TheFanatic
Footballguy
I thought he was going to play. Cinci homers? Is he going to get cut tomorrow?
How is that different from any other year?Cinci this year = a massive![]()
The Bengals have had many more successful years than certain other franchises.. (*cough* avatar *cough*)And besides, I'm thinking more in terms of FF production... I could see a total implosion on offense.How is that different for any other year?Cinci this year = a massive![]()
But if Rudi makes the final roster and refuses to restructure?Liquid Tension said:If I had to guess Cinci found no takers and now will go back to Rudi and say lets restructure your deal that is incentive driven for how much and well you play. Similar to the Ahman deal, but more rich
here s the key from your post ( but in the past has proved a reliable inside runner ) .Rudi is done , yes he was hurt last season but what about the previous one. He has been on the decline for the last 2 1/2 years .sholditch said:Winner by default? Possibly. Here's another curveball:
Bengals coach Marvin Lewis said he held out Rudi Johnson and T.J. Houshmandzadeh because he wanted to make sure they were at full strength for the opener.
An odd turnaround from Lewis who said just days ago that he needed to see Rudi play in order to make a judgment on his running back pecking order. It's tough to gauge the Bengals' plan, but Rudi is due $4 million this season. We would be surprised to see him on the roster by Saturday night.
OK, it's clear that everything that we have coming through the Bengals organization and fantasy sites is all a smokescreen. There is no real info out there, period. So let's get objective for a minute and look at the pieces of the puzzle:
Rudi is a former pro-bowler who was injured last season, but in the past has proved a reliable inside runner for the Bengals who kept defenses from spreading the field against the pass.
Chris Perry is more of a pass-catching outside runner who has never been able to stay healthy and has never really proven himself on the field, in terms of a full season, especially as a starter or feature back.
Rudi believes that the team is trying to trade him.
Most everyone believes that Rudi would bring little in a trade.
This is all we "know" about this situation. We also know that the Bengals are not the best run organization, so them doing something that would seem detrimental to the team is not necessarily out of the picture.
Looking at the above I only see one plausible scenario, and one remotely possible scenario.
Plausible is that the Bengals keep Rudi and allow him to be part of a balanced rushing attack with Perry and Watson. This would be good for the Bengals and bad for fantasy owners, as it kills the value of all three.
Possible is that they cut Rudi, name Perry the starter, and keep Ja. Johnson as the third RB. This would be a bad move for the Bengals and good for fantasy owners.
Personally, I think the plausible scenario wins out, and it's something that we and most fantasy sites don't want to see because ultimately it's not exciting to talk about and doesn't create any opportunity for fantasy owners.
Sorry but the numbers just do not support your claim. 3 years prior to 2007 he was a stud and very consistent. He had one bad year and that was because of injury. Where did you get 2 1/2 years?2004 CIN 16 361 1454 4.0 12here s the key from your post ( but in the past has proved a reliable inside runner ) .Rudi is done , yes he was hurt last season but what about the previous one. He has been on the decline for the last 2 1/2 years .sholditch said:Winner by default? Possibly. Here's another curveball:
Bengals coach Marvin Lewis said he held out Rudi Johnson and T.J. Houshmandzadeh because he wanted to make sure they were at full strength for the opener.
An odd turnaround from Lewis who said just days ago that he needed to see Rudi play in order to make a judgment on his running back pecking order. It's tough to gauge the Bengals' plan, but Rudi is due $4 million this season. We would be surprised to see him on the roster by Saturday night.
OK, it's clear that everything that we have coming through the Bengals organization and fantasy sites is all a smokescreen. There is no real info out there, period. So let's get objective for a minute and look at the pieces of the puzzle:
Rudi is a former pro-bowler who was injured last season, but in the past has proved a reliable inside runner for the Bengals who kept defenses from spreading the field against the pass.
Chris Perry is more of a pass-catching outside runner who has never been able to stay healthy and has never really proven himself on the field, in terms of a full season, especially as a starter or feature back.
Rudi believes that the team is trying to trade him.
Most everyone believes that Rudi would bring little in a trade.
