What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

***Semi-Official FFAWT Draft Thread (RaiderFan...Congrats!) (1 Viewer)

More on V. Davis from Silva

2. Vernon Davis

We pushed Davis hard last year, and people wondered why. We're backing off him big time this year. Here's why.

Touchdown dependent to the extreme, Davis borderline-miraculously turned the 60th-most receptions in football into the third most receiving scores (13) last season. Davis finished 66th in the NFL in targets. I'm not saying he'll stop being a big-time red-zone threat, but Davis could easily still sport that description on a five-touchdown regression. And his target totals with Michael Crabtree back from injury paint a troubling picture. They were 5, 3, 7, 3, 5 in Crabtree's regular season appearances, and 7, 4, 3 in the playoffs. Davis topped five targets just twice in Crabtree's eight games played. And that was with Crabtree at less than 100 percent.

The 49ers traded for Stevie Johnson, re-signed Anquan Boldin, and return Crabtree at full health. Fullback Bruce Miller ranked third on the 49ers in targets a year ago. I think Davis will finish third or possibly fourth this year, behind Crabtree, Boldin, and Johnson. Downfield threat Brandon Lloyd, sophomore Quinton Patton, and quick-twitch rookieBruce Ellington are also in the mix.

Now 30 years old, Davis has been a frustrating fantasy player for most of his career. He's got great speed and is a high-impact blocker, but he's never been a high-volume checkdown catcher like Jason Witten or even Jordan Cameron. He runs the vertical seam, plays tough in the red zone, and blocks -- a lot. I fully expect Davis to resume frustrating fantasy owners this year. Currently sporting a fifth-round ADP, Davis is on my do-not-draft list.

 
Bender's Beauties will take

Dexter McCluster, RB, TEN

If the come back gets to me tonight - please just autopick me whatever Defense is best, I'll trust whomever's judgement there.

 
12.14 - Alfred Blue, RB, HOU

13.01 - Jonathan Grimes, RB, HOU


It's still unclear which of these guys will be the main man once Gimp Foster inevitably goes down, so WTH.... I'll take 'em both.

 
:goodposting: All these Philly dudes in here, too. What is Cooper's ADP. Wild guess that was pretty good value. Good job lumpy.
i was waiting to grab him. It was a toss up between him and benjamin, and for some reason i grabbed Britt out of thin air. Britt gave me a lot of love years ago when he had that good year, and i am a loyal, player-friendly, owner

 
Yall can skip me or pick whomever the best defense remaining is.

Tia
According to FBG

Houston

Buffalo

Pitt

Chicago

NYG

Cleveland

Baltimore

TB

GB

SD

Ind

Det

Was

NO

Tenn

Atl

Philly

Mia

Dallas(lol)

Minn

NYJ

Oak

Jax

And STL D is a double tazer since they were already picked twice

 
Pitt

Hou

Chi

NO

SD

GB

Buff

IND
Mia

Phi

TB

Det

Atl

Ten

Was

Dal

Min

NYJ

Jax

Oak

eta: beat me to it

 
Last edited by a moderator:
12.01 Chainsaw- Greg Jennings, WR MIN
12.02 Tony- Alex Smith, QB KC
12.03 Beavers- New England Patriots D
12.04 Mo- Kenny Britt, WR STL
12.05 Lambskin- Jarrett Boykin, WR GB
12.06 MITB- Tre Mason, RB STL
12.07 Ref- Kembrell Thompkins, WR NE
12.08 Nugs- Jonathan Stewart, RB CAR
12.09 GMTAN- Chris Ivory, RB NYJ
12.10 SheerTerror- Arizona Cardinals D
12.11 Lumpy- Riley Cooper, WR PHI

12.12 Bender- Dexter McCluster, RB TEN

12.13 DD Brong- Kenny Stills, WR NO

12.14 RN- Alfred Blue, RB HOU

13.01 RN- Jonathan Grimes, RB HOU

13.02 DD Brong- Eric Ebron, TE DET

13.03 Bender- Pittsburgh Steelers D

13.04 Lumpy

13.05 SheerTerror

13.06 GMTAN

13.07 Nugs

13.08 Ref

Draft link for Rude: http://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=710030&p=17106613

 
Last edited by a moderator:
We're getting close to my favorite part of the draft...when bender realizes he has to manually enter every player drafted in the 15 rounds

 
The request was to keep things simple :shrug:

Maybe we could add an IR spot or two so we still keep the draft at 15 but allows some roster flexibility for injuries?

 
so when someone like Aaron Rodgers gets banged up and has to miss a game or two, someone will have to cut him to pick up Geno Smith?

that sounds fun.

