What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

Saints fans must hate Da Bears.... (1 Viewer)

Sweetness_34

Footballguy
3 years in a row, the Bears have ended the Saints season. 2 years back in the NFCC game; last year when they had to win to qualify to the playoffs (with some outside help) and now again this year.

And every year it is the same story. It is cold and field conditions are what they should be in winter. And the finesse Saints cannot play their O like they play in the dome. Bears beat up Brees every year, sack and intercept him and then the Bears always make plays on special teams (last year Hester returned a punt for a TD). Oh, and the Saints never learn to play D, and always let Hester beat them deep. Make no mistake, Hester could have had 3 bombs for TDs today if the ball was thrown more accurately.

Wow....3 years now....wash, rinse, repeat. I would not hate the Saints fans for hating the Bears. Will the Sainst ever learn that you do not win by throwing for 400 yards in this league? When you pass that much, you never let your D rest and when it gets cold, that passing game no longer works. The Saints have to improve their D & STs if they ever want to take the next step. I will take a team that plays solid STs, great D and can run the ball over the sexy O that the Sainst trot out every year, with no D, no STs and not much running game (until recently). Just my 2 cents....

 
I beat the same guy in my division each of the last 3 years to win my division. may be off topic a little but dominance imo.

 
Let's face facts for a moment.

The Bears won because the coin landed on heads. To their credit, they moved the ball and scored in OT.

But they hadn't stopped New Orleans the entire 2nd half. Had the coin landed on tails, the Bears would be packing up.

The NFL's overtime rule MUST go.

It was fair years ago, but it's no longer fair when every rule change the past 10 years was designed to help the offense.

 
While I don't give a flip about either team other than fantasy impact, I'd like to point out that the condition of the field turf at the Bears home field is an embarrassment. It's clear that the Bears manipulate turf condition to slow down factor backs and primary receivers and have been doing so for years. This is beyond any temporary turf issues seen in Pittsburg, Oakland or elsewhere around the league, and should be addressed by the competition committee.

 
Right now I hate our defensive coordinator more than I hate the Bears. Yes the Bears have had the Saints number and all and I don't know how in the world the Bears got 3 home games in a row without having to play one in New Orleans (Maybe someone has an in with the Schedulers) but as for this particular loss a lot of it is self inflicted. DC Gibbs has got to go this off season period. I bet even the lions are licking their chops with the Saints coming to town.

PS it had nothing to do with the offense and we did run the ball and got twice the yards on the gound than the Bears did.

Saints running game against the Bears

P. Thomas 22 carries for 87 yards and 1 rushing TD

R. Bush 6 carries for 30 yards in the first half before the injury.

Actually the Bears went through the air with Orton more than the Saints did with Brees.

Our defense is the problem.

Also besides the Defensive Coordinator we have too many injuries. Our starting corners Tracy Porter and Mike McKenzie and starting safties Usama Young and Kevin Kaesvaharn are lost for the season. The entire secondary is made of backups. Sometimes backups step up (Pierre Thomas, Lance Moore) but these guys have proven game after game they should not be playing in the NFL. Also Orton saw very little pass rush because one of the best DE's in the game Charles Grant is lost for the season.Starting DT Bryan Young also on injured reserve so Pound your chest all you want but the Bears are still a very mediocre team and will likely be spending most of their offseason watching the playoffs on TV just like the Saints.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
While I don't give a flip about either team other than fantasy impact, I'd like to point out that the condition of the field turf at the Bears home field is an embarrassment. It's clear that the Bears manipulate turf condition to slow down factor backs and primary receivers and have been doing so for years. This is beyond any temporary turf issues seen in Pittsburg, Oakland or elsewhere around the league, and should be addressed by the competition committee.
:tinfoilhat:
 
Let's face facts for a moment.

The Bears won because the coin landed on heads. To their credit, they moved the ball and scored in OT.

But they hadn't stopped New Orleans the entire 2nd half. Had the coin landed on tails, the Bears would be packing up.

The NFL's overtime rule MUST go.

It was fair years ago, but it's no longer fair when every rule change the past 10 years was designed to help the offense.
Not true.
 
