With so many RBBCs PPR keeps more RBs relevant and playable.Yeah, depends on your scoring.The problem is he doesn't catch many balls. In ppr I like Duke because he's more likely to get 6 catches than Hyde is to score.mikel0254 said:I'll reiterate I don't think he'll do well this week. BUT...He came back in and had the best run of the day after going down. Even with a bad ypc, he gets so many carries that he'll still probably get 60 yards, with the chance of putting up much more +TD. I know things don't look great going in, but I would start Hyde over your other options. At least he'll get 15-20 opportunities to break one off...something those other guys can't say.SameSongNDance said:My RBs aside from him are Abdullah, West, Vereen, D. Johnson and Matt Jones :X and I still never even contemplated starting him this week. After seeing him stop at the LOS and fall down without contact because he was in so much pain just four days ago, I just can't even debate starting him.mikel0254 said:I'm forced to start him due to byes...but certainly don't feel good about it. He has bust written all over him.SameSongNDance said:In 1PPR they've given up the 3rd fewest at 17.7ppg. There's so much going against Hyde this week (short week, foot injury, Reggie Bush probable, negative gameflow, #### match-up) that I don't see how anyone can start him.iamkoza said:So fbg email says Hyde had a good matchup.... In my 0.5ppr, sea has given up the fewest points to rb position this year... Confused how that gets a good matchup grade
Side note: This is exactly why I don't like PPR. I play in both PPR and standard but much prefer the standard scoring. In my mind, there's no way the pass catching back in Cleveland who is part of a two or three player committee should be more valuable than the bellcow in SF. Just a rant...moving on.
yeah it's a bummer.####### guy runs hard. He seems to always break the first tackle, and sometimes a few more. Too bad he has defenders in his face almost as soon as he gets the ball, if he had even a little room he's gonna get 6 yards out of it.
I thought his season was over when I saw him take that hit you're talking about.I'm telling you guys, after that blow to the knee he took vs. PIT (I believe) I was astonished that he was able to continue playing. It twisted in a way that left me convinced he tore something. Later on in that same game, he went to the locker room to be tested for a "possible" concussion but was eventually cleared to play (although I do not think he touched the ball again). This guys pain threshold must high as #### and I wouldn't put it past him to be playing through a legitimate foot injury right now.
One of the more criminal teams for a guy with this much upside to be trapped on in the league. He's simply a bench and hold in keeper/dynasty at this point until the offense gets overhauled. I just can't trust Kaep/the line to give him game play and a game plan for him to even approach potential until we see it, which doesn't seem like 2015 at least.Looks fine thus far. If he was on a different team, he could push for top 5 RB
Yeah sell a rb who just put up 168 yds, 2tds, isn't in a rbbc, and plays for a team that wants to run the ball. Seems like a winning strategy to me.
To me, that depends on how long the coach is there. Prime time game, in your building. Any time the team makes a glaring mistake, camera's on you for the whole nation to see. He needed to make sure the camera was never on him. Instead it was punt, punt, punt, punt, punt, punt, punt.He actually looks decent. He just plays for a team with an below average defense and no QB. So his team will be playing from behind. I view him similar as Gordon. Productive low end RB1 over the next 4-5 years, but frustrating for owners that hoped he would have big impact this year.
SF improves by getting a real QB.The team is so bad I don't think I could come up with a "good" match up. Maybe the Bears and Browns games much later in the season, but with his injury there's the potential that they just shut him down before then. His redraft value is pretty much toast.
Dynasty isn't quite as bad, but it's still hard to be very optimistic IMO. I know situations can change quickly, but I just don't see how SF improves that much anytime soon. He looks really good, I'd love to see him on even an average team, but two more years of this is going to frustrate the heck out of owners.
These types of posts make me want to :XEvery year there are a few Frisman Jackson week one performances and every year people pat themselves on the back like they have won their league after week one. Sorry to say, but this is one of those examples. I wanted no part of Hyde this year because his team is awful and QB is putrid.
Sounds simple enough...SF improves by getting a real QB.The team is so bad I don't think I could come up with a "good" match up. Maybe the Bears and Browns games much later in the season, but with his injury there's the potential that they just shut him down before then. His redraft value is pretty much toast.
Dynasty isn't quite as bad, but it's still hard to be very optimistic IMO. I know situations can change quickly, but I just don't see how SF improves that much anytime soon. He looks really good, I'd love to see him on even an average team, but two more years of this is going to frustrate the heck out of owners.
The plan is simple. Of course, finding a good QB tends to be a challenge in the NFL. That had to be the offseason plan for SF.SF improves by getting a real QB.The team is so bad I don't think I could come up with a "good" match up. Maybe the Bears and Browns games much later in the season, but with his injury there's the potential that they just shut him down before then. His redraft value is pretty much toast.
