What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Saints Homers (1 Viewer)

nxmehta

Footballguy
I watched the Indy game last week and was very surprised at how NO's offense was shut down. I didn't watch much of this week's game, but again it looks like the Saints got hosed. What's going on in NO homers? Where do you point the finger to explain the struggles of the first two weeks?

:confused:

 
Not a homer but from what I've seen the offensive line has been atrocious. There's not much of a running game so it's all on Brees. The defense isn't doing them any favors either.

 
They were overrated. They'll bounce back but all the Super Bowl predictions by "experts" kind of shuked me. I think they have some issues on D and right now their offense isn't clicking. The offense will straighten itself out but teams are ready to play them this year. I think they need to get the rock to Bush more because he creates match-up problems.

 
2 years ago the Indy offense got off to a very very slow start.

They are just not in sync. I don't expect this to go on. They are too talented not to bust out and get into their rhythm sooner rather than later.

 
Offensive line looks out of sync. I think that's mostly it.

A few drops by the receivers here and there, and a few overthrows by Brees here and there.

But mostly the line.

Not panicking... as a Saints fan, you come know that win or lose, it's never pretty.

We'll get some ugly wins soon enough.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The coaching/gameplan/adjustments have been horrible. This rests all on the shoulders of the Saints coaching staff and those with personnel input.

There was a lot of talk this offseason about how much their defense had been improved, but I wasn't buying the smoke and mirrors show. Introducing Simmons/Harper/David to the defense was actually a step backward. That's why I include the personnel people. They made the decision to go with Meachem in the first round instead of an impact defensive player like Posluszny or Weddle.

The entire Saints organization is getting a 210 volt Jolt of "you're not as good as you thought you were", and they better recognize that the rest of the league isn't just going to lay down and die simply because the Saints offense has a lot of good players.

 
I watched the Indy game last week and was very surprised at how NO's offense was shut down. I didn't watch much of this week's game, but again it looks like the Saints got hosed. What's going on in NO homers? Where do you point the finger to explain the struggles of the first two weeks? :shrug:
not a Saints homer, but its looking more and more like they simply overachieved last season. Bush looks like Eric Metcalf v2.0..they look out of sync..but in the end, its probably more a matter of opposing teams have caught up to their gameplan(s)..they simply snuck up on teams last season. Now, opposing defenses have studied the Saints offense during the off-season, and they're finding ways of stopping them.expect a 7-9 ,6-10 season from N.O. remember, they won what, 2 games in 2005? they most defnitely overachieved last season...now they're going to come back down to earth a bit.and, teams are learning that you can slap the ball down against a short QB like Drew Brees.
 
Brees hasn't been accurate. The o-line has been bad. The WRs are dropping passes- especially Henderson (who has been dropping passes since his LSU days). The running game hasn't gotten going b/c a)they are getting behind early, and b) Reggie keeps running backwards. The DBs are not good enough for a man coverage scheme.

I've been a big Saints fan since birth... they overachieved last season. There really isn't much talent at WR, OL, TE, or anywhere on defense. Oh, Olindo Mare sucks, too.

 
What I don't get is if Reggie is struggling, why are him and McAllister still splitting touches almost 50/50?

Why not lean on Deuce a little heavier the next few weeks, and work Reggie back into situations gradually until he starts to perform a little better.

I'd like to see what McAllister could do with close to a full workload...last time he was handling it, he was easily a in the top third of NFL RBs in terms of production.

 
What I don't get is if Reggie is struggling, why are him and McAllister still splitting touches almost 50/50?Why not lean on Deuce a little heavier the next few weeks, and work Reggie back into situations gradually until he starts to perform a little better. I'd like to see what McAllister could do with close to a full workload...last time he was handling it, he was easily a in the top third of NFL RBs in terms of production.
Deuce fumbled a few times today, and was a little limited after being poked in the eye. But yes, Deuce is a better RB than Bush. And it isn't close.
 