As a Saints fan, the only loss that really hurt was the NFC championship game loss. We are one of the only handful of franchises who have never appeared in the Super Bowl, and it would have been great to get over that hump, especially a year removed from all the emotion associated with Katrina.

While losses are never good, I don't rank last year's or this year's loss up there on the pain scale. The Saints needed either/both wins to stay alive and last year the other factors never came into play anyway. Last year, even if the Saints would have won, they would not have made the playoffs. This year, even if the Saints would have won, I think there chances would have been long anyway.

The Viking loss at home this year hurt. We seemed to outplay the Vikings that game and still lost. Last night's game was evenly played by both teams, and a handful of plays eventually turned the balance in Chicago's favor.

 
While I don't give a flip about either team other than fantasy impact, I'd like to point out that the condition of the field turf at the Bears home field is an embarrassment. It's clear that the Bears manipulate turf condition to slow down factor backs and primary receivers and have been doing so for years. This is beyond any temporary turf issues seen in Pittsburg, Oakland or elsewhere around the league, and should be addressed by the competition committee.
:goodposting: Excellent
 
While I don't give a flip about either team other than fantasy impact, I'd like to point out that the condition of the field turf at the Bears home field is an embarrassment. It's clear that the Bears manipulate turf condition to slow down factor backs and primary receivers and have been doing so for years. This is beyond any temporary turf issues seen in Pittsburg, Oakland or elsewhere around the league, and should be addressed by the competition committee.
Are you aware that the Bears do not own the stadium?
 
While I don't give a flip about either team other than fantasy impact, I'd like to point out that the condition of the field turf at the Bears home field is an embarrassment. It's clear that the Bears manipulate turf condition to slow down factor backs and primary receivers and have been doing so for years. This is beyond any temporary turf issues seen in Pittsburg, Oakland or elsewhere around the league, and should be addressed by the competition committee.
It's pretty hypocritcal for a Patriots fan to be bashing another teams field, when Gillette Stadium has had major field problems of it's own in the past.
 
It is cold and field conditions are what they should be in winter.
Maybe one year we can get the Bears away from the crutch of having to play the Saints at home, in the winter and with the benefit of deplorable field conditions that compensate for their shortcomings. Needing every possible advantage to beat the Saints in overtime is hardly something to brag about.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Raider Nation said:
Let's face facts for a moment.

The Bears won because the coin landed on heads. To their credit, they moved the ball and scored in OT.

But they hadn't stopped New Orleans the entire 2nd half. Had the coin landed on tails, the Bears would be packing up.

The NFL's overtime rule MUST go.

It was fair years ago, but it's no longer fair when every rule change the past 10 years was designed to help the offense.
I agree. Let's face facts. Jason David was beaten in the corner of the endzone by Greg Olsen late in the 4th quarter. Well thrown ball that Olsen catches most days. Most days except the ones where he has a CB hanging off of his back and trying to tie him down. If David doesn't inferere there, it's a TD and it's game over, win for Da Bears. If the refs call Pass interference (like they should have), the Bears have a great shot to punch it in for the win.

If you are going to call pass interference on Roman Harper guarding Hester, the refs needed to throw pass intereference on David for hanging off of Olsen in the end zone.

That game should never have gotten to OT.

 
guderian said:
Sweetness_34 said:
It is cold and field conditions are what they should be in winter.
Maybe one year we can get the Bears away from the crutch of having to play the Saints at home, in the winter and with the benefit of deplorable field conditions that compensate for their shortcomings. Needing every possible advantage to beat the Saints in overtime is hardly something to brag about.
Maybe one year the Saints will only play dome teams and have pizza parties and extra recess every Friday.
 
Raider Nation said:
Let's face facts for a moment.

The Bears won because the coin landed on heads. To their credit, they moved the ball and scored in OT.

But they hadn't stopped New Orleans the entire 2nd half. Had the coin landed on tails, the Bears would be packing up.

The NFL's overtime rule MUST go.

