Team needs - as broken down by The Sporting News (1 Viewer)

[PranksterJD]

WASHINGTON: OT, S, OLB. - The team must add depth at tackle, where it has age and injury issues. Finding a quality free safety is also a priority -- LaRon Landry is capable of playing that position but is better suited to strong safety.

Head Coach.

 

[BroadwayG]

Agreed on the Packers.

Why do they need a "dynamic" linebacker?. Barnett and Hawk are playmakers. And while Poppinga isn't a playmaker, I don't hear of the SLB ever described in that term anyway.

GREEN BAY: G, OLB, CB. - The team might want to add bigger, more physical guards so it can call more inside zone running plays . The Packers also need to add a dynamic linebacker and a young corner.

I have a few disagreements with this. First, I thought the whole point of zone blocking was that you typically use smaller but athletic guards. Second, totally agree with Andy - the Pack already has 2 playmaking LBs. I don't really love Poppinga, but he is serviceable.Would rather see the Packers target a DE who can rush the passer, along with a CB who can take over for Harris or Woodson in a year. The rest (OLB, G, etc) is just gravy. In fact, I'd rather see us target a Tackle - Clifton and Tauscher are both quickly aging.

This is all just my opinion:They've been pitiful at Guard ever since Wahle and Rivera left. They've thrown a bazillion people into the position and none of them has stepped up to become 'the man.' This shouldn't be a surprise here. I will agree Tackle will also become an issue sooner rather than later.

At LB, Barnett is not a 'playmaker'. Sure he puts up mad tackle numbers, but who doesn't from the Mike? He's got zero presence in the blitz scheme, and gets housed by RBs when he is forced into coverage. I'd love to see Hawk in the middle if this 'dynamic' LB ever arrives. I'm thinking what an Adalius Thomas clone could do. :drool:

CB I'd put at #1. Al Harris played like he aged 25 years in and after the Dallas game.

A DE who can rush the passer? Kampman down? Him and KGB combined for 22 sacks! Their DL is pretty flippin' stout, not sure I'd go messing around with it. I'd rather see a LB who can wreak some havoc.

 

[Kevin Ashcraft]

I would actually say for KCQB, WR, T, G, C, DT, MLB, CB, PK...you get the picture.But if I were to pick three I would keep CB, T and instead of G, I would insert QB. Brodie Croyle is not even close to being an average NFL starting QB.

Do you think they go tackle or quarterback with that first rounder? If Ellis falls to them, he'd be a great option too, right?

Such a tough call....IMO there is not a air-tight franchise QB that sticks out to me in this draft, I would take Jake Long if he is there @ 4 or 5. As for Ellis, believe it or not, I don't think that is the biggest need. The Alfonso Boone signing helped and better LB play will help in '08.In a perfect world, Mcfadden would still be there when KC comes up and DALL gets excited and sends KC its two first rounders and a 3rd to get Mcfadden.,...but that is a dream scenario.As it stands now, I would go Hake Long, move McIntosh to RT. If that happens, and they sign one G, that Ol is massively better.

Any potential FA QB's that may be on their radar?

Not that I have heard of...of course they think Croyle is good enough with a better OL.

 

[DoubleG]

NFC (Link)

CHICAGO: QB, OT, S. - There isn't a surefire solution to the quarterback problem. One option: Re-sign Rex Grossman and draft a passer in the middle rounds to develop. The team badly needs a young tackle who can play immediately.

I concur. As a Bear fan, I acutally wouldn't mind if the re-signed Rex - as long as they DID go after O-line help to protect him. When he had time to throw he was fine - it's when he's taking a ton of heat that he gets erratic and takes dumb chances. I also think they need to do something at RB. Benson is not "the guy" and hasn't earned the spot. Safety is a huge need for them. All you have to do is see the difference in stats when Mike Brown played vs. when he was out. I had hoped that AA could help in that regard - but he was bad, then he was bad AND hurt

 

[VaCatFan]

CAROLINA: OT, DE, WR. - Both starting tackles are free agents; expect the team to spend a lot to retain RT Jordan Gross. The team put little pressure on the pocket in 2007 and must replace RE Mike Rucker, who is expected to retire.

I agree with this, but it looks like Rucker wants to come back for another year. Whether that's a lesser deal with Carolina so he doesn't have to move and can retire a Panther, is yet to be determined. Jordan Gross likely will be retained, but LT Travelle Wharton is likely gone. I can see them going with an OT (preferably a LT). DE is another concern simply because they may lose Julius Peppers in 2009. Plus they are aging on the DL. The only other position of need I see is DB, especially safety. It will be interesting to see what direction they take to find their #2 WR for 2008. Will they get someone from the FA market like Bryant Johnson or will they continue to groom Dwayne Jarrett? I think the level of WRs that are available in the 2nd and 3rd round will determine how they plan the rest of their draft. I definitely think OT or DE will be their first pick and maybe their first and second pick. If they did go Safety later on in the 4th or 6th round (no 5th rd pick) - I like Quentin Demps (UTEP)

- Solid analysis. Rucker wants to play this year, although I don't think it's with Carolina. I think the wants to play with whatever team his brother Martin gets picked by. A 2nd round DE would be a welcome addition as Carolina got NO pressure on the QB last year. Granted, most of us think Peppers issues were due to Mono and his inability to use steroids (standard treatment) to overcome it. Gross and the Panthers are already in negotiations and he's already said that they're going ok. I think he'll be back, even if he's franchised for a year. Wharton is the question mark. There is word floating around that Mike Wahle may be cut due to his $3m salary and the fact that he's due a $1m roster bonus. If he is cut, I expect Wharton to be resigned and moved to LG with Gross playing LT. That makes the need for a RT which may be easier for us to find later in the draft than a franchise LT. At WR2, I think it's going to be Jarret. A lot of it depends on his improvement this year, but he's already in Carolina working out ahead of camp. I can still see a WR later in the draft and most likely a veteran free agent brought in. Defensive tackle may be a requirement as well as Carolina's 3rd and 4th rotation DT's are free agents and we haven't been thrilled with Maake "I want my baby back ribs" Kemoeatu. Free safety is another position of need. They could try Richard Marshall or Chris Gamble at the position. I'd prefer Gamble there as he isn't very good in run support and he plays wr's soft. Marshall is a hitter who I think complements Lucas better. Demps is a good choice, or we could look at Hefney from Tennessee or the kid from NC State.

