What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Team needs - as broken down by The Sporting News (1 Viewer)

Andy Dufresne

Footballguy
NFC (Link)

ARIZONA: CB, DE/OLB, RB. - With Antrel Rolle expected to move to free safety, the Cardinals are dangerously thin at cornerback. They also need a pass rusher, and the coaches would like to find someone with speed to complement or replace RB Edgerrin James.

ATLANTA: G, QB, OT. - The new regime is determined to establish the run, so it needs to revamp the line at guard and tackle. Look for the team to draft a young quarterback to groom; in the meantime, it will try to get by with Chris Redman or Byron Leftwich.

CAROLINA: OT, DE, WR. - Both starting tackles are free agents; expect the team to spend a lot to retain RT Jordan Gross. The team put little pressure on the pocket in 2007 and must replace RE Mike Rucker, who is expected to retire.

CHICAGO: QB, OT, S. - There isn't a surefire solution to the quarterback problem. One option: Re-sign Rex Grossman and draft a passer in the middle rounds to develop. The team badly needs a young tackle who can play immediately.

DALLAS: RB, WR, CB. - With Julius Jones headed for free agency, the Cowboys need a running back to complement Marion Barber -- and they'll likely add one in back-rich draft . They also could draft a potential No. 1 receiver to eventually replace Terrell Owens.

DETROIT: DE, CB, LB. - The Lions might not be able to fill their first need. They don't have a high enough pick to draft an impact end, and the free-agent pool isn't promising. They need two starting corners; expect them to land one in free agency.

GREEN BAY: G, OLB, CB. - The team might want to add bigger, more physical guards so it can call more inside zone running plays . The Packers also need to add a dynamic linebacker and a young corner.

MINNESOTA: QB, WR, DE. - The team could pursue a veteran quarterback if it decides Tarvaris Jackson isn't the long-term answer. No matter the quarterback, the Vikings need to add at least one downfield threat.

NEW ORLEANS: CB, LB, DT. - The Saints had one of the league's worst pass defenses last season and need an upgrade at corner. They could get in the running for Patriots free agent Asante Samuel. The team also needs an impact linebacker.

NEW YORK: CB, OLB, S. - Even with the emergence of Corey Webster and the solid play of rookie Aaron Ross , the team needs to add young depth at corner. The Giants also need more athletes at outside linebacker and could a sign a free-agent safety.

PHILADELPHIA: DE, CB, KR. - The club needs a pass-rushing complement to RE Trent Cole, who had more than a third of the team's sacks . The team must add depth at corner--especially because Lito Sheppard is injury-prone--and an impact return man .

ST. LOUIS: DE, WR, OT. - The Rams need some fresh legs at end and wide receiver, and they need to devote a lot of attention to the offensive line. With the second overall pick, the team could take Virginia DE Chris Long or Michigan OT Jake Long.

SAN FRANCISCO: WR, DE, ILB. - The lack of a playmaking wideout continues to drag down the offense, so expect the team to draft one capable of stretching the field. Also expect the 49ers to draft an end and pursue a free-agent inside linebacker.

SEATTLE: RB, TE, G. - Even if Shaun Alexander returns, the Seahawks must add a back. Oregon's Jonathan Stewart and Illinois' Rashard Mendenhall are possibilities in the first round. Eagles TE L.J. Smith and Colts G Jake Scott are potential free-agent targets.

TAMPA BAY: WR, TE, RB. - Outside of WR Joey Galloway, 36, the team has no threats in the passing game. The Bucs could be players for Bears WR Bernard Berrian and the Eagles' Smith. The team needs to rebuild at running back and could pursue Chargers free agent Michael Turner.

WASHINGTON: OT, S, OLB. - The team must add depth at tackle, where it has age and injury issues. Finding a quality free safety is also a priority -- LaRon Landry is capable of playing that position but is better suited to strong safety.

AFC (Link)

BALTIMORE: CB, QB, OT. - Starting CBs Chris McAlister, 30, and Samari Rolle, 31, missed significant time this season. The team doesn't have a quarterback of the future, and there is speculation it could trade up from the No. 8 spot and take Boston College's Matt Ryan.

BUFFALO: WR, TE, DT. QB - Trent Edwards needs more weapons, specifically a big receiver who can be a red zone target. Robert Royal is an outstanding blocker, but a receiving threat at tight end also would help Edwards.

