What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Sabathia a Brewer (1 Viewer)

strykerpks

Footballguy
LINK

Brewers, Indians agree on Sabathia

By Tom Haudricourt

Sunday, Jul 6 2008, 05:46 PM

I just was told by a reliable club source that the Brewers have a deal in place with Cleveland for left-hander C.C. Sabathia, contingent on the paperwork being done and medical records exchanged.

But believe me, folks, that's a deal. All that other stuff is formality.

All I know so far is that top prospect Matt LaPorta is in the deal. I was told two lower-level minor leaguers also are included. The Brewers refused to include another top prospect such as Alcides Escobar or Mat Gamel.

Look for Sabathia to make his debut for the Brewers Tuesday night at Miller Park against Colorado.

I'll post more details as I get them.
 
Kinda figured LaPorta would get it done. Cleveland fans should be overwhelmed that this guy is coming to town...good deal for both clubs.

 
Milwaukee needs to either win the NL or re-sign CC to a new deal to make this worth it.

Neither is likely. Pretty short-sighted, imo.

 
This makes inking Fielder a must. LaPorta was that insurance policy unless they figure Gamel can play there :shudder:

Cubs nation just went into full panic mode now. Sheets plus CC at the top of a rotation is deadly.

 
This makes inking Fielder a must. LaPorta was that insurance policy unless they figure Gamel can play there :shudder:Cubs nation just went into full panic mode now. Sheets plus CC at the top of a rotation is deadly.
Throw in an impressive Parra and we are sitting pretty 1-2-3... :excited: :goodposting: :lmao: :lmao:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
:confused: As a Yankee fan

1) Get him out of the AL

2) No way MIL signs both him AND Sheets so now Yanks can sign one without giving up their minor leaguers.

 
Milwaukee needs to either win the NL or re-sign CC to a new deal to make this worth it.Neither is likely. Pretty short-sighted, imo.
Get the compinsation picks when he leaves via free agency makes it worth it.This is really a win now / benefit later deal.
 
Milwaukee needs to either win the NL or re-sign CC to a new deal to make this worth it.Neither is likely. Pretty short-sighted, imo.
Get the compinsation picks when he leaves via free agency makes it worth it.This is really a win now / benefit later deal.
:confused: Great move by Melvin. He will get two first rounders when Sabathia leaves. Laporta is going to be a solid player, but they have Gamel. I really like this deal for the Brewers. It is an expensive rental, but their farm system depth allows them to make the move.
 
Milwaukee needs to either win the NL or re-sign CC to a new deal to make this worth it.Neither is likely. Pretty short-sighted, imo.
The Brewers haven't been into the playoffs in over 25 years and have played for the future forever. They were on the edge before this trade now they should be sitting pretty for at least a wildcard. Plus LaPorta is a corner OF or 1B and with Braun and Hart both being young and talented LaPorta probably would have been switched back to 1B at the major league level. Prince will be around at least 2 more years so I'm not sure where LaPorta would've played in the immediate future.Plus why can't the Brewers win the NL...they are only a couple of games behind the Cubbies?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Just to be clear, here: The Indians traded their left handed Cy Young winning ace because they didn't want to give him a 6 or 7 year deal. Additionally, they traded him for a top hitting prospect who projects to be a DH in the American League because his glove stinks. This just a year after signing their own DH to a $57M, 4 year deal. Right?

Someone please convince me that this was good for the Tribe.

 
I don't have a problem with them going for it, I just think they paid way too high of a price.

The draft choices will be in the 30s...unlikely to garner a LaPorta-esque prospect.

Also, there was a very good article on ESPN the other day (by Stark?) detailing how these trades very, very rarely work out.

 
Just to be clear, here: The Indians traded their left handed Cy Young winning ace because they didn't want to give him a 6 or 7 year deal. Additionally, they traded him for a top hitting prospect who projects to be a DH in the American League because his glove stinks. This just a year after signing their own DH to a $57M, 4 year deal. Right?Someone please convince me that this was good for the Tribe.
Gamel is worse defensively from what I've read, even on this board. Can you point me to something that says LaPorta is a defensive hack? Garko was considered a hack in the field and he's not been a liability at 1B. The Tribe took the best prospect offered to them and ran with it. LaPorta can help them alot sooner than the draft picks the Brewers will get. Looking back at the Colon deal, Phillips was the prize that we miserably mishandled (I'm looking at you, Wedge!). It will be interesting to see who these A-ball prospects are that we are pulling in here. They most likely won't turn out to be All Stars like Grady and Lee, but we definitely needed to add more depth to our system.
 
