What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Round 1 for 2008 (1 Viewer)

Rounders

Footballguy
Top 12, redraft, No-PPR

Here's mine:

1. Peterson

2. Jackson

3. Tomlinson

4. Westbrook

5. Addai

6. Johnson

7. Parker

8. Barber

9. Portis

10. Bush

11. K.Jones

12. Lynch

Close: Manning, Brady, McGahee, Gore

 
Top 12, redraft, No-PPR

Here's mine:

1. Peterson

2. Jackson

3. Tomlinson

4. Westbrook

5. Addai

6. Johnson

7. Parker

8. Barber

9. Portis

10. Bush

11. K.Jones

12. Lynch

Close: Manning, Brady, McGahee, Gore
Seriously? Jackson over Tomlinson?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Top 12, redraft, No-PPR

Here's mine:

1. Peterson

2. Jackson

3. Tomlinson

4. Westbrook

5. Addai

6. Johnson

7. Parker

8. Barber

9. Portis

10. Bush

11. K.Jones

12. Lynch

Close: Manning, Brady, McGahee, Gore
Seriously? Jackson over Tomlinson?
Yep, call it a hunch. Also ask yourself how many times has LT finished the season #1?
depends on scoring but including this year, 3 times in my one league which is ppr.
 
I would not be suprised to see the success of AD go to the heads of some resulting in McFadden going in the top 12-15

 
Top 12, redraft, No-PPR

Here's mine:

1. Peterson

2. Jackson

3. Tomlinson

4. Westbrook

5. Addai

6. Johnson

7. Parker

8. Barber

9. Portis

10. Bush

11. K.Jones

12. Lynch

Close: Manning, Brady, McGahee, Gore
Seriously? Jackson over Tomlinson?
Yep, call it a hunch. Also ask yourself how many times has LT finished the season #1?
depends on scoring but including this year, 3 times in my one league which is ppr.
In my non PPR league, LT has finished (amongst RBs):2007 YTD - 1

2006 - 1

2005 - 3

2004 - 3

2003 - 2

2002 - 2

That's 6 straight seasons in the the Top 3, including #1 the last 2 seasons. To have him behind Jackson and ADP in a redraft is not very smart IMO.

 
K Jones is a huge amount of speculation if we are talking about the Lion. Of course, he could be very solid once Martz leaves or is shown the door.

Putting a guy like that in round one is a case of huge overkill on RBs -- ahead of R.Wayne, other rock solid WRs??

 
Last edited by a moderator:
PPR League

1. Tomlinson

2. S Jackson

3. Westbrook

4. Peterson

5. Addai

6. Parker

7. Mcgahee

8. Lynch

9. Portis

10. Bush

11. M Barber

12. Grant

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm not sure that it's appropriate to have all RB's in the first anymore - the RB position has been underwhelming, to say the least, moreso than previous years. I think at least one and maybe two QB's should go in the first.

 
I'm not sure that it's appropriate to have all RB's in the first anymore - the RB position has been underwhelming, to say the least, moreso than previous years. I think at least one and maybe two QB's should go in the first.
Randy Moss would have been worth a first rounder this year.
 
I'm not sure that it's appropriate to have all RB's in the first anymore - the RB position has been underwhelming, to say the least, moreso than previous years. I think at least one and maybe two QB's should go in the first.
:goodposting: There is going to be a significant change in how the first round of most drafts go next year. At least for those that are paying attention. Brady, Moss, TO, maybe even Manning or Romo could sneak into the first. OH, and Wayne...holy crap, you have to include him.
 