 

[Houston turmOiler]

HOUSTON: CB, DE, OT. CB - Dunta Robinson (knee) likely will miss half of the season, and the Texans need a quality fill-in. They also need a pass-rushing end to start opposite Mario Williams.

I've been saying this for a while now. Despite Mario's success last season there were still too many times opposing QBs had all day to throw. Put a speed rusher at RDE, Mario at LDE, and hope Okoye makes similar progress in his second year like Mario did. If it pans out the defense is vastly improved. I really hope the Texans can find a guy like this somewhere in the draft. I really don't see us using our 1st rounder on another defensive lineman, but I'm hoping to find a gem in the later rounds like Indy did with Robert Mathis and Denver did with Dumervil (even though they lack ideal size). IMO it would help mask some of our secondary problems and be the most effective way to improve the defense. You need consistent pressure, and having just one guy right now (Mario) isn't enough.

Obviously, CB is also a huge need with Dunta being out. It's very possible this is our first round pick, and we could easily take another one later as well. Bennett looks like a keeper but Fletcher is nothing more than a nickel back and Faggins is flat-out awful. Hutchins isn't very good either. I pretty much agree with the article that these two areas are huge needs. A play-making safety who can run and cover a little bit would be a very nice addition as well. Will Demps did a decent job once we picked him up, but he's not exactly fast and there's a reason he was a free agent. CC Brown will never be anything more than average. This is why I REALLY want another consistent pass-rusher (or two), because there's no way to fill all of the holes in the secondary unless you harass the opposing QB repeatedly.

LT is another possibility. We've been trying to fill that position for years. I liked what I saw from Matt Schaub for the most part (but hell, I was subjected to five years of David Carr, so what do I know?). Sacks allowed were down, but Schaub still got pummeled quite a bit and missed a lot of time. Keeping him alive might be the biggest priority headed into the draft, even though Rosenfels had his moments. I'd still rather have a healthy Schaub starting at QB, and LT is the weakest spot on the OL. Winston's becoming a good player at RT, and you can always count on Pitts to be there at LG. McKinney should be back, and he's a lot better than Flanagan at C. We could use an upgrade at RG as well.

I'm not as worried about RB b/c I think they're much easier to find than DEs and CBs, but I suspect one will drafted in the middle rounds. I'd still like to see what Chris Taylor can do, but it's pretty hard to count on a guy who has no track record and is coming off an injury that kept him out for the season. I expect Dayne to be back but he needs a compliment at the very least. Ahman Green would be great for that role, except he gets paid a lot of money and can't finish a game. Maybe I should be a little more worried about it...

As I type this I'm beginning to think the best scenario would be to get a RB with our first pick, but with that pick being much lower or even out of the first round. Obviously that would involve trading down, something that's easier said than done. It's a RB-rich draft and there's bound to be good ones available, and an extra pick or two somewhere along the way would be helpful since we dealt our 2nd away for Schaub last season. Gotta find a willing partner though. If we stay where we are, I think the pick is CB or LT.

 

[3nOut]

NFC (Link)

CHICAGO: QB, OT, S. - There isn't a surefire solution to the quarterback problem. One option: Re-sign Rex Grossman and draft a passer in the middle rounds to develop. The team badly needs a young tackle who can play immediately.

I concur. As a Bear fan, I acutally wouldn't mind if the re-signed Rex - as long as they DID go after O-line help to protect him. When he had time to throw he was fine - it's when he's taking a ton of heat that he gets erratic and takes dumb chances. I also think they need to do something at RB. Benson is not "the guy" and hasn't earned the spot. Safety is a huge need for them. All you have to do is see the difference in stats when Mike Brown played vs. when he was out. I had hoped that AA could help in that regard - but he was bad, then he was bad AND hurt

The needs are correct, but the order is not. I would say OT, S, QB.

 

[hitmenssharpshooters]

I don't think bringing in another young WR is going to be very high on Miami's priority list come draft day -- especially with so many other BIG needs. I do see Miami acquiring some kind of veteran receiver (another Marty Booker-type) through FA..At the draft, I think it's going to be all defense with an offensive lineman sprinkled in here or there...My rankings of priority on draft day are:1) DL LB DB2) OT3) OG C

Assuming they keep the pick, who is your preference for the #1 overall?

As a Fins fanChris Long,Jake Long,Howie Long...we need to get Longgggg!I would be ok with Dorsey if Tuna feels he can fit in the system.

 

[thecatch]

NFC (Link)

SAN FRANCISCO: WR, DE, ILB. - The lack of a playmaking wideout continues to drag down the offense, so expect the team to draft one capable of stretching the field. Also expect the 49ers to draft an end and pursue a free-agent inside linebacker.

From listening to SF's front office, I think if they make a big move at WR it will be via trade or FA. I don't think anyone in the front office or the coaching staff has the patience (or job security) to wait for a rookie to develop, and it's clearly their #1 need.Otherwise I think they'll focus on the defensive line, especially if Sopoaga and Douglas leave

 

[Marvelous]

WASHINGTON: OT, S, OLB. - The team must add depth at tackle, where it has age and injury issues. Finding a quality free safety is also a priority -- LaRon Landry is capable of playing that position but is better suited to strong safety.

OL depth and depth as a whole in the secondary (S and CB) should definitely be big priorities for the 'Skins. I don't think OLB is in the top 3, though. DL and WR would rank ahead of OLB in my book. They're probably seeing Rocky McIntosh's injury and Lance Briggs being a FA and trying to put 2 and 2 together. The 'Skins courted Briggs via trade pretty heavily last year, but McIntosh was just reported to be on or ahead of his rehab schedule. I'm not saying the 'Skins won't go after Briggs, by any means, just that OLB isn't as big a "team need" as some other positions.

TSN missed the mark on the Redskins. At OT, the age and cap figures for Samuels and Jansen are a concern. But I think they like Heyers as a future starter. Wade is a solid backup. So unless either Samuels or Jansen will not be back next year, OT is not an immediate concern.

At OLB, the have Rocky McIntosh one one side, and had Washingon/Godfrey/HB Blades on the other. Washington and Godfrey may not be back, but I think they like HB Blades too. But depth could be a concern.

