Dread Pirate
Footballguy
So the FBG week 7 write-up on M Ryan v TEN slots this one as a tough matchup! The "Joe and Mark" statemtents rounds out with the following,
".....Ryan Tannehill and company managed 22/29 for 266 yards passing, two TDs and two interceptions thrown (254 net yards passing subtracting two sacks taken for -12 yards). They held the Bills to net 82 yards passing two games ago with four sacks for -31 yards (11/18 for 113 yards passing, one TD and zero interceptions thrown). With Marcus Mariota out for this game, the Titans' offense may have trouble staying on the field - this looks like a tougher-than-usual matchup for Ryan and company, but not as scary as the defensive stats make it appear."
It's analysis like this that has me thinking i buy this service only for the subscriber contest.
C'mon Man! Tannehill score 20 fantasy points including 2 INTs (that had nothing to do with pressure) and the Bills throw for 82 yards (28th in PassYds/game) and the best hope you can offer for Ryan is, "but not as scary as the defensive stats make it appear."
With nowhere near the talent that Ryan has at WR and a running game that can hardly be called an NFL run game when compared to what Freeman has done in Atlanta, Tannehill ripped thru the TEN pass defense for 20 fantasy points. Mark and Joe mention the Bills but why? The Bills are about defense. Who is scheming to stop the mighty pass attack of the Bills? If that's not enough, Luck scored 21 fantasy points wk5. Is Ryan's pass attack more like the Bills or more like Luck and his Colts? Dudes, Ryan's team just got embarrassed in NO last week. Matt Ryan, Freeman and Julio are going to FEAST on TEN.
Listing some stats in the write-up is good but you have to qualify it more than just the "not as scary" line at the end of the write-up. More often than not I'm counting on FBG to give me well-though-out advice that gives the BEST chance to win FF. When I see stuff like the week 7 write-up on Ryan, I wonder if you guys are paying attention.
".....Ryan Tannehill and company managed 22/29 for 266 yards passing, two TDs and two interceptions thrown (254 net yards passing subtracting two sacks taken for -12 yards). They held the Bills to net 82 yards passing two games ago with four sacks for -31 yards (11/18 for 113 yards passing, one TD and zero interceptions thrown). With Marcus Mariota out for this game, the Titans' offense may have trouble staying on the field - this looks like a tougher-than-usual matchup for Ryan and company, but not as scary as the defensive stats make it appear."
It's analysis like this that has me thinking i buy this service only for the subscriber contest.
C'mon Man! Tannehill score 20 fantasy points including 2 INTs (that had nothing to do with pressure) and the Bills throw for 82 yards (28th in PassYds/game) and the best hope you can offer for Ryan is, "but not as scary as the defensive stats make it appear."
With nowhere near the talent that Ryan has at WR and a running game that can hardly be called an NFL run game when compared to what Freeman has done in Atlanta, Tannehill ripped thru the TEN pass defense for 20 fantasy points. Mark and Joe mention the Bills but why? The Bills are about defense. Who is scheming to stop the mighty pass attack of the Bills? If that's not enough, Luck scored 21 fantasy points wk5. Is Ryan's pass attack more like the Bills or more like Luck and his Colts? Dudes, Ryan's team just got embarrassed in NO last week. Matt Ryan, Freeman and Julio are going to FEAST on TEN.
Listing some stats in the write-up is good but you have to qualify it more than just the "not as scary" line at the end of the write-up. More often than not I'm counting on FBG to give me well-though-out advice that gives the BEST chance to win FF. When I see stuff like the week 7 write-up on Ryan, I wonder if you guys are paying attention.
?