This is all we "know" about this situation. We also know that the Bengals are not the best run organization, so them doing something that would seem detrimental to the team is not necessarily out of the picture.
Looking at the above I only see one plausible scenario, and one remotely possible scenario.
Plausible is that the Bengals keep Rudi and allow him to be part of a balanced rushing attack with Perry and Watson. This would be good for the Bengals and bad for fantasy owners, as it kills the value of all three.
Possible is that they cut Rudi, name Perry the starter, and keep Ja. Johnson as the third RB. This would be a bad move for the Bengals and good for fantasy owners.
Personally, I think the plausible scenario wins out, and it's something that we and most fantasy sites don't want to see because ultimately it's not exciting to talk about and doesn't create any opportunity for fantasy owners.
Sorry but the numbers just do not support your claim. 3 years prior to 2007 he was a stud and very consistent. He had one bad year and that was because of injury. Where did you get 2 1/2 years?2004 CIN 16 361 1454 4.0 12here s the key from your post ( but in the past has proved a reliable inside runner ) .Rudi is done , yes he was hurt last season but what about the previous one. He has been on the decline for the last 2 1/2 years .sholditch said:Winner by default? Possibly. Here's another curveball:
Bengals coach Marvin Lewis said he held out Rudi Johnson and T.J. Houshmandzadeh because he wanted to make sure they were at full strength for the opener.
An odd turnaround from Lewis who said just days ago that he needed to see Rudi play in order to make a judgment on his running back pecking order. It's tough to gauge the Bengals' plan, but Rudi is due $4 million this season. We would be surprised to see him on the roster by Saturday night.
OK, it's clear that everything that we have coming through the Bengals organization and fantasy sites is all a smokescreen. There is no real info out there, period. So let's get objective for a minute and look at the pieces of the puzzle:
Rudi is a former pro-bowler who was injured last season, but in the past has proved a reliable inside runner for the Bengals who kept defenses from spreading the field against the pass.
Chris Perry is more of a pass-catching outside runner who has never been able to stay healthy and has never really proven himself on the field, in terms of a full season, especially as a starter or feature back.
Rudi believes that the team is trying to trade him.
Most everyone believes that Rudi would bring little in a trade.
This is all we "know" about this situation. We also know that the Bengals are not the best run organization, so them doing something that would seem detrimental to the team is not necessarily out of the picture.
Looking at the above I only see one plausible scenario, and one remotely possible scenario.
Plausible is that the Bengals keep Rudi and allow him to be part of a balanced rushing attack with Perry and Watson. This would be good for the Bengals and bad for fantasy owners, as it kills the value of all three.
Possible is that they cut Rudi, name Perry the starter, and keep Ja. Johnson as the third RB. This would be a bad move for the Bengals and good for fantasy owners.
Personally, I think the plausible scenario wins out, and it's something that we and most fantasy sites don't want to see because ultimately it's not exciting to talk about and doesn't create any opportunity for fantasy owners.
2005 CIN 16 337 1458 4.3 12
2006 CIN 16 341 1309 3.8 12
2007 CIN 11 170 497 2.9
He went from 4.0 to 4.3 to 3.8....where is the 2 1/2 years of decline? His #'s gained from 2004 to 2005 then went back to just below 4ypc......In 2007 he was injured and never look very good. I have no problem with anyone thinking he is done.....but to say he was declining for 2 1/2 years is false.....that would include the year when he ran for 4.3ypcSorry but the numbers just do not support your claim. 3 years prior to 2007 he was a stud and very consistent. He had one bad year and that was because of injury. Where did you get 2 1/2 years?2004 CIN 16 361 1454 4.0here s the key from your post ( but in the past has proved a reliable inside runner ) .Rudi is done , yes he was hurt last season but what about the previous one. He has been on the decline for the last 2 1/2 years .sholditch said:Winner by default? Possibly. Here's another curveball:
Bengals coach Marvin Lewis said he held out Rudi Johnson and T.J. Houshmandzadeh because he wanted to make sure they were at full strength for the opener.
