Big Fred Jackson fan, but I think his injury opened the door for Spiller to take on a true split in the workload next year.
What is the recovery timetable for Jackson's injury?Jackson was by far and away the better RB this year, and one of the best in the league before his injury. Spiller hasn't shown much since taking over. Unless you're talking about a split in order for Jackson to stay healthy, I don't see how Jackson isn't the bellcow again next year. His injury was not one of wear and tear.
Jackson should be fine within a few months, that's not the issue. The issue I see is that team brass wants to get Spiller more involved, and the injury to Jackson allowed it to happen.While Spiller hasn't been setting the world on fire, I think he's done enough to become a become a meaningful factor in the Bills' offensive plans going forward. Enough that is to keep Jackson from being a true, three-down bellcow.
I took a look at their respective numbers. In the 9 full games Jackson played (not counting the game he was injured in), he averaged 102 yards rushing, 44 yards receiving, 5.6 YPC, and 0.66TD/game. Spiller in the 3 full games since Jackson's injury is averaging 61 yards rushing, 15 yards receiving, 4.1 YPC, and 0.33TD/game. Jackson doubled Spiller's production in the games they've both started. To me, Spiller hasn't done enough to warrant splitting carries next year. Almost every backup in the league can come in and average half of what the starter averages, and most can produce more than just half.While I tend to agree the owners would want to get an early 1st round pick more involved, I think they're much more interested in winning...and that happened when Jackson was a 3-down back, and Spiller was lining up as a WR and occasionally spelling Jackson. I think Spiller will get playing time, but I see it more like it was earlier on in the season when they tried to get him the ball in space and gimmick plays as opposed to splitting a meaningful amount of carries.