It was fair years ago, but it's no longer fair when every rule change the past 10 years was designed to help the offense.
I agree. Let's face facts. Jason David was beaten in the corner of the endzone by Greg Olsen late in the 4th quarter. Well thrown ball that Olsen catches most days. Most days except the ones where he has a CB hanging off of his back and trying to tie him down. If David doesn't inferere there, it's a TD and it's game over, win for Da Bears. If the refs call Pass interference (like they should have), the Bears have a great shot to punch it in for the win.

If you are going to call pass interference on Roman Harper guarding Hester, the refs needed to throw pass intereference on David for hanging off of Olsen in the end zone.

That game should never have gotten to OT.
They are awarded a touchdown if that flag is thrown? Interesting.
 
Raider Nation said:
Let's face facts for a moment.

The Bears won because the coin landed on heads. To their credit, they moved the ball and scored in OT.

But they hadn't stopped New Orleans the entire 2nd half. Had the coin landed on tails, the Bears would be packing up.

The NFL's overtime rule MUST go.

It was fair years ago, but it's no longer fair when every rule change the past 10 years was designed to help the offense.
I agree. Let's face facts. Jason David was beaten in the corner of the endzone by Greg Olsen late in the 4th quarter. Well thrown ball that Olsen catches most days. Most days except the ones where he has a CB hanging off of his back and trying to tie him down. If David doesn't inferere there, it's a TD and it's game over, win for Da Bears. If the refs call Pass interference (like they should have), the Bears have a great shot to punch it in for the win.

If you are going to call pass interference on Roman Harper guarding Hester, the refs needed to throw pass intereference on David for hanging off of Olsen in the end zone.

That game should never have gotten to OT.
They are awarded a touchdown if that flag is thrown? Interesting.
:lmao:
 
Raider Nation said:
Let's face facts for a moment.

The Bears won because the coin landed on heads. To their credit, they moved the ball and scored in OT.

But they hadn't stopped New Orleans the entire 2nd half. Had the coin landed on tails, the Bears would be packing up.

The NFL's overtime rule MUST go.

It was fair years ago, but it's no longer fair when every rule change the past 10 years was designed to help the offense.
I agree. Let's face facts. Jason David was beaten in the corner of the endzone by Greg Olsen late in the 4th quarter. Well thrown ball that Olsen catches most days. Most days except the ones where he has a CB hanging off of his back and trying to tie him down. If David doesn't inferere there, it's a TD and it's game over, win for Da Bears. If the refs call Pass interference (like they should have), the Bears have a great shot to punch it in for the win.

If you are going to call pass interference on Roman Harper guarding Hester, the refs needed to throw pass intereference on David for hanging off of Olsen in the end zone.

That game should never have gotten to OT.
They are awarded a touchdown if that flag is thrown? Interesting.
:football:
Precisely.You can't assume they would have scored.

 
Raider Nation said:
Let's face facts for a moment.

The Bears won because the coin landed on heads. To their credit, they moved the ball and scored in OT.

But they hadn't stopped New Orleans the entire 2nd half. Had the coin landed on tails, the Bears would be packing up.

The NFL's overtime rule MUST go.

It was fair years ago, but it's no longer fair when every rule change the past 10 years was designed to help the offense.
I agree. Let's face facts. Jason David was beaten in the corner of the endzone by Greg Olsen late in the 4th quarter. Well thrown ball that Olsen catches most days. Most days except the ones where he has a CB hanging off of his back and trying to tie him down. If David doesn't inferere there, it's a TD and it's game over, win for Da Bears. If the refs call Pass interference (like they should have), the Bears have a great shot to punch it in for the win.

If you are going to call pass interference on Roman Harper guarding Hester, the refs needed to throw pass intereference on David for hanging off of Olsen in the end zone.

That game should never have gotten to OT.
They are awarded a touchdown if that flag is thrown? Interesting.
:football:
Precisely.You can't assume they would have scored.
He didn't:
If the refs call Pass interference (like they should have), the Bears have a great shot to punch it in for the win.
 