There was a report that Gregg Williams thought the top priority was at CB. Williams likes to have 3 starting caliber CBs. Rogers injury could be a big one. And Shawn Springs is injury prone and old. So that could be a big need.

I think the biggest need is a pass rushing DE. Unless they think Wilson is the answer in the future, they don't even have a potential pass rushing DE on the roster. I read one report that if the Redskins play more cover 2 (which they may), getting more pass rush from the front 4 will be important.

This is some need at WR, depending on who comes back. McCardell may retire. Caldwell looked ok and could be a decent #3 for the interim. Mike Espy may come back from injury and get a shot.

OL depth is always a need, especially at OG.

 

[Rovers]

Clueless as far as the Jets go.

Top needs: OLG, ORT

Next: 3-4 Nose tackle

ANYONE who can pass rush!

If you can't protect the QB for 3 and 5 step drops, even Jerry Rice in his prime isn't gonna help. Coles and Cotchery are fine for now. Yes, they need a pass rusher... don't care if it's a 3-4 DE or an OLB. But the Jets O line is amoung the worst in the NFL. Can't run block, can't pass block. Unless they fix the O line, it's going to be another dismall 5 win type of year.

 

[Obie Wan]

NFC (Link)

A

BUFFALO: WR, TE, DT. QB - Trent Edwards needs more weapons, specifically a big receiver who can be a red zone target. Robert Royal is an outstanding blocker, but a receiving threat at tight end also would help Edwards.

[

The Bills single biggest need is playmakers at LB. Ellison and the Pizzaboy are not starter material.Schauman may be the answer at TE, but he was injured last year.

Bills will probably keep Losman, but may need to replace him after 2008 when he is a free agent. So they could draft a QB is one drops like Edwards did.

 

[The Kansas Comet]

For the Bears, I would switch OT to OL, but aside from that, safety and quarterback are huge needs as well. And then there's running back and wide receiver and...

 

[Pat Patriot]

The Patriots needs are obvious but I still think they have the ability to go BPA with the #7 pick.

Asante Samuel is likely gone.

My preference is for Vernon Gholsten with the first pick. I think there is a possibility that Colvin will come back at a reduced price, if not, he will be released (high salary cap #). If they draft Gholsten it allows the Pats to move A. Thomas and Vrabel back and forth from outside to inside to provide more depth for the ILB spot. I think Bruschi and Seau will be back.

Or the Pats could draft Mike Jenkins from South Florida and try and sign a FA LB (Belichicks' historical preference). There are a few impact LB's available; Karlos Dansby, Clark Haggans, Lance Briggs.

If Jake Long (not likely) or Ryan Clady are still there at #7, I could see the Pats going OT. Light is starting to get up in years and Kaczur is more of backup type who has overachieved to this point.

 

[larry_boy_44]

Agreed on the Packers.

Why do they need a "dynamic" linebacker?. Barnett and Hawk are playmakers. And while Poppinga isn't a playmaker, I don't hear of the SLB ever described in that term anyway.

I was amazed that they listed linebacker... The only possible explanation I can come up with is the fact that they don't need anything else...They could use some better OL (and possible a T or 2 to groom to take over those spots eventually)... and they definately could use another young corner to learn the ropes from Harris & Woodson...but other than that we don't really need anything...

 

[nerangers]

The Patriots needs are obvious but I still think they have the ability to go BPA with the #7 pick.Asante Samuel is likely gone.My preference is for Vernon Gholsten with the first pick. I think there is a possibility that Colvin will come back at a reduced price, if not, he will be released (high salary cap #). If they draft Gholsten it allows the Pats to move A. Thomas and Vrabel back and forth from outside to inside to provide more depth for the ILB spot. I think Bruschi and Seau will be back.Or the Pats could draft Mike Jenkins from South Florida and try and sign a FA LB (Belichicks' historical preference). There are a few impact LB's available; Karlos Dansby, Clark Haggans, Lance Briggs.If Jake Long (not likely) or Ryan Clady are still there at #7, I could see the Pats going OT. Light is starting to get up in years and Kaczur is more of backup type who has overachieved to this point.

I think for the Patriots, you can add WR/TE as a need. Not because they don't have them, but because most of the WRs are not signed or have big bonuses coming. Also at TE, they been having health issues. I almost wish they had kept Daniel Graham and Garrett Mills instead of Watson and Thomas.

 

[Michael Fox Fan]

They've been pitiful at Guard ever since Wahle and Rivera left. They've thrown a bazillion people into the position and none of them has stepped up to become 'the man.' This shouldn't be a surprise here. I will agree Tackle will also become an issue sooner rather than later.

They may have been subpar at guard - the TSN claims they need a big, powerful guard. That doesn't seem to fit the zone blocking scheme, at least based on what I know of zone blocking.

At LB, Barnett is not a 'playmaker'. Sure he puts up mad tackle numbers, but who doesn't from the Mike? He's got zero presence in the blitz scheme, and gets housed by RBs when he is forced into coverage. I'd love to see Hawk in the middle if this 'dynamic' LB ever arrives. I'm thinking what an Adalius Thomas clone could do. :drool:

Barnett was arguably the best player on Green Bay's defense this year. I have no idea what you're talking about.

CB I'd put at #1. Al Harris played like he aged 25 years in and after the Dallas game.

Totally agree.

A DE who can rush the passer? Kampman down? Him and KGB combined for 22 sacks! Their DL is pretty flippin' stout, not sure I'd go messing around with it. I'd rather see a LB who can wreak some havoc.

When it counted, Green Bay was unable to pressure opposing QBs with just 4 guys rushing the passer. KGB is a situational player - in case you haven't noticed, he only plays on obvious passing downs. Kampman is good, but he isn't a dominant pass rusher. Rather, he gets a bunch of "hustle" sacks. Cullen Jenkins is solid, but we need a stud DE.

 

[gianmarco]

NEW ORLEANS: CB, LB, DT. - The Saints had one of the league's worst pass defenses last season and need an upgrade at corner. They could get in the running for Patriots free agent Asante Samuel. The team also needs an impact linebacker.

You think? Obviously can't disagree and also can't say it's not completely obvious. Getting Samuel would be HUGE for the Saints.

