Seriously? Jackson over Tomlinson?Top 12, redraft, No-PPR
Here's mine:
1. Peterson
2. Jackson
3. Tomlinson
4. Westbrook
5. Addai
6. Johnson
7. Parker
8. Barber
9. Portis
10. Bush
11. K.Jones
12. Lynch
Close: Manning, Brady, McGahee, Gore
Yep, call it a hunch. Also ask yourself how many times has LT finished the season #1?Seriously? Jackson over Tomlinson?Top 12, redraft, No-PPR
Here's mine:
1. Peterson
2. Jackson
3. Tomlinson
4. Westbrook
5. Addai
6. Johnson
7. Parker
8. Barber
9. Portis
10. Bush
11. K.Jones
12. Lynch
Close: Manning, Brady, McGahee, Gore
depends on scoring but including this year, 3 times in my one league which is ppr.Yep, call it a hunch. Also ask yourself how many times has LT finished the season #1?Seriously? Jackson over Tomlinson?Top 12, redraft, No-PPR
Here's mine:
1. Peterson
2. Jackson
3. Tomlinson
4. Westbrook
5. Addai
6. Johnson
7. Parker
8. Barber
9. Portis
10. Bush
11. K.Jones
12. Lynch
Close: Manning, Brady, McGahee, Gore
In my non PPR league, LT has finished (amongst RBs):2007 YTD - 1depends on scoring but including this year, 3 times in my one league which is ppr.Yep, call it a hunch. Also ask yourself how many times has LT finished the season #1?Seriously? Jackson over Tomlinson?Top 12, redraft, No-PPR
Here's mine:
1. Peterson
2. Jackson
3. Tomlinson
4. Westbrook
5. Addai
6. Johnson
7. Parker
8. Barber
9. Portis
10. Bush
11. K.Jones
12. Lynch
Close: Manning, Brady, McGahee, Gore
depends on where he lands.Michael Turner should be a first rounder next year.![]()
Randy Moss would have been worth a first rounder this year.I'm not sure that it's appropriate to have all RB's in the first anymore - the RB position has been underwhelming, to say the least, moreso than previous years. I think at least one and maybe two QB's should go in the first.
I'm not sure that it's appropriate to have all RB's in the first anymore - the RB position has been underwhelming, to say the least, moreso than previous years. I think at least one and maybe two QB's should go in the first.
How many great seasons has Jackson had?Yep, call it a hunch. Also ask yourself how many times has LT finished the season #1?Seriously? Jackson over Tomlinson?Top 12, redraft, No-PPR
Here's mine:
1. Peterson
2. Jackson
3. Tomlinson
4. Westbrook
5. Addai
6. Johnson
7. Parker
8. Barber
9. Portis
10. Bush
11. K.Jones
12. Lynch
Close: Manning, Brady, McGahee, Gore
not really good posting. As we all know next year will be totally different. After Peytons 49 td season how many did he have the next year? werent all his players returning? I am not saying Brady and Manning wont go in your first rounds next year, but take your RB and grab say Hasslebeck BigBen later and your team will be better off.Taking a QB in round 1 is still flawed drafting IMO. Now a top end WR at the end of round 1 you can convince me on.I'm not sure that it's appropriate to have all RB's in the first anymore - the RB position has been underwhelming, to say the least, moreso than previous years. I think at least one and maybe two QB's should go in the first.There is going to be a significant change in how the first round of most drafts go next year. At least for those that are paying attention. Brady, Moss, TO, maybe even Manning or Romo could sneak into the first. OH, and Wayne...holy crap, you have to include him.
Its a good posting from the perspective of people sobering up about RBsM. Colston, R. Wayne etc. will be justified ahead of typical late first round RBs that havent consistently reached 1,100 and 7 TDs. And why shouldnt they!not really good posting. As we all know next year will be totally different. After Peytons 49 td season how many did he have the next year? werent all his players returning? I am not saying Brady and Manning wont go in your first rounds next year, but take your RB and grab say Hasslebeck BigBen later and your team will be better off.Taking a QB in round 1 is still flawed drafting IMO. Now a top end WR at the end of round 1 you can convince me on.I'm not sure that it's appropriate to have all RB's in the first anymore - the RB position has been underwhelming, to say the least, moreso than previous years. I think at least one and maybe two QB's should go in the first.There is going to be a significant change in how the first round of most drafts go next year. At least for those that are paying attention. Brady, Moss, TO, maybe even Manning or Romo could sneak into the first. OH, and Wayne...holy crap, you have to include him.
I think there is an issue as to whether his knee will be ready for the season or notronnie brown?
We had a rough year with RB injuries in 2007, so that's what will dicatate your 2008? Isn't this a classic case of using "last year's thinking"?I'm not sure that it's appropriate to have all RB's in the first anymore - the RB position has been underwhelming, to say the least, moreso than previous years. I think at least one and maybe two QB's should go in the first.There is going to be a significant change in how the first round of most drafts go next year. At least for those that are paying attention. Brady, Moss, TO, maybe even Manning or Romo could sneak into the first. OH, and Wayne...holy crap, you have to include him.