Raider Nation said:
Let's face facts for a moment.The Bears won because the coin landed on heads. To their credit, they moved the ball and scored in OT.But they hadn't stopped New Orleans the entire 2nd half. Had the coin landed on tails, the Bears would be packing up.The NFL's overtime rule MUST go. It was fair years ago, but it's no longer fair when every rule change the past 10 years was designed to help the offense.
The Bears should have won in regulation after getting the ball at the 1 on the non-called PI in the endzone. That was the most blatant missed PI call I have ever seen.The Bears certainly would have run it in from there - Forte would have willed his way in.
 
guderian said:
Sweetness_34 said:
It is cold and field conditions are what they should be in winter.
Maybe one year we can get the Bears away from the crutch of having to play the Saints at home, in the winter and with the benefit of deplorable field conditions that compensate for their shortcomings. Needing every possible advantage to beat the Saints in overtime is hardly something to brag about.
Maybe we can cancel football games when weather gets a little chilly. God knows we don't want to make football anything other than a perfect condition ballet.Bronco Nagurski laughs at you :yucky: Both teams play on the same field, how can it be an advantage to 1 and a disadvantage to another. Learn how to play football and quit crying.
 
SeniorVBDStudent said:
While I don't give a flip about either team other than fantasy impact, I'd like to point out that the condition of the field turf at the Bears home field is an embarrassment. It's clear that the Bears manipulate turf condition to slow down factor backs and primary receivers and have been doing so for years. This is beyond any temporary turf issues seen in Pittsburg, Oakland or elsewhere around the league, and should be addressed by the competition committee.
Didn't seem to slow down Hester who consistently got behind the Saints DB's.
 
guderian said:
Sweetness_34 said:
It is cold and field conditions are what they should be in winter.
Maybe one year we can get the Bears away from the crutch of having to play the Saints at home, in the winter and with the benefit of deplorable field conditions that compensate for their shortcomings. Needing every possible advantage to beat the Saints in overtime is hardly something to brag about.
Maybe we can cancel football games when weather gets a little chilly. God knows we don't want to make football anything other than a perfect condition ballet.Bronco Nagurski laughs at you :hot:

Both teams play on the same field, how can it be an advantage to 1 and a disadvantage to another. Learn how to play football and quit crying.
:lmao: at a Bears-fan-tough-guy. Haven't seen one of those before. :hot: All I'm saying is that the Bears had every conceivable advantage, even their crutch of "field conditions", and it still took overtime to beat the Saints. :shrug: Maybe you guys should build a team that can win with something besides just kick returns and pass interference and you won't need all of those other crutches to beat the poor, helpless, dome-team Saints with 15 players on IR. If you guys have to win a coin-flip to beat the pansy Saints at your house, what does it say about the big, bad tough-guy Bears???

 
Last edited by a moderator:
guderian said:
Sweetness_34 said:
It is cold and field conditions are what they should be in winter.
Maybe one year we can get the Bears away from the crutch of having to play the Saints at home, in the winter and with the benefit of deplorable field conditions that compensate for their shortcomings. Needing every possible advantage to beat the Saints in overtime is hardly something to brag about.
Maybe one year the Saints will only play dome teams and have pizza parties and extra recess every Friday.
Again, the big, tough Bears had to win a coin flip to beat the wussy Saints in their own house with their tough-guy field conditions. :ptts:At least we didn't have to listen to the "Reggie Bush Taunted Us :ptts: :cry: " this year.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
guderian said:
Sweetness_34 said:
It is cold and field conditions are what they should be in winter.
Maybe one year we can get the Bears away from the crutch of having to play the Saints at home, in the winter and with the benefit of deplorable field conditions that compensate for their shortcomings. Needing every possible advantage to beat the Saints in overtime is hardly something to brag about.
Maybe one year the Saints will only play dome teams and have pizza parties and extra recess every Friday.
Again, the big, tough Bears had to win a coin flip to beat the wussy Saints in their own house with their tough-guy field conditions. :ptts:At least we didn't have to listen to the "Reggie Bush Taunted Us :ptts: :cry: " this year.
Why do you keep whining?
 
guderian said:
Sweetness_34 said:
It is cold and field conditions are what they should be in winter.
Maybe one year we can get the Bears away from the crutch of having to play the Saints at home, in the winter and with the benefit of deplorable field conditions that compensate for their shortcomings. Needing every possible advantage to beat the Saints in overtime is hardly something to brag about.
Maybe one year the Saints will only play dome teams and have pizza parties and extra recess every Friday.
Again, the big, tough Bears had to win a coin flip to beat the wussy Saints in their own house with their tough-guy field conditions. :( At least we didn't have to listen to the "Reggie Bush Taunted Us ;) :cry: " this year.
Why do you keep whining?
:lmao: :wall: You tough-guy Bears fans are great.Why don't you pick on someone your own size...like the Packers of Vikings? The best you can do these days is talk smack to Saints fans after the game??? Have the Bears sunk that low???