 
Man In The Box said:
Aaron Rudnicki said:
seriously, can we add a bench spot or 3 here?
I have no issue with this. Only thing is it makes waiver wire position next to useless, so I hope people are up for trading in-season.
shtick?

with shallow rosters like this, half the league will be on waivers at some point.

 
Man In The Box said:
Aaron Rudnicki said:
seriously, can we add a bench spot or 3 here?
I have no issue with this. Only thing is it makes waiver wire position next to useless, so I hope people are up for trading in-season.
shtick?with shallow rosters like this, half the league will be on waivers at some point.
My team sucks, I'm all in favor of half the league being on waivers at some point.

 
I'll do it. Live draft on the evening/night of the 23rd cool? That's a Saturday. That gives us two weeks. I'm down for the simple scoring system too, so that won't be an issue.

Mr. Lambskin is doing it. :thumbup:
I set it up for offline draft though

12 teams 2 divisions 4 playoff teams (schedule will be unbalanced but oh well...NFL is too)

QB RB RB WR WR FLEX TE DEF K 6 bench slots (was gonna add a D Line slot for schtick but decided against it)

6 pts all TD's, no PPR

Cool?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Man In The Box said:
Aaron Rudnicki said:
seriously, can we add a bench spot or 3 here?
I have no issue with this. Only thing is it makes waiver wire position next to useless, so I hope people are up for trading in-season.
shtick?

with shallow rosters like this, half the league will be on waivers at some point.
A bit extreme with the Rodgers example. Will you have to cut a player with some value at times to fill a need? Sure.

If we add 3 bench spots, that's 252 players. The 253rd ranked player in this league last year would have been Lance Moore who would have scored 55 points with a stat line of 37/457/2. The waiver wire would be barren.

 
I didn't really pay attention. I'm assuming nobody else did either.

I assumed there was enough people who knew what they were doing in here since it's a fantasy football message board.

 
Man In The Box said:
Aaron Rudnicki said:
seriously, can we add a bench spot or 3 here?
I have no issue with this. Only thing is it makes waiver wire position next to useless, so I hope people are up for trading in-season.
shtick?

with shallow rosters like this, half the league will be on waivers at some point.
A bit extreme with the Rodgers example. Will you have to cut a player with some value at times to fill a need? Sure.

If we add 3 bench spots, that's 252 players. The 253rd ranked player in this league last year would have been Lance Moore who would have scored 55 points with a stat line of 37/457/2. The waiver wire would be barren.
without PPR, the difference between the 200th ranked player and the 250th ranked player is probably really small.

the way things are, everybody will be rotating kickers and defenses with some teams probably taking zeros at those spots to avoid having to cut players that are actually good.

 
I didn't really pay attention. I'm assuming nobody else did either.

I assumed there was enough people who knew what they were doing in here since it's a fantasy football message board.
You'd be wrong.

1- Know your league rules

2- No take backs on draft picks

3- No changing the rules in the middle of the game

Pretty basic stuff IMO.

I'm not in favor of breaking rule #3 and adding roster spots. I would have drafted completely different the last two rounds.

 
I didn't really pay attention. I'm assuming nobody else did either.

I assumed there was enough people who knew what they were doing in here since it's a fantasy football message board.
You'd be wrong.

1- Know your league rules

2- No take backs on draft picks

3- No changing the rules in the middle of the game

Pretty basic stuff IMO.

I'm not in favor of breaking rule #3 and adding roster spots. I would have drafted completely different the last two rounds.
#2 should be in the thread title

 
I don't think my co-owners read the rules either. We're flying blind.

I'm just trying to anticipate problems we'll have down the road. I'm all for a good cluster if that's what we are going for.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top