What I don't get is if Reggie is struggling, why are him and McAllister still splitting touches almost 50/50?Why not lean on Deuce a little heavier the next few weeks, and work Reggie back into situations gradually until he starts to perform a little better. I'd like to see what McAllister could do with close to a full workload...last time he was handling it, he was easily a in the top third of NFL RBs in terms of production.
Deuce fumbled a few times today, and was a little limited after being poked in the eye. But yes, Deuce is a better RB than Bush. And it isn't close.
Yeah, Deuce didn't exactly set the world on fire today, but when they put him in, he moved the ball. A lot of running is getting in a rhythm...if they gave him three...four series in a row, I wonder how'd do. And it's not like you couldn't use Reggie's home-run play ability in collaboration with it...but McAllister as the 20-25 carries a game RB and Reggie as the all-purpose offensive player (receiver, change-of-pace back, returner) would seem the most obvious thing for this team.
 
It is a conglomeration of things. First of all, I would agree with the OL being especially out of sync so far this year. They are getting no run push and are allowing a lot of pressure on passing plays, seemingly with little blitzing from the oppostion. I posted in the Shark Pool when discussing OLs that I didn't think the Saints OL was all that strong

Also, Payton doesn't seem to be as creative as he was last year on offense. Last year, he would often have Deuce deep in the I-formation, and have Bush all over the formation. This created mismatches all over the place and Brees was an excellent instrument to pick apart the defenses. He has a decent arm, but his strength is reading things quickly and getting the ball to the right place. It seems to me at least through the first few games is that he is trying to make Bush that standard HB, giving him the ball in standard formations.

On defense, I think they are the same as they were last year. The personnel added to the team at CB were not upgrades. Because of the lack of talent at LB, they bring the safeties up a lot to help the LBs, making them vulnerable to the big play. That is what happened today and what happened last year.

Passing on LB Poluzny in favor of WR Meachem is not looking to be a wise draft decision at this time.

 
Henderson should not be in that starting lineup. David Patten and even moreso Lance Moore have looked far more dependable in these 2 games. That's just for starters.

 
They cannot adjust to the cover 2...dating back to the playoffs theyve gotten smashed by three teams playing cover 2 schemes (Chicago, Indy, Tampa) other teams have a blueprint of how to shut down the Saints "explosive" offense

 
They cannot adjust to the cover 2...dating back to the playoffs theyve gotten smashed by three teams playing cover 2 schemes (Chicago, Indy, Tampa) other teams have a blueprint of how to shut down the Saints "explosive" offense
They played just fine against the cover two last year, including two wins over Tampa. The last three games, the offense hasn't played well. Pinning it all on the cover two, however, might be a bit premature.The offensive line has been offensive. The WRs haven't caught the ball and Brees has been off. Not sure what the issue is, but the defense was supposed to be the weak part of this team. The offense is the real letdown so far.
 
It is a conglomeration of things. First of all, I would agree with the OL being especially out of sync so far this year. They are getting no run push and are allowing a lot of pressure on passing plays, seemingly with little blitzing from the oppostion. I posted in the Shark Pool when discussing OLs that I didn't think the Saints OL was all that strong

Also, Payton doesn't seem to be as creative as he was last year on offense. Last year, he would often have Deuce deep in the I-formation, and have Bush all over the formation. This created mismatches all over the place and Brees was an excellent instrument to pick apart the defenses. He has a decent arm, but his strength is reading things quickly and getting the ball to the right place. It seems to me at least through the first few games is that he is trying to make Bush that standard HB, giving him the ball in standard formations.

On defense, I think they are the same as they were last year. The personnel added to the team at CB were not upgrades. Because of the lack of talent at LB, they bring the safeties up a lot to help the LBs, making them vulnerable to the big play. That is what happened today and what happened last year.