I think this year may be an aberration with RBs scoring a bit less on a relative basis. Unless one believes that the league will have more and more RBBCs (not out of the realm of possibility), IMO RBs will revert back to their justified scarcity value.Its a good posting from the perspective of people sobering up about RBsM. Colston, R. Wayne etc. will be justified ahead of typical late first round RBs that havent consistently reached 1,100 and 7 TDs. And why shouldnt they!not really good posting. As we all know next year will be totally different. After Peytons 49 td season how many did he have the next year? werent all his players returning? I am not saying Brady and Manning wont go in your first rounds next year, but take your RB and grab say Hasslebeck BigBen later and your team will be better off.Taking a QB in round 1 is still flawed drafting IMO. Now a top end WR at the end of round 1 you can convince me on.I'm not sure that it's appropriate to have all RB's in the first anymore - the RB position has been underwhelming, to say the least, moreso than previous years. I think at least one and maybe two QB's should go in the first.There is going to be a significant change in how the first round of most drafts go next year. At least for those that are paying attention. Brady, Moss, TO, maybe even Manning or Romo could sneak into the first. OH, and Wayne...holy crap, you have to include him.
maybe. It's tough to determine the difference between an outlier and a trend. I thought Manning was worth a first heading into 2007; in hindsight some WR's might be as well. I'd like to see a VBD ranking based on end of year production for the past several years and see if there are any actual trends that w have glossed over.We had a rough year with RB injuries in 2007, so that's what will dicatate your 2008? Isn't this a classic case of using "last year's thinking"?I'm not sure that it's appropriate to have all RB's in the first anymore - the RB position has been underwhelming, to say the least, moreso than previous years. I think at least one and maybe two QB's should go in the first.There is going to be a significant change in how the first round of most drafts go next year. At least for those that are paying attention. Brady, Moss, TO, maybe even Manning or Romo could sneak into the first. OH, and Wayne...holy crap, you have to include him.
IMHO it's far more difficult to predict passing game studs than running game studs. Manning is obviously a top-5 QB (at least) every year, but to put him into the top 10 of the draft in most scoring systems means that he has to have one of those crazy years, not merely an "average" year for him. I couldn't predict 2004 for him; Brady's 2007 was only slightly more predictable, but I was skeptical he could gel that well, that fast with so many new WR's. You just never know. In the meantime LT is yet again justifying his top-5 draft status, as would SJax but for the injuries. It's like that every year with teh RB's, except for injuries and whenever they hit the proverbial wall in their careers . . . but that just means that they're replaced by another RB at the top of the rankings by the end of the year.maybe. It's tough to determine the difference between an outlier and a trend. I thought Manning was worth a first heading into 2007; in hindsight some WR's might be as well. I'd like to see a VBD ranking based on end of year production for the past several years and see if there are any actual trends that w have glossed over.We had a rough year with RB injuries in 2007, so that's what will dicatate your 2008? Isn't this a classic case of using "last year's thinking"?I'm not sure that it's appropriate to have all RB's in the first anymore - the RB position has been underwhelming, to say the least, moreso than previous years. I think at least one and maybe two QB's should go in the first.There is going to be a significant change in how the first round of most drafts go next year. At least for those that are paying attention. Brady, Moss, TO, maybe even Manning or Romo could sneak into the first. OH, and Wayne...holy crap, you have to include him.
no doubt. However, i'm not talking about the top 5 RB's - I think that the first 5 picks should always be RB and that is not up for debate any time soon. however, I'm not convinced that QB's and/or WRs can't sneak into positions 6-12. I'm also not talking about 6-12 being completely QB/WR, but at least a couple of non-RB's should make the cut.IMHO it's far more difficult to predict passing game studs than running game studs. Manning is obviously a top-5 QB (at least) every year, but to put him into the top 10 of the draft in most scoring systems means that he has to have one of those crazy years, not merely an "average" year for him. I couldn't predict 2004 for him; Brady's 2007 was only slightly more predictable, but I was skeptical he could gel that well, that fast with so many new WR's. You just never know. In the meantime LT is yet again justifying his top-5 draft status, as would SJax but for the injuries. It's like that every year with teh RB's, except for injuries and whenever they hit the proverbial wall in their careers . . . but that just means that they're replaced by another RB at the top of the rankings by the end of the year.maybe. It's tough to determine the difference between an outlier and a trend. I thought Manning was worth a first heading into 2007; in hindsight some WR's might be as well. I'd like to see a VBD ranking based on end of year production for the past several years and see if there are any actual trends that w have glossed over.We had a rough year with RB injuries in 2007, so that's what will dicatate your 2008? Isn't this a classic case of using "last year's thinking"?I'm not sure that it's appropriate to have all RB's in the first anymore - the RB position has been underwhelming, to say the least, moreso than previous years. I think at least one and maybe two QB's should go in the first.There is going to be a significant change in how the first round of most drafts go next year. At least for those that are paying attention. Brady, Moss, TO, maybe even Manning or Romo could sneak into the first. OH, and Wayne...holy crap, you have to include him.
looks like many will be sleeping on Frank Gore next year.
That seems anomolous to me. FWP may not get double digit TD's, but I'd figure he's far closer to that number than he will be to this year's number.I think Ryan Grant will deserve some consideration.
I doubt Parker goes that high, considering the lack of tds.
1. LT
2. AP
3. Westy
4. Addai
5. S Jax
6. Parker
7. M Barber (especially if Jones is gone, maybe if he is there)
8. L Johnson
9. McGahee
10. Lynch
11. Bush
12. Brady (BC someone always takes a QB)
13. Gore
14. B Jacobs
15. Moss
16. TO
17. R Grant
18. Portis
19. L Fitz
20. K Jones (especially ppr)
21. R Wayne
22. L White
23. B Edwards/ A Johnson
24. Manning