CINCINNATI: DE, DT, OT. - DEs Robert Geathers and Justin Smith, who is expected to leave as a free agent, had only six sacks combined in 2007. That allowed a promising secondary to get picked apart. The team also needs a run-stuffing tackle.

CLEVELAND: DE, DT, RB. - The team could trade QB Derek Anderson to move back into the first round and draft help for the defensive line--a weak position that is sure to get a lot of offseason attention. RB Jamal Lewis wants to re-sign, but if a deal can't be reached, the Browns will have to sign a free agent or spend a high draft pick on a back.

DENVER: DT, LB, S. - The team's patchwork approach to the middle of the front four has caught up to it. D.J. Williams piled up tackles in his first year at middle linebacker, but he's more natural on the weak side. His versatility gives the team flexibility.

HOUSTON: CB, DE, OT. CB - Dunta Robinson (knee) likely will miss half of the season, and the Texans need a quality fill-in. They also need a pass-rushing end to start opposite Mario Williams.

INDIANAPOLIS: DE, TE, OT. - The pass rush was virtually nonexistent after RE Dwight Freeney (foot) was lost. The Colts must add a third pass rusher to play behind Freeney and LE Robert Mathis. The team favors two-tight end sets and needs to find a complement to Dallas Clark.

JACKSONVILLE: DE, WR, S. - The defense struggles to generate consistent pressure from the outside. Ravens OLB/DE Terrell Suggs is a possible free-agent target, though he may not reach the market. The team lacks a receiver defenses truly fear.

KANSAS CITY: OT, G, CB. - The Chiefs would be wise to move LT Damion McIntosh to the right side, which was a mess in 2007, and draft a left tackle in the first round. CB Ty Law's play has slipped dramatically; he probably won't return.

MIAMI: DT, WR, OT. - There are holes everywhere. Help is needed for a run defense that was often inept. LSU DT Glenn Dorsey could be targeted with the No. 1 pick. Ted Ginn made strides as a rookie, but he's not ready to be a No. 1 wideout.

NEW ENGLAND: LB, CB, S. - The team has four linebackers older than 30. Free-agent CB Asante Samuel likely will leave, which will create a big hole in the secondary.

NEW YORK: OLB, G, WR. - The team needs an outside linebacker who can beat blockers one-on-one and get to the quarterback. The Jets also lack a speedster who can stretch defenses and a tall wideout who can be an imposing target on fade routes.

OAKLAND: OT, WR, DT. - LT Barry Sims, 33, is on the downside of his career, and RT Cornell Green is a free agent coming off a season-ending foot injury. The team needs a No. 1 receiver to spark a passing game that ranked 31st in the league.

PITTSBURGH: G, DE, C. - Standout LG Alan Faneca is expected to leave as a free agent, and the team doesn't have a quality backup to replace him. A season-ending biceps injury to Aaron Smith underscored the team's lack of depth at defensive end. The line rotation needs young bodies.

SAN DIEGO: CB, G, RB. - Free-agent CB Drayton Florence won't be back, and Paul Oliver could move to safety. With RB Michael Turner leaving as a free agent, look for the Chargers to draft a runner to serve as LaDainian Tomlinson's backup.

TENNESSEE: WR, RB, TE. - Justin Gage, a Bears castoff, has become the team's most reliable receiver, which is telling. A downfield threat is needed to open up the offense. A home run threat to complement bruising RB LenDale White also would help. RB Chris Henry was slow to develop in his rookie year.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Can't much argue with the Giants. As noted elsewhere, there are no glaring needs but we could be in line for a LB or DB. I still think shoring up the interior line would help as well.

 
Steelers = accurate

Ben wants a tall WR, but i wouldn't call that a glaring need.

O-line and D-line are definite concerns...

 
BTW - I hope this kind of thread is okay to post. I'm trying not to throw stuff up here that the FBG staff are trying to prepare on their own and make some $$$ with.

If it is against the rules, I won't be mad if it's whacked and I apologize in advance. :(

 
Giants is pretty accurate. I would add a WR to that list. I would put in order of importance S, LB, WR, CB. Though I could be convinced to switch WR and CB.

 
Looks spot on for NE. Getting younger and faster at LB has to be the top priority. One position I haven't seen much mention of is an edge pass rush. I think we're getting to the end of the line with Vrabel in that role.

