I don’t feel like it’s a big deal.
Look at the Becky Hammon situation in the NBA as a cross example.
If an NBA team has an opening for head coach and does not interview Hammon, they will be attacked for it
If an NBA team has an opening for head coach and does interview Hammon but she doesn't get the job, they will be attacked for it.
If an NBA team has an opening for head coach and does interview Hammon and she gets the job, the day she is fired ( and all coaches eventually get fired) they will be attacked for it.
The Trail Blazers interviewed Hammon, didn't hire her, hired someone with a rough past ( Billups) that involved women and ugly accusations, and then they backdoor released a hit piece on Hammon to provide coverage as to why they didn't hire her. Do I agree with their move? Yes and No. I agree with them if they didn't hire for head coach because they didn't think she'd help them win and/or Damon Lillard wanted someone else ( You make your superstar player happy in the NBA, that's just how it works). I don't agree with the hatchet job on Hammon, even if the situation was incredibly complex in that they were presented with Lose/Lose media optics.
Here's the thing with Nassib. What happens when it's time to cut him? ( All players get cut at some point, except Tom Brady I suppose)
What will help the Raiders or some other future team is when Nassib is near the end of his career, he sits down with his agent and has a true "Come To Jesus" moment about his prospects to keep playing, and if he knows he can't make a roster again at some point, then he should openly announce his retirement.
While I have no love for NFL owners in general, the people working in front offices and most coaches are just rank and file people trying to earn a living. Nassib and his agent can do things to make things infinitely easier to not bring down the roof on a position coach or a scout or a mid level front office person because the woke world will want their pound of flesh.