packersfan
Footballguy
I realize Plummer isn't the greatest QB in the world and I realize he's had a rocky season thus far. But watching last night's game it was shocking to see how Shanahan has basically turned his team into Billick's Ravens. Run the ball effectively; move the chains when you can but essentially rely on the defense to win the game for you. So far that's been working but I wonder if that approach is going to catch up to them at some point.
Shanahan appears frightened to give Plummer too much responsibility. You can make a case that's justified and I suppose you can applaud that approach when you're playing a team with a good or great defense like the Ravens but should he really be that fearful against arguably the worst team in the NFL? He basically let the Raiders hang around because he refused to attack them offensively. The Raiders did a pretty decent job of not letting Tatum Bell beat them but Shanahan refused to go after them in the passing game. The one time he did was their best play of the night - the 54-yard connection to Walker which set up the Bell TD run.
At that point they had the Raiders on the ropes and some more big plays probably would have buried them early. Instead, Shanahan went into a shell and the Raiders continued to hang around until a combination of their own ineptitude and the Denver defense finally put the game to bed.
Again, I understand if there's a reluctance to have Plummer winging it 40 times a game. But there's no reason to when you have the ability to run the ball the way the Broncos do. However, I do think it's a waste of talent to not try and be more aggressive and I think it's a risky strategy to continue to hope that every week your defense does not allow a touchdown.
I was just surprised watching that game last night because everything was set up for the Broncos' offense to "get well" against a truly pathetic team. Instead, they had to leave that game with more questions than answers given how they really didn't overpower the Raiders at all in my opinion.
Shanahan appears frightened to give Plummer too much responsibility. You can make a case that's justified and I suppose you can applaud that approach when you're playing a team with a good or great defense like the Ravens but should he really be that fearful against arguably the worst team in the NFL? He basically let the Raiders hang around because he refused to attack them offensively. The Raiders did a pretty decent job of not letting Tatum Bell beat them but Shanahan refused to go after them in the passing game. The one time he did was their best play of the night - the 54-yard connection to Walker which set up the Bell TD run.
At that point they had the Raiders on the ropes and some more big plays probably would have buried them early. Instead, Shanahan went into a shell and the Raiders continued to hang around until a combination of their own ineptitude and the Denver defense finally put the game to bed.
Again, I understand if there's a reluctance to have Plummer winging it 40 times a game. But there's no reason to when you have the ability to run the ball the way the Broncos do. However, I do think it's a waste of talent to not try and be more aggressive and I think it's a risky strategy to continue to hope that every week your defense does not allow a touchdown.
I was just surprised watching that game last night because everything was set up for the Broncos' offense to "get well" against a truly pathetic team. Instead, they had to leave that game with more questions than answers given how they really didn't overpower the Raiders at all in my opinion.