An odd turnaround from Lewis who said just days ago that he needed to see Rudi play in order to make a judgment on his running back pecking order. It's tough to gauge the Bengals' plan, but Rudi is due $4 million this season. We would be surprised to see him on the roster by Saturday night.
OK, it's clear that everything that we have coming through the Bengals organization and fantasy sites is all a smokescreen. There is no real info out there, period. So let's get objective for a minute and look at the pieces of the puzzle:
Rudi is a former pro-bowler who was injured last season, but in the past has proved a reliable inside runner for the Bengals who kept defenses from spreading the field against the pass.
Chris Perry is more of a pass-catching outside runner who has never been able to stay healthy and has never really proven himself on the field, in terms of a full season, especially as a starter or feature back.
Rudi believes that the team is trying to trade him.
Most everyone believes that Rudi would bring little in a trade.
This is all we "know" about this situation. We also know that the Bengals are not the best run organization, so them doing something that would seem detrimental to the team is not necessarily out of the picture.
Looking at the above I only see one plausible scenario, and one remotely possible scenario.
Plausible is that the Bengals keep Rudi and allow him to be part of a balanced rushing attack with Perry and Watson. This would be good for the Bengals and bad for fantasy owners, as it kills the value of all three.
Possible is that they cut Rudi, name Perry the starter, and keep Ja. Johnson as the third RB. This would be a bad move for the Bengals and good for fantasy owners.
Personally, I think the plausible scenario wins out, and it's something that we and most fantasy sites don't want to see because ultimately it's not exciting to talk about and doesn't create any opportunity for fantasy owners.
2005 CIN 16 337 1458 4.3 12
2006 CIN 16 341 1309 3.8 12
2007 CIN 11 170 497 2.9
I think what the guy is saying he went down in 2006, 2007 and all of the offseason would seem to indicate continued dropping as he was not doing so well. But if you want to take off the 1/2 year fine. Rudi Johnson has been on the decline for 2 full years now and nothing more. Does that make you happy or is there some other minutia you would like to discuss.He went from 4.0 to 4.3 to 3.8....where is the 2 1/2 years of decline? His #'s gained from 2004 to 2005 then went back to just below 4ypc......In 2007 he was injured and never look very good. I have no problem with anyone thinking he is done.....but to say he was declining for 2 1/2 years is false.....that would include the year when he ran for 4.3ypcSorry but the numbers just do not support your claim. 3 years prior to 2007 he was a stud and very consistent. He had one bad year and that was because of injury. Where did you get 2 1/2 years?2004 CIN 16 361 1454 4.0here s the key from your post ( but in the past has proved a reliable inside runner ) .Rudi is done , yes he was hurt last season but what about the previous one. He has been on the decline for the last 2 1/2 years .sholditch said:Winner by default? Possibly. Here's another curveball:
Bengals coach Marvin Lewis said he held out Rudi Johnson and T.J. Houshmandzadeh because he wanted to make sure they were at full strength for the opener.
An odd turnaround from Lewis who said just days ago that he needed to see Rudi play in order to make a judgment on his running back pecking order. It's tough to gauge the Bengals' plan, but Rudi is due $4 million this season. We would be surprised to see him on the roster by Saturday night.
OK, it's clear that everything that we have coming through the Bengals organization and fantasy sites is all a smokescreen. There is no real info out there, period. So let's get objective for a minute and look at the pieces of the puzzle:
Rudi is a former pro-bowler who was injured last season, but in the past has proved a reliable inside runner for the Bengals who kept defenses from spreading the field against the pass.
Chris Perry is more of a pass-catching outside runner who has never been able to stay healthy and has never really proven himself on the field, in terms of a full season, especially as a starter or feature back.
Rudi believes that the team is trying to trade him.
Most everyone believes that Rudi would bring little in a trade.
This is all we "know" about this situation. We also know that the Bengals are not the best run organization, so them doing something that would seem detrimental to the team is not necessarily out of the picture.
Looking at the above I only see one plausible scenario, and one remotely possible scenario.
Plausible is that the Bengals keep Rudi and allow him to be part of a balanced rushing attack with Perry and Watson. This would be good for the Bengals and bad for fantasy owners, as it kills the value of all three.
