Wow, guess it was all about the money.
I'm sure the Angels would have loved to give Pujols a 6 or 7 year contract. They would have much preferred that, I'm sure.Albert will be 32 in January. 10 years? Probably has three years left at his peak, then another three good but injury riddled years. Think 6-7 would have been more than enough.
Al least he can DH when he is 42.
The Angels are a great organization that's committed to winning and in a great market. So, that's a little unfair to say.Pujols went to an equally good situation, for better money, and in a city/state that very well might be more desirable for him (it would be for alot of people).I have no idea how anyone could find fault with that.Wow, guess it was all about the money.
What is it with this attitude that Pujols somehow owes something to STL?He brought 2 WS titles (after a 24 year drought) and was the best $104 mill. bargain in MLB history.Dude deserves a shot to live somewhere else and make more money in an equally good organization.I think a simple "Thank you, Mr. Pujols" would suffice.Wow, guess it was all about the money.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The guy had a wild hair up his #### about the Cards organization mistreating him for sometime. Sorry they only paid you $104 million in your career, you #####.
wow. no wonder he left if Cards fans treated him like this.Wow, guess it was all about the money.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The guy had a wild hair up his #### about the Cards organization mistreating him for sometime. Sorry they only paid you $104 million in your career, you #####.
He just went to the highest bidder. I won't hold it against him, but that's what happened.The Angels are a great organization that's committed to winning and in a great market. So, that's a little unfair to say.Pujols went to an equally good situation, for better money, and in a city/state that very well might be more desirable for him (it would be for alot of people).I have no idea how anyone could find fault with that.Wow, guess it was all about the money.
Seriously? Dude was an idol in STL. Don't let sour grapes on the day of this signing somehow taint how well he was treated in his 11 years there. Like a king.wow. no wonder he left if Cards fans treated him like this.Wow, guess it was all about the money.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The guy had a wild hair up his #### about the Cards organization mistreating him for sometime. Sorry they only paid you $104 million in your career, you #####.
The Cards had their shot to renegotiate with Pujols and they admittedly dragged their feet. He owes the Cards nothing.What is it with this attitude that Pujols somehow owes something to STL?He brought 2 WS titles (after a 24 year drought) and was the best $104 mill. bargain in MLB history.Dude deserves a shot to live somewhere else and make more money in an equally good organization.I think a simple "Thank you, Mr. Pujols" would suffice.Wow, guess it was all about the money.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The guy had a wild hair up his #### about the Cards organization mistreating him for sometime. Sorry they only paid you $104 million in your career, you #####.
He was the best player in baseball, he's a nice guy and he helped the franchise win two championships. Why would he not be treated like a king? Is St Louis Ukraine under Stalin?Seriously? Dude was an idol in STL. Don't let sour grapes on the day of this signing somehow taint how well he was treated in his 11 years there. Like a king.wow. no wonder he left if Cards fans treated him like this.Wow, guess it was all about the money.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The guy had a wild hair up his #### about the Cards organization mistreating him for sometime. Sorry they only paid you $104 million in your career, you #####.
Seriously? Dude was an idol in STL. Don't let sour grapes on the day of this signing somehow taint how well he was treated in his 11 years there. Like a king.wow. no wonder he left if Cards fans treated him like this.Wow, guess it was all about the money.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The guy had a wild hair up his #### about the Cards organization mistreating him for sometime. Sorry they only paid you $104 million in your career, you #####.
Pretty sure most of them will come around to this position, if they're not already there. This is one guy on a message board 20 minutes after his deal with the Angels was announced.What is it with this attitude that Pujols somehow owes something to STL?He brought 2 WS titles (after a 24 year drought) and was the best $104 mill. bargain in MLB history.Dude deserves a shot to live somewhere else and make more money in an equally good organization.I think a simple "Thank you, Mr. Pujols" would suffice.Wow, guess it was all about the money.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The guy had a wild hair up his #### about the Cards organization mistreating him for sometime. Sorry they only paid you $104 million in your career, you #####.
Only if you're Tino Martinez.Is St Louis Ukraine under Stalin?
Maybe he did, but if he felt that a $200 million contract from STL would hamper their ability to keep an elite team around him, he wouldn't be alone.I'd guess the vast majority of people felt that way.Not that it isn't about money because that's always a huge issue, but in this situation, it's clearly about winning too.He just went to the highest bidder. I won't hold it against him, but that's what happened.The Angels are a great organization that's committed to winning and in a great market. So, that's a little unfair to say.Pujols went to an equally good situation, for better money, and in a city/state that very well might be more desirable for him (it would be for alot of people).I have no idea how anyone could find fault with that.Wow, guess it was all about the money.
if a player wins my favorite team two titles and plays like the best player in the league while being underpaid the entire time, and then the franchise waits until the last possible second to try and keep him around, I think it's pretty shameful to call him a ##### when he agrees to accept a deal that none of us would ever be able to resist signing.Seriously? Dude was an idol in STL. Don't let sour grapes on the day of this signing somehow taint how well he was treated in his 11 years there. Like a king.
