What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Seahawks discussing contract with V Jackson (1 Viewer)

Can anyone name a single player that sat out 10 or more games in a season as a holdout and ever had an impact in the NFl again?
Well, it's a pretty limited pool to pick from, not that many players have held out that long. I'm not sure the followup part means much as every situation is different.But off the top of my head, Bo Jackson and Joey Galloway both had long-term holdouts and were successful after.
 
I've always liked VJax - he's smart and hard worker despite his dumb mistakes off the field w/re to alcohol - but I don't think the drop off will be that great. As Maurile mentioned, VJax is an outstanding run blocker, which is probably the skill that will be missed most as Floyd is below average in that department. I like Mathews' ability to break through the 2nd level and think that VJax's blocking would have been far more valuable this season as opposed to the last two when LT never got to the secondary.
Really? I have always thought Floyd was an above average run blocker. The only source I know of that addresses this is ProFootballFocus, which ranked Floyd as the 10th best run blocking WR in the league last year, despite the fact that he played only 571 snaps due to not starting until the 8th game (it is a cumulative rating). VJax was tied for 7th in their ranking. Here are the top 10 (zero is the average grade):Muhammad 6.7

Ward 4.1

Sam Aiken 3.7

Cribbs 3.4

Schilens 3.0

Kelley Washington 2.7

VJax 2.4

Meachem 2.4

Crayton 2.1

Floyd 2.0

I was under the impression that run blocking is one reason Floyd became the starter last season.

Now, they will obviously still miss VJax's blocking, regardless, since it would have been VJax and Floyd starting and now it will be Floyd and Naanee.

 
But I really don't want AJ to give him a long term extension. Rivers makes VJax, not the other way around. The offense is built around Rivers identifying and throwing to the best matchup on any particular play, as opposed to the Chargers game planning to get VJax the ball and going from there. As much as he doesn't deserve a huge deal either, I'd much rather AJ blow his wad on McNeil.
While I agree with your general sentiment here, the fact that VJax had the second most targets on the team to Gates pretty much shows that Rivers found that he very often had the best matchup, which is a credit to VJax. In fact, by your statement here, I don't think that is "Rivers making VJax"... that is VJax playing well enough to get the ball in position to make a lot of big plays. I think Rivers will do fine without him, but they would obviously be much better off with him from a competitive standpoint (ignoring off field issues, salary cap, etc.).
 
Can anyone name a single player that sat out 10 or more games in a season as a holdout and ever had an impact in the NFl again?
Depends on how you define "impact". Galloway was the first to pop into my mind.
I guess he qualifies. Although he didn't have a season over 1000 yards receiving until 7 years after his holdout. The sample size is admittedly small, but it seems to me that guys just don't come back ready to play for quite some time when they sit out.
 
The sample size is admittedly small, but it seems to me that guys just don't come back ready to play for quite some time when they sit out.
Keenan McCardell sat out 9 games and made an immediate impact when traded to the chargersthen next year (2005) the Charger's top receivers were:Gates: 1101McCardell: 917
 
(KFFL) The San Diego Chargers have received interested from at least three teams about acquiring restricted free-agent WR Vincent Jackson, but the team has allowed only the Seattle Seahawks to negotiate with Jackson, according to Kevin Acee, of the San Diego Union-Tribune.

 
I've always liked VJax - he's smart and hard worker despite his dumb mistakes off the field w/re to alcohol - but I don't think the drop off will be that great. As Maurile mentioned, VJax is an outstanding run blocker, which is probably the skill that will be missed most as Floyd is below average in that department. I like Mathews' ability to break through the 2nd level and think that VJax's blocking would have been far more valuable this season as opposed to the last two when LT never got to the secondary.
Really? I have always thought Floyd was an above average run blocker. The only source I know of that addresses this is ProFootballFocus, which ranked Floyd as the 10th best run blocking WR in the league last year, despite the fact that he played only 571 snaps due to not starting until the 8th game (it is a cumulative rating). VJax was tied for 7th in their ranking. Here are the top 10 (zero is the average grade):Muhammad 6.7

Ward 4.1

Sam Aiken 3.7

Cribbs 3.4

Schilens 3.0

Kelley Washington 2.7

VJax 2.4

Meachem 2.4

Crayton 2.1

Floyd 2.0

I was under the impression that run blocking is one reason Floyd became the starter last season.

Now, they will obviously still miss VJax's blocking, regardless, since it would have been VJax and Floyd starting and now it will be Floyd and Naanee.
:X I didn't realize Floyd graded out so well as a blocker. I wouldn't have guessed it from watching him and knowing his physical attributes (great hands, long strider, yet skinny and not great lateral movement). One think Floyd does seem to have is hustle and heart, which goes a long way w/re to blocking and likely is the reason Floyd grades well.Thanks for pointing this out - I feel even better about VJax moving on and am happy to be corrected. :thumbup:

 
(KFFL) The San Diego Chargers have received interested from at least three teams about acquiring restricted free-agent WR Vincent Jackson, but the team has allowed only the Seattle Seahawks to negotiate with Jackson, according to Kevin Acee, of the San Diego Union-Tribune.
This is what is confusing to me. Common sense says that if the Chargers have made up their mind to move on, wouldn't they let everyone (except maybe divisional opponents) try to sign him?
 