Possible is that they cut Rudi, name Perry the starter, and keep Ja. Johnson as the third RB. This would be a bad move for the Bengals and good for fantasy owners.
Personally, I think the plausible scenario wins out, and it's something that we and most fantasy sites don't want to see because ultimately it's not exciting to talk about and doesn't create any opportunity for fantasy owners.
2005 CIN 16 337 1458 4.3 12
2006 CIN 16 341 1309 3.8 12
2007 CIN 11 170 497 2.9
I just don't agree with you.....sorry......does that make you happy?I think what the guy is saying he went down in 2006, 2007 and all of the offseason would seem to indicate continued dropping as he was not doing so well. But if you want to take off the 1/2 year fine. Rudi Johnson has been on the decline for 2 full years now and nothing more. Does that make you happy or is there some other minutia you would like to discuss.He went from 4.0 to 4.3 to 3.8....where is the 2 1/2 years of decline? His #'s gained from 2004 to 2005 then went back to just below 4ypc......In 2007 he was injured and never look very good. I have no problem with anyone thinking he is done.....but to say he was declining for 2 1/2 years is false.....that would include the year when he ran for 4.3ypcSorry but the numbers just do not support your claim. 3 years prior to 2007 he was a stud and very consistent. He had one bad year and that was because of injury. Where did you get 2 1/2 years?2004 CIN 16 361 1454 4.0here s the key from your post ( but in the past has proved a reliable inside runner ) .Rudi is done , yes he was hurt last season but what about the previous one. He has been on the decline for the last 2 1/2 years .sholditch said:Winner by default? Possibly. Here's another curveball:
Bengals coach Marvin Lewis said he held out Rudi Johnson and T.J. Houshmandzadeh because he wanted to make sure they were at full strength for the opener.
An odd turnaround from Lewis who said just days ago that he needed to see Rudi play in order to make a judgment on his running back pecking order. It's tough to gauge the Bengals' plan, but Rudi is due $4 million this season. We would be surprised to see him on the roster by Saturday night.
OK, it's clear that everything that we have coming through the Bengals organization and fantasy sites is all a smokescreen. There is no real info out there, period. So let's get objective for a minute and look at the pieces of the puzzle:
Rudi is a former pro-bowler who was injured last season, but in the past has proved a reliable inside runner for the Bengals who kept defenses from spreading the field against the pass.
Chris Perry is more of a pass-catching outside runner who has never been able to stay healthy and has never really proven himself on the field, in terms of a full season, especially as a starter or feature back.
Rudi believes that the team is trying to trade him.
Most everyone believes that Rudi would bring little in a trade.
This is all we "know" about this situation. We also know that the Bengals are not the best run organization, so them doing something that would seem detrimental to the team is not necessarily out of the picture.
Looking at the above I only see one plausible scenario, and one remotely possible scenario.
Plausible is that the Bengals keep Rudi and allow him to be part of a balanced rushing attack with Perry and Watson. This would be good for the Bengals and bad for fantasy owners, as it kills the value of all three.
Possible is that they cut Rudi, name Perry the starter, and keep Ja. Johnson as the third RB. This would be a bad move for the Bengals and good for fantasy owners.
Personally, I think the plausible scenario wins out, and it's something that we and most fantasy sites don't want to see because ultimately it's not exciting to talk about and doesn't create any opportunity for fantasy owners.