Passing on LB Poluzny in favor of WR Meachem is not looking to be a wise draft decision at this time.
Maybe the league just catches onto what he does and he's not capable of adjusting beyond that.In two stops in the NFL (Dallas, and NYG) he was a "boy genius" who later had his play-calling responsibilities pulled.

 
I watched the Indy game last week and was very surprised at how NO's offense was shut down. I didn't watch much of this week's game, but again it looks like the Saints got hosed. What's going on in NO homers? Where do you point the finger to explain the struggles of the first two weeks? :popcorn:
not a Saints homer, but its looking more and more like they simply overachieved last season. Bush looks like Eric Metcalf v2.0..they look out of sync..but in the end, its probably more a matter of opposing teams have caught up to their gameplan(s)..they simply snuck up on teams last season. Now, opposing defenses have studied the Saints offense during the off-season, and they're finding ways of stopping them.expect a 7-9 ,6-10 season from N.O. remember, they won what, 2 games in 2005? they most defnitely overachieved last season...now they're going to come back down to earth a bit.and, teams are learning that you can slap the ball down against a short QB like Drew Brees.
:rolleyes: One of the best post so far this season, I am also a little concerned about the way Brees is throwing the ball. somthing seems off, I hope his shoulder is holding up.
 
MEA-CHEM! MEA-CHEM! MEA-CHEM! MEA-CHEM!

MEA-CHEM! MEA-CHEM! MEA-CHEM! MEA-CHEM!

MEA-CHEM! MEA-CHEM! MEA-CHEM! MEA-CHEM!

MEA-CHEM! MEA-CHEM! MEA-CHEM! MEA-CHEM!

 
Saints-Man said:
Passing on LB Poluzny in favor of WR Meachem is not looking to be a wise draft decision at this time.
Um, it was a dumb idea at the time too. Fat girls don't need more ice cream.
 
Saints-Man said:
Passing on LB Poluzny in favor of WR Meachem is not looking to be a wise draft decision at this time.
Um, it was a dumb idea at the time too. Fat girls don't need more ice cream.
Probably their bad decision was not to get Meachem up and running ASAP once healthy, inserting him into the lineup as they did Colston last year, and quit screwing around with failures like D Henderson and pedestrian talents like L Moore and Patten. I think Meachem was the 2nd most talented WR in this draft and they s/b getting him in there rather than making him inactive each week. And yes, I know how the preseason went. He's a gamer. Get him in there!Fat girls likey ice creamy.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It really appears they are trying to get too cute for their own good. Play your studs as most suggest, and get Deuce the ball (avg 4.9 ypc week 2). Quit trying to trick everyone and see if you can beat it down someones throat. Last year they started out sporadically using Bush this year they are trying to ram finesse down everyones throat; doesn't seem quite right...

 
saintsfan said:
DarabZarrabi said:
They cannot adjust to the cover 2...dating back to the playoffs theyve gotten smashed by three teams playing cover 2 schemes (Chicago, Indy, Tampa) other teams have a blueprint of how to shut down the Saints "explosive" offense
They played just fine against the cover two last year, including two wins over Tampa. The last three games, the offense hasn't played well. Pinning it all on the cover two, however, might be a bit premature.The offensive line has been offensive. The WRs haven't caught the ball and Brees has been off. Not sure what the issue is, but the defense was supposed to be the weak part of this team. The offense is the real letdown so far.
I have to agree. The D-line was solid against Cadillac. They just aren't getting to the QB. No sacks yet. You can disguise a weak secondary by having a tremendous pass rush. They aren't getting turnovers either. Everyone agrees the O-line is out of sorts. Brees is struggling. It's easy to say that they should run Deuce more but when you fall behind 21-0, a power running game is out of the question. The WR's have been MIA too. 3 drops last game - 1 for a TD - by Henderson! I have to think they miss the leadership of Joe Horn more than they let on. He was a gamer. He would have put it on his shoulders with the offense, if necessary.
 