 
Last edited by a moderator:
guderian said:
Sweetness_34 said:
It is cold and field conditions are what they should be in winter.
Maybe one year we can get the Bears away from the crutch of having to play the Saints at home, in the winter and with the benefit of deplorable field conditions that compensate for their shortcomings. Needing every possible advantage to beat the Saints in overtime is hardly something to brag about.
Maybe one year the Saints will only play dome teams and have pizza parties and extra recess every Friday.
Again, the big, tough Bears had to win a coin flip to beat the wussy Saints in their own house with their tough-guy field conditions. :goodposting: At least we didn't have to listen to the "Reggie Bush Taunted Us :hot: :hot: " this year.
Why do you keep whining?
:rant: :rant: You tough-guy Bears fans are great.Why don't you pick on someone your own size...like the Packers of Vikings? The best you can do these days is talk smack to Saints fans after the game??? Have the Bears sunk that low???
I'm not talking smack; I'm asking you to have some dignity. You won't see me whining when the Bears lose.
 
guderian said:
Sweetness_34 said:
It is cold and field conditions are what they should be in winter.
Maybe one year we can get the Bears away from the crutch of having to play the Saints at home, in the winter and with the benefit of deplorable field conditions that compensate for their shortcomings. Needing every possible advantage to beat the Saints in overtime is hardly something to brag about.
Maybe one year the Saints will only play dome teams and have pizza parties and extra recess every Friday.
Again, the big, tough Bears had to win a coin flip to beat the wussy Saints in their own house with their tough-guy field conditions. :thumbup: At least we didn't have to listen to the "Reggie Bush Taunted Us :ninja: :cry: " this year.
Why do you keep whining?
:coffee: :coffee: You tough-guy Bears fans are great.Why don't you pick on someone your own size...like the Packers of Vikings? The best you can do these days is talk smack to Saints fans after the game??? Have the Bears sunk that low???
I'm not talking smack; I'm asking you to have some dignity. You won't see me whining when the Bears lose.
"Maybe one year the Saints will only play dome teams and have pizza parties and extra recess every Friday." That's not smack? It's not good smack, but it's smack. It's just a shame. The Bears used to be so good and now they can't even talk smack with Packers or Vikings, so they have to start smack threads after the fact in a vain attempt to seek relevance in the football world. Pity the Bears.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The arguing in this thread proves the Saints fans do hate the Bears. Say whatever you want, but your recent track record vs us is 0-3. :P

 
Last edited by a moderator:
meanjoegreen said:
SeniorVBDStudent said:
While I don't give a flip about either team other than fantasy impact, I'd like to point out that the condition of the field turf at the Bears home field is an embarrassment. It's clear that the Bears manipulate turf condition to slow down factor backs and primary receivers and have been doing so for years. This is beyond any temporary turf issues seen in Pittsburg, Oakland or elsewhere around the league, and should be addressed by the competition committee.
It's pretty hypocritcal for a Patriots fan to be bashing another teams field, when Gillette Stadium has had major field problems of it's own in the past.
The turf issues at Gillette Stadium lasted for 4 games two years ago. Get real.
 
SeniorVBDStudent said:
While I don't give a flip about either team other than fantasy impact, I'd like to point out that the condition of the field turf at the Bears home field is an embarrassment. It's clear that the Bears manipulate turf condition to slow down factor backs and primary receivers and have been doing so for years. This is beyond any temporary turf issues seen in Pittsburg, Oakland or elsewhere around the league, and should be addressed by the competition committee.
Didn't seem to slow down Hester who consistently got behind the Saints DB's.
Hester runs the skinny post.That's it.