 

[Pat Patriot]

The Patriots needs are obvious but I still think they have the ability to go BPA with the #7 pick.Asante Samuel is likely gone.My preference is for Vernon Gholsten with the first pick. I think there is a possibility that Colvin will come back at a reduced price, if not, he will be released (high salary cap #). If they draft Gholsten it allows the Pats to move A. Thomas and Vrabel back and forth from outside to inside to provide more depth for the ILB spot. I think Bruschi and Seau will be back.Or the Pats could draft Mike Jenkins from South Florida and try and sign a FA LB (Belichicks' historical preference). There are a few impact LB's available; Karlos Dansby, Clark Haggans, Lance Briggs.If Jake Long (not likely) or Ryan Clady are still there at #7, I could see the Pats going OT. Light is starting to get up in years and Kaczur is more of backup type who has overachieved to this point.

I think for the Patriots, you can add WR/TE as a need. Not because they don't have them, but because most of the WRs are not signed or have big bonuses coming. Also at TE, they been having health issues. I almost wish they had kept Daniel Graham and Garrett Mills instead of Watson and Thomas.

Moss will be a Patriot next year through long term deal or being franchised. I expect Stallworth to be gone. Chad Jackson will be in mix. I expect either K. Washington or Gaffney to be resigned fairly cheap. I prefer Gaffney but he will come at a higher price than Washington.That leaves us with Moss, Welker, Jackson and Washington. They'll pick up another one somewhere but I dont think they draft one in the first 3 rounds.As for TE, they have Watson, K. Brady and D. Thomas under contract. Unless you think they are letting go of one of those guys, I dont see them drafting a significant TE.

 

[Mr.Pack]

Agreed on the Packers.

Really?I agree with the CB and some bigger OL, but a LB? Why do we need a "dynamic" LB? Isn't Barnett "Dynamic" enough?I'd rather go strong in the defensive backfield, CB, S.We could use a "Dynamic" DE to compliment Kampman, I mean I do like Jenkins, btu a good pass rusher would be nice. KGB didn't do much this year and he's only getting older.

 

[Mr.Pack]

Agreed on the Packers.

Why do they need a "dynamic" linebacker?. Barnett and Hawk are playmakers. And while Poppinga isn't a playmaker, I don't hear of the SLB ever described in that term anyway.

 

[Mr.Pack]

Agreed on the Packers.

Why do they need a "dynamic" linebacker?. Barnett and Hawk are playmakers. And while Poppinga isn't a playmaker, I don't hear of the SLB ever described in that term anyway.

GREEN BAY: G, OLB, CB. - The team might want to add bigger, more physical guards so it can call more inside zone running plays . The Packers also need to add a dynamic linebacker and a young corner.

I have a few disagreements with this. First, I thought the whole point of zone blocking was that you typically use smaller but athletic guards. Second, totally agree with Andy - the Pack already has 2 playmaking LBs. I don't really love Poppinga, but he is serviceable.Would rather see the Packers target a DE who can rush the passer, along with a CB who can take over for Harris or Woodson in a year. The rest (OLB, G, etc) is just gravy. In fact, I'd rather see us target a Tackle - Clifton and Tauscher are both quickly aging.

 

[Jeff Haseley]

CAROLINA: OT, DE, WR. - Both starting tackles are free agents; expect the team to spend a lot to retain RT Jordan Gross. The team put little pressure on the pocket in 2007 and must replace RE Mike Rucker, who is expected to retire.

I agree with this, but it looks like Rucker wants to come back for another year. Whether that's a lesser deal with Carolina so he doesn't have to move and can retire a Panther, is yet to be determined. Jordan Gross likely will be retained, but LT Travelle Wharton is likely gone. I can see them going with an OT (preferably a LT). DE is another concern simply because they may lose Julius Peppers in 2009. Plus they are aging on the DL. The only other position of need I see is DB, especially safety. It will be interesting to see what direction they take to find their #2 WR for 2008. Will they get someone from the FA market like Bryant Johnson or will they continue to groom Dwayne Jarrett? I think the level of WRs that are available in the 2nd and 3rd round will determine how they plan the rest of their draft. I definitely think OT or DE will be their first pick and maybe their first and second pick. If they did go Safety later on in the 4th or 6th round (no 5th rd pick) - I like Quentin Demps (UTEP)

- Solid analysis. Rucker wants to play this year, although I don't think it's with Carolina. I think the wants to play with whatever team his brother Martin gets picked by. A 2nd round DE would be a welcome addition as Carolina got NO pressure on the QB last year. Granted, most of us think Peppers issues were due to Mono and his inability to use steroids (standard treatment) to overcome it. Gross and the Panthers are already in negotiations and he's already said that they're going ok. I think he'll be back, even if he's franchised for a year. Wharton is the question mark. There is word floating around that Mike Wahle may be cut due to his $3m salary and the fact that he's due a $1m roster bonus. If he is cut, I expect Wharton to be resigned and moved to LG with Gross playing LT. That makes the need for a RT which may be easier for us to find later in the draft than a franchise LT. At WR2, I think it's going to be Jarret. A lot of it depends on his improvement this year, but he's already in Carolina working out ahead of camp. I can still see a WR later in the draft and most likely a veteran free agent brought in. Defensive tackle may be a requirement as well as Carolina's 3rd and 4th rotation DT's are free agents and we haven't been thrilled with Maake "I want my baby back ribs" Kemoeatu. Free safety is another position of need. They could try Richard Marshall or Chris Gamble at the position. I'd prefer Gamble there as he isn't very good in run support and he plays wr's soft. Marshall is a hitter who I think complements Lucas better. Demps is a good choice, or we could look at Hefney from Tennessee or the kid from NC State.

:X More on Jonathan Hefney. At 5'9 185 lbs he is not the Bob Sanders mold that some might think of him to be. Some teams are looking at him as a CB not a Safety. Again, the difference between college and the pros are big. I think he'll probably fall to the 4th round, but some team may overspend on him as a late 3rd round pick. He is a playmaker, meaning he has great tendencies and instincts of where the ball will be thrown, but he does not have the size to be a hitting Safety in the NFL. At least not yet. He's a project that has produced at the college level by making plays, but the plays NFL teams will want him to make, I think he'll struggle. Just my on Jonathan Hefney.

 

[Raiders37]

OAKLAND: OT, WR, DT. - LT Barry Sims, 33, is on the downside of his career, and RT Cornell Green is a free agent coming off a season-ending foot injury. The team needs a No. 1 receiver to spark a passing game that ranked 31st in the league.

