I just gave them one vote........Baltimore--The running game is beastly and thats what you need to slow down an offense like the Colts. Add a turnover or two on defense and they're in business.Dallas--Simply a better team on both sides of the ball right now (IMHO)New Orleans--This one is tough for me to call but I really believe the home field crowd will almost will this team to victory. Also, it doesn't hurt to be playing against an atrocious defense. San Diego--Unlike the Bungles, this team will put up points. The defense will cause Sanchez to make mistakes.Balt has no votes, but if they play like they did against NE they definitely could win.
I hope you go 0-4 again this week.Colts
Neither did the Cards last week.Jets gettin' no respect!NJ Jets @ SD ChargersJets [ 7 ] [11.29%] Chargers [ 55 ] [88.71%]
They were at 24% - more than twice the love that the JESTS are getting right now.Last week's FBG's guess: G.B. Packers @ AZ CardinalsPackers [ 282 ] [76%] Cardinals [ 91 ] [24%]Neither did the Cards last week.Jets gettin' no respect!NJ Jets @ SD ChargersJets [ 7 ] [11%] Chargers [ 55 ] [89%]
I agree with everything stated but another obvious edge for the Vikings would be that the game is in the Metrodome.Dallas - as good as Minnesota is, Dallas is even better. The Cowboys definitely have a better running game, and they might have the better passing game and defense, too. Scary thought. Only edge for the Vikings are in special teams and HFA, but Dallas is a really good (and really hot) team. Minnesota was a product of an easy schedule; the good teams they've beaten are GB, Baltimore (when the Ravens missed a 40 yard FG at the end to win) and Cincinnati when the Bengals were slumping. OTOH, they lost to the other good teams they played -- Pitt, Arizona and Carolina in December. They also lost to a not so good team in the Bears. In other words, the Vikings can basically hang their hats on beating GB and that's it.
Sanchez?Jets -- ... and frustrating day from the guy I think is the best QB in the league.
Ravens -- Baltimore is the better team on a neutral field, but this game is in Indy. Still, I think playing at Lucas Oil earlier this year will be a tremendous help for the Ravens and will make that first quarter that much easier. Indy trying to tackle McGahee/McLain/Rice without Sanders could be laughable. Indy will be one dimensional (even moreso than usual) as there's no way the Colts run on the Ravens. Just a brutal matchup for the Colts. Lots of reasons will be given for why the Colts lost, but the real reason is they're not as good as Baltimore. And that's with Baltimore not having a QB or any WRs. Take the under and the points.
Correct.Flacco threw a pick in the red zone that killed it.Game was at Baltimore.
So the Jets should win twice as easy.They were at 24% - more than twice the love that the JESTS are getting right now.Last week's FBG's guess: G.B. Packers @ AZ CardinalsPackers [ 282 ] [76%] Cardinals [ 91 ] [24%]Neither did the Cards last week.Jets gettin' no respect!NJ Jets @ SD ChargersJets [ 7 ] [11%] Chargers [ 55 ] [89%]
Agreed.I agree with everything stated but another obvious edge for the Vikings would be that the game is in the Metrodome.Dallas - as good as Minnesota is, Dallas is even better. The Cowboys definitely have a better running game, and they might have the better passing game and defense, too. Scary thought. Only edge for the Vikings are in special teams and HFA, but Dallas is a really good (and really hot) team. Minnesota was a product of an easy schedule; the good teams they've beaten are GB, Baltimore (when the Ravens missed a 40 yard FG at the end to win) and Cincinnati when the Bengals were slumping. OTOH, they lost to the other good teams they played -- Pitt, Arizona and Carolina in December. They also lost to a not so good team in the Bears. In other words, the Vikings can basically hang their hats on beating GB and that's it.
Oh. Good catch.That makes me rethink this a bit. Call it a coin flip.Ravens -- Baltimore is the better team on a neutral field, but this game is in Indy. Still, I think playing at Lucas Oil earlier this year will be a tremendous help for the Ravens and will make that first quarter that much easier. Indy trying to tackle McGahee/McLain/Rice without Sanders could be laughable. Indy will be one dimensional (even moreso than usual) as there's no way the Colts run on the Ravens. Just a brutal matchup for the Colts. Lots of reasons will be given for why the Colts lost, but the real reason is they're not as good as Baltimore. And that's with Baltimore not having a QB or any WRs. Take the under and the points.Game was at Baltimore.
