'Wadsworth said:
'FreeBaGeL said:
'Wadsworth said:
I have a hard time attributing the play of the Bronco defense
This still blows my mind. The Broncos defense was 22nd in the NFL in scoring defense after Tebow took over. That's not good. The Patriots' defense, which New England supposedly won "in spite of" was 15th. Yet the Broncos won because of their 22nd ranked defense?
In the 7 wins under Tebow the Bronco defense allowed: 15, 24, 10, 13, 13, 32, 10 or 16.7 points per game. Which would have been good for 4th in the NFL.
LOL, so only wins count now, and only for the Broncos? I would imagine that 16.7 would no longer be 4th if you were only counting points allowed only in wins for the other teams as well.Just for fun, counting wins only and picking a few teams randomly...
Jaguars: 10.2 ppg
Steelers: 11.0 ppg
Chiefs: 11.5 ppg
Dolphins: 12.3 ppg
Browns: 12 ppg
Rams: 16.5 ppg
Chargers: 17 ppg
Bills: 17 ppg
Patriots: 18 ppg
Raiders: 19 ppg
Newsflash, 16.7 ppg isn't anything particularly impressive when taking only wins into account. It's probably somewhere in the 15-20 range overall.
Ugh, this is why even though I sit pretty much in the middle of the endless Tebow debate (I don't think he's particularly good but I don't think he's hideously awful either), I always end up arguing in favor of the pro-Tebow side. At least the pro-Tebow side keeps their ridiculous arguments under control with just the main "he has the heart of a winner" schtick. The anti-Tebow side shows no shame in inventing random nonsense and making ridiculous and often completely untrue points.