Go.
Fixed.Go Texans.
No chance. The Colts haven't been getting much love from Vegas this year, and I doubt that will change in the playoffs, even against a Ravens team that looks vulnerable.haven't had a chance to see much of the texans this year. they're starting to smell like the annual bye team that loses at home in round one. am i way off base here? how do they look? and on the flip side, are the colts going to be favored on the road against the ravens? the colts and the ravens seem to be trending in opposite directions.
That really should have been a fumble. His arm was going backwards when the ball came out of his hand, and the ball went backwards... bad call IMO.I just caught the last second of that before the commercial, but what immediately came to mind was: tuck rule?
Yep, awful call. The ball going backwards should have made whether or not his arm going forward irrelevant.How is that not a fumble? And if it wasn't a fumble, it's a backwards pass, no?
The ball going backwards doesn't make whether or not his arm was going forward irrelevant. If the arm is going forward, it's incomplete.That said, I don't think his arm was going forward.That said part two, even if his arm wasn't going forward, the tuck rule might make it a forward pass anyway (although that's not what they called).Yep, awful call. The ball going backwards should have made whether or not his arm going forward irrelevant.How is that not a fumble? And if it wasn't a fumble, it's a backwards pass, no?
Right, but I don't think it should have applied to that play.Tuck rule. Learn to love it.
That said, there were not receivers in the vicinity of where he could've been passing. If he threw the ball, it would've been intentional grounding. An all around awful call. Can't believe the reversed the correct call.The ball going backwards doesn't make whether or not his arm was going forward irrelevant. If the arm is going forward, it's incomplete.That said, I don't think his arm was going forward.That said part two, even if his arm wasn't going forward, the tuck rule might make it a forward pass anyway (although that's not what they called).Yep, awful call. The ball going backwards should have made whether or not his arm going forward irrelevant.How is that not a fumble? And if it wasn't a fumble, it's a backwards pass, no?
it was a good no callWayne gets hit as a defenseless receiver and no penalty. I've seen it called for much less.
So you've seen bad calls before. It wasn't a penalty, didn't hit his head or neck.Wayne gets hit as a defenseless receiver and no penalty. I've seen it called for much less.
What about the ball was clearly incomplete and at his feet?! Watch it again.So you've seen bad calls before. It wasn't a penalty, didn't hit his head or neck.Wayne gets hit as a defenseless receiver and no penalty. I've seen it called for much less.
That doesn't make it an illegal hit on a defenseless receiver. That would be a different penalty that has nothing to do with your complaint.What about the ball was clearly incomplete and at his feet?! Watch it again.So you've seen bad calls before. It wasn't a penalty, didn't hit his head or neck.Wayne gets hit as a defenseless receiver and no penalty. I've seen it called for much less.
You win. Change my complaint to late hit or unsportsmanlike conduct. Feel better?That doesn't make it an illegal hit on a defenseless receiver. That would be a different penalty that has nothing to do with your complaint.What about the ball was clearly incomplete and at his feet?! Watch it again.So you've seen bad calls before. It wasn't a penalty, didn't hit his head or neck.Wayne gets hit as a defenseless receiver and no penalty. I've seen it called for much less.
Life isn't lived in slow mo. That was a clean play. We're definitely still waiting for the makeup call on that bizarre fumble reversal.What about the ball was clearly incomplete and at his feet?! Watch it again.So you've seen bad calls before. It wasn't a penalty, didn't hit his head or neck.Wayne gets hit as a defenseless receiver and no penalty. I've seen it called for much less.
it was a good no callYou win. Change my complaint to late hit or unsportsmanlike conduct. Feel better?That doesn't make it an illegal hit on a defenseless receiver. That would be a different penalty that has nothing to do with your complaint.What about the ball was clearly incomplete and at his feet?! Watch it again.So you've seen bad calls before. It wasn't a penalty, didn't hit his head or neck.Wayne gets hit as a defenseless receiver and no penalty. I've seen it called for much less.
There have been 10 games between these 2 teams played in Indy. I have a many wins as the Texans.Keep waiting. It's what you'll likely need to win.right
Haven't seen anything close to that all year!He didn't even move off his line - just straight up the middle