What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Thank you Shanahan (1 Viewer)

TheFanatic

Footballguy
This may be the first time in my life I am happy about Shanahan jerking around with the RB's. I just assumed that Selvin Young was the starter and was going to get all the carries. Thank you Skeletor for splitting the carries and allowing to eke out a 4 point victory as my opponent had Young going last night and the lead. But with Young only getting 9, that lead didn't hold up....

 
I have to say, I never thought I'd see the Broncos absolutely suck at running the ball. But they looked AWFUL last night. Just awful.

 
NET YARDS RUSHING 142

Total Rushing Plays 34

Average Gain per Rushing Play 4.2

Tackled for a Loss (Number-Yards) 1-1

and 2 rush TDs.

I take this rush attach any week.

 
I have to say, I never thought I'd see the Broncos absolutely suck at running the ball. But they looked AWFUL last night. Just awful.
Huh? They gained 142 yards last night at 4.2 yds a carry. I wouldn't call that "awful, just awful".
 
Andre Hall - 6.1 YPC

Selvin Young 5.1 YPC

Peyton Hills 4.7 YPC

All of which was done with no run longer than 16 yards

Horrendous.

Michael Pitman 1.9 YPC (While many were near the goal line, he was undoubtedly terrible)

 
Andre Hall - 6.1 YPCSelvin Young 5.1 YPCPeyton Hills 4.7 YPCAll of which was done with no run longer than 16 yardsHorrendous. Michael Pitman 1.9 YPC (While many were near the goal line, he was undoubtedly terrible)
It was a great running performance.And a fantasy nightmare.
 
I have to say, I never thought I'd see the Broncos absolutely suck at running the ball. But they looked AWFUL last night. Just awful.
:boxing: Very weird take here. The 2 primary ball carriers ran for 6.1 and 5.1 YPC, respectively. Pittman had just 1.9 YPC, but on 7 carries that stat is sandbagged by 3 and 1 yard TDs, where distance is not his fault. Cutler had a 1.8 YPC, and I wouldn't even figure that into the equation. Come to think of it, I am not clear how a QB even averages 1.8 on 5 carries with a long run of 11 yards when behind the line should be a sack.
 
I have to say, I never thought I'd see the Broncos absolutely suck at running the ball. But they looked AWFUL last night. Just awful.
:boxing: Very weird take here. The 2 primary ball carriers ran for 6.1 and 5.1 YPC, respectively. Pittman had just 1.9 YPC, but on 7 carries that stat is sandbagged by 3 and 1 yard TDs, where distance is not his fault. Cutler had a 1.8 YPC, and I wouldn't even figure that into the equation. Come to think of it, I am not clear how a QB even averages 1.8 on 5 carries with a long run of 11 yards when behind the line should be a sack.
11 yard scramble1 yard scramble3 kneels for -1 yards each= 5 carries for 9 yards. = 1.8 ypc
 
I have to say, I never thought I'd see the Broncos absolutely suck at running the ball. But they looked AWFUL last night. Just awful.
:bag: Very weird take here. The 2 primary ball carriers ran for 6.1 and 5.1 YPC, respectively. Pittman had just 1.9 YPC, but on 7 carries that stat is sandbagged by 3 and 1 yard TDs, where distance is not his fault. Cutler had a 1.8 YPC, and I wouldn't even figure that into the equation. Come to think of it, I am not clear how a QB even averages 1.8 on 5 carries with a long run of 11 yards when behind the line should be a sack.
11 yard scramble1 yard scramble :goodposting:3 kneels for -1 yards each = 5 carries for 9 yards. = 1.8 ypc
:goodposting: I had forgotten those count as runs... stupid rule. So in reality he had 2 carries for a 5.5 average. Excluding the 3 kneels and the 1 yard TD [4 carries accounting for -2 yards] the real rushing stat would be 30 carries for 144 yards [4.8 YPC].
 
hofer said:
All of which was done with no run longer than 16 yards
I guess that's what I was focusing on... the guys looked like they couldn't break away form the D... they'd get 3-4 yards, and then swarmed under. ;)Of course, I was also watching while I was half asleep.
 
BigRed said:
lolI'm loving Shanny too. Go Skeletor go! Do that musical RBs thing you do so well.....
I love it all the more considering I avoided their RB's in every single league. Looks like you need 3 roster spots for mediocre numbers...
 