I'm not sure that it's appropriate to have all RB's in the first anymore - the RB position has been underwhelming, to say the least, moreso than previous years. I think at least one and maybe two QB's should go in the first.
:popcorn: There is going to be a significant change in how the first round of most drafts go next year. At least for those that are paying attention. Brady, Moss, TO, maybe even Manning or Romo could sneak into the first. OH, and Wayne...holy crap, you have to include him.
not really good posting. As we all know next year will be totally different. After Peytons 49 td season how many did he have the next year? werent all his players returning? I am not saying Brady and Manning wont go in your first rounds next year, but take your RB and grab say Hasslebeck BigBen later and your team will be better off.Taking a QB in round 1 is still flawed drafting IMO. Now a top end WR at the end of round 1 you can convince me on.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm not sure that it's appropriate to have all RB's in the first anymore - the RB position has been underwhelming, to say the least, moreso than previous years. I think at least one and maybe two QB's should go in the first.
:popcorn: There is going to be a significant change in how the first round of most drafts go next year. At least for those that are paying attention. Brady, Moss, TO, maybe even Manning or Romo could sneak into the first. OH, and Wayne...holy crap, you have to include him.
not really good posting. As we all know next year will be totally different. After Peytons 49 td season how many did he have the next year? werent all his players returning? I am not saying Brady and Manning wont go in your first rounds next year, but take your RB and grab say Hasslebeck BigBen later and your team will be better off.Taking a QB in round 1 is still flawed drafting IMO. Now a top end WR at the end of round 1 you can convince me on.
Its a good posting from the perspective of people sobering up about RBsM. Colston, R. Wayne etc. will be justified ahead of typical late first round RBs that havent consistently reached 1,100 and 7 TDs. And why shouldnt they!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm not sure that it's appropriate to have all RB's in the first anymore - the RB position has been underwhelming, to say the least, moreso than previous years. I think at least one and maybe two QB's should go in the first.
:unsure: There is going to be a significant change in how the first round of most drafts go next year. At least for those that are paying attention. Brady, Moss, TO, maybe even Manning or Romo could sneak into the first. OH, and Wayne...holy crap, you have to include him.
We had a rough year with RB injuries in 2007, so that's what will dicatate your 2008? Isn't this a classic case of using "last year's thinking"?
 
I'm not sure that it's appropriate to have all RB's in the first anymore - the RB position has been underwhelming, to say the least, moreso than previous years. I think at least one and maybe two QB's should go in the first.
:unsure: There is going to be a significant change in how the first round of most drafts go next year. At least for those that are paying attention. Brady, Moss, TO, maybe even Manning or Romo could sneak into the first. OH, and Wayne...holy crap, you have to include him.
not really good posting. As we all know next year will be totally different. After Peytons 49 td season how many did he have the next year? werent all his players returning? I am not saying Brady and Manning wont go in your first rounds next year, but take your RB and grab say Hasslebeck BigBen later and your team will be better off.Taking a QB in round 1 is still flawed drafting IMO. Now a top end WR at the end of round 1 you can convince me on.
Its a good posting from the perspective of people sobering up about RBsM. Colston, R. Wayne etc. will be justified ahead of typical late first round RBs that havent consistently reached 1,100 and 7 TDs. And why shouldnt they!
I think this year may be an aberration with RBs scoring a bit less on a relative basis. Unless one believes that the league will have more and more RBBCs (not out of the realm of possibility), IMO RBs will revert back to their justified scarcity value.
 
I'm not sure that it's appropriate to have all RB's in the first anymore - the RB position has been underwhelming, to say the least, moreso than previous years. I think at least one and maybe two QB's should go in the first.
:P There is going to be a significant change in how the first round of most drafts go next year. At least for those that are paying attention. Brady, Moss, TO, maybe even Manning or Romo could sneak into the first. OH, and Wayne...holy crap, you have to include him.
We had a rough year with RB injuries in 2007, so that's what will dicatate your 2008? Isn't this a classic case of using "last year's thinking"?
maybe. It's tough to determine the difference between an outlier and a trend. I thought Manning was worth a first heading into 2007; in hindsight some WR's might be as well. I'd like to see a VBD ranking based on end of year production for the past several years and see if there are any actual trends that w have glossed over.
 
