What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Seattle signs Billy McMullen (1 Viewer)

He hasn't ever been on the Eagle's active roster, and he hasn't been with them for 3 years. I think he's gotten most of his active time w/ the Vikings? Meh, I never thought he was anything special.

 
Wasn't he with the Skins in the preseason?

He is terrible.
Yes. He actually had a very good preseason and surprised people by NOT making the roster as the anticipated 6th WR (they only kept 5). And Zorn's system = Holmgren's system.
This is why he was signed IMO. I expect Seneca Wallace to either start or get a ton of reps at WR this weekend. He is now by far the most explosive weapon we have and probably knows the offense more than anyone.
 
Wasn't he with the Skins in the preseason?He is terrible.
Yes. He actually had a very good preseason and surprised people by NOT making the roster as the anticipated 6th WR (they only kept 5). And Zorn's system = Holmgren's system.
Ditto! After he didn't make the final roster, most people were wondering what a person had to do to make it, he was very pleasant surprise during the pre-season.
 
McMullen was a STUD at UVA and should of made the Redskins roster. Only reason he didn't is because they had to have room for the two Rooks. I bet after a game or two, Seahawk fans will start falling for him...

 
McMullen was a STUD at UVA and should of made the Redskins roster. Only reason he didn't is because they had to have room for the two Rooks. I bet after a game or two, Seahawk fans will start falling for him...
This will make 3 teams that he will suck for. 40 receptions in 5 years. Hmmm, somehow I don't think anyone will be falling for this guy
 
McMullen was a STUD at UVA and should of made the Redskins roster. Only reason he didn't is because they had to have room for the two Rooks. I bet after a game or two, Seahawk fans will start falling for him...
This is good news.
It's also probably an overstatement, but he can be a competent possession WR in the WCO and may be able to contribute in deep FF leagues as a bye week/injury fill-in.
 
McMullen was a STUD at UVA and should of made the Redskins roster. Only reason he didn't is because they had to have room for the two Rooks. I bet after a game or two, Seahawk fans will start falling for him...
This is good news.
It's also probably an overstatement, but he can be a competent possession WR in the WCO and may be able to contribute in deep FF leagues as a bye week/injury fill-in.
Anyone that starts Billy McMullen on their fantasy teams, bye week filler or not, should be immeadiatley removed from the league, or at the very least penalized for tanking.
 
McMullen was a STUD at UVA and should of made the Redskins roster. Only reason he didn't is because they had to have room for the two Rooks. I bet after a game or two, Seahawk fans will start falling for him...
This is good news.
It's also probably an overstatement, but he can be a competent possession WR in the WCO and may be able to contribute in deep FF leagues as a bye week/injury fill-in.
Anyone that starts Billy McMullen on their fantasy teams, bye week filler or not, should be immeadiatley removed from the league, or at the very least penalized for tanking.
That makes you sound very authoritative when you talk that way, Johnny.
 
McMullen was a STUD at UVA and should of made the Redskins roster. Only reason he didn't is because they had to have room for the two Rooks. I bet after a game or two, Seahawk fans will start falling for him...
This is good news.
It's also probably an overstatement, but he can be a competent possession WR in the WCO and may be able to contribute in deep FF leagues as a bye week/injury fill-in.
I seriously doubt it. I've seen most of his games with the Eagles, and he's B-A-D. he was dealt for an undrafted FA (Baskett) when Childress went to MIN to coach. He lasted 1 year there.
 
Anyone looking for the next Fitzgerald or Marshall should look elsewhere. Anyone in a 12-16 team league, starting 3 WR might get a serviceable player after a week or two of learning the terminology.

 
McMullen was a STUD at UVA and should of made the Redskins roster. Only reason he didn't is because they had to have room for the two Rooks. I bet after a game or two, Seahawk fans will start falling for him...
This is good news.
It's also probably an overstatement, but he can be a competent possession WR in the WCO and may be able to contribute in deep FF leagues as a bye week/injury fill-in.
Anyone that starts Billy McMullen on their fantasy teams, bye week filler or not, should be immeadiatley removed from the league, or at the very least penalized for tanking.
That makes you sound very authoritative when you talk that way, Johnny.
I'm just a bitter old man ;)
 
Anyone looking for the next Fitzgerald or Marshall should look elsewhere. Anyone in a 12-16 team league, starting 3 WR might get a serviceable player after a week or two of learning the terminology.
Overall, not sure what people expect when teams are giving try outs to guys who did not make a team or practice squad. these guys all some version of spare, that if the team gets any significant production out of it is more lucky than good or smart.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Anyone looking for the next Fitzgerald or Marshall should look elsewhere. Anyone in a 12-16 team league, starting 3 WR might get a serviceable player after a week or two of learning the terminology.
Overall, not sure what people expect when teams are giving try outs to guys who did not make a team or practice squad. these guys all some version of spare, that if the team gets any significant production out of it is more lucky than good or smart.
I was hoping they'd either go after Koren robinson - to at least give them another return option who know the terminology, or to sign somebody young with upside (or keep Kent active). McMullen really solves no problems for the Seahawks, other than being listed at "WR".
 
Anyone looking for the next Fitzgerald or Marshall should look elsewhere. Anyone in a 12-16 team league, starting 3 WR might get a serviceable player after a week or two of learning the terminology.
Overall, not sure what people expect when teams are giving try outs to guys who did not make a team or practice squad. these guys all some version of spare, that if the team gets any significant production out of it is more lucky than good or smart.
I was hoping they'd either go after Koren robinson - to at least give them another return option who know the terminology, or to sign somebody young with upside (or keep Kent active). McMullen really solves no problems for the Seahawks, other than being listed at "WR".
I would guess that Koren has burned a bridge or two with that organization, even though he is one of better names to come up in this type of situation.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top