LINK

Jackson, Bryson included in trade

By Tom Haudricourt

Sunday, Jul 6 2008, 09:19 PM

A source familiar with the Brewers' trade for Cleveland lefty C.C. Sabathia just told me that the other players going to the Indians with Matt LaPorta are minor-league pitchers Zach Jackson and Rob Bryson and a fourth player, perhaps minor-league third baseman Taylor Green.

The fourth player currently is listed as "to be named later" but it is believed the Indians want to look more at Green, with the idea of moving him to second base.

Jackson, who was up briefly with the Brewers this season, is 1-5 with a 7.85 ERA at Class AAA Nashville in 22 appearances (six starts).

Bryson is pitching at Class A West Virginia, where he is 3-2 with a 4.25 ERA in 22 outings (five starts).

If Green indeed is the fourth player, he is batting .298 with 10 homers and 54 RBI at Class A Brevard County.

 
Just to be clear, here: The Indians traded their left handed Cy Young winning ace because they didn't want to give him a 6 or 7 year deal. Additionally, they traded him for a top hitting prospect who projects to be a DH in the American League because his glove stinks. This just a year after signing their own DH to a $57M, 4 year deal. Right?

Someone please convince me that this was good for the Tribe.
Gamel is worse defensively from what I've read, even on this board. Can you point me to something that says LaPorta is a defensive hack? Garko was considered a hack in the field and he's not been a liability at 1B.

The Tribe took the best prospect offered to them and ran with it. LaPorta can help them alot sooner than the draft picks the Brewers will get. Looking back at the Colon deal, Phillips was the prize that we miserably mishandled (I'm looking at you, Wedge!). It will be interesting to see who these A-ball prospects are that we are pulling in here. They most likely won't turn out to be All Stars like Grady and Lee, but we definitely needed to add more depth to our system.
LaPorta, a right-handed slugger who is below-average defensively, would be a better fit for the American League. He was the Brewers' first-round pick in 2007, and played first base at the University of Florida, but the Brewers converted him to left field — a position occupied by Ryan Braun, who is signed through 2015.
http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/8318218...ia-from-Indians
Tabbed by Baseball America as the top overall prospect in Milwaukee's organization, LaPorta, 23, came to the Brewers as a first baseman but, with Prince Fielder appearing to be ensconced there for the long-term, they moved him to left field.

But the Brewers this season moved slugger Ryan Braun to left from third base at the major league level. LaPorta, known as a bat whose glove is almost an afterthought, is viewed by scouts more as an American League player, where he could wind up as a designated hitter.
http://www.sportsline.com/mlb/story/10888845
 
Just to be clear, here: The Indians traded their left handed Cy Young winning ace because they didn't want to give him a 6 or 7 year deal. Additionally, they traded him for a top hitting prospect who projects to be a DH in the American League because his glove stinks. This just a year after signing their own DH to a $57M, 4 year deal. Right?

Someone please convince me that this was good for the Tribe.
Gamel is worse defensively from what I've read, even on this board. Can you point me to something that says LaPorta is a defensive hack? Garko was considered a hack in the field and he's not been a liability at 1B.

The Tribe took the best prospect offered to them and ran with it. LaPorta can help them alot sooner than the draft picks the Brewers will get. Looking back at the Colon deal, Phillips was the prize that we miserably mishandled (I'm looking at you, Wedge!). It will be interesting to see who these A-ball prospects are that we are pulling in here. They most likely won't turn out to be All Stars like Grady and Lee, but we definitely needed to add more depth to our system.
LaPorta, a right-handed slugger who is below-average defensively, would be a better fit for the American League. He was the Brewers' first-round pick in 2007, and played first base at the University of Florida, but the Brewers converted him to left field — a position occupied by Ryan Braun, who is signed through 2015.
http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/8318218...ia-from-Indians
Tabbed by Baseball America as the top overall prospect in Milwaukee's organization, LaPorta, 23, came to the Brewers as a first baseman but, with Prince Fielder appearing to be ensconced there for the long-term, they moved him to left field.