1. DT2. OT

3. WR

:( I 100% whole-heartedly agree!

A run-stopping D is the biggest need, especially being in the AFC West. We really have to stop the damn run for crying out loud. THIS, IMO, is our GREATEST need.

The O-line? While not stellar by any means, our O-line really did show a HUGE improvement this year. Gallery even seemed to be coming along, especially if you leave out the penalties... and later on in the year he even seemed to be avoiding them. We still need help here, but not as much as on the D.

WR's?? Yeah, we need a good one or two that can get deep, but IMO, you really have to take care of these other 2 needs first and foremost. Curry and Higgins (still not sold on him yet tho...) will just have to do here for now. A later round pick would work for me on the WR issues.

as usual... JMO...

 

[Pictus Cat]

NFC (Link)

CHICAGO: QB, OT, S. - There isn't a surefire solution to the quarterback problem. One option: Re-sign Rex Grossman and draft a passer in the middle rounds to develop. The team badly needs a young tackle who can play immediately.

I concur. As a Bear fan, I acutally wouldn't mind if the re-signed Rex - as long as they DID go after O-line help to protect him. When he had time to throw he was fine - it's when he's taking a ton of heat that he gets erratic and takes dumb chances. I also think they need to do something at RB. Benson is not "the guy" and hasn't earned the spot. Safety is a huge need for them. All you have to do is see the difference in stats when Mike Brown played vs. when he was out. I had hoped that AA could help in that regard - but he was bad, then he was bad AND hurt

The needs are correct, but the order is not. I would say OT, S, QB.

My thoughts exactly.

 

[PranksterJD]

NEW ORLEANS: CB, LB, DT. - The Saints had one of the league's worst pass defenses last season and need an upgrade at corner. They could get in the running for Patriots free agent Asante Samuel. The team also needs an impact linebacker.

You think? Obviously can't disagree and also can't say it's not completely obvious. Getting Samuel would be HUGE for the Saints.

The only thing they missed on was the idea that the Safeties don't need an upgrade as well.

 

[nerangers]

The Patriots needs are obvious but I still think they have the ability to go BPA with the #7 pick.Asante Samuel is likely gone.My preference is for Vernon Gholsten with the first pick. I think there is a possibility that Colvin will come back at a reduced price, if not, he will be released (high salary cap #). If they draft Gholsten it allows the Pats to move A. Thomas and Vrabel back and forth from outside to inside to provide more depth for the ILB spot. I think Bruschi and Seau will be back.Or the Pats could draft Mike Jenkins from South Florida and try and sign a FA LB (Belichicks' historical preference). There are a few impact LB's available; Karlos Dansby, Clark Haggans, Lance Briggs.If Jake Long (not likely) or Ryan Clady are still there at #7, I could see the Pats going OT. Light is starting to get up in years and Kaczur is more of backup type who has overachieved to this point.

I think for the Patriots, you can add WR/TE as a need. Not because they don't have them, but because most of the WRs are not signed or have big bonuses coming. Also at TE, they been having health issues. I almost wish they had kept Daniel Graham and Garrett Mills instead of Watson and Thomas.

Moss will be a Patriot next year through long term deal or being franchised. I expect Stallworth to be gone. Chad Jackson will be in mix. I expect either K. Washington or Gaffney to be resigned fairly cheap. I prefer Gaffney but he will come at a higher price than Washington.That leaves us with Moss, Welker, Jackson and Washington. They'll pick up another one somewhere but I dont think they draft one in the first 3 rounds.As for TE, they have Watson, K. Brady and D. Thomas under contract. Unless you think they are letting go of one of those guys, I dont see them drafting a significant TE.

If you are only talking drafting needs, than no. If you are talking off-season needs, then yes.

 

[Andy Dufresne]

OAKLAND: OT, WR, DT. - LT Barry Sims, 33, is on the downside of his career, and RT Cornell Green is a free agent coming off a season-ending foot injury. The team needs a No. 1 receiver to spark a passing game that ranked 31st in the league.

1. DT2. OT

3. WR

I 100% whole-heartedly agree!

A run-stopping D is the biggest need, especially being in the AFC West. We really have to stop the damn run for crying out loud. THIS, IMO, is our GREATEST need.

The O-line? While not stellar by any means, our O-line really did show a HUGE improvement this year. Gallery even seemed to be coming along, especially if you leave out the penalties... and later on in the year he even seemed to be avoiding them. We still need help here, but not as much as on the D.

WR's?? Yeah, we need a good one or two that can get deep, but IMO, you really have to take care of these other 2 needs first and foremost. Curry and Higgins (still not sold on him yet tho...) will just have to do here for now. A later round pick would work for me on the WR issues.

as usual... JMO...

I think Sedrick Ellis is just about a lock to be the Raiders pick if he even lasts to their spot.

 

[Yankee23Fan]

Giants is pretty accurate. I would add a WR to that list. I would put in order of importance S, LB, WR, CB. Though I could be convinced to switch WR and CB.

Was going to post the same.

The thinking being that Moss is a bust and Toomer has at most one good season left?

Pretty much. Smith showed a lot of promise though so it might not be all that bad. But there is very little depth there if Plax were to ever go out - at least explosive depth. I'd like to see more speed at the position and see Smith get more playing time. Lotsa love for Amani but he just isn't the same, at least it seems like he isn't, player from a few years ago.My bigest concern with the offense is what seems to be a lack of check down options for Eli with the RB's. I still think Jacobs can be a stud - I might be biased there admittedly - but between him and Bradshaw and Ward, there should be more RB receiving options to take the pressure off of Eli having to hit 10 yarders to WR's all the time. They did win without this stuff though so what do I know.In the end, whatever Tom Coughlin wants is ok by me.

 

[heidbrink]

CAROLINA: OT, DE, WR. - Both starting tackles are free agents; expect the team to spend a lot to retain RT Jordan Gross. The team put little pressure on the pocket in 2007 and must replace RE Mike Rucker, who is expected to retire.