The fact that Saints DB's can't cover him is a Saints issue, not a turf issue.

 
guderian said:
Sweetness_34 said:
It is cold and field conditions are what they should be in winter.
Maybe one year we can get the Bears away from the crutch of having to play the Saints at home, in the winter and with the benefit of deplorable field conditions that compensate for their shortcomings. Needing every possible advantage to beat the Saints in overtime is hardly something to brag about.
Maybe one year the Saints will only play dome teams and have pizza parties and extra recess every Friday.
Again, the big, tough Bears had to win a coin flip to beat the wussy Saints in their own house with their tough-guy field conditions. :hophead: At least we didn't have to listen to the "Reggie Bush Taunted Us :bowtie: :cry: " this year.
Why do you keep whining?
:hophead: :hophead: You tough-guy Bears fans are great.Why don't you pick on someone your own size...like the Packers of Vikings? The best you can do these days is talk smack to Saints fans after the game??? Have the Bears sunk that low???
I'm not talking smack; I'm asking you to have some dignity. You won't see me whining when the Bears lose.
"Maybe one year the Saints will only play dome teams and have pizza parties and extra recess every Friday." That's not smack? It's not good smack, but it's smack. It's just a shame. The Bears used to be so good and now they can't even talk smack with Packers or Vikings, so they have to start smack threads after the fact in a vain attempt to seek relevance in the football world. Pity the Bears.
The Bears have owned the Packers under Lovie Smith. The 34-3 win by the packers this year was really the only time the Lovie Bears have been handed by the Packers. And even then, we owned them 37-3 just last year when they were playing for everything (home field etc) and we were already out of the playoffs.As for the Vikings, again, the Bears have done far better than the Vikings in the last 5 years. What have the VIkings done?

Which team out of the Bears, Packers and Vikings has been to a SB in the last 5 years? Bears

Which team out of the Bears, Packers and Vikings has had a 4-12 record recently? Packers

Which team has swept the other? Bears swept Packers twice now under Lovie

So I am not sure what your point is?

 
Sonny Lubick Blow Up Doll said:
Speaking of memories, this Bears team reminds me a lot of that overrated one a few years back. Only they suck more.
Overrated doesn't win NFC Championships.
Not anymore, congrats. And lol at you hanging onto that. Do you also celebrate Cubs' regular seasons?
If you are a Saints fan what do you hang your hat onto? The fact that your over-rated QB can score at home but fold like a ###### on the road? They said it on NFL Network last night. Do not even think about mentioning Brees in the MVP talk. He cannot play on the road. 1-6 this year, ~70 QB rating, more ints than TDs. Stick to playing in the dome because being a finesse team, the Aints have no shot at anything other than some Sportscenter highlights.
 
The arguing in this thread proves the Saints fans do hate the Bears. Say whatever you want, but your recent track record vs us is 0-3. :hophead:
And every year, the Bears end their season. If that is not ownage, not sure what else is. Funny thing is, last year the Saints had everything to play for and the Bears had nothing on the last weekend, and the Bears still found a way to beat them.
 
Sonny Lubick Blow Up Doll said:
Speaking of memories, this Bears team reminds me a lot of that overrated one a few years back. Only they suck more.
Overrated doesn't win NFC Championships.
Not anymore, congrats. And lol at you hanging onto that. Do you also celebrate Cubs' regular seasons?
If you are a Saints fan what do you hang your hat onto? The fact that your over-rated QB can score at home but fold like a ###### on the road? They said it on NFL Network last night. Do not even think about mentioning Brees in the MVP talk. He cannot play on the road. 1-6 this year, ~70 QB rating, more ints than TDs. Stick to playing in the dome because being a finesse team, the Aints have no shot at anything other than some Sportscenter highlights.
I'm not a Saints fan...So you were saying?
 
