What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Steve Spagnuolo -- Welcome to Washington! (1 Viewer)

Spags star sure is rising. Hard to believe he'll be a head coach before Ron Rivera; who was the first Eagles assistant to really seem to be on the path.

 
Spags star sure is rising. Hard to believe he'll be a head coach before Ron Rivera; who was the first Eagles assistant to really seem to be on the path.
Ron Rivera?! the same guy who continually got outcoached and was let go by Chicago and wound up as a LB coach in SD!?Spags was brilliant! I do think NY pays him BIG bucks to keep him around, ala Dallas with Garrett..
 
Spags star sure is rising. Hard to believe he'll be a head coach before Ron Rivera; who was the first Eagles assistant to really seem to be on the path.
Ron Rivera?! the same guy who continually got outcoached and was let go by Chicago and wound up as a LB coach in SD!?Spags was brilliant! I do think NY pays him BIG bucks to keep him around, ala Dallas with Garrett..
Spags won't stick around IMHO. No team is going to match Snyder if he wants his guy, and it's a team Spags knows really well, and has a ready made staff in place [something to consider if he's going to take a HC job this late in the offseason]. The Garrett analogy is a flawed one because it's clear Jones views Garrett as the future head coach in New York. There's no way Coughlin is going anywhere anytime soon, and it's all but impossible to imagine Spags' star will ever be as bright as it is this moment.
 
I've got seriously a thousand bucks to keep Spags here! Pass the hat Giant fans. We won't hold him down forever, but one more year at least please! Don't join either of those freak shows in DC or Oakland. Wait for a better job than to get in bed with these ##### owners. Your day will come, and you should build a team. Take over KC next year when Herm is booted, or St. Louis or Minny, somewhere with some class, don't get in bed with these jagoffs!

We need ya Spags! We love you too!!! PAY THIS MAN HIS MON-NEE!!!!

 
main difference with Garrett is that he has ties to Dallas. Spags, that I know of, does not have ties to giants. He's not gonna take less to stick it out with them

 
Popinski said:
Spags was great this year, but it's not like the Giants were searching for talented pass rushers.
His 4 DE set will be imitated in 08
 
Jason Wood said:
Tanner9919 said:
Jason Wood said:
Spags star sure is rising. Hard to believe he'll be a head coach before Ron Rivera; who was the first Eagles assistant to really seem to be on the path.
Ron Rivera?! the same guy who continually got outcoached and was let go by Chicago and wound up as a LB coach in SD!?Spags was brilliant! I do think NY pays him BIG bucks to keep him around, ala Dallas with Garrett..
Spags won't stick around IMHO. No team is going to match Snyder if he wants his guy, and it's a team Spags knows really well, and has a ready made staff in place [something to consider if he's going to take a HC job this late in the offseason]. The Garrett analogy is a flawed one because it's clear Jones views Garrett as the future head coach in New York. There's no way Coughlin is going anywhere anytime soon, and it's all but impossible to imagine Spags' star will ever be as bright as it is this moment.
I agree
 
guy was a complete unknown going into this year and now has the chance to be a head coach? Gotta take it while you can IMO - Wash is a good situation unlike Atlanta - he should jump on it. G Men D has talent - they will be fine without him

 
This is kind of funny to me as a Redskin fan. I'm still convinced Snyder wants to hire Jim Fassel. He almost did about 10 days ago and then backed off due to massive public opinion against the hiring. I think he was waiting for the resistance to Fassel to die down, and has gone through other interviews since that time mostly for show. I think the Spagnuolo interview also was mostly to be for show, and to open a door to a guy they may want to talk to again in future years. Now that Spagnuolo's defense held down the Patriots in front of a huge audience, there's real pressure on Snyder for the first time to hire the guy.

I like watching Snyder squirm.

 
This is kind of funny to me as a Redskin fan. I'm still convinced Snyder wants to hire Jim Fassel. He almost did about 10 days ago and then backed off due to massive public opinion against the hiring. I think he was waiting for the resistance to Fassel to die down, and has gone through other interviews since that time mostly for show. I think the Spagnuolo interview also was mostly to be for show, and to open a door to a guy they may want to talk to again in future years. Now that Spagnuolo's defense held down the Patriots in front of a huge audience, there's real pressure on Snyder for the first time to hire the guy.I like watching Snyder squirm.
My thoughts exactly. It's pretty apparent that Snyder wants a puppet and it looks more and more like Fassel is more than happy to be that guy. The only way I see Spagnuolo winning any points w/ the Redskins is if during his entire interview he does nothing but talk about how great Dan and Vinny are.
 