 
NFC (Link)

PHILADELPHIA: DE, CB, KR. - The club needs a pass-rushing complement to RE Trent Cole, who had more than a third of the team's sacks. The team must add depth at corner--especially because Lito Sheppard is injury-prone--and an impact return man.
Agreed on the CB, DE, KR - but safety needs some youth as well. Mikell >> Considine, but Brian Dawkins is nearing the end.WR and TE should also get looks if they don't improve via FA.

AFC (Link)

BALTIMORE: CB, QB, OT. - Starting CBs Chris McAlister, 30, and Samari Rolle, 31, missed significant time this season. The team doesn't have a quarterback of the future, and there is speculation it could trade up from the No. 8 spot and take Boston College's Matt Ryan.
Backup RB could also be needed if Musa's gone.
 
NFC (Link)

PHILADELPHIA: DE, CB, KR. - The club needs a pass-rushing complement to RE Trent Cole, who had more than a third of the team's sacks. The team must add depth at corner--especially because Lito Sheppard is injury-prone--and an impact return man.
Agreed on the CB, DE, KR - but safety needs some youth as well. Mikell >> Considine, but Brian Dawkins is nearing the end.WR and TE should also get looks if they don't improve via FA.

AFC (Link)

BALTIMORE: CB, QB, OT. - Starting CBs Chris McAlister, 30, and Samari Rolle, 31, missed significant time this season. The team doesn't have a quarterback of the future, and there is speculation it could trade up from the No. 8 spot and take Boston College's Matt Ryan.
Backup RB could also be needed if Musa's gone.
Agree on the Eagles. Safety is a position that they need to address considering that Dawkins in near the end. They can probably get by next year, but then what?

I don't think they need to address WR right now. I have bigger concerns along the offensive line. Tra Thomas and Jon Runyan are up there in years, how much longer do they have? It would be a big blow to lose both those guys in the same year and have to insert Giles and Justice at the same time. I would much prefer to bring in an established guard so that either Andrews or Herremans can swing out to tackle if one of those guys retires.

TE is another position they'll have a need at if LJ Smith leaves (which seemed almost certain at the end of last year).

I would rank needs like this DE, CB, OL, S, TE.

 
The Chefs are right on cue as well!!
Is it true that Law may not return?
yes, its true that both Law and Surtain may not return. I read an article this morning on KC Star regarding an interview with Gunther Cunningham and he said "we are taking a sledgehammer to this defense" in the off season. They got burnt soo bad this past season, especially in divisional play, so they are definitely looking to get younger via the draft. I would love for them to pursue Trufant, but that probably wont happen.
 
CHICAGO: QB, OT, S. - There isn't a surefire solution to the quarterback problem. One option: Re-sign Rex Grossman and draft a passer in the middle rounds to develop. The team badly needs a young tackle who can play immediately.
Also need a starting guard.
 
I dont think its any surprise that the Steelers' glaring need is at O- and D-Line. I'll be surprised if they dont go lineman with their first three picks.

 
I dont think its any surprise that the Steelers' glaring need is at O- and D-Line. I'll be surprised if they dont go lineman with their first three picks.
Fortunately for them (and a lot of teams), this appaers to be a lineman rich draft.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
NFC (Link)

PHILADELPHIA: DE, CB, KR. - The club needs a pass-rushing complement to RE Trent Cole, who had more than a third of the team's sacks. The team must add depth at corner--especially because Lito Sheppard is injury-prone--and an impact return man.
Agreed on the CB, DE, KR - but safety needs some youth as well. Mikell >> Considine, but Brian Dawkins is nearing the end.WR and TE should also get looks if they don't improve via FA.

AFC (Link)

BALTIMORE: CB, QB, OT. - Starting CBs Chris McAlister, 30, and Samari Rolle, 31, missed significant time this season. The team doesn't have a quarterback of the future, and there is speculation it could trade up from the No. 8 spot and take Boston College's Matt Ryan.
Backup RB could also be needed if Musa's gone.
Agree on the Eagles. Safety is a position that they need to address considering that Dawkins in near the end. They can probably get by next year, but then what?