I agree with this, but it looks like Rucker wants to come back for another year. Whether that's a lesser deal with Carolina so he doesn't have to move and can retire a Panther, is yet to be determined. Jordan Gross likely will be retained, but LT Travelle Wharton is likely gone. I can see them going with an OT (preferably a LT). DE is another concern simply because they may lose Julius Peppers in 2009. Plus they are aging on the DL. The only other position of need I see is DB, especially safety. It will be interesting to see what direction they take to find their #2 WR for 2008. Will they get someone from the FA market like Bryant Johnson or will they continue to groom Dwayne Jarrett? I think the level of WRs that are available in the 2nd and 3rd round will determine how they plan the rest of their draft. I definitely think OT or DE will be their first pick and maybe their first and second pick. If they did go Safety later on in the 4th or 6th round (no 5th rd pick) - I like Quentin Demps (UTEP)

- Solid analysis. Rucker wants to play this year, although I don't think it's with Carolina. I think the wants to play with whatever team his brother Martin gets picked by. A 2nd round DE would be a welcome addition as Carolina got NO pressure on the QB last year. Granted, most of us think Peppers issues were due to Mono and his inability to use steroids (standard treatment) to overcome it. Gross and the Panthers are already in negotiations and he's already said that they're going ok. I think he'll be back, even if he's franchised for a year. Wharton is the question mark. There is word floating around that Mike Wahle may be cut due to his $3m salary and the fact that he's due a $1m roster bonus. If he is cut, I expect Wharton to be resigned and moved to LG with Gross playing LT. That makes the need for a RT which may be easier for us to find later in the draft than a franchise LT. At WR2, I think it's going to be Jarret. A lot of it depends on his improvement this year, but he's already in Carolina working out ahead of camp. I can still see a WR later in the draft and most likely a veteran free agent brought in. Defensive tackle may be a requirement as well as Carolina's 3rd and 4th rotation DT's are free agents and we haven't been thrilled with Maake "I want my baby back ribs" Kemoeatu. Free safety is another position of need. They could try Richard Marshall or Chris Gamble at the position. I'd prefer Gamble there as he isn't very good in run support and he plays wr's soft. Marshall is a hitter who I think complements Lucas better. Demps is a good choice, or we could look at Hefney from Tennessee or the kid from NC State.

More on Jonathan Hefney. At 5'9 185 lbs he is not the Bob Sanders mold that some might think of him to be. Some teams are looking at him as a CB not a Safety. Again, the difference between college and the pros are big. I think he'll probably fall to the 4th round, but some team may overspend on him as a late 3rd round pick. He is a playmaker, meaning he has great tendencies and instincts of where the ball will be thrown, but he does not have the size to be a hitting Safety in the NFL. At least not yet. He's a project that has produced at the college level by making plays, but the plays NFL teams will want him to make, I think he'll struggle. Just my on Jonathan Hefney.

As I look at Carolina's Depth chart, I wonder what they plan to do at QB.

...

QB: Vinny Testaverde (inj), Matt Moore, David Carr (inj), Jake Delhomme (IR), Brett Basanez (IR)

...

Not a homer so I am honestly curious about this. btw, good analysis on the line concerns. Thanks. For the Panthers sake, let's hope they can maintain continuity on the O-line (the importance of this can never be underestimated!), and find a way to fill the hole(s) that Rucker and/or Peppers might leave (gluck w/ that!).

 

[Jeff Haseley]

As I look at Carolina's Depth chart, I wonder what they plan to do at QB. ...QB: Vinny Testaverde (inj), Matt Moore, David Carr (inj), Jake Delhomme (IR), Brett Basanez (IR)...Not a homer so I am honestly curious about this. btw, good analysis on the line concerns. Thanks. For the Panthers sake, let's hope they can maintain continuity on the O-line (the importance of this can never be underestimated!), and find a way to fill the hole(s) that Rucker and/or Peppers might leave (gluck w/ that!).

Jake Delhomme is beginning to throw (a nerf ball right now) and will begin to throw a football in the coming weeks in Feb. He is on pace, if not ahead of schedule to resume football duties this off-season to be ready for training camp. Carolina's #1 priority is getting Delhomme back to health. Whether people like it or not (personally I do), Jake will be the QB, so there's problem #1 solved. #2 - his backup will probably be Matt Moore followed by Brett Basanez as the #3. I fully expect them to cut David Carr to gain more cap space and Vinny Testaverde has decided to retire after 21 long seasons. That leaves them with three QBs on their roster. They may want to add a 4th via the draft, but they aren't in a dire position where they have to. If they did look to draft a QB some notable QBs that might be available with their 6th round pick include Dennis Dixon (Oregon), Matt Flynn (LSU), Paul Smith (Tulsa) or the ever falling Colt Brennan (Hawaii). Dennis Dixon would have to fall, because he is projected to go in the 5th round.

 

[SwampDawg]

I don't think bringing in another young WR is going to be very high on Miami's priority list come draft day -- especially with so many other BIG needs. I do see Miami acquiring some kind of veteran receiver (another Marty Booker-type) through FA..At the draft, I think it's going to be all defense with an offensive lineman sprinkled in here or there...My rankings of priority on draft day are:1) DL LB DB2) OT3) OG C

Assuming they keep the pick, who is your preference for the #1 overall?

Chris Long!

I'm on board with you there.

 

[a_rackowski]

Houston could address the need for a speed rusher by swapping 2nds or giving a 3rd round pick with GB for KGB.

Thats going to make their DLINE really jump up a notch. The Pack doesnt need KGB with Jenkins takign his spot. Although he does move inside on passing downs...but KGB is an expensive situational guy.

 

[Houston turmOiler]

Houston could address the need for a speed rusher by swapping 2nds or giving a 3rd round pick with GB for KGB. Thats going to make their DLINE really jump up a notch. The Pack doesnt need KGB with Jenkins takign his spot. Although he does move inside on passing downs...but KGB is an expensive situational guy.

We have no second (sent to ATL in the Schaub trade). While I'd like a guy like KGB, I want him younger and without that contract. We've got too many holes to give up any more draft picks. If anything, we need to work like hell to move down and get another pick or two. Gotta find a willing partner though. We really need to find our Robert Mathis, Elvis Dumervil, or Mark Anderson in the draft this season. We could also look for a free agent, but I hope we won't be trading away any more picks...

 

[BroadwayG]

Houston could address the need for a speed rusher by swapping 2nds or giving a 3rd round pick with GB for KGB. Thats going to make their DLINE really jump up a notch. The Pack doesnt need KGB with Jenkins takign his spot. Although he does move inside on passing downs...but KGB is an expensive situational guy.

