LittlePhatty
Footballguy
Armstrong has put up LB1 numbers while filling in for the injured Reuben Foster. But Foster may come back Week 6. What does SF do with Ray-Ray then, and does it mean fantasy owners should throw him back to the waiver wire?
Recent grades are positive:I believe I read somewhere that RRA doesn't grade out very well as a LB
WOO-FREAKING-HOO!!!! Been holding him because I believe he has elite potential, but the number of LBs I'm carrying is bloated because of him and Humber. Foster being healthy enough to play would be a huge boon, if for no other reason than it would free a roster spot, lol.Anyway, just read that Foster is back at practice today - hellelujah!
Traded for him (redraft) while he was hurt for obvious reasons.Flyman75 said:Been holding him because I believe he has elite potential,
While I agree with this -- their rankings have merit. Their attempt is in-depth and worthy of being used and considered.Legalize Stickum said:They don't translate into real life playing time or on field production.
They are definitely relevant when used correctly. If the guy is too bad, he'll get replaced. And for dynasty purposes it's extremely important to make sure you're not trading a future 1st for a guy that's averaging 15.4 PPG now but will be a backup in Detroit the following year.Legalize Stickum said:First of all, I wouldn't go putting too much stock in PFF's positional grades. They don't translate into real life playing time or on field production. You don't have to go any further than last years 49er LB shuffle and the Chip Kelly regime inexplicably playing Nick Bellore over Gerald Hodges all season once Bowman went down. I don't think Bellore's PFF grade ever approached my shoe size. That said, I got some good production out of him while he lasted.
Anyway, just read that Foster is back at practice today - hellelujah!
He's not solid until more is known about Bowman. Even if it is good news for Ray-Ray then he still has to beat Foster and Tartt to the ball. I don't feel great about it, but I moved on where I could.so with Foster coming back, RAy-Ray will lose snaps (and potentially tackles). Is he a solid start this weekend or not?
Or to make sure a former stud like Navarro Bowman doesn't get released and you get caught with your PANTS AROUND YOUR ANKLES WITH NO BACKUP PLAN GAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH.They are definitely relevant when used correctly. If the guy is too bad, he'll get replaced. And for dynasty purposes it's extremely important to make sure you're not trading a future 1st for a guy that's averaging 15.4 PPG now but will be a backup in Detroit the following year.
I just read that. My guess is Ray-Ray looks strong enough to management, and Foster is back on the field this weekend.Bowman released!
Lol. Paul Worrilow is the perfect example for the point you were trying to makeThey are definitely relevant when used correctly. If the guy is too bad, he'll get replaced. And for dynasty purposes it's extremely important to make sure you're not trading a future 1st for a guy that's averaging 15.4 PPG now but will be a backup in Detroit the following year.
Thanks for the Reid info. I'm needing a DB this week while Byard is on bye and was thinking about picking Reid back up. I dropped him earlier in the year when he got hurt. Curious your thoughts on his snap counts going forward?So Eric Reid logged 48 snaps at OLB, largely at the expense of Ray-Ray, this past Sunday according to sources. I know Ray-Ray had a bum shoulder going in, but this looks like a concern for Ray-Ray owners at this point. At the same time, it could be a boon for Reid owners. I suppose it's possible they were "showcasing" Reid in an effort to trade him before the deadline as his days are numbered in SF with Tartt taking over at SS, but it's something to keep an eye on.
+2I like the call Robar! Hope you are right as I'm subbing Reid in for Karl Joseph (he is doubtful)