What is the thinking now that there have been two straight dissappointing games? I was considering a trade for Bush before this week, but now I don't know.

 
Offensive line looks out of sync. I think that's mostly it.A few drops by the receivers here and there, and a few overthrows by Brees here and there.But mostly the line.Not panicking... as a Saints fan, you come know that win or lose, it's never pretty.We'll get some ugly wins soon enough.
Homer here and the above are my thoughts exactly. The line, which was arguably the biggest reason for the Saints' offensive success last year, has been terrible. And yes, it's never pretty with the Saints. We'll probably get trounced on Monday, have the bye, and be completely forgotten until we upset Carolina in week 5. That would be a classic Saints right there.ETA: the playcalling has been way too cute, as well. There has been talk that they will simplify things on Monday.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Gr00vus said:
Until the offensive line starts playing o.k., keeps pressure off Brees and keeps the passing lanes clear Brees will not be effective and the whole offense will suffer. Brees can not handle pressure.
This is somewhat incorrect. Brees is far from a mobile quarterback but he made quite a few plays last season because of his pocket presence. Something that he does not seem to have this year.The o-line is not protecting as well as they have done in the past, but they've been good enough to give Brees the opportunity to make plays, which he has not done.
 
I have been saying that Bush is overrated for months now...

he averaged 3.6 ypc last year...He is a below average RB

he is overrated due to the fact that he lines up at WR and adds to his yardage through that...

a below average RB/below average WR = below average player

 
If you look at stats and ignore the scoreboard...the Saints owned the Panthers yesterday nearly all game. Just a couple of key plays turned on them, BUT they had two weeks to prepare and they were at home. No excuse.

 
can anyone explain to me whats going on down in New Orleans?I havent watched a game, but where did the offense go, apparently anyone can stop them.
:lmao: It's a mystery because it isn't one phase that keeps breaking down. They put together a 90-something yard drive and then the kicker basically kicks the ball into Julius Peppers' head and they come away with zero points. They had a TD called back because an O-lineman lined up too far off the line. Brees hits Henderson on a deep pass and it bounces off of his hands and right into the defensive back's hands. This year 10 guys will do things right, one guy will do something wrong and when it goes wrong it goes very wrong and ends up in a turnover, sack, lost first down, etc. Line play (on both sides of the ball) is clearly a problem, but the strange part is that they have the same personnel. I keep hearing "opposing teams had an offseason to study film and have 'figured them out'". I think that's a BS excuse because they weren't doing anything that novel or creative last year that defensive coordinators hadn't seen before.
 
benson_will_lead_the_way said:
can anyone explain to me whats going on down in New Orleans?I havent watched a game, but where did the offense go, apparently anyone can stop them.
Yes Sean Peyton thought going into this year that he was the greatest coach in the history of the NFL. He's very Smug. And he thinks he can dial up anything. He reminds me very much of the OBC when he was at Washington. Also looks like that Ric Metcalf/Dave Megget 2 pick overall is. Just that. Metcalf/Megget. Should of traded down and locked up Aj Hawk. Atleast at this pace they'll lock up Glen Dorsey and maybe take there 6 yard avg down to 4.5Also there 2007 draft was terrible. Meachum sucks, I dont think he's been dressed yet. There 2nd pick Osama Young was 21 ranked CB and they take him in the 2nd rd. They trade up to get A. Pittman, he gets cut and they cut there 5th rd draft pick. Good scouting guys :popcorn:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I have been saying that Bush is overrated for months now...he averaged 3.6 ypc last year...He is a below average RBhe is overrated due to the fact that he lines up at WR and adds to his yardage through that...a below average RB/below average WR = below average player
If you watched the game you would have seen Bush make something out of nothing on almost every play. The blocking was ridiculously bad. I'm not sure what's going on with the OL as I don't follow the Saints, but it SUCKS this year, and that has a lot to do with the offensive woes. Bush was the best offensive player on the field for the Saints yesterday, rushing and receiving. Colston, Johnson, Copper, Moore all had a case of the dropsys. Stecker looked pretty decent on a couple plays, but went down easily on others, just inconsistent - but he has potential. That Pierre guy looked, well - bad.
 