We have no second (sent to ATL in the Schaub trade). While I'd like a guy like KGB, I want him younger and without that contract. We've got too many holes to give up any more draft picks. If anything, we need to work like hell to move down and get another pick or two. Gotta find a willing partner though. We really need to find our Robert Mathis, Elvis Dumervil, or Mark Anderson in the draft this season. We could also look for a free agent, but I hope we won't be trading away any more picks...

The other Packer fans in this thread would trade you KGB for a 6-pack as he's only a situational pass rusher.

 

[morris4903]

NFC (Link)

SAN FRANCISCO: WR, DE, ILB. - The lack of a playmaking wideout continues to drag down the offense, so expect the team to draft one capable of stretching the field. Also expect the 49ers to draft an end and pursue a free-agent inside linebacker.

From listening to SF's front office, I think if they make a big move at WR it will be via trade or FA. I don't think anyone in the front office or the coaching staff has the patience (or job security) to wait for a rookie to develop, and it's clearly their #1 need.Otherwise I think they'll focus on the defensive line, especially if Sopoaga and Douglas leave

I would add OG with Larry Allen retiring and Justin Smiley a FA that we probably won't re-sign. Another pass rusher is something else I would add to this list.

 

[GregR_2]

I was curious to see how this list of team needs breaks down by position. A lot of Excel "Text To Column" and a Pivot Table later and here's what I came up with:

Position Total

CB 13

DE 13

OT 12

WR 12

DT 7

G 7

RB 7

S 6

OLB 5

QB 5

TE 5

LB 4

C 1

ILB 1

KR 1

Grand Total 99

(Edit to replace with a list sorted by # of spots needed)

Most needed positions, CB and DE tied for first with 13. Tackle and WR tied for 3rd with 12. RB, Guard, and DT tied for 5th with 7 each.

 

[Ridgelake]

NFC (Link)

DALLAS: RB, WR, CB. - With Julius Jones headed for free agency, the Cowboys need a running back to complement Marion Barber -- and they'll likely add one in back-rich draft . They also could draft a potential No. 1 receiver to eventually replace Terrell Owens.

Well, they are right about the positions. But their order is wrong. CB is THE major weak link on this team. Its a position that cost them games this past year. Couple that with the fact that Newman and Henry are both 30+, and you have a major need.RB, well, you do have a Pro Bowl RB on the roster thats only in his 4th year. Yes, he needs a compliment. But just how much investment do you really need to make in a complimentary player? A guy who might get 40% of the snaps for the next several years.

WR, yes, they need a guy who can become a #1. But what are the odds of a 1st rounder developing into that? Dallas already has a top athlete who's learning to become an NFL receiver. Last year's 4th rounder Isaiah Stanback. Dallas has a window of opportunity to get to the Superbowl. Trade or FA is a much more likely means of obtaining a compliment to TO.

 

[Boston]

Looks spot on for NE. Getting younger and faster at LB has to be the top priority. One position I haven't seen much mention of is an edge pass rush. I think we're getting to the end of the line with Vrabel in that role.

Agreed on this need. I'd like to see the Pats add another pass rusher or two. If you look at the Colts loss last year and the Giants loss this year you can make a very good case the Pats were one sack away from pulling out both games. The ability to apply just a little more pressure could have turned the tide in both those games.

 

[The Duff Man]

NFC (Link)

A

BUFFALO: WR, TE, DT. QB - Trent Edwards needs more weapons, specifically a big receiver who can be a red zone target. Robert Royal is an outstanding blocker, but a receiving threat at tight end also would help Edwards.

[

The Bills single biggest need is playmakers at LB. Ellison and the Pizzaboy are not starter material.Schauman may be the answer at TE, but he was injured last year.

Bills will probably keep Losman, but may need to replace him after 2008 when he is a free agent. So they could draft a QB is one drops like Edwards did.

I strongly disagree. The LBs are making too many plays because the front 4 don't do anything.I would list WR, DT, DE, OT

WR is a no brainer, the guys behind Evans wouldn't make a lot of teams. DT is needed to help keep blockers off the LBs they have so they can make plays. DE is needed for a pass rush. They have a lot of money tied up here, but these guys have underperformed. This could be in part due to the problems at DT, having a push up the middle might help the guys on the end. They spent a lot of money on OL in free agency last year, it didnt' pan out as well as they hoped but another year of continuity might help. They don't have much depth here though and could really use a diamond in the rough at that position.

TE was listed, most of the time the TE is needed to be kept in to block for the Bills so I would pass at this position. QB was listed, they will probably trade Losman, they should probably pick up a veteran #2QB and ride with Evans for another year before investing another pick at this position.

 

[munchkin]

The Patriots needs are obvious but I still think they have the ability to go BPA with the #7 pick.

Asante Samuel is likely gone.

My preference is for Vernon Gholsten with the first pick. I think there is a possibility that Colvin will come back at a reduced price, if not, he will be released (high salary cap #). If they draft Gholsten it allows the Pats to move A. Thomas and Vrabel back and forth from outside to inside to provide more depth for the ILB spot. I think Bruschi and Seau will be back.

Or the Pats could draft Mike Jenkins from South Florida and try and sign a FA LB (Belichicks' historical preference). There are a few impact LB's available; Karlos Dansby, Clark Haggans, Lance Briggs.

If Jake Long (not likely) or Ryan Clady are still there at #7, I could see the Pats going OT. Light is starting to get up in years and Kaczur is more of backup type who has overachieved to this point.

I think for the Patriots, you can add WR/TE as a need. Not because they don't have them, but because most of the WRs are not signed or have big bonuses coming. Also at TE, they been having health issues. I almost wish they had kept Daniel Graham and Garrett Mills instead of Watson and Thomas.

Moss will be a Patriot next year through long term deal or being franchised. I expect Stallworth to be gone. Chad Jackson will be in mix. I expect either K. Washington or Gaffney to be resigned fairly cheap. I prefer Gaffney but he will come at a higher price than Washington.That leaves us with Moss, Welker, Jackson and Washington. They'll pick up another one somewhere but I dont think they draft one in the first 3 rounds.