I'm not sure that it's appropriate to have all RB's in the first anymore - the RB position has been underwhelming, to say the least, moreso than previous years. I think at least one and maybe two QB's should go in the first.
:yes: There is going to be a significant change in how the first round of most drafts go next year. At least for those that are paying attention. Brady, Moss, TO, maybe even Manning or Romo could sneak into the first. OH, and Wayne...holy crap, you have to include him.
We had a rough year with RB injuries in 2007, so that's what will dicatate your 2008? Isn't this a classic case of using "last year's thinking"?
maybe. It's tough to determine the difference between an outlier and a trend. I thought Manning was worth a first heading into 2007; in hindsight some WR's might be as well. I'd like to see a VBD ranking based on end of year production for the past several years and see if there are any actual trends that w have glossed over.
IMHO it's far more difficult to predict passing game studs than running game studs. Manning is obviously a top-5 QB (at least) every year, but to put him into the top 10 of the draft in most scoring systems means that he has to have one of those crazy years, not merely an "average" year for him. I couldn't predict 2004 for him; Brady's 2007 was only slightly more predictable, but I was skeptical he could gel that well, that fast with so many new WR's. You just never know. In the meantime LT is yet again justifying his top-5 draft status, as would SJax but for the injuries. It's like that every year with teh RB's, except for injuries and whenever they hit the proverbial wall in their careers . . . but that just means that they're replaced by another RB at the top of the rankings by the end of the year.
 
I'm not sure that it's appropriate to have all RB's in the first anymore - the RB position has been underwhelming, to say the least, moreso than previous years. I think at least one and maybe two QB's should go in the first.
:thumbup: There is going to be a significant change in how the first round of most drafts go next year. At least for those that are paying attention. Brady, Moss, TO, maybe even Manning or Romo could sneak into the first. OH, and Wayne...holy crap, you have to include him.
We had a rough year with RB injuries in 2007, so that's what will dicatate your 2008? Isn't this a classic case of using "last year's thinking"?
maybe. It's tough to determine the difference between an outlier and a trend. I thought Manning was worth a first heading into 2007; in hindsight some WR's might be as well. I'd like to see a VBD ranking based on end of year production for the past several years and see if there are any actual trends that w have glossed over.
IMHO it's far more difficult to predict passing game studs than running game studs. Manning is obviously a top-5 QB (at least) every year, but to put him into the top 10 of the draft in most scoring systems means that he has to have one of those crazy years, not merely an "average" year for him. I couldn't predict 2004 for him; Brady's 2007 was only slightly more predictable, but I was skeptical he could gel that well, that fast with so many new WR's. You just never know. In the meantime LT is yet again justifying his top-5 draft status, as would SJax but for the injuries. It's like that every year with teh RB's, except for injuries and whenever they hit the proverbial wall in their careers . . . but that just means that they're replaced by another RB at the top of the rankings by the end of the year.
no doubt. However, i'm not talking about the top 5 RB's - I think that the first 5 picks should always be RB and that is not up for debate any time soon. however, I'm not convinced that QB's and/or WRs can't sneak into positions 6-12. I'm also not talking about 6-12 being completely QB/WR, but at least a couple of non-RB's should make the cut.
 
here is how the first round should have gone in 2007:

1 Brian Westbrook

2 Ronnie Brown

3 LaDainian Tomlinson

4 Tom Brady

5 Joseph Addai

6 Adrian Peterson

7 Randy Moss

8 Steven Jackson

9 Reggie Bush

10 Jamal Lewis

11 Andre Johnson

12 Willis McGahee

this is for PPR in terms of points per game, sorted using Joes VBD Excel app.

 
I think Ryan Grant will deserve some consideration.

I doubt Parker goes that high, considering the lack of tds.
That seems anomolous to me. FWP may not get double digit TD's, but I'd figure he's far closer to that number than he will be to this year's number.
 
1. Tomlinson

2. Westbrook

3. Peterson

4. Addai

5. Jackson

6. Barber--if jones is gone--game over

7. Brady

8. Moss

9. Mcgahee

10. Gore

11. Terrell Owens

12. Andre Johnson

Ronnie Brown would be my #2 or 3 if not for the injjury, he could push his way up to the 6 or 7 range if the recovery goes well.

 
This is from a few days ago

1. LT

2. AP

3. Westy

4. Addai

5. S Jax

6. Parker

7. M Barber (especially if Jones is gone, maybe if he is there)

8. L Johnson

9. McGahee

10. Lynch

11. Bush

12. Brady (BC someone always takes a QB)

13. Gore

14. B Jacobs

15. Moss

16. TO

17. R Grant

18. Portis

19. L Fitz

20. K Jones (especially ppr)

21. R Wayne

22. L White

23. B Edwards/ A Johnson

24. Manning
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top