What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Sell Larry Fitzgerald for any of these? (1 Viewer)

Matt's Eagles

Footballguy
Start 1 qb, 2-3 RBs, 3-5 WRs, 1 TE. It is 12 team PPR, TE yardage bonus

QB Dak, Palmer, Kizer

RB J. Howard, McCoy, Martin, Sims, Vereen, pumphrey, McGuire, T Cohen

WR TY Hilton, Mike Thomas, Larry Fitz, Sanders, Kenny Britt, Zay  Jones, Aiken, Darboh, Zamora, JJ Nelson, A Stewart, Funchess

TE Jesse James, Fleener, D Allen, Higbee

Trade A

give Fitz

get Marlon Mack, 18 2nd(mid)

Trade B

give Fitz

get fuller, 18 2nd (mid)

Trade C

give Fitz

get Juju Schuster, 18 2nd (mid)

 
A and C are 100% no. B is interesting. I think Fuller is a very underrated player, he looked like a stud early last year, before falling victim to some drops(a problem of his) and the entire passing game in general kinda falling apart. I think that is a fair offer, it depends on if you think your team is a contender or not right now. It doesn't look like one based on the roster, but you know your league better than I do. 

 
I agree with travdogg.  The only offer I would consider is B however if you wait until the season is going to see where you sit and what other teams may be in contention and in need of an upgrade at WR you may be able to get more value as the season goes along.   I would have no issue with taking offer B but I would probably wait to see how my season is going and trade Fitz mid season if you fall out of contention and maximize value that way.

 
A and C are just laughable offers.  B is OK and could be accepted, but I also would rather wait and I believe someone in contention needing a WR3 will pay more for Fitz.

If OP wants to counter A and C, the 2018 pick needs to be a 1st rounder.....probably too much to pay from the other owner's perspective.

 
Surprised by the consensus that Fuller is the best target and Smith-Schuster is laughable as an alternative.

Most sites seems to have Juju ranked meaningfully ahead of Fuller, and Fuller didnt show a lot last year to suggest significant reliable fantasy usage.

Could someone unpack this for me?  I'd think Juju + 2nd was a decent starting point for a good one-year rental, but also agree that the time to shop Fitzgerald is in season, when those immediate points look shinier and the draft seems far away.

 
Surprised by the consensus that Fuller is the best target and Smith-Schuster is laughable as an alternative.

Most sites seems to have Juju ranked meaningfully ahead of Fuller, and Fuller didnt show a lot last year to suggest significant reliable fantasy usage.

Could someone unpack this for me?  I'd think Juju + 2nd was a decent starting point for a good one-year rental, but also agree that the time to shop Fitzgerald is in season, when those immediate points look shinier and the draft seems far away.
Fuller showed quite a bit before the wheels fell off the Texans passing game. JuJu has shown nothing, and unless Bryant gets suspended again, is the #3 WR in a best case scenario, and really #4, because Bell sees as many targets as many starting WRs. On top of that, Fuller arguably has a better QB situation long term. Watson may not pan out, but he could, and if he does will be there for years. Roethlisberger has flirted with retirement and by the time JuJu becomes startable, he might be gone. I have Fuller probably at least a good 15 spots ahead of JuJu at WR.

 
I guess I'm in the minority here but Fuller and Smith are not targets for me in dynasty. I think A is the most interesting. I'd rather have Mack/18 2nd over Fitz. I think all 3 trades are around the same value to me it's just a matter of preference on the players involved. I wouldn't give anything more than a mid 2nd for any of them. So to me it's really two 2nd rd rookie picks for a possible 1 year Fitzgerald rental. Seems about right 

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top