I've seen articles on kids who were caught dealing drugs and the police found drugs in their rooms. Guess what, the parents weren't charged with the crimes, the kid was. There is no way for anyone to be expected to know everything going on with another human being, even if it's family...especially family that doesn't even live in the same state.
But guess what ?? They could be. Ever hear of parents being arrested for their children drinking in their home illegally ? Or how about the person who drives home drunk from a party, gets into an accident and the home owner is responsible?Get a clue, you really have no idea whats going on in this country as far as law goes.
LOL, ok, but someone who wants him lynched with no evidence like yourself does?Also rarely if ever are there convictions on these crimes your talking about. I've heard of parents who had knowledge of underage drinking have the law come after them, but not when they had no knowledge of it and weren't involved in it at all.
The drunk driving from someone's home where the homeowner gets conviced also rarely if ever gets prosecuted.
Your bringing up ridiculous instances that #1 don't relate to this case, and #2 don't get prosecuted anyway.
Are you taking a protaganistic view just to be different?No one has come out and said there is 100% proof that Vick is running a dog fighting/gambling ring.
However, your statement that "LOL, ok, but someone who wants him lynched with no evidence like yourself does?" holds no water.
The facts, as we know them are:
- Michael Vick owns a home where a number of dogs used for dogfighting and dogfighting equipment was found.
- The home was being occupied by a close friend/relative of Vick.
- Vick has a history of breeding and selling the same types of dogs used for dogfighting.
- Witnesses have placed Vick at or around the home numerous times in the last year plus.
Maybe all that evidence in inconclusive. Maybe Vick comes around, has no clue what is going on, sees the mangled dogs and thinks "Hey, maybe my cousin just isn't doing a good enough job raising these harmless little pups."
Better yet, maybe he doesn't come around at all and these "suposed" eyewitnesses are making everything up. Maybe the feed store guy just wants his fifteen minutes of fame. Who knows, maybe Vick is just an innocent landowner who never speaks to his cousin. It's not like he has any history of questionable activity.
Let's get real here. Our judicial system is based on reasonable doubt. Sadly, he'll probably get off with little punishment, if any. However, I think it's pretty safe to assume he's played a pretty big part in this mess.