I have my doubts about this hire by the 'Skins and not because I don't think he's the right kind of guy to target.

If you're Spags, coming off of a great win on a huge stage with your unit and your scheme prominently featured, why go to a team that won't even let you hire your own staff? This guy can write his own ticket in a year if he's patient. Yeah, the 'Skins can offer him a boatload of money, but I still have my doubts here.

 
Spags will have his pick of teams next year, why would he go to a team that's not built from the inside out, an owner who consistently trades picks for free agent busts and who's team is constantly in salary cap trouble, and then if you don't mind all of that, you go into a place where your whole coaching staff is picked for you.

Why would you do that?

 
Spags will have his pick of teams next year, why would he go to a team that's not built from the inside out, an owner who consistently trades picks for free agent busts and who's team is constantly in salary cap trouble, and then if you don't mind all of that, you go into a place where your whole coaching staff is picked for you.

Why would you do that?
The bolded part is the only part that's right.
 
Spags will have his pick of teams next year, why would he go to a team that's not built from the inside out, an owner who consistently trades picks for free agent busts and who's team is constantly in salary cap trouble, and then if you don't mind all of that, you go into a place where your whole coaching staff is picked for you.Why would you do that?
A bird in hand...Spags has the chance to go to a team he knows well, for lots of $$$$, coming off a playoff appearance even though it's young QB was hobbled. Considering most job openings come when woeful teams are looking to rebuild, I hardly think it's as easy as "I'll get a better offer next year."
 
Spags will have his pick of teams next year, why would he go to a team that's not built from the inside out, an owner who consistently trades picks for free agent busts and who's team is constantly in salary cap trouble, and then if you don't mind all of that, you go into a place where your whole coaching staff is picked for you.Why would you do that?
A bird in hand...Spags has the chance to go to a team he knows well, for lots of $$$$, coming off a playoff appearance even though it's young QB was hobbled. Considering most job openings come when woeful teams are looking to rebuild, I hardly think it's as easy as "I'll get a better offer next year."
:rolleyes: As bad as the already-built staff is (IMHO), he couldn't know another team's roster better than he knows the 'Skins, and it's certainly not a bad situation from a team building standpoint. He would certainly be handsomely paid, and he even worked on the 'Skins staff in the early 80's under Gibbs for a short time when he was just starting off in the NFL. It could happen I guess, but again it would greatly bother me to be hired where a staff was already in place. That's a major negative IMHO.
 
I think most of the staff are on one-year contracts only. So Spag could come in and coach with these guys for a year, then bring in his own guys next year.

 
I think most of the staff are on one-year contracts only. So Spag could come in and coach with these guys for a year, then bring in his own guys next year.
That thought has occurred to me too, however the life of an NFL head coach seems too short to be willing to give away a year in building your team and coaching staff. He'd practically be starting over from square one in 2009 if he made any major changes to that staff.
 
I think most of the staff are on one-year contracts only. So Spag could come in and coach with these guys for a year, then bring in his own guys next year.
That thought has occurred to me too, however the life of an NFL head coach seems too short to be willing to give away a year in building your team and coaching staff. He'd practically be starting over from square one in 2009 if he made any major changes to that staff.
And if he doesn't take a head coaching job now, he'd be back at square one in 2009 anyway.
 
I think most of the staff are on one-year contracts only. So Spag could come in and coach with these guys for a year, then bring in his own guys next year.
That thought has occurred to me too, however the life of an NFL head coach seems too short to be willing to give away a year in building your team and coaching staff. He'd practically be starting over from square one in 2009 if he made any major changes to that staff.
And if he doesn't take a head coaching job now, he'd be back at square one in 2009 anyway.
Square one in terms of building, but not square one in terms of the patience and track record with his team. Ask Cam Cameron how fragile that can be (not that I expect a 1-15 performance from the 'Skins in 2008). Again, maybe it works out, maybe it doesn't, but I think we can agree that this is far from ideal.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top