Raider Nation
Devil's Advocate
?
For Glavin, it'll depend a lot on who else is eligible in their first year class. Glavine has 300 Ws and two CYAs but was never as dominant as Maddux. I think Glavine's case is stronger than someone like Don Sutton who took five tries to make it into the Hall.Smoltz will have a tougher time unless he finishes strong. Even if he won 20 games each of the three years he spent as a closer, he'd still be a season or two short of 300 wins. His CYA shares are pretty low as well. He's a lot closer to Schilling and Mussina than Maddux and Glavine IMHO.
Maddux: 4853 IP, 3.12 ERA, 5.8 k/9, 1.3 BB/9, 172.1 WARP-3Glavine: 4367 IP, 3.50 ERA, 4.9 K/9, 2.9 BB/9, 129.7 WARP-3For Glavin, it'll depend a lot on who else is eligible in their first year class. Glavine has 300 Ws and two CYAs but was never as dominant as Maddux. I think Glavine's case is stronger than someone like Don Sutton who took five tries to make it into the Hall.Smoltz will have a tougher time unless he finishes strong. Even if he won 20 games each of the three years he spent as a closer, he'd still be a season or two short of 300 wins. His CYA shares are pretty low as well. He's a lot closer to Schilling and Mussina than Maddux and Glavine IMHO.
I'm not saying it's right, but HoF voters have historically been overly concerned about wins when it comes to SPs. Glavine is a cinch for the Hall because of the 300 win credential and to a lesser extent the two CYAs.Smoltz has statistically been a better pitcher but he's lacking the eye catching career marks that seem to sway the voters. He's unlikely to end up w/ more than 225 career wins & low 3000s in SOs, he has one 20 game season, one CYA, never led the league in ERA. The years as a closer show his versatility but may end up hurting Smoltz when it comes to the HoF. The most memorable game of his career ended w/ a no decision on the losing side.Keys Myaths said:Maddux: 4853 IP, 3.12 ERA, 5.8 k/9, 1.3 BB/9, 172.1 WARP-3Glavine: 4367 IP, 3.50 ERA, 4.9 K/9, 2.9 BB/9, 129.7 WARP-3Eephus said:For Glavin, it'll depend a lot on who else is eligible in their first year class. Glavine has 300 Ws and two CYAs but was never as dominant as Maddux. I think Glavine's case is stronger than someone like Don Sutton who took five tries to make it into the Hall.Smoltz will have a tougher time unless he finishes strong. Even if he won 20 games each of the three years he spent as a closer, he'd still be a season or two short of 300 wins. His CYA shares are pretty low as well. He's a lot closer to Schilling and Mussina than Maddux and Glavine IMHO.Raider Nation said:
Smoltz: 3394 IP, 3.25 ERA, 7.7 K/9, 2.2 BB/9, 125.8 WARP-3
Mussina: 3394 IP, 3.71 ERA, 6.7 K/9, 1.5 BB/9, 126.8 WARP-3
Schilling: 3261 IP, 3.46 ERA, 8.0 K/9, 1.5 BB/9, 113.9 WARP-3
Wins are a horrible, horrible, horrible way to evaluate pitchers. Terrible. Especially when one of those pitchers was a closer for four years.
Look at the above and tell me which of the Atlanta three are closer to Mussina and Schilling.
It's not Maddux or Smoltz. Glavine pitches 1000 innings more, yet adds only 4 more wins? And he's better?
Eckersley down?Smoltz is in easy. No other pitcher has done what he has done with wins and saves.
Smoltz was never a mediocre starter though. He was always a front of the rotation guy and he wasn't demoted to the pen, he went there for health concerns.Eckersley down?Smoltz is in easy. No other pitcher has done what he has done with wins and saves.
Eck has only 13 fewer career Ws than Smoltz, with 2 1/2 times the SVs. They both have one season with 20 Wins and one Cy Young. Eckersley adds an AL MVP award to the mix.Eckersley ranged from very effective to mediocre as a starter. Two years before he moved to the pen, he put up a 128 ERA+ and a sub 1 WHIP. He followed that with a poor year culminating in a trade to Oakland for Brian Guinn, Dave Wilder and Mark Leonette. Then he became the best reliever of all time.Smoltz was never a mediocre starter though. He was always a front of the rotation guy and he wasn't demoted to the pen, he went there for health concerns.Eckersley down?Smoltz is in easy. No other pitcher has done what he has done with wins and saves.
He may only have 13 fewer wins, but he has 24 more losses. Smoltz is clearly the better starter. As a closer he doesnt have the length of service of Eckersley, but he was just as dominant in 2003 as any reliever has been. As for greatest reliever of all time, I'll gladly take Fingers, Wilhelm or Gossage before any modern closer.Eck has only 13 fewer career Ws than Smoltz, with 2 1/2 times the SVs. They both have one season with 20 Wins and one Cy Young. Eckersley adds an AL MVP award to the mix.Eckersley ranged from very effective to mediocre as a starter. Two years before he moved to the pen, he put up a 128 ERA+ and a sub 1 WHIP. He followed that with a poor year culminating in a trade to Oakland for Brian Guinn, Dave Wilder and Mark Leonette. Then he became the best reliever of all time.Smoltz was never a mediocre starter though. He was always a front of the rotation guy and he wasn't demoted to the pen, he went there for health concerns.Eckersley down?Smoltz is in easy. No other pitcher has done what he has done with wins and saves.
I don't think any non-Braves fan really cares that much.He said that we (fans) might want to make hotel reservations for Cooperstown for 2014,
Pitcher W-L ERA Ks Walks Cy Young AwardsGreg Maddux 349-217 3.12 3,298 977 4Tom Glavine 303-200 3.51 2,581 1,475 2John Smoltz 210-147 3.25 3,011 992 1 (154 saves)Total 862-564 3.29 8,890 3,444 7