But the Brewers this season moved slugger Ryan Braun to left from third base at the major league level. LaPorta, known as a bat whose glove is almost an afterthought, is viewed by scouts more as an American League player, where he could wind up as a designated hitter.
http://www.sportsline.com/mlb/story/10888845
Yeah I read those too. I'll try to hunt down some scouts views. It will be interesting to see what happens though.Would be nice if we get Green as the ptbnl. Not sure why they want to look at him more....3b or 2b, who cares? Unless Brantley is available if the Tribe thinks Green would be too much of a project at 2B, then this all makes sense.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
http://blog.cleveland.com/sports/2008/07/t...ading_saba.html

The Phillies were offering several prospects. Among the players the Indians expressed interest in were second Adrian Cardenas, catcher Lou Manson and left-hander Antonio Bastardo. The Indians wanted Class AA pitcher Carlos Carrasco, but the Phillies didn't want to give him up.

The Rays dropped out of the bargaining on Sunday.

The Dodgers' top prospects did not match up well with the Indians needs. The Indians asked for four players from the Dodgers to make the deal work. The Dodgers said they'd go to ownership to see if they could make it work, but apparently it didn't.
I read the Dodgers deal focused on Kemp, but also know they are in the market for a SS. Not sure if they tried to get Peralta or plan on moving Kemp for a SS (not sure there will be many SS available worth dealing Kemp for).
 
http://blog.cleveland.com/sports/2008/07/t...ading_saba.html

The Phillies were offering several prospects. Among the players the Indians expressed interest in were second Adrian Cardenas, catcher Lou Manson and left-hander Antonio Bastardo. The Indians wanted Class AA pitcher Carlos Carrasco, but the Phillies didn't want to give him up.

The Rays dropped out of the bargaining on Sunday.

The Dodgers' top prospects did not match up well with the Indians needs. The Indians asked for four players from the Dodgers to make the deal work. The Dodgers said they'd go to ownership to see if they could make it work, but apparently it didn't.
I read the Dodgers deal focused on Kemp, but also know they are in the market for a SS. Not sure if they tried to get Peralta or plan on moving Kemp for a SS (not sure there will be many SS available worth dealing Kemp for).
I think I would have liked the Phillies deal more, if for no other reason than to have The Great Bastardo in the organization.
 
Anyone have a fantasy take on this? Surely, Sabathia gets more run support as a Brewer. And NL hitters will be less familiar with his stuff.

 
Anyone have a fantasy take on this? Surely, Sabathia gets more run support as a Brewer. And NL hitters will be less familiar with his stuff.
He's something like 7-1 career against the NL Central in inter-league play. Only team to beat him was the Cubs who rocked him as his ERA is something like 32.50 against them.In saying that, Outside of Wins, I'm not sure how he gets better then he's been over the last 2 months. If he does, it's going to be scary.
 
Cubs nation just went into full panic mode now. Sheets plus CC at the top of a rotation is deadly.
:no: Sure, I would have liked the Cubs to have signed him. Apparently the Cubs will "settle" for going after Harden from the A's - I say "settle" because in almost every career stat, Harden is better than CC.

Besides, CC + Sheets is a deadly combo to be sure - until Sheets ends up on the DL...again. Sheets hasn't started more than 24 games in 5 years. He's 30 now - and he's already started 17 - about 7 more to go before he breaks down again.

Cubs fans in full panic? :shrug: The Cubs just took 2 out of 3 from the Cardinals in St. Louis (and were a blown save away from sweeping), still have the best record in the NL and are looking like they're finally getting healthy after having Soriano, Zambrano, R. Johnson and Scott Eyre out for the last couple weeks - and still maintaining their lead in the NL Central despite injuries to their ace and arguably one of the best offensive players at the same time (Soriano - I mean I like R. Johnson and all, but...)