at least there's a ray of hope for Saints fans...Devery is no longer our default WR2. there may have been a lot of miscues yesterday, but his drop that led to the INT is at the top for me. the dude just can't catch, which is unfortunate since he's an NFL wide receiver. I'm willing to bet that Lance Moore takes the WR2 job from now on and doesn't give it up.

from Rotoworld: Saints coach Sean Payton said Monday that the team will use a rotation at the receiver position opposite Marques Colston moving forward.Devery Henderson had a big drop in Sunday's loss and may have lost his starting job to Lance Moore. David Patten, Terrance Copper, and eventually first-round pick Robert Meachem could also be a part of the committee.
 
at least there's a ray of hope for Saints fans...Devery is no longer our default WR2. there may have been a lot of miscues yesterday, but his drop that led to the INT is at the top for me. the dude just can't catch, which is unfortunate since he's an NFL wide receiver. I'm willing to bet that Lance Moore takes the WR2 job from now on and doesn't give it up.

from Rotoworld: Saints coach Sean Payton said Monday that the team will use a rotation at the receiver position opposite Marques Colston moving forward.Devery Henderson had a big drop in Sunday's loss and may have lost his starting job to Lance Moore. David Patten, Terrance Copper, and eventually first-round pick Robert Meachem could also be a part of the committee.
:mellow:It's about time. Given he's a pending FA and not going to be back, this team is 0-5 and going nowhere fast, no reason not to look at other options. I like Lance Moore quite a bit myself. Solid route runner and GOOD HANDS!!Said a couple weeks ago, look for Henderson to be an inactive sooner rather than later. The guy simply can't consistently catch the ball. After Stallworth's issues early in his career, why go through this again?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
As much as I hated the Meacham pick, I've got to think he's better than what the Saints are putting on the field opposite Colston right now. Why the hell isn't he in there?

 
I really wonder what it is about Moore that is holding the coaches back from making him a starter. Is he a bad blocker? Does he not know the offense?

 
I really wonder what it is about Moore that is holding the coaches back from making him a starter. Is he a bad blocker? Does he not know the offense?
he is a possession receiver - period . . . the problem is that the Saints main speed guy (Henderson) has terrible hands . . .you start Moore?? fine, then you are dink and dunk city . . .
 
As much as I hated the Meacham pick, I've got to think he's better than what the Saints are putting on the field opposite Colston right now. Why the hell isn't he in there?
Meachem is the guy that doesnt know the offense - he got behind in training camp - and is probably 6th on the depth chart . . .
 
It's a mystery because it isn't one phase that keeps breaking down.
What mystery?They're the Saints, they're destined to suck. That's the way it always has been, and the way it always will be, no matter how much talent or coaching.There's no mystery here, they're just plain old cursed.
 
Also looks like that Ric Metcalf/Dave Megget 2 pick overall is. Just that. Metcalf/Megget. Should of traded down and locked up Aj Hawk. Atleast at this pace they'll lock up Glen Dorsey and maybe take there 6 yard avg down to 4.5Also there 2007 draft was terrible. Meachum sucks, I dont think he's been dressed yet. There 2nd pick Osama Young was 21 ranked CB and they take him in the 2nd rd. They trade up to get A. Pittman, he gets cut and they cut there 5th rd draft pick. Good scouting guys :unsure:
Do you remember Brian Westbrook when he entered the league. Not until last year which was his 6th year in the league did he become a good looking/between the tackles RB. Reggie is still a role player and needs a little more maturity. As you said, Meachem hasn't even dressed yet, so how in the world can he suck? How many 1st round receivers come into the league dominating? Your really jumping the gun here.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top