That should prove once and for all that that talk about X% of his tackles were too far from the LOS is bunk without context.The team spent the off-season trying to trade Donnie Edwards, who led all linebackers in pass tackles (72) and finished second in the NFL in Stops (94).
Don't have it yet but the raw data may be in this season's Football Prospectus. Some of it is applicable to IDP leagues, in the sense that it helps to learn whose skill set works well in which scheme.I like the article but wish I could see the raw data on "stops".Not that it has any impact for FF IDP other than recognising which players will be more valuable in FA and to thier respective teams.I have no idea why SD is not happy with Edwards. He has been and is one of the best defenders in the league period.
Don't have it yet but the raw data may be in this season's Football Prospectus. Some of it is applicable to IDP leagues, in the sense that it helps to learn whose skill set works well in which scheme.I like the article but wish I could see the raw data on "stops".Not that it has any impact for FF IDP other than recognising which players will be more valuable in FA and to thier respective teams.I have no idea why SD is not happy with Edwards. He has been and is one of the best defenders in the league period.
Free agent Sam Cowart isn't toast yet, but the butter is on the counter.
Third-year pro Gilbert Gardner, who weighs 225 pounds after a trip to Waffle House, rounds out Ron Meeks' pesky band of Ewoks.
Would be cool to see this.But sounds like it is not in digital format?Sorry I don't know what football prospectus is.Don't have it yet but the raw data may be in this season's Football Prospectus. Some of it is applicable to IDP leagues, in the sense that it helps to learn whose skill set works well in which scheme.I like the article but wish I could see the raw data on "stops".Not that it has any impact for FF IDP other than recognising which players will be more valuable in FA and to thier respective teams.I have no idea why SD is not happy with Edwards. He has been and is one of the best defenders in the league period.Amazon shipped mine a couple of days ago. Should get it today.
It's a book. Inspired by the sabermetric movement that works well for some baseball enthusiasts. There is a yearly book (Baseball Prospectus) and now a separate stand-alone book by the same crew that has used some pretty interesting statistical measures to evaluate baseball players by taking as much luck out of the equation as possible and providing a framework to compare production across leagues and eras. Statistical ideas have been tried in the past for football -- Bob Carroll and others in The Hidden Game of Football for example -- but haven't gained much of a following at all. Think TMQ beating "It is better to have run and lost than never to have run at all" type essays.Although I agree with Rovers that football doesn't lend itself well to individual statistical analysis well at all because of the many variables involved in team play, there are some interesting raw stats that you can use as an adjunct to your player evaluation.Would be cool to see this.But sounds like it is not in digital format?Don't have it yet but the raw data may be in this season's Football Prospectus. Some of it is applicable to IDP leagues, in the sense that it helps to learn whose skill set works well in which scheme.I like the article but wish I could see the raw data on "stops".
Not that it has any impact for FF IDP other than recognising which players will be more valuable in FA and to thier respective teams.
I have no idea why SD is not happy with Edwards. He has been and is one of the best defenders in the league period.Amazon shipped mine a couple of days ago. Should get it today.
Sorry I don't know what football prospectus is.![]()
I didn't mean to imply that statistical analysis doesn't have it's place.... it certainly does, but they take it to an extreme that I find is faulted, and therefore limits the usefulness of their data.It's a book. Inspired by the sabermetric movement that works well for some baseball enthusiasts. There is a yearly book (Baseball Prospectus) and now a separate stand-alone book by the same crew that has used some pretty interesting statistical measures to evaluate baseball players by taking as much luck out of the equation as possible and providing a framework to compare production across leagues and eras. Statistical ideas have been tried in the past for football -- Bob Carroll and others in The Hidden Game of Football for example -- but haven't gained much of a following at all. Think TMQ beating "It is better to have run and lost than never to have run at all" type essays.Although I agree with Rovers that football doesn't lend itself well to individual statistical analysis well at all because of the many variables involved in team play, there are some interesting raw stats that you can use as an adjunct to your player evaluation.Would be cool to see this.But sounds like it is not in digital format?Don't have it yet but the raw data may be in this season's Football Prospectus. Some of it is applicable to IDP leagues, in the sense that it helps to learn whose skill set works well in which scheme.I like the article but wish I could see the raw data on "stops".
Not that it has any impact for FF IDP other than recognising which players will be more valuable in FA and to thier respective teams.
I have no idea why SD is not happy with Edwards. He has been and is one of the best defenders in the league period.Amazon shipped mine a couple of days ago. Should get it today.
Sorry I don't know what football prospectus is.![]()
I haven't seen this year's book yet, but, much like targets on the offensive side of the ball and now passes defended, breaking out tackles made in pass coverage and near the line of scrimmage is good data to have. It'll still be up to the reader to decide how to interpret (eg. were those tackles made due to scheme, solid surrounding cast, etc), but there are things to be gleaned from them.
It's worth flipping through in the bookstore. Some people love Dr. Z, some don't. Some people will be into this analysis, some won't.