I hope you go 0-4 again this week.Colts![]()
I went:1) Dallas but I think that one is close2) Baltimore - their defense is better than Indi run defense3) Arizona - I think that the Saints have lost confidence and are unraveling and I am a big Saints fan4) San Diego - Jets running attack will make it a game, but Chargers will prevail
Would you have liked Joe Namath?After listening, yet again, to the guy that's become the most quotable coach on ESPN, I'm really hoping the Board's prediction on the SD/NYJ is correct. I've had my fill of Fat Rex. The guy just completely slights Charles Woodson by telling us all how the voters for the DPOY that voted for Revis were the only ones who really understood football. It's completely fine that he thinks his guy is better, but good grief try to have an ounce of tact. Yes, I'm a Packer fan and yes, I know there are some Jets fans that probably love his big mouth because he's "their guy" but his tough guy act is wearing thin. Between those comments and his tough talk to the Chargers stating he doesn't care what they think or what bulletin board material he and his QB are giving them is ridiculous. This guy's spreading more ill will faster than any coach I've ever seen, Belichick included. I guess he's probably the perfect fit for a NY team, but he's building up the bad karma quickly. To his credit, Revis himself was much more respectful about it. But Ryan's chip on his shoulder is about to to become too much weight for even his frame to carry.<Rant over>
Probably not.I'm probably just overreacting but doesn't it seem like this guy's on a mission to piss off anyone and everyone who will listen? He attempts to create an "Us against them" argument every time I hear him it seems.Would you have liked Joe Namath?After listening, yet again, to the guy that's become the most quotable coach on ESPN, I'm really hoping the Board's prediction on the SD/NYJ is correct. I've had my fill of Fat Rex. The guy just completely slights Charles Woodson by telling us all how the voters for the DPOY that voted for Revis were the only ones who really understood football. It's completely fine that he thinks his guy is better, but good grief try to have an ounce of tact. Yes, I'm a Packer fan and yes, I know there are some Jets fans that probably love his big mouth because he's "their guy" but his tough guy act is wearing thin. Between those comments and his tough talk to the Chargers stating he doesn't care what they think or what bulletin board material he and his QB are giving them is ridiculous. This guy's spreading more ill will faster than any coach I've ever seen, Belichick included. I guess he's probably the perfect fit for a NY team, but he's building up the bad karma quickly. To his credit, Revis himself was much more respectful about it. But Ryan's chip on his shoulder is about to to become too much weight for even his frame to carry.<Rant over>
2 have a chance of being blow-outs.I'm going to take:VikesColtsCardinals JetsI think one thing we can all agree on is that we have four spectacular games this weekend!![]()
I heard very similar things about Philly last week, that they would beat Dallas too. They played vanilla D week 17, they'd blitz and Dallas line wouldn't be able to handle it, they had film... blah blah blah.The problem with Dallas is, right now, they are simply too potent in all aspects of the offense to stop. Do you blitz and get burned by screens, and sweeps? Do you drop back and get burned on inside running? Do you play to stop the deep ball and Witten burns you? Do you bring a safety up on Witten, and Austin burns you?And on defense, the Cowboys have one of the best defenses in the league. It will be tough for MIN to get going against them. I like Rice and Harvin a lot, but I'm not sure MIN's line can handle the DAL rush enough for Favre to get them the ball.ETA:Cowboys - I think they dominateColts - Too much firepowerSaints - really undecided about this oneChargers - Will be close, better QB winsI see Minn correcting the mistakes from the Carolina game. They have good film on what Dallas did to NO & Philly Minn DL will cause more trouble than Dallas can handle. It will be the Minn D that makes the difference, but I can see this being a close match. Minn has too many receiving options for Dallas to limit unlike Philly being limited in DeSean.
Sounds a lot like Bill Belichek.I'm probably just overreacting but doesn't it seem like this guy's on a mission to piss off anyone and everyone who will listen? He attempts to create an "Us against them" argument every time I hear him it seems.
And Santi fumbled on the 1 yard line. Both teams threw some points away that game. IMO, the Colts run D has been underrated this year. They had a bad game against the Miami Wildcat, and the last 2 games when they were sitting a number of starters. Barring a long run like they had against NE, I think they will hold them under 120 which means Flacco will have to make plays through the air. I think it will be tight like most of the Colts games this year, but I still think they win it.Correct.Flacco threw a pick in the red zone that killed it.Game was at Baltimore.
