of pressure off of McCoy, crucial if he's going to develop.

- The team has lacked an identity for a very long time and Richardson would be the kind of impact player they wanted out of RG3.
Click to expand...
That was my exact reasoning for the Browns taking Richardson at 4, and It was more of Ingram over Perry not Coples i am just not a fan of his i think he is more of a 3-4 LE or a 4-3 pass rushing DT (Jason Jones). I have him mocked to Miami for the reason of them using a hybrid 4-3/3-4 defense.
 
'Zimm said:
It was more of Ingram over Perry not Coples i am just not a fan of his i think he is more of a 3-4 LE or a 4-3 pass rushing DT (Jason Jones). I have him mocked to Miami for the reason of them using a hybrid 4-3/3-4 defense.
Click to expand...
It seems a waste to put a guy like Coples at 3-4 LE and he looks like a prototypical 4-3 DE to me. I think he'd be fine in the new Dolphins defense, but then again so would Ingram.
 
'cstu said:
'Zimm said:
It was more of Ingram over Perry not Coples i am just not a fan of his i think he is more of a 3-4 LE or a 4-3 pass rushing DT (Jason Jones). I have him mocked to Miami for the reason of them using a hybrid 4-3/3-4 defense.
Click to expand...
It seems a waste to put a guy like Coples at 3-4 LE and he looks like a prototypical 4-3 DE to me. I think he'd be fine in the new Dolphins defense, but then again so would Ingram.
Click to expand...
I have to disagree with you about Coples, I don't think he has the speed/athleticism you look for in a 4-3 DE. He has the strength and sort area quickness you look for in a pass rusher, but i think would get handled fairly easy vs most LT (He would have to play LE). He plays the inside gap very well and did so often at North Carolina.
 
Again, I cannot fathom how the Rams would pass on Blackmon if he is there at 6. Blackmon and Bradford just seem like a match destined for each other

 
'pantherclub said:
Again, I cannot fathom how the Rams would pass on Blackmon if he is there at 6. Blackmon and Bradford just seem like a match destined for each other
Click to expand...
'Banemorth said:
You need to deduct all those picks the Saints are going to lose. Great mock. :thumbup:
Click to expand...
I can easily see the Rams passing on Blackmon, and i thought about the Saints picks but ill just wait until the judgement day to change it up.
 
'Zimm said:
'pantherclub said:
Again, I cannot fathom how the Rams would pass on Blackmon if he is there at 6. Blackmon and Bradford just seem like a match destined for each other
Click to expand...
'Banemorth said:
You need to deduct all those picks the Saints are going to lose. Great mock. :thumbup:
Click to expand...
I can easily see the Rams passing on Blackmon, and i thought about the Saints picks but ill just wait until the judgement day to change it up.
Click to expand...
Not to keep harping on it but why would you think the Rams would pass on Blackmon especially if he was there at 6? He seems to address one of their biggest needs.I would love for it to happen because he would probably fall to 9 for the Panthers.
 
I think the WR class is very deep and IMO Blackmon is not the top WR of the class and there are various opinions on that, Richardson on the other hand is hands down the top RB of his class, And with that said could see Blackmon falling as far as 15 in the draft.

 
'Zimm said:
I think the WR class is very deep and IMO Blackmon is not the top WR of the class and there are various opinions on that, Richardson on the other hand is hands down the top RB of his class, And with that said could see Blackmon falling as far as 15 in the draft.
Click to expand...
I like Floyd over Blackmon :thumbup:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Matt Montgomery
Wednesday IDP Rookie Mock Drafts!
Replies
9
Views
443
Matt Montgomery
Matt Montgomery
JohnnyU
2025 Rookie Mock Draft (3 rounds) (The Devy Royale) / Hit Rates (Dynasty Nerds)
Replies
32
Views
22K
JohnnyU
JohnnyU
Matt Montgomery
IDP Rookie Mock Draft
Replies
0
Views
227
Matt Montgomery
Matt Montgomery

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top