packersfan
Footballguy
Bush has been a disappointment to some degree in his first two years. However, from a fantasy perspective he's been a very good option in PPR leagues having caught 88 passes and 73 (despite missing four games). Using the dreaded "on pace" argument he was on pace for 97 receptions last season had he not suffered a season-ending injury. In a PPR league, that's obviously strong production for a RB. But coming off a season in which he failed to take the next step forward, Bush's value is down in drafts so far. His ADP in PPR drafts is 24 which means he's available at the end of the second round.
That brings me to my question - let's say you have a Top 5 pick in a PPR league and you took a RB in the first round (LT, Peterson, Westbrook, Jackson or Addai - maybe Gore), would you take Bush in the second or would you grab a top WR knowing how important they are in PPR leagues?
The top WRs currently on the board at the backend of the second round, early part of the third are: Houshmandzadeh, Andre Johnson, Colston, Chad Johnson, Steve Smith (he could be dropping with his suspension), Boldin, Holt and Burress. Is grabbing one of those top WRs the right move or would taking Bush as your RB2 and then hoping a solid, if not elite, WR is on the board early in the third more to your liking. You could be looking at one of two possibilities:
Westbrook/Bush/Chad Johnson or Westbrook/Andre Johnson/Chad Johnson.
That's if you went with a second WR in the third. If you took a RB you could be looking at options including Jones-Drew, Jacobs or Lewis.
My belief is Bush right now represents huge value so even in a PPR league where WRs play such a critical role, if he's still on the board at the backend of the second round it's going to be awfully difficult to pass on him. You run the risk of going from a Andre Johnson to Burress, Holt or Boldin as your WR1 but if you can snare a quality WR2 in the fourth or fifth it could work out.
What does everyone here think? Are they seeing the same potential value with Bush or is the possibility of loading up with a top RB in the first and two strong WRs (assuming that's the way you want to go) in the second and third more appealing?
That brings me to my question - let's say you have a Top 5 pick in a PPR league and you took a RB in the first round (LT, Peterson, Westbrook, Jackson or Addai - maybe Gore), would you take Bush in the second or would you grab a top WR knowing how important they are in PPR leagues?
The top WRs currently on the board at the backend of the second round, early part of the third are: Houshmandzadeh, Andre Johnson, Colston, Chad Johnson, Steve Smith (he could be dropping with his suspension), Boldin, Holt and Burress. Is grabbing one of those top WRs the right move or would taking Bush as your RB2 and then hoping a solid, if not elite, WR is on the board early in the third more to your liking. You could be looking at one of two possibilities:
Westbrook/Bush/Chad Johnson or Westbrook/Andre Johnson/Chad Johnson.
That's if you went with a second WR in the third. If you took a RB you could be looking at options including Jones-Drew, Jacobs or Lewis.
My belief is Bush right now represents huge value so even in a PPR league where WRs play such a critical role, if he's still on the board at the backend of the second round it's going to be awfully difficult to pass on him. You run the risk of going from a Andre Johnson to Burress, Holt or Boldin as your WR1 but if you can snare a quality WR2 in the fourth or fifth it could work out.
What does everyone here think? Are they seeing the same potential value with Bush or is the possibility of loading up with a top RB in the first and two strong WRs (assuming that's the way you want to go) in the second and third more appealing?