I don't think they need to address WR right now. I have bigger concerns along the offensive line. Tra Thomas and Jon Runyan are up there in years, how much longer do they have? It would be a big blow to lose both those guys in the same year and have to insert Giles and Justice at the same time. I would much prefer to bring in an established guard so that either Andrews or Herremans can swing out to tackle if one of those guys retires.

TE is another position they'll have a need at if LJ Smith leaves (which seemed almost certain at the end of last year).

I would rank needs like this DE, CB, OL, S, TE.
Put WR as the #1 need. As Donovan and Dawkins have said, this team needs a playmaker. I agree with the DE, CB and KR but I think if the Eagles can secure a top WR that will have a greater impact on their performance than any of these other positions.
 
I dont think its any surprise that the Steelers' glaring need is at O- and D-Line. I'll be surprised if they dont go lineman with their first three picks.
Fortunately for them (and a lot of teams), this appaers to be a lineman rich draft.
:popcorn: Although their bigger need is on offense, I think we saw just how valuable Aaron Smith was on defense. An insurance policy would be nice.
 
Put WR as the #1 need. As Donovan and Dawkins have said, this team needs a playmaker. I agree with the DE, CB and KR but I think if the Eagles can secure a top WR that will have a greater impact on their performance than any of these other positions.
What are the chances the Eagles break with tradition and look at WR in the first round?
 
NFC (Link)

ATLANTA: G, QB, OT. - The new regime is determined to establish the run, so it needs to revamp the line at guard and tackle. Look for the team to draft a young quarterback to groom; in the meantime, it will try to get by with Chris Redman or Byron Leftwich.

CHICAGO: QB, OT, S. - There isn't a surefire solution to the quarterback problem. One option: Re-sign Rex Grossman and draft a passer in the middle rounds to develop. The team badly needs a young tackle who can play immediately.

MINNESOTA: QB, WR, DE. - The team could pursue a veteran quarterback if it decides Tarvaris Jackson isn't the long-term answer. No matter the quarterback, the Vikings need to add at least one downfield threat.

AFC (Link)

BALTIMORE: CB, QB, OT. - Starting CBs Chris McAlister, 30, and Samari Rolle, 31, missed significant time this season. The team doesn't have a quarterback of the future, and there is speculation it could trade up from the No. 8 spot and take Boston College's Matt Ryan.

BUFFALO: WR, TE, DT. QB - Trent Edwards needs more weapons, specifically a big receiver who can be a red zone target. Robert Royal is an outstanding blocker, but a receiving threat at tight end also would help Edwards.
I saw this the other day but didn't share because of the above where they only show five teams needing QB help and then only think two teams would put QB at the top of their list. When they show a team like Miami needing WR help over quarterback I question their line of reasoning. They have three teams listing G as their number one need but only two listing QB at the top of their need list. Somehow I think Atlanta would much prefer a franchise QB over a G at the top of their need priority list. And although many Panther fans say that Carolina doesn't need a QB I don't see one of their top three needs at WR with Steve Smith and their top pick last year at WR. QB would have to rate higher than putting WR as one of their top three needs. And Tampa hasn't had a stable QB situation since Doug Williams. I would think the way Chuckie has gone after any QB that he has QB as one of his top prioritites. Then one of the teams they list with QB as one of their top three needs, Buffalo, I simply don't agree with that. KC may be whistling past the graveyard with Croyle but its no secret he hasn't done anything to bump QB off their need list.

Its one guy trying to match up talent available in the draft and possibly free agency with what he perceives as top needs for teams but its very tough to keep track of every team and know every top need. The raw numbers where he only has two teams with QB as their top need doesn't jive with the teams who had poor QB play but it fits in better with the minimal talent available in the draft/free agency that could help.

 
I don't think bringing in another young WR is going to be very high on Miami's priority list come draft day -- especially with so many other BIG needs. I do see Miami acquiring some kind of veteran receiver (another Marty Booker-type) through FA..

At the draft, I think it's going to be all defense with an offensive lineman sprinkled in here or there...

