What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

SSL1 Draft Thread (1 Viewer)

4.14 Mark Clayton

REALLY wanted one of the TE's to fall. I think we all noticed they were slipping. But FM got a steal at least!!

Nice pick for all the TE's taken in this round IMO.

 
Week 6 is gonna SUCK, but if I get by it, I may go far.

4.15 RB Marshawn Lynch (Buf)

sending PM to twilight

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Week 6 is gonna SUCK, but if I get by it, I may go far.

4.15 RB Marshawn Lynch (Buf)

sending PM to twilight
Can I change my pick, since twi hasn't picked yet? Or is that forbidden?I kinda rushed this one along.

 
Week 6 is gonna SUCK, but if I get by it, I may go far.

4.15 RB Marshawn Lynch (Buf)

sending PM to twilight
Can I change my pick, since twi hasn't picked yet? Or is that forbidden?I kinda rushed this one along.
Eh, nevermind.
:thumbup: Buyer's remorse?
LOL, not really, more that I thought of another player I'd prefer, but it's not worth changing the pick.I pretty much draft the 1st 6-8 rounds off the top of my head to be honest, no papers, no cheatsheats... just memory.

 
Week 6 is gonna SUCK, but if I get by it, I may go far.

4.15 RB Marshawn Lynch (Buf)

sending PM to twilight
Can I change my pick, since twi hasn't picked yet? Or is that forbidden?I kinda rushed this one along.
Eh, nevermind.
:goodposting: Buyer's remorse?
LOL, not really, more that I thought of another player I'd prefer, but it's not worth changing the pick.I pretty much draft the 1st 6-8 rounds off the top of my head to be honest, no papers, no cheatsheats... just memory.
The rules are that you are allowed to change your pick if I'm not mistaken...I've done it a few times.Just repick dude.

 
After four rounds, five owners are with only one RB. Given the tendency for many of us to be RB happy in a 16 teamer, does anyone recall this as being unusual?

Anyone think it's worthwhile getting a commentary thread going? :popcorn:

 
After four rounds, five owners are with only one RB. Given the tendency for many of us to be RB happy in a 16 teamer, does anyone recall this as being unusual?Anyone think it's worthwhile getting a commentary thread going? :confused:
Who needs RB's? I mean really. This is a PPR league, right? :bag:
 
After four rounds, five owners are with only one RB. Given the tendency for many of us to be RB happy in a 16 teamer, does anyone recall this as being unusual?Anyone think it's worthwhile getting a commentary thread going? :popcorn:
Who needs RB's? I mean really. This is a PPR league, right? :(
:banned: RBs are a little overrated in these league, I think. PPR and 16 teams means that you don't have to match scores as high as you may at other positions.
 
After four rounds, five owners are with only one RB. Given the tendency for many of us to be RB happy in a 16 teamer, does anyone recall this as being unusual?Anyone think it's worthwhile getting a commentary thread going? :lmao:
Who needs RB's? I mean really. This is a PPR league, right? :lmao:
:thumbup: RBs are a little overrated in these league, I think. PPR and 16 teams means that you don't have to match scores as high as you may at other positions.
I agree that RB2 is kinda overrated. And there seems to be a movement in these sruvivors, especailly by the top of the draft to eschew RB2 all together and go for a platoon of 2 RBBC guys at that spot
 
After four rounds, five owners are with only one RB. Given the tendency for many of us to be RB happy in a 16 teamer, does anyone recall this as being unusual?Anyone think it's worthwhile getting a commentary thread going? :lmao:
Who needs RB's? I mean really. This is a PPR league, right? :lmao:
:thumbup: RBs are a little overrated in these league, I think. PPR and 16 teams means that you don't have to match scores as high as you may at other positions.
I agree that RB2 is kinda overrated. And there seems to be a movement in these sruvivors, especailly by the top of the draft to eschew RB2 all together and go for a platoon of 2 RBBC guys at that spot
which works better when the entire group eschews drafting multiple running backs allowing a few useful guys to slip farther than they should and make the guys at the top even stronger?
 
After four rounds, five owners are with only one RB. Given the tendency for many of us to be RB happy in a 16 teamer, does anyone recall this as being unusual?Anyone think it's worthwhile getting a commentary thread going? :lmao:
Who needs RB's? I mean really. This is a PPR league, right? :lmao:
:thumbup: RBs are a little overrated in these league, I think. PPR and 16 teams means that you don't have to match scores as high as you may at other positions.
I agree that RB2 is kinda overrated. And there seems to be a movement in these sruvivors, especailly by the top of the draft to eschew RB2 all together and go for a platoon of 2 RBBC guys at that spot
which works better when the entire group eschews drafting multiple running backs allowing a few useful guys to slip farther than they should and make the guys at the top even stronger?
Yup! Thanks guys!
 
After four rounds, five owners are with only one RB. Given the tendency for many of us to be RB happy in a 16 teamer, does anyone recall this as being unusual?Anyone think it's worthwhile getting a commentary thread going? :confused:
Who needs RB's? I mean really. This is a PPR league, right? :bag:
:banned: RBs are a little overrated in these league, I think. PPR and 16 teams means that you don't have to match scores as high as you may at other positions.
I agree that RB2 is kinda overrated. And there seems to be a movement in these sruvivors, especailly by the top of the draft to eschew RB2 all together and go for a platoon of 2 RBBC guys at that spot
which works better when the entire group eschews drafting multiple running backs allowing a few useful guys to slip farther than they should and make the guys at the top even stronger?
I think that Chester Taylor slipped too far. :shrug:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top