2005 CIN 16 337 1458 4.3 12
2006 CIN 16 341 1309 3.8 12
2007 CIN 11 170 497 2.9
Ok it s a two year decline . From 4,3 to 3.8 from 2005 to 2006 it isnt even the NFL average yard per carry avg , that s one year of decline ant then to 2.8 YPC last year ( Dont tell it doesnt count cause injury , it spart of the game especially when you get older ) so it s 2006 - 2007 made a half a season mistake sorry.He went from 4.0 to 4.3 to 3.8....where is the 2 1/2 years of decline? His #'s gained from 2004 to 2005 then went back to just below 4ypc......In 2007 he was injured and never look very good. I have no problem with anyone thinking he is done.....but to say he was declining for 2 1/2 years is false.....that would include the year when he ran for 4.3ypcSorry but the numbers just do not support your claim. 3 years prior to 2007 he was a stud and very consistent. He had one bad year and that was because of injury. Where did you get 2 1/2 years?2004 CIN 16 361 1454 4.0here s the key from your post ( but in the past has proved a reliable inside runner ) .Rudi is done , yes he was hurt last season but what about the previous one. He has been on the decline for the last 2 1/2 years .sholditch said:Winner by default? Possibly. Here's another curveball:
Bengals coach Marvin Lewis said he held out Rudi Johnson and T.J. Houshmandzadeh because he wanted to make sure they were at full strength for the opener.
An odd turnaround from Lewis who said just days ago that he needed to see Rudi play in order to make a judgment on his running back pecking order. It's tough to gauge the Bengals' plan, but Rudi is due $4 million this season. We would be surprised to see him on the roster by Saturday night.
OK, it's clear that everything that we have coming through the Bengals organization and fantasy sites is all a smokescreen. There is no real info out there, period. So let's get objective for a minute and look at the pieces of the puzzle:
Rudi is a former pro-bowler who was injured last season, but in the past has proved a reliable inside runner for the Bengals who kept defenses from spreading the field against the pass.
Chris Perry is more of a pass-catching outside runner who has never been able to stay healthy and has never really proven himself on the field, in terms of a full season, especially as a starter or feature back.
Rudi believes that the team is trying to trade him.
Most everyone believes that Rudi would bring little in a trade.
This is all we "know" about this situation. We also know that the Bengals are not the best run organization, so them doing something that would seem detrimental to the team is not necessarily out of the picture.
Looking at the above I only see one plausible scenario, and one remotely possible scenario.
Plausible is that the Bengals keep Rudi and allow him to be part of a balanced rushing attack with Perry and Watson. This would be good for the Bengals and bad for fantasy owners, as it kills the value of all three.
Possible is that they cut Rudi, name Perry the starter, and keep Ja. Johnson as the third RB. This would be a bad move for the Bengals and good for fantasy owners.
Personally, I think the plausible scenario wins out, and it's something that we and most fantasy sites don't want to see because ultimately it's not exciting to talk about and doesn't create any opportunity for fantasy owners.
2005 CIN 16 337 1458 4.3 12
2006 CIN 16 341 1309 3.8 12
2007 CIN 11 170 497 2.9
Brown would go as his back has been an issue this preseason...and rudi would be motivated to run hard just to spite the bunglesHouston seems to be the team everyone points to, with regards to running back needs. That may be the case, but they would have to lose one of the backs in there stable to accommodate another one, right? So, who goes - Ahman Green, Chris Brown....can't see Slaton not making the team.
Just what a stable of past their peak, injured RB's need....another oneHouston seems to be the team everyone points to, with regards to running back needs. That may be the case, but they would have to lose one of the backs in there stable to accommodate another one, right? So, who goes - Ahman Green, Chris Brown....can't see Slaton not making the team.
so was 2004 when his Avg. was 4.0 an up year or a down year. The differnce in 2004 and 2006 is not much at all....I would say that 2005 was an up year and 2004 and 2006 were more in line with what he would put up most years if healthy. 2007 was a down year for sure....he did not look good and his numbers were not good. I just don't really see a down year til 2007(because I see 2005 as an up year).Traders2001 said:Ok it s a two year decline . From 4,3 to 3.8 from 2005 to 2006 it isnt even the NFL average yard per carry avg , that s one year of decline ant then to 2.8 YPC last year ( Dont tell it doesnt count cause injury , it spart of the game especially when you get older ) so it s 2006 - 2007 made a half a season mistake sorry.Yitbos69 said:He went from 4.0 to 4.3 to 3.8....where is the 2 1/2 years of decline? His #'s gained from 2004 to 2005 then went back to just below 4ypc......In 2007 he was injured and never look very good. I have no problem with anyone thinking he is done.....but to say he was declining for 2 1/2 years is false.....that would include the year when he ran for 4.3ypcTheFanatic said:Sorry but the numbers just do not support your claim. 3 years prior to 2007 he was a stud and very consistent. He had one bad year and that was because of injury. Where did you get 2 1/2 years?2004 CIN 16 361 1454 4.0here s the key from your post ( but in the past has proved a reliable inside runner ) .Rudi is done , yes he was hurt last season but what about the previous one. He has been on the decline for the last 2 1/2 years .sholditch said:Winner by default? Possibly. Here's another curveball:
Bengals coach Marvin Lewis said he held out Rudi Johnson and T.J. Houshmandzadeh because he wanted to make sure they were at full strength for the opener.