My rankings of priority on draft day are:

1) DL LB DB

2) OT

3) OG C

 
Last edited by a moderator:
CAROLINA: OT, DE, WR. - Both starting tackles are free agents; expect the team to spend a lot to retain RT Jordan Gross. The team put little pressure on the pocket in 2007 and must replace RE Mike Rucker, who is expected to retire.
I agree with this, but it looks like Rucker wants to come back for another year. Whether that's a lesser deal with Carolina so he doesn't have to move and can retire a Panther, is yet to be determined. Jordan Gross likely will be retained, but LT Travelle Wharton is likely gone. I can see them going with an OT (preferably a LT). DE is another concern simply because they may lose Julius Peppers in 2009. Plus they are aging on the DL. The only other position of need I see is DB, especially safety. It will be interesting to see what direction they take to find their #2 WR for 2008. Will they get someone from the FA market like Bryant Johnson or will they continue to groom Dwayne Jarrett? I think the level of WRs that are available in the 2nd and 3rd round will determine how they plan the rest of their draft. I definitely think OT or DE will be their first pick and maybe their first and second pick. If they did go Safety later on in the 4th or 6th round (no 5th rd pick) - I like Quentin Demps (UTEP)
 
I don't think bringing in another young WR is going to be very high on Miami's priority list come draft day -- especially with so many other BIG needs. I do see Miami acquiring some kind of veteran receiver (another Marty Booker-type) through FA..At the draft, I think it's going to be all defense with an offensive lineman sprinkled in here or there...My rankings of priority on draft day are:1) DL LB DB2) OT3) OG C
Assuming they keep the pick, who is your preference for the #1 overall?
 
JACKSONVILLE: DE, WR, S. - The defense struggles to generate consistent pressure from the outside. Ravens OLB/DE Terrell Suggs is a possible free-agent target, though he may not reach the market. The team lacks a receiver defenses truly fear.
These are accurate needs. I would add CB to the list of immediate needs.
 
Put WR as the #1 need. As Donovan and Dawkins have said, this team needs a playmaker. I agree with the DE, CB and KR but I think if the Eagles can secure a top WR that will have a greater impact on their performance than any of these other positions.
What are the chances the Eagles break with tradition and look at WR in the first round?
I was thinking an established FA #1 WR. There are some nice names floating around that may be available this offseason. I would LOVE to see what kind of numbers Fitz can put up with McNabb. I don't want to see another wasted pick on a WR - in any round. We don't have time for a project and I can't recall any panning out anyway. Anyone who thinks Reggie Brown is the answer at WR is :lmao:
 
I don't think bringing in another young WR is going to be very high on Miami's priority list come draft day -- especially with so many other BIG needs. I do see Miami acquiring some kind of veteran receiver (another Marty Booker-type) through FA..At the draft, I think it's going to be all defense with an offensive lineman sprinkled in here or there...My rankings of priority on draft day are:1) DL LB DB2) OT3) OG C
Assuming they keep the pick, who is your preference for the #1 overall?
Chris Long!
 
Agreed on the Packers.
Why do they need a "dynamic" linebacker?. Barnett and Hawk are playmakers. And while Poppinga isn't a playmaker, I don't hear of the SLB ever described in that term anyway.
GREEN BAY: G, OLB, CB. - The team might want to add bigger, more physical guards so it can call more inside zone running plays . The Packers also need to add a dynamic linebacker and a young corner.
I have a few disagreements with this. First, I thought the whole point of zone blocking was that you typically use smaller but athletic guards. Second, totally agree with Andy - the Pack already has 2 playmaking LBs. I don't really love Poppinga, but he is serviceable.Would rather see the Packers target a DE who can rush the passer, along with a CB who can take over for Harris or Woodson in a year. The rest (OLB, G, etc) is just gravy. In fact, I'd rather see us target a Tackle - Clifton and Tauscher are both quickly aging.

 
CLEVELAND: DE, DT, RB. - The team could trade QB Derek Anderson to move back into the first round and draft help for the defensive line--a weak position that is sure to get a lot of offseason attention. RB Jamal Lewis wants to re-sign, but if a deal can't be reached, the Browns will have to sign a free agent or spend a high draft pick on a back.
LB is a priority too. Wimbley needs another pass rusher opposite him, Peek is an adequate backup but no starter. On the inside DQwell and Leon are good but not great and Andra's clearly lost a step, we need another in there. Another safety for depth would be nice too, Adams isn't even good enough to be a backup and we can't be relying on Baxter's knees to get him back on the field even though that is the hope.
 