Dynasty isn't quite as bad, but it's still hard to be very optimistic IMO. I know situations can change quickly, but I just don't see how SF improves that much anytime soon. He looks really good, I'd love to see him on even an average team, but two more years of this is going to frustrate the heck out of owners.
Sounds simple enough...
Clearly he is not talented enough to outweigh a bad situation. Does the truth make you sick?These types of posts make me want to :XEvery year there are a few Frisman Jackson week one performances and every year people pat themselves on the back like they have won their league after week one. Sorry to say, but this is one of those examples. I wanted no part of Hyde this year because his team is awful and QB is putrid.
It was his first game as a starter. Not hard to imagine why people in here got very very excited. Talent can outweigh bad situations. Charles has been a great example of that over the years. Hyde is talented, but he's no Charles. Doesn't look like it's going to happen this year, but he's got the talent to really make some noise if the team makes some changes.
So I guess you agree- not much reason to be optimistic that they are going to improve much in the next year or two. Assuming they even realize they need a new QB, it's really hard to find a good one.The plan is simple. Of course, finding a good QB tends to be a challenge in the NFL. That had to be the offseason plan for SF.SF improves by getting a real QB.The team is so bad I don't think I could come up with a "good" match up. Maybe the Bears and Browns games much later in the season, but with his injury there's the potential that they just shut him down before then. His redraft value is pretty much toast.
Dynasty isn't quite as bad, but it's still hard to be very optimistic IMO. I know situations can change quickly, but I just don't see how SF improves that much anytime soon. He looks really good, I'd love to see him on even an average team, but two more years of this is going to frustrate the heck out of owners.
Sounds simple enough...
You pat your self on the back in the same post as blasting people for doing the same. The season isn't even half over. He's had highs and lows (more lows than highs for sure). But it could flip again next week.Clearly he is not talented enough to outweigh a bad situation. Does the truth make you sick?These types of posts make me want to :XEvery year there are a few Frisman Jackson week one performances and every year people pat themselves on the back like they have won their league after week one. Sorry to say, but this is one of those examples. I wanted no part of Hyde this year because his team is awful and QB is putrid.
It was his first game as a starter. Not hard to imagine why people in here got very very excited. Talent can outweigh bad situations. Charles has been a great example of that over the years. Hyde is talented, but he's no Charles. Doesn't look like it's going to happen this year, but he's got the talent to really make some noise if the team makes some changes.
Stress fractures are basically "almost breaks". What happens is the bone is chipped or cracked but not all the way through like a full fracture. Then with repeated pounding on the chipped bone, the fracture spreads, moving towards a full break (kind of like in the movies when an earthquake hits, and the small fissures move through the ground. If he truly does have a stress fracture, he shouldn't be running on it, as it could break fully. I had one in my tibia, and it took about eight weeks to heal fully?I don't have much knowledge about stress fractures beyond this report. Anyone with any knowledge or comparisons with players who have had a stress fracture?
49ers coach Jim Tomsula said Carlos Hyde is not in danger of damaging his foot further.
"With our medical staff, we're not going to put somebody in danger," Tomsula said. "So I have complete confidence in that. Our people don't put people on the field that are at risk to further injure themselves." There have been reports Hyde is dealing with a stress fracture. If true, it is an injury which requires rest to heal, and the fracture certainly could be worsened by playing. The 49ers are trying to manage the injury by holding Hyde out of almost all practice activities, but the foot has clearly been an issue on game days. At less than 100 percent in a bad offense, Hyde has become a risky, low-end RB2.
Source: Sacramento Bee
Oct 27 - 9:24 AM
CSN Bay Area reports Carlos Hyde is dealing with a stress fracture in his left foot that could require surgery.
The stress fracture is in his mid-foot area. The injury can be fixed by either rest or surgery. If Hyde plays through it, he'll likely require surgery after the season. Hyde hasn't practiced all week and is considered a game-time call Sunday against St. Louis. With the Niners headed nowhere this year, it might be in the team's best interest to give Hyde some time off.
On this team, it doesn't matter. Maybe if Bush could stay healthy for more than a game he'd be worthwhile as a stash in PPR but my gut is telling me to stay far away from this dumpster fire. I also think Hayne could be productive on 10+ carries but again, dumpster fire.No clue what the heck is going on here. Dude plays a THU game after a SUN game and then has 10 days off and is a GTD? Whos the handcuff? Bush, Davis, Hayne? Does it even matter?
. He has a stress fracture in his foot that needs either rest or surgery... I wouldn't expect much. There are only a few games left where it looks like sf will even be able to possibly run the ball anywayJust got him and Anquan in a trade (guy offered). I planned on avoiding SF all year and have Ingram, Ivory, and Charcnado already. What can I expect? The 14-16 schedule looks nice.