An odd turnaround from Lewis who said just days ago that he needed to see Rudi play in order to make a judgment on his running back pecking order. It's tough to gauge the Bengals' plan, but Rudi is due $4 million this season. We would be surprised to see him on the roster by Saturday night.
OK, it's clear that everything that we have coming through the Bengals organization and fantasy sites is all a smokescreen. There is no real info out there, period. So let's get objective for a minute and look at the pieces of the puzzle:
Rudi is a former pro-bowler who was injured last season, but in the past has proved a reliable inside runner for the Bengals who kept defenses from spreading the field against the pass.
Chris Perry is more of a pass-catching outside runner who has never been able to stay healthy and has never really proven himself on the field, in terms of a full season, especially as a starter or feature back.
Rudi believes that the team is trying to trade him.
Most everyone believes that Rudi would bring little in a trade.
This is all we "know" about this situation. We also know that the Bengals are not the best run organization, so them doing something that would seem detrimental to the team is not necessarily out of the picture.
Looking at the above I only see one plausible scenario, and one remotely possible scenario.
Plausible is that the Bengals keep Rudi and allow him to be part of a balanced rushing attack with Perry and Watson. This would be good for the Bengals and bad for fantasy owners, as it kills the value of all three.
Possible is that they cut Rudi, name Perry the starter, and keep Ja. Johnson as the third RB. This would be a bad move for the Bengals and good for fantasy owners.
Personally, I think the plausible scenario wins out, and it's something that we and most fantasy sites don't want to see because ultimately it's not exciting to talk about and doesn't create any opportunity for fantasy owners.
2005 CIN 16 337 1458 4.3 12
2006 CIN 16 341 1309 3.8 12
2007 CIN 11 170 497 2.9
I'm going to be pissed if he's not released. I dropped Felix Jones to take a flyer on Chris Perry as my RB5. The statements from Johnson made me believe a cut was imminent.It makes no sense to keep him at his current salary and consequently he can't have much trade value.BustedKnuckles said:Johnson is set to make about $4 million this season...
Yes he has declined......but it was only last year and the #'s prove that to be true....he may be done in Cin..but his numbers from 2004 and 2006 are very much the same and he was not declining in 2004 so I don't see how he was in 2006.Yitbos, Rudi has declined. Disagree all you want, but I have watched every one of those games since he came along and made Dillon look old and he is not the same back as he was in 2005. He does not hit the holes as fast and the burst is rare.......I wish Rudi all the best, but his days as a Bengal are over.
Rudi won't go anywhere and it will be one of the worst RBBC's in the league this year in Cincy.Cincinnati Bengals
Should be Safe: Rudi Johnson
Despite huge speculation, the team really would be taking a risk if they let him go. Johnson really is the only true power runner on a team that runs a power rushing scheme on offense. Keep in mind Chris Perry, who some believe is all the way back from ankle problems, has only played in six games since the 2005 season.
Looks like much ado about nothing....From Adam Kaplan on Scout.com
Rudi won't go anywhere and it will be one of the worst RBBC's in the league this year in Cincy.Cincinnati Bengals
Should be Safe: Rudi Johnson
Despite huge speculation, the team really would be taking a risk if they let him go. Johnson really is the only true power runner on a team that runs a power rushing scheme on offense. Keep in mind Chris Perry, who some believe is all the way back from ankle problems, has only played in six games since the 2005 season.