Not the best move IMO, true some of the K's available are ???? but 11 of us will have advantages over the others in some weeks.Interesting....5 teams with one kicker.
I've gone solo kicker in past SSL's, think when I won it all I only had 1. That said, it's only a solid move if there is more than a flyer type available at a position where you're weak and need to shore things up.For example, my QB position this year... going solo at K was a consideration IF there was a QB worthy of shoring things up, but IMO, the QB's were all backups and mere gambles to start due to injuries or performance (I waited too long for !B2, but thems the breaks). In the end, I decided a flyer QB won't be as valuable as the 2nd K which gives me a 2nd chance at decent K points each week.Not the best move IMO, true some of the K's available are ???? but 11 of us will have advantages over the others in some weeks.Interesting....5 teams with one kicker.
In 18 rounds it is tough, and two years ago I won Capt. Hook's QSL with just one K. But it was Vanderjagt on the Colts. I would only consider it if, - they were elite K's with elite O's in dome/good weather teams. i.e. - Vinateri ( and an early Bye, helps too)In 18 rounders I noramlly go 2qb/4rb/6wr/2 each of TE/K/D, but if you try to get a WR7, so you need to short TE or K, and cause I had Gates I chose 2 KI've gone solo kicker in past SSL's, think when I won it all I only had 1. That said, it's only a solid move if there is more than a flyer type available at a position where you're weak and need to shore things up.For example, my QB position this year... going solo at K was a consideration IF there was a QB worthy of shoring things up, but IMO, the QB's were all backups and mere gambles to start due to injuries or performance (I waited too long for !B2, but thems the breaks). In the end, I decided a flyer QB won't be as valuable as the 2nd K which gives me a 2nd chance at decent K points each week.Not the best move IMO, true some of the K's available are ???? but 11 of us will have advantages over the others in some weeks.Interesting....5 teams with one kicker.
I agree with the others in that you can go with 1 kicker if you need to shore up other areas. I think this is the one position where it hurt the least. I won SSL2 last year with only Reed. I was wondering if there was more of a trend starting to happen with teams only going with 1 kicker...or if this was just an anamoly and teams just felt the need to draft for depth at other positions.bicycle_seat_sniffer said:Not the best move IMO, true some of the K's available are ???? but 11 of us will have advantages over the others in some weeks.Shadowfax said:Interesting....5 teams with one kicker.
What I find strange is that due to the injury factor, it seems smarter to short DEF than K to me. An entire DEF will never be hurt and miss a game, while a K could get hurt and miss some games or be less effective in some games, like Akers was a couple of years ago. And look at how Vanderjagt crashed and burned. I'd grab BAL or CHI and just ride with them if I was going to short a position.I agree with the others in that you can go with 1 kicker if you need to shore up other areas. I think this is the one position where it hurt the least. I won SSL2 last year with only Reed. I was wondering if there was more of a trend starting to happen with teams only going with 1 kicker...or if this was just an anamoly and teams just felt the need to draft for depth at other positions.bicycle_seat_sniffer said:Not the best move IMO, true some of the K's available are ???? but 11 of us will have advantages over the others in some weeks.Shadowfax said:Interesting....5 teams with one kicker.
I used to subscribe to that same theory, the defense couldn't get hurt, so if you could just get by that one bye week..... I checked out the scoring though. The defenses, both good and bad score wildly fluctuates. When you have two of them, you capitalize on the ability to hit more often and especially in this format, miss less. Kickers overall score both less and with less fluctuation, in my opinion, than the defenses. Check out Twilight's league set-up and historical scoring.What I find strange is that due to the injury factor, it seems smarter to short DEF than K to me. An entire DEF will never be hurt and miss a game, while a K could get hurt and miss some games or be less effective in some games, like Akers was a couple of years ago. And look at how Vanderjagt crashed and burned. I'd grab BAL or CHI and just ride with them if I was going to short a position.I agree with the others in that you can go with 1 kicker if you need to shore up other areas. I think this is the one position where it hurt the least. I won SSL2 last year with only Reed. I was wondering if there was more of a trend starting to happen with teams only going with 1 kicker...or if this was just an anamoly and teams just felt the need to draft for depth at other positions.bicycle_seat_sniffer said:Not the best move IMO, true some of the K's available are ???? but 11 of us will have advantages over the others in some weeks.Shadowfax said:Interesting....5 teams with one kicker.
Good post. I was thinking that scoring had something to do with it, but I didn't know it was that clear. Thanks.I used to subscribe to that same theory, the defense couldn't get hurt, so if you could just get by that one bye week..... I checked out the scoring though. The defenses, both good and bad score wildly fluctuates. When you have two of them, you capitalize on the ability to hit more often and especially in this format, miss less. Kickers overall score both less and with less fluctuation, in my opinion, than the defenses. Check out Twilight's league set-up and historical scoring.What I find strange is that due to the injury factor, it seems smarter to short DEF than K to me. An entire DEF will never be hurt and miss a game, while a K could get hurt and miss some games or be less effective in some games, like Akers was a couple of years ago. And look at how Vanderjagt crashed and burned. I'd grab BAL or CHI and just ride with them if I was going to short a position.I agree with the others in that you can go with 1 kicker if you need to shore up other areas. I think this is the one position where it hurt the least. I won SSL2 last year with only Reed. I was wondering if there was more of a trend starting to happen with teams only going with 1 kicker...or if this was just an anamoly and teams just felt the need to draft for depth at other positions.bicycle_seat_sniffer said:Not the best move IMO, true some of the K's available are ???? but 11 of us will have advantages over the others in some weeks.Shadowfax said:Interesting....5 teams with one kicker.
Denverthread is up to date,What team does Qunicy Morgan play on?