I am sure they would love to dump Wells and Hunter.Pujols - $25+ millionWells - $21 millionHunter - $18 millionHaren - $12.8 millionWeaver - $14 millionTotal of almost 91 million bucks for 5 players next year. Can't say that LAAAAA won't spend some money.
I think Ravech was on yesterday saying that St Louis is better off long-term without Pujols, I tend to agree. That is just too much money for a smaller market team, even with St Louis' regional following.
Well I guess that makes them the AL West favorite for 2012, and maybe 2013. And makes it even uglier beyond that. The NL East teams should send Moreno a thank you card.And now they get CJ wilson
And now they get CJ wilson
Possibly. I'm a Pujols fan regardless. That wasn't about to change unless he went to the Yanks.Maybe he did, but if he felt that a $200 million contract from STL would hamper their ability to keep an elite team around him, he wouldn't be alone.I'd guess the vast majority of people felt that way.Not that it isn't about money because that's always a huge issue, but in this situation, it's clearly about winning too.He just went to the highest bidder. I won't hold it against him, but that's what happened.The Angels are a great organization that's committed to winning and in a great market. So, that's a little unfair to say.Pujols went to an equally good situation, for better money, and in a city/state that very well might be more desirable for him (it would be for alot of people).I have no idea how anyone could find fault with that.Wow, guess it was all about the money.
Hunter and Abreu (9 mill) come off next year so that frees up 27 mill in 2013I am sure they would love to dump Wells and Hunter.Pujols - $25+ millionWells - $21 millionHunter - $18 millionHaren - $12.8 millionWeaver - $14 millionTotal of almost 91 million bucks for 5 players next year. Can't say that LAAAAA won't spend some money.
I totally agree. If Pujols were 28-27 like Fielder the deal may have worked. Even then it was a big risk. I could not see the last four years working in the NL playing the field everyday into his 40s. At least he can DH in the AL.I think Ravech was on yesterday saying that St Louis is better off long-term without Pujols, I tend to agree. That is just too much money for a smaller market team, even with St Louis' regional following.
Angels doing a Michael Corleone today.And now it LOOKS like they have acquired Andrew Bailey.Jesus did Gene Autry come back from the dead and jump on his deathbed?
I don't disagree with the sentiment, but are we really classifying all of the Cardinals fan base on Mr. Phoenix's post-signing meltdown? As for waiting until the last second, were you asleep for the past year? Albert cut off all negotiations in February when he reported for Spring Training. That was an "Albert thing" that the Cardinals respected.if a player wins my favorite team two titles and plays like the best player in the league while being underpaid the entire time, and then the franchise waits until the last possible second to try and keep him around, I think it's pretty shameful to call him a ##### when he agrees to accept a deal that none of us would ever be able to resist signing.Seriously? Dude was an idol in STL. Don't let sour grapes on the day of this signing somehow taint how well he was treated in his 11 years there. Like a king.
I understand the point, but there's no way the Cards are better off without Albert Pujols.I think Ravech was on yesterday saying that St Louis is better off long-term without Pujols, I tend to agree. That is just too much money for a smaller market team, even with St Louis' regional following.In the end, you're right.Ooh, I see the Angels got CJ Wilson, too.
today no, tomorrow yesI understand the point, but there's no way the Cards are better off without Albert Pujols.I think Ravech was on yesterday saying that St Louis is better off long-term without Pujols, I tend to agree. That is just too much money for a smaller market team, even with St Louis' regional following.In the end, you're right.Ooh, I see the Angels got CJ Wilson, too.
ExactlyHe just went to the highest bidder. I won't hold it against him, but that's what happened.The Angels are a great organization that's committed to winning and in a great market. So, that's a little unfair to say.Pujols went to an equally good situation, for better money, and in a city/state that very well might be more desirable for him (it would be for alot of people).I have no idea how anyone could find fault with that.Wow, guess it was all about the money.
I hold no ill will towards Pujols. It is a bummer to see him go, but that is too much money and many years to give to him. And at least he didn't go to the Yankees or the Cubs or to a scrub team like the Marlins.
Thanks for a great 11 years, Albert! You'll always be one of the greatest Cardinals ever.![]()
![]()
whos that?Unreal, Pujols really was just about the money
???1997, 2003...I hold no ill will towards Pujols. It is a bummer to see him go, but that is too much money and many years to give to him. And at least he didn't go to the Yankees or the Cubs or to a scrub team like the Marlins.
Thanks for a great 11 years, Albert! You'll always be one of the greatest Cardinals ever.![]()
![]()