The Cubs will probably face them both in the July series, but I'd be very suprised if both are still in the Brewer rotation by the 6 games in September - I'd also be shocked if the Cubs still "only" had Zambrano and Dempster at the top of their rotation by then.

Full panic? No. A little disappointed that Jim Hendry didn't pull this off himself? Sure. Looking forward to a fun rest of the season because at least one team in the NL Central is trying to make it interesting for the Cubs. ;)

 
Cubs nation just went into full panic mode now. Sheets plus CC at the top of a rotation is deadly.
:no: Sure, I would have liked the Cubs to have signed him. Apparently the Cubs will "settle" for going after Harden from the A's - I say "settle" because in almost every career stat, Harden is better than CC.

Besides, CC + Sheets is a deadly combo to be sure - until Sheets ends up on the DL...again. Sheets hasn't started more than 24 games in 5 years. He's 30 now - and he's already started 17 - about 7 more to go before he breaks down again.

Cubs fans in full panic? :shrug: The Cubs just took 2 out of 3 from the Cardinals in St. Louis (and were a blown save away from sweeping), still have the best record in the NL and are looking like they're finally getting healthy after having Soriano, Zambrano, R. Johnson and Scott Eyre out for the last couple weeks - and still maintaining their lead in the NL Central despite injuries to their ace and arguably one of the best offensive players at the same time (Soriano - I mean I like R. Johnson and all, but...)

The Cubs will probably face them both in the July series, but I'd be very suprised if both are still in the Brewer rotation by the 6 games in September - I'd also be shocked if the Cubs still "only" had Zambrano and Dempster at the top of their rotation by then.

Full panic? No. A little disappointed that Jim Hendry didn't pull this off himself? Sure. Looking forward to a fun rest of the season because at least one team in the NL Central is trying to make it interesting for the Cubs. ;)
Still in denial here, huh?
 
Sure, I would have liked the Cubs to have signed him. Apparently the Cubs will "settle" for going after Harden from the A's - I say "settle" because in almost every career stat, Harden is better than CC.
Perhaps you overlooked the one called "Cy Youngs" CC - 1 Harden - 0.You'd take Harden over Sabathia? I call you :goodposting:
 
Looking forward to a fun rest of the season because at least one team in the NL Central is trying to make it interesting for the Cubs. :goodposting:
:lmao: You talk like the Cubs own the Central or something. That division is still up for grabs, and while the Cubs are in first place right now, any of the top 3 teams could very well end up winning the division, so implying that this trade means that the Brewers are the one team that might be able to scare the Cubs is absurd.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sure, I would have liked the Cubs to have signed him. Apparently the Cubs will "settle" for going after Harden from the A's - I say "settle" because in almost every career stat, Harden is better than CC.
Perhaps you overlooked the one called "Cy Youngs" CC - 1 Harden - 0.You'd take Harden over Sabathia? I call you :loco:
Who wins the injury stat?IMO, the Cubs are going to be wannabee buyers this year. They don't have what other teams can offer. They're going to get a few guys nobody else wants or make a few minor deadline deals when the bigger names are gone.
 
Anyone have a fantasy take on this? Surely, Sabathia gets more run support as a Brewer. And NL hitters will be less familiar with his stuff.
Sabathia will kill the Reds each time out. They are lefty laden.Houston will be ugly too because it turns Berkman to his weaker side and only 3/8ths of that lineup can hit anyhow.Sabathia should win 8-10 from here out. The Brewer defense still sucks big time, and the pen isn't great, so 10 will be a reach because I'm sure one of those two parties will blow a couple starts for him.
 
DoubleG said:
Cubs nation just went into full panic mode now. Sheets plus CC at the top of a rotation is deadly.
:no: Sure, I would have liked the Cubs to have signed him. Apparently the Cubs will "settle" for going after Harden from the A's - I say "settle" because in almost every career stat, Harden is better than CC.
I've heard that also, but why would the A's trade Harden when there team is still right in this thing? :rolleyes:
 
DoubleG said:
Cubs nation just went into full panic mode now. Sheets plus CC at the top of a rotation is deadly.
:shrug: Sure, I would have liked the Cubs to have signed him. Apparently the Cubs will "settle" for going after Harden from the A's - I say "settle" because in almost every career stat, Harden is better than CC.
I've heard that also, but why would the A's trade Harden when there team is still right in this thing? :rolleyes:
because hes healthy and someone wants him.
 
