What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

RBG is cancer free! (1 Viewer)

Good thing the president cured cancer. 
Wrong thread.😉

I wish RBG the best, but given her age and recent health, I worry about her ability to hang on into January 2021.  Their stance on the Garland nomination notwithstanding, I have no doubt that our current President and the Senate would have no issue fast-tracking another conservative justice onto the bench up until inauguration day, if a Democrat is elected and even if the Senate flips.  Our current Republican leadership's hypocrisy has no bounds.  

 
Wrong thread.😉

I wish RBG the best, but given her age and recent health, I worry about her ability to hang on into January 2021.  Their stance on the Garland nomination notwithstanding, I have no doubt that our current President and the Senate would have no issue fast-tracking another conservative justice onto the bench up until inauguration day, if a Democrat is elected and even if the Senate flips.  Our current Republican leadership's hypocrisy has no bounds.  
Exactly like Democrats.  The Democrats bare at least as much responsibility for how overly politicized the judicial appointment process has become.   Trying to claim a hide road is laughable.  

 
Exactly like Democrats.  The Democrats bare at least as much responsibility for how overly politicized the judicial appointment process has become.   Trying to claim a hide road is laughable.  
I can accept the idea that Democrats have contributed in some fashion to where we are currently on judicial appointments.  But the idea that they bare "at least as much responsibility" as Republicans seems absurd.  I would think even a staunch Republican defender like yourself would admit that the Merrick Garland debacle was a giant leap forward.  No?

 
Wrong thread.😉

I wish RBG the best, but given her age and recent health, I worry about her ability to hang on into January 2021.  Their stance on the Garland nomination notwithstanding, I have no doubt that our current President and the Senate would have no issue fast-tracking another conservative justice onto the bench up until inauguration day, if a Democrat is elected and even if the Senate flips.  Our current Republican leadership's hypocrisy has no bounds.  
That's a great question.  I wonder what the real date is, where we are actually safe.  By law the new Congress convenes on January 3rd each year, so I guess it would depend on the makeup of the Senate as of that date.  If Republicans retain control, perhaps January 17th or 18th?  I could see them rushing someone through the process last minute, and it seems like norms would suggest it would take a few weeks to get someone through, but as we learned with Merrick Garland, norms mean nothing if not written into law.  Could Senate confirmation literally mean a vote called day of, like mid day 1/19, where Republicans confirm someone completely unvetted?

 
I can accept the idea that Democrats have contributed in some fashion to where we are currently on judicial appointments.  But the idea that they bare "at least as much responsibility" as Republicans seems absurd.  I would think even a staunch Republican defender like yourself would admit that the Merrick Garland debacle was a giant leap forward.  No?
There is nothing even remotely equivalent that the GOP has done to the political circus that was seen during the Bork, Thomas, and Kavanaugh hearings.  You can claim the game that was played with Garland was worse, but dropping 11th hour politically motivated rape allegations has to be near the top of dirty tricks ever played in a nomination process.  Of course the Supreme Court thread is a more appropriate place to dive into this.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
There is nothing even remotely equivalent that the GOP has done to the political circus that was seen during the Bork, Thomas, and Kavanaugh hearings.  You can claim the game that was played with Garland was worse, but dropping 11th hour politically motivated rape allegations has to be near the top of dirty tricks ever played in a nomination process.  Of course the Supreme Court thread is a more appropriate place to dive into this.
Democrats didn't drop any rape allegations - American citizens did.  Where were the Gorsuch rape allegations?

 
Democrats didn't drop any rape allegations - American citizens did.  Where were the Gorsuch rape allegations?
Yes they did.  They advised and colluded with the supposed victim and leaked the info at the last-minute to try to blow up the nomination. 

 
Let's not have the same conversation in this thread that we have in every Supreme Court thread about which political party is worse.

 
I feel like I need a shower after reading these posts.  Using this news to score political potshots is a disgrace.

 
I think we ought to have our spirits buoyed and lock the thread before the prototypical.

Life trumps all. She's a fine justice, human being, and wonderfully spirited. Policy decisions be what they may, the world could use more women like her. 

Her daughter is apparently a very fine IP lawyer and RBG leans of her for those cases. Her understanding of IP is pretty good thenceforth, according to most legal experts.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I feel like I need a shower after reading these posts.  Using this news to score political potshots is a disgrace.
The Scalia one was so bad, but I think the main offenders were banned.

No need to get too meta, someone is cancer-free. Should be an easy-peasy thing to laud. 

 
Could Senate confirmation literally mean a vote called day of, like mid day 1/19, where Republicans confirm someone completely unvetted?
I would fully expect that.  I have no doubt the republicans have a running short list of candidates that they could fast track given this exact scenario.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top