So if you have to start a rams wr (1 Viewer)

[Khalua83]

So in a ppr leauge and you have to start a rams wr, probably either amendola or l robinson. If you had to pick one which would it be and why? I think amedola may have more catches but robinson has the bigger play potential. What yall think?

 

[Clifford]

Robinson is the better athlete, WR1, and the obvious choice here.

 

[Abstract]

I would go with Robinson

 

[ldizzle]

i would...hate to be in your situation in the first week of Fantasy Football . Having to roll with a rams wr might mean ur not going to win very many games.....

nonetheless: Plug in Robinson. He is the swing for the fences rams wr.

 

[tombonneau]

I would build a time machine so I could go back and redraft.

 

[Khalua83]

i would...hate to be in your situation in the first week of Fantasy Football . Having to roll with a rams wr might mean ur not going to win very many games.....

I know this mannn! Bradford could be dope and suprise me but I have holmes who's out and mike bush wont get enough touches to be fantasy relevant for a few weeks. Gotta play one of them unfortunatly.

 

[Khalua83]

I would build a time machine so I could go back and redraft.

Wish I could have. Drafted for dynasty last year and ouch it hurts to talk about, obviously when im considering starting a rams wr week 1 its not good to say the least....

 

[videoguy505]

Pretty sure coach Spagnuolo can start more than one. Shouldn't be an issue.

Often in NFL games you see one, two, three, sometimes four, maybe even five if an extra guy declares eligible, wide receivers on the field.

 

[two_dollars]

Wrong forum.

 

[Tau837]

Robinson is the better athlete, WR1, and the obvious choice here.

/thread

 

[zoobird]

On the bright side, they should be playing from behind a lot.

I actually think once they unleash Bradford a bit (which I assume will be after 3 or 4 weeks), these guys aren't such awful options to have on your team.