SAN DIEGO: CB, G, RB. - Free-agent CB Drayton Florence won't be back, and Paul Oliver could move to safety. With RB Michael Turner leaving as a free agent, look for the Chargers to draft a runner to serve as LaDainian Tomlinson's backup.

I think T is more improtant than G. IMO

CB, not so much I'd say Saftey.

I would want an improved ILB as well

 
I think Cinci needs to take several risks with their early picks on good talent / questionable character guys.

You can NEVER have enough of that type of player in your locker room.

:unsure:

 
NEW YORK: OLB, G, WR. - The team needs an outside linebacker who can beat blockers one-on-one and get to the quarterback. The Jets also lack a speedster who can stretch defenses and a tall wideout who can be an imposing target on fade routes.
Well, and a DT and a RT and possibly a QB.

 
Andy Dufresne said:
Kruppe said:
Put WR as the #1 need. As Donovan and Dawkins have said, this team needs a playmaker. I agree with the DE, CB and KR but I think if the Eagles can secure a top WR that will have a greater impact on their performance than any of these other positions.
What are the chances the Eagles break with tradition and look at WR in the first round?
Slim to none. They'll go DB that can be a playmaker and/or return kicks.WR should be addressed in FA.
 
I think this is right for Detroit. The Lions need CBs, but the success of the Tampa 2 defense starts with the D line putting pressure on the QB. Kalimba Edwards didn't work out (thanks Millen for giving him a big contract). The Lions also need a middle linebacker to help stop the run.

 
Andy Dufresne said:
Kruppe said:
Put WR as the #1 need. As Donovan and Dawkins have said, this team needs a playmaker. I agree with the DE, CB and KR but I think if the Eagles can secure a top WR that will have a greater impact on their performance than any of these other positions.
What are the chances the Eagles break with tradition and look at WR in the first round?
Slim to none. They'll go DB that can be a playmaker and/or return kicks.WR should be addressed in FA.
:unsure:
 
Andy Dufresne said:
SAN DIEGO: CB, G, RB. - Free-agent CB Drayton Florence won't be back, and Paul Oliver could move to safety. With RB Michael Turner leaving as a free agent, look for the Chargers to draft a runner to serve as LaDainian Tomlinson's backup.
Add T and DT to this list. The Chargers had some problems on the right side of their line this year and Jamal Williams looks to be on the downside of his career.
 
Andy Dufresne said:
WASHINGTON: OT, S, OLB. - The team must add depth at tackle, where it has age and injury issues. Finding a quality free safety is also a priority -- LaRon Landry is capable of playing that position but is better suited to strong safety.
OL depth and depth as a whole in the secondary (S and CB) should definitely be big priorities for the 'Skins. I don't think OLB is in the top 3, though. DL and WR would rank ahead of OLB in my book. They're probably seeing Rocky McIntosh's injury and Lance Briggs being a FA and trying to put 2 and 2 together. The 'Skins courted Briggs via trade pretty heavily last year, but McIntosh was just reported to be on or ahead of his rehab schedule. I'm not saying the 'Skins won't go after Briggs, by any means, just that OLB isn't as big a "team need" as some other positions.

 
I would actually say for KC

QB, WR, T, G, C, DT, MLB, CB, PK

...you get the picture.

But if I were to pick three I would keep CB, T and instead of G, I would insert QB. Brodie Croyle is not even close to being an average NFL starting QB.

 
Andy Dufresne said:
DETROIT: DE, CB, LB. - The Lions might not be able to fill their first need. They don't have a high enough pick to draft an impact end, and the free-agent pool isn't promising. They need two starting corners; expect them to land one in free agency.
We're stuck with Kitna for better or worse, Stanton is not ready.KJ is injury prone while Bell and Duckett may go elsewhere.

We're set at WR.

:towelwave:

No talent at TE.

Backus would be better suited at guard than LT, and we could use an upgrade at WT.

Need two corners and more depth at S (KK is 30).

Would be nice to have an impact player in the front 7 but the other needs are more pressing.

Hanson is going into his 16th year, and we need a potential game breaker returner.

We have an awesome punter!

:towelwave:

51 years and counting...