Ghost Rider said:
DoubleG said:
Looking forward to a fun rest of the season because at least one team in the NL Central is trying to make it interesting for the Cubs. :moneybag:
:thumbup: You talk like the Cubs own the Central or something. That division is still up for grabs, and while the Cubs are in first place right now, any of the top 3 teams could very well end up winning the division, so implying that this trade means that the Brewers are the one team that might be able to scare the Cubs is absurd.
Well let's look at it shall we?How about the Cardinals? Well, the Cubs have played them 6 times and split 3-3. All 6 games were in St. Louis. The Cardinals have won against Hill (who is now in the minors) and Marquis (who is arguably the worst starter on the Cubs) - the 3rd victory was this weekend when Wood blew an easy save. The Cubs and Cards have 9 games left head-to-head, 6 of which are at Wrigley. Many Cardinals are on pace to have career offensive years, including Ludwig, Molina, Miles and even Pujols. Yes, if all those Cardinal hitters can all have career years, it may be possible for the Cardinals to chase down the Cubs. Many of the Cardinal pitchers are also playing well over their collective heads - including Lohse (whose had only 2 winning seasons in his career and never finished with an ERA < 4) and Todd Wellenmeyer, who is already starting to come back to earth - his ERA climbing a point in the last month. Closer is also a major issue for the Cardinals. The Cardinals have been impressive to this point, but again, they are playiing way over the heads and will likely (and most experts agree) fade in the second half - especially with more road games and a tougher second half schedule. In the past two weeks, the Cubs have been without Zambrano and A. Soriano, yet over that time the Cardinals have been unable to even pick up a single game in the standings. Starting tommorrow night, the Cubs have 3 more games at home than on the road the rest of the season. Offensively, almost every Cub player is either at or below their typical numbers. As an example, Ramirez has a .498 SL% - he's never had one under .500 since 2004 since becoming a full time Cub - Soriano is on pace to hit only 30 HRs - which would be his least since 2004. The only pitcher for the Cubs who seems to pitching above his head is Dempster - but then again, he's been a closer for the past several years, so it's difficult to project his numbers.Everyone else in the division is 10.5 games back or more - and again, could not close the gap with the Cubs during a period when they were missing their ace pitcher and their best offensive weapon, as well as several other players. That leaves the Brewers - whom I've already stated, are the one team that can make it interesting...assuming Sheets can stay healthy. If Sheets goes down again, then getting CC Sabathia but losing Sheets is basically a wash in terms of being able to send a stud to the mound every 5th day. All of the above also assumes that the Cubs don't add anyone prior to the trade deadline, which most people believe they have every intention of doing.
 
DoubleG said:
Cubs nation just went into full panic mode now. Sheets plus CC at the top of a rotation is deadly.
:thumbup: Sure, I would have liked the Cubs to have signed him. Apparently the Cubs will "settle" for going after Harden from the A's - I say "settle" because in almost every career stat, Harden is better than CC.
I've heard that also, but why would the A's trade Harden when there team is still right in this thing?
:goodposting: In what? They're 6 games back, dropped 6 of their last 10 and haven't won a series against an AL team since the Tigers a month ago.

Wild card - they're going to catch Boston or Minnesota? or not going to get caught by the Yankees?

Sorry - but the A's aren't exactly in the thick of things. Yes, they've had a decent first half, but they look more like a team that will be selling rather than buying come the end of July - especially as they have to face the Yankees, Rays and Angels before the deadline.

