What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

The Audible - 2010 Draft RECAP - NFC South (1 Viewer)

Cecil Lammey

Footballguy
Great stuff as always guys :shrug:

I have one point of clarification regarding what you said about the Panthers WR situation.

You dismissed Brandon LaFell as not being a compelling dynasty target because he's going to be a "60 catch, 700/800 yards, 6 TD" guy and then you praise Armanti Edwards and say he could be "Antwaan Randle El Plus."

To me those two statements contrast against one another. How can a receiver with 60/800/6 potential not be a far more sought after commodity than a guy you're comparing to ARE? ARE, for all his intangible value, has never been more than a replacement level offensive talent. Randle El's career highs are 45 catches, 542 yards and 2 touchdowns. :shrug:

 
Great stuff as always guys :own3d:I have one point of clarification regarding what you said about the Panthers WR situation.You dismissed Brandon LaFell as not being a compelling dynasty target because he's going to be a "60 catch, 700/800 yards, 6 TD" guy and then you praise Armanti Edwards and say he could be "Antwaan Randle El Plus."To me those two statements contrast against one another. How can a receiver with 60/800/6 potential not be a far more sought after commodity than a guy you're comparing to ARE? ARE, for all his intangible value, has never been more than a replacement level offensive talent. Randle El's career highs are 45 catches, 542 yards and 2 touchdowns. :lmao:
sorry maybe my comments threw things off a bit - I definitely agree that LaFell is the better fantasy commodity, I have him about 15 spots above Edwards in 100. I like Armanti Edwards a little more as a 4th/5th round dynasty rookie pick than laFell as a 2nd, so in that sense I like Edwards better, and I do think that Edwards presence takes the edge off of LaFell's upside. I would never advocate taking Edwards before LaFell, but at the current cost, Edwards is more likely to be on my roster than LaFell.
 
Great stuff as always guys :own3d:I have one point of clarification regarding what you said about the Panthers WR situation.You dismissed Brandon LaFell as not being a compelling dynasty target because he's going to be a "60 catch, 700/800 yards, 6 TD" guy and then you praise Armanti Edwards and say he could be "Antwaan Randle El Plus."To me those two statements contrast against one another. How can a receiver with 60/800/6 potential not be a far more sought after commodity than a guy you're comparing to ARE? ARE, for all his intangible value, has never been more than a replacement level offensive talent. Randle El's career highs are 45 catches, 542 yards and 2 touchdowns. :shrug:
sorry maybe my comments threw things off a bit - I definitely agree that LaFell is the better fantasy commodity, I have him about 15 spots above Edwards in 100. I like Armanti Edwards a little more as a 4th/5th round dynasty rookie pick than laFell as a 2nd, so in that sense I like Edwards better, and I do think that Edwards presence takes the edge off of LaFell's upside. I would never advocate taking Edwards before LaFell, but at the current cost, Edwards is more likely to be on my roster than LaFell.
:lmao: I figured as much, but just wanted to make sure it as clarified in case other listeners didn't get the nuance either. Of course, I could've just waited to read the new Bloom 100 and then had the answer. :)
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top