 
Andy Dufresne said:
WASHINGTON: OT, S, OLB. - The team must add depth at tackle, where it has age and injury issues. Finding a quality free safety is also a priority -- LaRon Landry is capable of playing that position but is better suited to strong safety.
OL depth and depth as a whole in the secondary (S and CB) should definitely be big priorities for the 'Skins. I don't think OLB is in the top 3, though. DL and WR would rank ahead of OLB in my book. They're probably seeing Rocky McIntosh's injury and Lance Briggs being a FA and trying to put 2 and 2 together. The 'Skins courted Briggs via trade pretty heavily last year, but McIntosh was just reported to be on or ahead of his rehab schedule. I'm not saying the 'Skins won't go after Briggs, by any means, just that OLB isn't as big a "team need" as some other positions.
There is no higher priority for them than DE IMHO. It's ridiculous that that didn't even get a mention. CB and WR also belong in the discussion, as does OG for that matter.
 
Reaper said:
Andy Dufresne said:
NEW YORK: OLB, G, WR. - The team needs an outside linebacker who can beat blockers one-on-one and get to the quarterback. The Jets also lack a speedster who can stretch defenses and a tall wideout who can be an imposing target on fade routes.
Well, and a DT and a RT and possibly a QB.
Yeah, I'd put Nose Tackle at the top of that list. WR is a need, but i think they have a few developmental guys (smith and stuckey) that could prove to be good. However, a tall speedster in the Moss mold would help any offense.
 
I would actually say for KCQB, WR, T, G, C, DT, MLB, CB, PK...you get the picture.But if I were to pick three I would keep CB, T and instead of G, I would insert QB. Brodie Croyle is not even close to being an average NFL starting QB.
Do you think they go tackle or quarterback with that first rounder? If Ellis falls to them, he'd be a great option too, right?
 
I would actually say for KCQB, WR, T, G, C, DT, MLB, CB, PK...you get the picture.But if I were to pick three I would keep CB, T and instead of G, I would insert QB. Brodie Croyle is not even close to being an average NFL starting QB.
Do you think they go tackle or quarterback with that first rounder? If Ellis falls to them, he'd be a great option too, right?
Such a tough call....IMO there is not a air-tight franchise QB that sticks out to me in this draft, I would take Jake Long if he is there @ 4 or 5. As for Ellis, believe it or not, I don't think that is the biggest need. The Alfonso Boone signing helped and better LB play will help in '08.In a perfect world, Mcfadden would still be there when KC comes up and DALL gets excited and sends KC its two first rounders and a 3rd to get Mcfadden.,...but that is a dream scenario.As it stands now, I would go Hake Long, move McIntosh to RT. If that happens, and they sign one G, that Ol is massively better.
 
I would actually say for KCQB, WR, T, G, C, DT, MLB, CB, PK...you get the picture.But if I were to pick three I would keep CB, T and instead of G, I would insert QB. Brodie Croyle is not even close to being an average NFL starting QB.
Do you think they go tackle or quarterback with that first rounder? If Ellis falls to them, he'd be a great option too, right?
Such a tough call....IMO there is not a air-tight franchise QB that sticks out to me in this draft, I would take Jake Long if he is there @ 4 or 5. As for Ellis, believe it or not, I don't think that is the biggest need. The Alfonso Boone signing helped and better LB play will help in '08.In a perfect world, Mcfadden would still be there when KC comes up and DALL gets excited and sends KC its two first rounders and a 3rd to get Mcfadden.,...but that is a dream scenario.As it stands now, I would go Hake Long, move McIntosh to RT. If that happens, and they sign one G, that Ol is massively better.
Any potential FA QB's that may be on their radar?
 
MIAMI: DT, WR, OT. - There are holes everywhere. Help is needed for a run defense that was often inept. LSU DT Glenn Dorsey could be targeted with the No. 1 pick. Ted Ginn made strides as a rookie, but he's not ready to be a No. 1 wideout.
Bold I agree with.The rest, I dunno. I'd agree that DT is a need, but QB is a bigger need than WR or even OT. While I think the team should take OT Jake Long #1 overall, getting another WR w/o addressing QB makes no sense for the team.

In order of need:

QB

DT

LB

DE

OT

WR

Someone may say defensive backfield, but recall that the team this year was decimated by injuries and they actually have players at the position. Now, all that said, I do not believe Parcells will address QB this year except to maybe sign a veteran. Since he won't address QB, I don't think he will sign a big name FA WR nor will he spend a high draft pick on one. So, making WR one of the team's top-3 needs was a poor choice.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top