 
Ghost Rider said:
DoubleG said:
Looking forward to a fun rest of the season because at least one team in the NL Central is trying to make it interesting for the Cubs. :hot:
:hot: You talk like the Cubs own the Central or something. That division is still up for grabs, and while the Cubs are in first place right now, any of the top 3 teams could very well end up winning the division, so implying that this trade means that the Brewers are the one team that might be able to scare the Cubs is absurd.
Well let's look at it shall we?How about the Cardinals? Well, the Cubs have played them 6 times and split 3-3. All 6 games were in St. Louis. The Cardinals have won against Hill (who is now in the minors) and Marquis (who is arguably the worst starter on the Cubs) - the 3rd victory was this weekend when Wood blew an easy save. The Cubs and Cards have 9 games left head-to-head, 6 of which are at Wrigley. Many Cardinals are on pace to have career offensive years, including Ludwig, Molina, Miles and even Pujols. Yes, if all those Cardinal hitters can all have career years, it may be possible for the Cardinals to chase down the Cubs. Many of the Cardinal pitchers are also playing well over their collective heads - including Lohse (whose had only 2 winning seasons in his career and never finished with an ERA < 4) and Todd Wellenmeyer, who is already starting to come back to earth - his ERA climbing a point in the last month. Closer is also a major issue for the Cardinals. The Cardinals have been impressive to this point, but again, they are playiing way over the heads and will likely (and most experts agree) fade in the second half - especially with more road games and a tougher second half schedule. In the past two weeks, the Cubs have been without Zambrano and A. Soriano, yet over that time the Cardinals have been unable to even pick up a single game in the standings. Starting tommorrow night, the Cubs have 3 more games at home than on the road the rest of the season. Offensively, almost every Cub player is either at or below their typical numbers. As an example, Ramirez has a .498 SL% - he's never had one under .500 since 2004 since becoming a full time Cub - Soriano is on pace to hit only 30 HRs - which would be his least since 2004. The only pitcher for the Cubs who seems to pitching above his head is Dempster - but then again, he's been a closer for the past several years, so it's difficult to project his numbers.Everyone else in the division is 10.5 games back or more - and again, could not close the gap with the Cubs during a period when they were missing their ace pitcher and their best offensive weapon, as well as several other players. That leaves the Brewers - whom I've already stated, are the one team that can make it interesting...assuming Sheets can stay healthy. If Sheets goes down again, then getting CC Sabathia but losing Sheets is basically a wash in terms of being able to send a stud to the mound every 5th day. All of the above also assumes that the Cubs don't add anyone prior to the trade deadline, which most people believe they have every intention of doing.
Wellemeyer hasn't been the same since coming back from his injury; that is why his ERA has been climbing. And the Cardinals are without Wainwright, their number 1 starter right now, not to mention Chris Carpenter, who is eating up a lot of the salary cap, but feel free to not mention those factors, while pointing out every little injury the Cubs have. And I guess not having Pujols for a few weeks was no big deal, either, right? Have the Cardinals overachieved this year? Absolutely, but when you are playing .556 ball through 90 games, that is not a fluke. That means you are a good team. And there is no reason the Cardinals cannot continue to keep doing well. But many are already counting them out in light of the Sabathia trade, so I guess you might as well do the same. No one gave them a chance coming into the season, and they are only 3 1/2 games behind the team many have called the best or 2nd best team for most of the season, so you will forgive me if I think they are better than you and many others think they are. :)Also, Pujols is NOT on pace to have a career year. His batting average is higher than usual, but his HRs and RBIs are down, and he hasn't been hitting as well with RISP. Yes, the Cardinals closer status is a major concern, as is the bullpen in general. Lastly, as for the supposed experts thinking they will fade in the second half, pretty much all of those so-called experts thought the Cardinals would be lucky to win a single game in the '06 Series. How did that turn out? :eek: :D :D
 
Anyone have a fantasy take on this? Surely, Sabathia gets more run support as a Brewer. And NL hitters will be less familiar with his stuff.
Sabathia will kill the Reds each time out. They are lefty laden.Houston will be ugly too because it turns Berkman to his weaker side and only 3/8ths of that lineup can hit anyhow.Sabathia should win 8-10 from here out. The Brewer defense still sucks big time, and the pen isn't great, so 10 will be a reach because I'm sure one of those two parties will blow a couple starts for him.
Don't forget that the Brewers get CC's bat in the lineup also!Those Cub/Brewer matchups are going to be playoff-atmosphere type baseball.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top