Take this trade? (Lost Rodgers) (1 Viewer)

[NeverEnough]

I was offered Rivers for my G. Tate.

PPR dynasty. I'm ok at WR without Tate, but I still don't like this trade. Am I crazy?

We start 3 WR & 1 flex. My other WRs are Evans, Diggs, Landry, T. Hill, Juju & Richardson.

 

[wlwiles]

It's a fair trade.  You've got plenty of WR depth, so your issue must be with Rivers.  What other QB options do you have?  Is there enough on waivers to stream with?  Any other owners with 2 that could sell you one?  I don't see an issue with that deal...yeah it's a slight overpay probably but it makes you better at QB and doesn't hurt you at WR so no issue with it for me

 

[Gally]

I would take the trade rather easily without knowing the other QB options.  Tate is out for a few weeks and Rivers is a solid QB option. 

 

[NeverEnough]

It's a fair trade.  You've got plenty of WR depth, so your issue must be with Rivers.  What other QB options do you have?  Is there enough on waivers to stream with?  Any other owners with 2 that could sell you one?  I don't see an issue with that deal...yeah it's a slight overpay probably but it makes you better at QB and doesn't hurt you at WR so no issue with it for me

Going to try to grab McCown or Hundley off the WW.

 

[Trelocke]

I'd go

Going to try to grab McCown or Hundley off the WW.

I'd go with Hundley. He didn't look half bad in a game he was absolutely not expecting to play and GB has a history of making even average QBs look godlike.

That said, I'd absolutely do this trade. Rivers is a set-and-forget QB for the most part. He'll disappoint occasionally, but he's pretty much always throwing and always trying to make a comeback. He's a good contingency plan for now. You can always pawn him off later.

 

[NeverEnough]

I took the deal, thanks guys.