reported on twitter feed of @geoffmosher
Last edited by a moderator:
I doubt Omar Gaither gets another look inside, so Mays would be the likely MLB if Bradley's injury is serious. Might see Gaither and Jordan on nickel downs, however, so he may not assume all of Bradley's value.Is this a big boost for Mays
Bradley (knee) and Hobbs (stinger) will have MRIs in the morning. The injuries appear to be minor.
Was reading on another board that trainers are concerned it could be serious.Jeff McLane (Philly Inquirer) via twitter:
Bradley (knee) and Hobbs (stinger) will have MRIs in the morning. The injuries appear to be minor.
I like Mays, he is all over the field in past preseason games, a tackling machine. Think Gaither might get first crack though, barring a signing.
So the real winner is Jordan then? He would be their only sure 3 down LB, no?Be careful before investing too much in Mays. Certainly worth a flyer, but there's no guarantee he plays on passing downs.
And the initial second team snaps had Gaither at OLB, not MLB. Still early, but looking pretty definitive that Mays will have every chance to hold the job.I just picked up Mays this morning in my league and am feeling confident about it:2:59 PM - Joe Mays lines up as the middle linebacker when the No. 1 defense takes the field in drills.
Not a clear-cut case, but I'd argue 60% of Mays in the base defense is better than 40% of Gaither in the nickel. I don't think Gaither's slim chance of ending up in the base defense is enough to take the "upside" risk with him.This is going to be very similar to the Andra Davis/Leon Williams platoon in Cleveland if today's practice alignment holds through opening weekend.So biggest upside for this year... Gaither or Mays?
This was my first thought.So the real winner is Jordan then? He would be their only sure 3 down LB, no?Be careful before investing too much in Mays. Certainly worth a flyer, but there's no guarantee he plays on passing downs.
Probably JordanHe has the best chance of being on the field the most.If Akeem Jordan, Wilhelm and Mays are all available, who are you targeting here? (In a 1:3 tackle to big play league)
Moving Jordon breaks two positions and he goes what 230? I don't see it.
I say its between Mays and Wilhelm. Mays is probably the better run stuffer, Wilhelm has the NFL experience, yeah, he comes from a 3-4, but played mike in 4-3 at Ohio State. I think experience may win out in the end. Doubt either will be a three down player. You may see Sean Jones playing a LB role in nickel.
I did... my bad Zoom.Moving Jordon breaks two positions and he goes what 230? I don't see it.
I say its between Mays and Wilhelm. Mays is probably the better run stuffer, Wilhelm has the NFL experience, yeah, he comes from a 3-4, but played mike in 4-3 at Ohio State. I think experience may win out in the end. Doubt either will be a three down player. You may see Sean Jones playing a LB role in nickel.Jordan will stay at Will and Gocong at Sam. Its between Gaither and Mays inside. Wilhelm is depth IMO or he wouldn't have been cut by SD. Gaither already showed he's a so-so MLB. Hopefully we see what Mays brings. I think Jordan wins the 3 down role with Gocong hence he will benefit the most
I think you may have misread my Jordan comment.
The Jones part is interesting though.
This is pretty much how I see it playing out as well.Jordan will stay at Will and Gocong at Sam. Its between Gaither and Mays inside. Wilhelm is depth IMO or he wouldn't have been cut by SD. Gaither already showed he's a so-so MLB. Hopefully we see what Mays brings. I think Jordan wins the 3 down role with Gocong hence he will benefit the most
From Jene Bramel in the training camp thread:Any updates for this thread after the first game?
How does Joe Mays look in preseason game action?
There's a note in one of the Philly newspapers that suggests Gaither was replacing Mays in the nickel. At least in the first three series as I'm watching, Gaither replaced Mays on only two of six or seven nickel snaps. I don't think this is the way the team will line up, especially given the way they've practiced all week, but it's not as cut-and-dried as the paper made it out to be. My guess is that the Eagles wanted to get Mays plenty of playing time and, knowing they'd be facing a lot of spread sets, decided to leave him in there this week.
Will be interesting to see how this plays out next week vs IND and Week 3 vs JAC.
As far as in run support, Mays didn't stand out either way. He played downhill on the few more traditional sets the Pats used on offense. He certainly didn't seem to play poorly enough to get bumped down the depth chart.
On the Patriot side of the ball, the defense spent a lot of time in a four man front against Philadelphia. The Eagles ran their share of spread sets, too, but there's been speculation that injuries and the defensive line talent might push the team to some more 4-3. Richard Seymour was playing end in the 4-3 with Mayo in the middle. If the Patriots use more 4-3 than usual and Seymour stays at RE, he (Seymour) has some interesting upside.
From Eyes of the GuruJoe Mays got the call at MLB for the Eagles and remained on the field in the nickel package most of the time. I saw him in coverage some and he looked OK.Any updates for this thread after the first game?How does Joe Mays look in preseason game action?
Anyone?badSSmofo said:I have a trade offer for Bradley and was wondering what history/success rate LBs have with this type of injury when coming back. How have other players come back from this type of injury?
I don't think it'll be an issue. Recovery times are still well within a year, although there's still some indication that players take a full year to get playing strength and positional-spatial sense back.Chad Greenway comes to mind as just one player who returned to form after an ACL injury.Anyone?badSSmofo said:I have a trade offer for Bradley and was wondering what history/success rate LBs have with this type of injury when coming back. How have other players come back from this type of injury?
Thanks Jene. Tough call I have here. Bradley showed good signs last year of performing well but he wasn't a LB1. He could be replaced. I'm still on the fence and looking to be pushed one direction or the other. Hard enough to predict what will happen this year, let alone next year if he comes back.I don't think it'll be an issue. Recovery times are still well within a year, although there's still some indication that players take a full year to get playing strength and positional-spatial sense back.Chad Greenway comes to mind as just one player who returned to form after an ACL injury.Anyone?badSSmofo said:I have a trade offer for Bradley and was wondering what history/success rate LBs have with this type of injury when coming back. How have other players come back from this type of injury?
Its a 16 team dynasty. Very deep. As crazy as you might think the scoring system, it works out very well, and keeps all 16 teams competitive year in and year out. I'll probably pull the trigger on the trade.You gotta be kidding me! My leagues don't place any abnormal premium on running qbs and Id take that trade if Bradley was healthy in dynasty. But it's a no brainer now. I'm pretty deep at lb though (willis, d.williams, lauranitis, d.harris, b.scott, merrimann, a.jordan, burnett, pierce, e.simms, diles). But my leagues are very deep (55-60 man rosters). If your league isn't that deep then u should be able to replace Bradley for sure. Good qb depth is hard to come by (unless you only start 1).