As for TE, they have Watson, K. Brady and D. Thomas under contract. Unless you think they are letting go of one of those guys, I dont see them drafting a significant TE.

If you are only talking drafting needs, than no. If you are talking off-season needs, then yes.

If Gholsten is capable of starting right away then I would agree that getting young at linebacker is a high priority. It is time for Seau to move on. He just doesn't make enough plays. A potential left tackle would also be a good use for the #7 pick. It's not like Light gets lit up week after week. The O-Line played pretty well through the year. They were just outplayed in the Super Bowl.

At tight end I don't know if Brady will be back (he signed a 2-year contract but it would not be a big hit if he was cut). Watson shows inconsistent hands and has not turned out to be the player the team had hoped for. If Thomas can stay healthy he could become the #1 receiving threat at the TE position.

With "Pay Me" likely moving on ( I don't see the Pats giving him a "blockbuster" deal) cornerback is an obvious need as well.

 

[QuizGuy66]

The Bengals assessment is pretty spot-on, though I think the need at DT is greater than DE. LB really is an area of concern as well.

-QG

 

[erymer]

AFC (Link)

CLEVELAND: DE, DT, RB. - The team could trade QB Derek Anderson to move back into the first round and draft help for the defensive line--a weak position that is sure to get a lot of offseason attention. RB Jamal Lewis wants to re-sign, but if a deal can't be reached, the Browns will have to sign a free agent or spend a high draft pick on a back.

I would agree with this as well. I love what Jamal was able to do and think he deserves to be resigned, but he is not the long term solution. I would love to see a good DT brought it to help shore up our Run D a little more. We sure need to work on the D-line

 

[Mungo Burrows]

WASHINGTON: OT, S, OLB. - The team must add depth at tackle, where it has age and injury issues. Finding a quality free safety is also a priority -- LaRon Landry is capable of playing that position but is better suited to strong safety.

Head Coach.

1) Owner2) General Manager

3) until 1&2 are done, does it matter?

 

[Godsbrother]

Steelers = accurateBen wants a tall WR, but i wouldn't call that a glaring need.O-line and D-line are definite concerns...

Agreed.The Steelers could use a big brusing back to complement FWP. Davenport is meh.

 

[Andy Dufresne]

WASHINGTON: OT, S, OLB. - The team must add depth at tackle, where it has age and injury issues. Finding a quality free safety is also a priority -- LaRon Landry is capable of playing that position but is better suited to strong safety.

Head Coach.

1) Owner2) General Manager

3) until 1&2 are done, does it matter?

I cannot believe that hire.

 

[Mungo Burrows]

BALTIMORE: CB, QB, OT. - Starting CBs Chris McAlister, 30, and Samari Rolle, 31, missed significant time this season. The team doesn't have a quarterback of the future, and there is speculation it could trade up from the No. 8 spot and take Boston College's Matt Ryan.

Pretty good list. CB is definitely #1. The backups proved to be overmatched when the top 2 got hurt this year and they're not getting any younger. QB is #2 unless troy smith turns out to be a steal. Even if he does, the position looks to be a weakness this year no matter what they do. Bringing in a top pick still put them a year away at best. I'd say a pass-rushing DE/OLB would be really close to OT for 3rd choice. Even if they can retain Suggs, the defense had trouble applying pressure once Pryce went out.

 

[Andy Dufresne]

Steelers = accurateBen wants a tall WR, but i wouldn't call that a glaring need.O-line and D-line are definite concerns...

Agreed.The Steelers could use a big brusing back to complement FWP. Davenport is meh.

If they want one of those, they have to be looking at Jonathan Stewart (1st round), Kevin Smith (possible 2nd) or Matt Forte (3rd).

 

[GroveDiesel]

NFC (Link)

A

BUFFALO: WR, TE, DT. QB - Trent Edwards needs more weapons, specifically a big receiver who can be a red zone target. Robert Royal is an outstanding blocker, but a receiving threat at tight end also would help Edwards.

[

The Bills single biggest need is playmakers at LB. Ellison and the Pizzaboy are not starter material.Schauman may be the answer at TE, but he was injured last year.

Bills will probably keep Losman, but may need to replace him after 2008 when he is a free agent. So they could draft a QB is one drops like Edwards did.

I strongly disagree. The LBs are making too many plays because the front 4 don't do anything.I would list WR, DT, DE, OT

WR is a no brainer, the guys behind Evans wouldn't make a lot of teams. DT is needed to help keep blockers off the LBs they have so they can make plays. DE is needed for a pass rush. They have a lot of money tied up here, but these guys have underperformed. This could be in part due to the problems at DT, having a push up the middle might help the guys on the end. They spent a lot of money on OL in free agency last year, it didnt' pan out as well as they hoped but another year of continuity might help. They don't have much depth here though and could really use a diamond in the rough at that position.

TE was listed, most of the time the TE is needed to be kept in to block for the Bills so I would pass at this position. QB was listed, they will probably trade Losman, they should probably pick up a veteran #2QB and ride with Evans for another year before investing another pick at this position.

Poz is going to be just fine at MLB next season and I wouldn't be surprised if Digiorgio moves outside and replaces Ellison. But the problem wasn't the LBers, it was the defensive front. The DTs have been terrible since Pat Williams was allowed to walk. The idea was to get smaller and faster DTs that could penetrate the gaps and get to the QB. But not only have they not been able to get to the QB, but they can't hold up in the running game either because they're getting blown off the ball. There's no question that the DTs are below average though.And obviously the Bills need an upgrade at the WR position. How much longer are they going to hope that Josh Reed can actually be a legitimate #2 during the regular season or that Roscoe Parrish will somehow grow 4 inches taller?

 

[Enforcer]

SEATTLE: RB, TE, G. - Even if Shaun Alexander returns, the Seahawks must add a back. Oregon's Jonathan Stewart and Illinois' Rashard Mendenhall are possibilities in the first round. Eagles TE L.J. Smith and Colts G Jake Scott are potential free-agent targets.

Good list for Seattle. I think they address TE and RB in the draft and go after a OG in free agency. Seattle also has players they need to lock up of their own. Josh Brown, DJ Hackett, and Marcus Trufant to name a few. I think they will aggressively try to keep Trufant as he's a local kid. That sort of thing plays well here in the northwest. I'm stumped when trying to figure out who they might slap the franchise tag on.