Sonny Lubick Blow Up Doll said:
Speaking of memories, this Bears team reminds me a lot of that overrated one a few years back. Only they suck more.
Overrated doesn't win NFC Championships.
Not anymore, congrats. And lol at you hanging onto that. Do you also celebrate Cubs' regular seasons?
You really are bitter...I look at the present, and we still are presently kicking your ###. :yawn: You're the one who brought up the previous NFC Champions being "overrated".
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sonny Lubick Blow Up Doll said:
Speaking of memories, this Bears team reminds me a lot of that overrated one a few years back. Only they suck more.
Overrated doesn't win NFC Championships.
Not anymore, congrats. And lol at you hanging onto that. Do you also celebrate Cubs' regular seasons?
You really are bitter...I look at the present, and we still are presently kicking your ###. :goodposting: You're the one who brought up the previous NFC Champions being "overrated".
Again, I AM NOT A SAINTS FAN.I bring up the overrated Bears because this team reminds me of them.
 
Sonny Lubick Blow Up Doll said:
Speaking of memories, this Bears team reminds me a lot of that overrated one a few years back. Only they suck more.
Overrated doesn't win NFC Championships.
Not anymore, congrats. And lol at you hanging onto that. Do you also celebrate Cubs' regular seasons?
You really are bitter...I look at the present, and we still are presently kicking your ###. :confused: You're the one who brought up the previous NFC Champions being "overrated".
Again, I AM NOT A SAINTS FAN.I bring up the overrated Bears because this team reminds me of them.
But I question, how a team can be "Overrated" if they were the best team in the NFC that year. They were in the Super Bowl... It's not like people say they are one of the all time great teams or anything...EDIT: So you're not a Saints fan, just a Bears hater. :rolleyes: Much better for your case.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sonny Lubick Blow Up Doll said:
Speaking of memories, this Bears team reminds me a lot of that overrated one a few years back. Only they suck more.
Overrated doesn't win NFC Championships.
Not anymore, congrats. And lol at you hanging onto that. Do you also celebrate Cubs' regular seasons?
You really are bitter...I look at the present, and we still are presently kicking your ###. :) You're the one who brought up the previous NFC Champions being "overrated".
Again, I AM NOT A SAINTS FAN.I bring up the overrated Bears because this team reminds me of them.
But I question, how a team can be "Overrated" if they were the best team in the NFC that year. They were in the Super Bowl... It's not like people say they are one of the all time great teams or anything...EDIT: So you're not a Saints fan, just a Bears hater. :) Much better for your case.
Nope, don't mind the Bears really. Don't even care enough to prove my point...people know. They remember how overrated they were -- one of those dream seasons where everything went right. Good for them, but luckily for football, Indy exposed them. :confused: They were who Denny Green thought they were... :thumbup:
 
8-6 teams don't need pity...they 'aint great, but they have exceeded my expectations.
Yeah, I just think it's laughable that anybody other than maybe Giants fans are talking smack at all about anything. Defending champs, crushing in 2008, etc. Titans fans possibly too, although I think most Giants fans are afraid of jinxing anything....and the same goes for Titans fans as well. Any given Sunday, it can all be over.Bears fans....Vikings fans :thumbup: ....Packers fans.....doesn't matter. All of their seasons are ending in a loss...unless they've been eliminated from contention after Week 16 and the win one for the Gipper to end the regular season. A whole lot of noise....much ado about nothing. :confused:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sweetness_34 said:
Sonny Lubick Blow Up Doll said:
Speaking of memories, this Bears team reminds me a lot of that overrated one a few years back. Only they suck more.
Overrated doesn't win NFC Championships.
Not anymore, congrats. And lol at you hanging onto that. Do you also celebrate Cubs' regular seasons?
If you are a Saints fan what do you hang your hat onto? The fact that your over-rated QB can score at home but fold like a ###### on the road? They said it on NFL Network last night. Do not even think about mentioning Brees in the MVP talk. He cannot play on the road. 1-6 this year, ~70 QB rating, more ints than TDs. Stick to playing in the dome because being a finesse team, the Aints have no shot at anything other than some Sportscenter highlights.
In the last two years, Brees actually had a better record on the road than at home, I think. This year's something of an abberation in that regard. He's challenged Marino's record with his top 3 weapons in and out of the lineup and kept a team with a horrid D afloat all season long. Lance Moore is his only real reliable "go-to" guy these days. Overrated? Watch more football.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top