BigRed said:
lolI'm loving Shanny too. Go Skeletor go! Do that musical RBs thing you do so well.....
I love it all the more considering I avoided their RB's in every single league. Looks like you need 3 roster spots for mediocre numbers...
I wish I had been that smart. When Selvin fell and fell and fell, I fell into thinking I was getting a value pick. :lmao:
 
hofer said:
All of which was done with no run longer than 16 yards
I guess that's what I was focusing on... the guys looked like they couldn't break away form the D... they'd get 3-4 yards, and then swarmed under. :bag:Of course, I was also watching while I was half asleep.
Sometimes I wonder if you're posting while you're half asleep too. Long runs are not the only mark of a good running offense. 140 yds with a pretty decent YPC are what help teams control TOP and control the tempo of the game and keep their defense off the field. Calling that "awful" just makes 0 sense from any angle you try to spin it.Seriously, why can't you ever admit you misspoke or made an error in evaluating a situation? It's ok to say "yeah, not sure what I was thinking, those are pretty decent #'s". It's ok to be wrong and man up to it. You might be taken a bit more seriously if you do that from time to time.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
hofer said:
All of which was done with no run longer than 16 yards
I guess that's what I was focusing on... the guys looked like they couldn't break away form the D... they'd get 3-4 yards, and then swarmed under. :bag: Of course, I was also watching while I was half asleep.
Sometimes I wonder if you're posting while you're half asleep too. Long runs are not the only mark of a good running offense. 140 yds with a pretty decent YPC are what help teams control TOP and control the tempo of the game and keep their defense off the field. Calling that "awful" just makes 0 sense from any angle you try to spin it.Seriously, why can't you ever admit you misspoke or made an error in evaluating a situation? It's ok to say "yeah, not sure what I was thinking, those are pretty decent #'s". It's ok to be wrong and man up to it. You might be taken a bit more seriously if you do that from time to time.
And then head over the Reggie Bush threads and admit the guy should be wearing 85 instead of 25...
 
hofer said:
All of which was done with no run longer than 16 yards
I guess that's what I was focusing on... the guys looked like they couldn't break away form the D... they'd get 3-4 yards, and then swarmed under. :shrug:Of course, I was also watching while I was half asleep.
Sometimes I wonder if you're posting while you're half asleep too. Long runs are not the only mark of a good running offense. 140 yds with a pretty decent YPC are what help teams control TOP and control the tempo of the game and keep their defense off the field. Calling that "awful" just makes 0 sense from any angle you try to spin it.Seriously, why can't you ever admit you misspoke or made an error in evaluating a situation? It's ok to say "yeah, not sure what I was thinking, those are pretty decent #'s". It's ok to be wrong and man up to it. You might be taken a bit more seriously if you do that from time to time.
:confused: I thought the fact I made an error in evaluating the situation was rather self evident by the numerous posts in response to mine. I explained why I thought that, that's all.
 
hofer said:
All of which was done with no run longer than 16 yards
I guess that's what I was focusing on... the guys looked like they couldn't break away form the D... they'd get 3-4 yards, and then swarmed under. :shrug:Of course, I was also watching while I was half asleep.
Sometimes I wonder if you're posting while you're half asleep too. Long runs are not the only mark of a good running offense. 140 yds with a pretty decent YPC are what help teams control TOP and control the tempo of the game and keep their defense off the field. Calling that "awful" just makes 0 sense from any angle you try to spin it.Seriously, why can't you ever admit you misspoke or made an error in evaluating a situation? It's ok to say "yeah, not sure what I was thinking, those are pretty decent #'s". It's ok to be wrong and man up to it. You might be taken a bit more seriously if you do that from time to time.
:confused: I thought the fact I made an error in evaluating the situation was rather self evident by the numerous posts in response to mine. I explained why I thought that, that's all.
It WAS self evident by the numerous posts in response to yours. Your admitting to being wrong WASN'T self evident. Your "explanation" looked more like a justification for how you could still be right. But, getting off topic here and not really that important to keep debating you personally. Let's get back to the Denver RB's.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Jayrod said:
:pickle: -Jay Cutler owner
:pickle: :pickle:-Jay Cutler and Eddie Royal ownerI picked up Cutler in 2006 (rookie season) for $1We are allowed to keep 2 players for a total of 3 years eachI've kept Cutler through 2006 and 2007.This is my final year with Cutler at this price and I'm about to cash in!
 
hofer said:
All of which was done with no run longer than 16 yards
I guess that's what I was focusing on... the guys looked like they couldn't break away form the D... they'd get 3-4 yards, and then swarmed under. :thumbdown:Of course, I was also watching while I was half asleep.
3 x 4 yards = a first down.
 
The Broncos running attack is taking a page from the Titans.

Their passing attack, on the other hand... Bengals (when they were good)

Or is this just week 1?

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top