I'll grant that I'm not objective when it comes to this debate. However, I just don't see how anyone can say Baltimore is a better team. They held them to 98 yards the first time they played and Baltimore was 1-6 against playoff teams. Baltimore definitely has a punchers chance and their D is good enough to keep it close or even cause enough havoc to win it for them. But to say they are a better team is a bit much.Ravens -- Baltimore is the better team on a neutral field, but this game is in Indy. Still, I think playing at Lucas Oil earlier this year will be a tremendous help for the Ravens and will make that first quarter that much easier. Indy trying to tackle McGahee/McLain/Rice without Sanders could be laughable. Indy will be one dimensional (even moreso than usual) as there's no way the Colts run on the Ravens. Just a brutal matchup for the Colts. Lots of reasons will be given for why the Colts lost, but the real reason is they're not as good as Baltimore. And that's with Baltimore not having a QB or any WRs. Take the under and the points.
Baltimore has, along with Dallas and the Jets, the best run O in the league. There's also no way the Colts can run on the Ravens, which will make them one-dimensional. The Colts are better at passing and stopping the pass, but the Ravens are better at running and stopping the run. The difference is I think the combination of an amazing running offense against a terrible run defense could lead to worse results than an awesome but one dimensional offense against a still better than average pass defense.I'll grant that I'm not objective when it comes to this debate. However, I just don't see how anyone can say Baltimore is a better team. They held them to 98 yards the first time they played and Baltimore was 1-6 against playoff teams. Baltimore definitely has a punchers chance and their D is good enough to keep it close or even cause enough havoc to win it for them. But to say they are a better team is a bit much.Ravens -- Baltimore is the better team on a neutral field, but this game is in Indy. Still, I think playing at Lucas Oil earlier this year will be a tremendous help for the Ravens and will make that first quarter that much easier. Indy trying to tackle McGahee/McLain/Rice without Sanders could be laughable. Indy will be one dimensional (even moreso than usual) as there's no way the Colts run on the Ravens. Just a brutal matchup for the Colts. Lots of reasons will be given for why the Colts lost, but the real reason is they're not as good as Baltimore. And that's with Baltimore not having a QB or any WRs. Take the under and the points.
Ravens -- Baltimore is the better team on a neutral field, but this game is in Indy. Still, I think playing at Lucas Oil earlier this year will be a tremendous help for the Ravens and will make that first quarter that much easier. Indy trying to tackle McGahee/McLain/Rice without Sanders could be laughable. Indy will be one dimensional (even moreso than usual) as there's no way the Colts run on the Ravens. Just a brutal matchup for the Colts. Lots of reasons will be given for why the Colts lost, but the real reason is they're not as good as Baltimore. And that's with Baltimore not having a QB or any WRs. Take the under and the points.
Because the recent history of the Colts shows that they are extremely dominant in the divisional round when having a first round bye, right?---------I was gonna pick against the Colts in this round, after the way they tanked the last two weeks, but Flacco has looked terrible lately, and I am not sure the Ravens offense will be well-balanced enough to win the game. I think it will be close most of the way, as the Ravens will get off to a good start, but once the Colts get their rhythm back, they will take the lead and hold on to win. My picks: Indy 20, Baltimore 16SD 28, NYJ 16 (Jets control more of the clock, but have to settle for too many FGs, and the Chargers hit some big pass plays for TDs)Dallas 24, Minnesota 17 (close the whole way, but Dallas' 'D' is the difference)Arizona 37, New Orleans 31 (a Saints comeback fall short after the Cardinals take command early)Colts will win this for sure, it won't even be close.
Because the past doesn't represent the future, and because the Colts already beat a better (healthier) Ravens team earlier. Ravens didn't score a single TD against IND earlier this year IIRC. Now Flacco is hurt. The Colts were dealing with injuries and have most of their players healthy now.Also, the Ravens are coming in a bit overrated, and likely thinking more of themselves than they should, due to the beat down they put on NE.Because the recent history of the Colts shows that they are extremely dominant in the divisional round when having a first round bye, right?Colts will win this for sure, it won't even be close.