The sample size is admittedly small, but it seems to me that guys just don't come back ready to play for quite some time when they sit out.
Keenan McCardell sat out 9 games and made an immediate impact when traded to the chargersthen next year (2005) the Charger's top receivers were:Gates: 1101McCardell: 917
In 7 games in 2004, McCardell had 393 yards receiving. That's 56 yards a game. That doesn't excite me a whole lot. He had 917 the next year which isn't terrible, but again, not really outstanding. In fact, that's right about the mark that T.J. Houshmandzadeh hit last year. I don't think anyone wants to pay $10M per year to a WR for that kind of production.
 
(KFFL) The San Diego Chargers have received interested from at least three teams about acquiring restricted free-agent WR Vincent Jackson, but the team has allowed only the Seattle Seahawks to negotiate with Jackson, according to Kevin Acee, of the San Diego Union-Tribune.
This is what is confusing to me. Common sense says that if the Chargers have made up their mind to move on, wouldn't they let everyone (except maybe divisional opponents) try to sign him?
Not sure, but maybe it's because they've discussed trade compensation with the teams before they allow them to talk to VJax about a contract? If they aren't close on trade compensation, then there's no reason to allow them to speak with him I guess.
 
-- Chargers Place Jackson & McNeill on Roster Exempt List --Sat Aug 21, 2010 --from FFMastermind.comThe North County Times reports unsigned holdouts WR Vincent Jackson and OT Marcus McNeill were officially placed on the roster exempt list Friday night by the San Diego Chargers, both players received letters last week notifying them of the action, which invokes a three-game suspension to be served after the player signs. If Jackson is traded, he would still serve the suspension with his new team.
I think this really dampens any hopes of V-Jax getting traded.
 
-- Chargers Place Jackson & McNeill on Roster Exempt List --Sat Aug 21, 2010 --from FFMastermind.comThe North County Times reports unsigned holdouts WR Vincent Jackson and OT Marcus McNeill were officially placed on the roster exempt list Friday night by the San Diego Chargers, both players received letters last week notifying them of the action, which invokes a three-game suspension to be served after the player signs. If Jackson is traded, he would still serve the suspension with his new team.
I think this really dampens any hopes of V-Jax getting traded.
I'm pretty sure that the suspension can be served concurrently with his league suspension. As long as he signs before game 1, he only has to serve the 3 games total, which teams already know about.
 
-- Chargers Place Jackson & McNeill on Roster Exempt List --Sat Aug 21, 2010 --from FFMastermind.comThe North County Times reports unsigned holdouts WR Vincent Jackson and OT Marcus McNeill were officially placed on the roster exempt list Friday night by the San Diego Chargers, both players received letters last week notifying them of the action, which invokes a three-game suspension to be served after the player signs. If Jackson is traded, he would still serve the suspension with his new team.
I think this really dampens any hopes of V-Jax getting traded.
The SD Chargers Blog (Bolthype) Twitter accountWord on the street: #Chargers assistant GM Randy Mueller is in Seattle now to scout players for a potential Vincent Jackson trade about 10 hours ago via Seesmic for BlackBerry This was posted last nigiht
 
(KFFL) The San Diego Chargers have received interested from at least three teams about acquiring restricted free-agent WR Vincent Jackson, but the team has allowed only the Seattle Seahawks to negotiate with Jackson, according to Kevin Acee, of the San Diego Union-Tribune.
This is what is confusing to me. Common sense says that if the Chargers have made up their mind to move on, wouldn't they let everyone (except maybe divisional opponents) try to sign him?
Not sure, but maybe it's because they've discussed trade compensation with the teams before they allow them to talk to VJax about a contract? If they aren't close on trade compensation, then there's no reason to allow them to speak with him I guess.
Or maybe the other teams are teams that the Chargers would prefer to see without VJax.
 
-- Chargers Place Jackson & McNeill on Roster Exempt List --Sat Aug 21, 2010 --from FFMastermind.comThe North County Times reports unsigned holdouts WR Vincent Jackson and OT Marcus McNeill were officially placed on the roster exempt list Friday night by the San Diego Chargers, both players received letters last week notifying them of the action, which invokes a three-game suspension to be served after the player signs. If Jackson is traded, he would still serve the suspension with his new team.
I think this really dampens any hopes of V-Jax getting traded.
The SD Chargers Blog (Bolthype) Twitter accountWord on the street: #Chargers assistant GM Randy Mueller is in Seattle now to scout players for a potential Vincent Jackson trade about 10 hours ago via Seesmic for BlackBerry This was posted last nigiht
Interesting...
 
Who's the last guy to sit out a whole season? Sean Gilbert? I can't imagine either Jackson or Revis not playing at all this year. These guys are football players and football players play football. It's not like they have an infinite amount of time to play the game. Once the season starts both sides always soften a bit. The player feels like he's missing the thrill, the team feels they're better with him. The question is how effective will Jackson be after missing so much time and coming back to a team that has learned to play without him? I say he's back around week 7 and is a tad less than what he usually is fantasy-wise. Maybe a nice shot in the arm for a team who needs to upgrade at WR3 down the stretch.
Gilbert did get the deal he wanted after sitting out, however. I know players only have a finite amount of time to play, but I imagine Jackson also thinks that any play could be his last in the NFL and wants to be well-compensated before that happens. I don't see him coming back to play with San Diego unless he absolutely feels he needs the service time, and if he does come back, it will be for the bare minimum of games.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top