Yes they were 24th in the league. I'm also not a fan of removing outlier games from the stats, however, when a team shuts it down and has 2nd and 3rd teamers in the game its at least worth noting. In the 1st half of the Jets game, they gave up 54 yards (and that wasn't even at full strength). They gave up 202 for the game and the next week against Buffalo they gave up 248 with very few defensive starters. They averaged 112 in the other 14 games (right at league average). They struggled against Miami's wildcat but gave up less than 100 in 6 of the other 13. To say they are "terrible" is just an overstatement.As for the Colts being one-dimensional, that's exactly what they've been all year. All Indy's run O has to do is be able to get the LBs to take a step towards the line. That creates the only space Manning needs. If Manning gets impatient and tries to put it into multiple coverage, that is where he gets into trouble.Baltimore has, along with Dallas and the Jets, the best run O in the league. There's also no way the Colts can run on the Ravens, which will make them one-dimensional. The Colts are better at passing and stopping the pass, but the Ravens are better at running and stopping the run. The difference is I think the combination of an amazing running offense against a terrible run defense could lead to worse results than an awesome but one dimensional offense against a still better than average pass defense.I'll grant that I'm not objective when it comes to this debate. However, I just don't see how anyone can say Baltimore is a better team. They held them to 98 yards the first time they played and Baltimore was 1-6 against playoff teams. Baltimore definitely has a punchers chance and their D is good enough to keep it close or even cause enough havoc to win it for them. But to say they are a better team is a bit much.Ravens -- Baltimore is the better team on a neutral field, but this game is in Indy. Still, I think playing at Lucas Oil earlier this year will be a tremendous help for the Ravens and will make that first quarter that much easier. Indy trying to tackle McGahee/McLain/Rice without Sanders could be laughable. Indy will be one dimensional (even moreso than usual) as there's no way the Colts run on the Ravens. Just a brutal matchup for the Colts. Lots of reasons will be given for why the Colts lost, but the real reason is they're not as good as Baltimore. And that's with Baltimore not having a QB or any WRs. Take the under and the points.
I was going more off what I've seen than just the raw numbers, which are still really bad (below average in first downs allowed (rushing) and YPC allowed, too). Baltimore's running game is incredible. If they run for 175+ yards against Indy -- and I think that's realistic -- it's going to be tough for the Colts to win.Yes they were 24th in the league. I'm also not a fan of removing outlier games from the stats, however, when a team shuts it down and has 2nd and 3rd teamers in the game its at least worth noting. In the 1st half of the Jets game, they gave up 54 yards (and that wasn't even at full strength). They gave up 202 for the game and the next week against Buffalo they gave up 248 with very few defensive starters. They averaged 112 in the other 14 games (right at league average). They struggled against Miami's wildcat but gave up less than 100 in 6 of the other 13. To say they are "terrible" is just an overstatement.As for the Colts being one-dimensional, that's exactly what they've been all year. All Indy's run O has to do is be able to get the LBs to take a step towards the line. That creates the only space Manning needs. If Manning gets impatient and tries to put it into multiple coverage, that is where he gets into trouble.Baltimore has, along with Dallas and the Jets, the best run O in the league. There's also no way the Colts can run on the Ravens, which will make them one-dimensional. The Colts are better at passing and stopping the pass, but the Ravens are better at running and stopping the run. The difference is I think the combination of an amazing running offense against a terrible run defense could lead to worse results than an awesome but one dimensional offense against a still better than average pass defense.I'll grant that I'm not objective when it comes to this debate. However, I just don't see how anyone can say Baltimore is a better team. They held them to 98 yards the first time they played and Baltimore was 1-6 against playoff teams. Baltimore definitely has a punchers chance and their D is good enough to keep it close or even cause enough havoc to win it for them. But to say they are a better team is a bit much.Ravens -- Baltimore is the better team on a neutral field, but this game is in Indy. Still, I think playing at Lucas Oil earlier this year will be a tremendous help for the Ravens and will make that first quarter that much easier. Indy trying to tackle McGahee/McLain/Rice without Sanders could be laughable. Indy will be one dimensional (even moreso than usual) as there's no way the Colts run on the Ravens. Just a brutal matchup for the Colts. Lots of reasons will be given for why the Colts lost, but the real reason is they're not as good as Baltimore. And that's with Baltimore not having a QB or any WRs. Take the under and the points.