This year, the Giants are worse than Green Bay, San Francisco, New Orleans, Atlanta, Detroit, Dallas (maybe), Seattle (maybe), New England, Baltimore, Pittsburgh, Houston, Oakland (maybe) and Denver (maybe). The fact that might make the playoffs and be a dangerous team if they play at the peak of their ability, doesn't make them a good team. They kind of remind me of last year's Seattle team.
I will reiterate this, I am not a Giant homer so take this for what it is: NYG already beat NE, would crush DEN, OAK and HOU; SEA, ATL, DET, DAL, and probably SF are about NYG equals; PIT and BAL would be tough games for them to win unless they played great; GB and NO would be nearly impossible for them to win at.By team:
[*]NE - is not that good period; their defense is very suspect.
[*]DEN - Could never hang the amount of points needed to stay even.
[*]OAK - is still trying to find itself.
[*]HOU - Really, this team is so dangerous without Schaub; they been stumbling since he went down.
[*]SEA - should never of beat the NYG the first time.
[*]ATL - if ATL plays their "A" game they probably win.
[*]DET - has been shaky ever since Best went down.
[*]DAL - Their "A" game is probably equal to NYG's "A".
[*]SF - barely beat a NYG team that did not have Bradshaw and had a pouting Jacobs. I honestly don't think SFO could beat them twice in a season.
[*]PIT - if healthy would cause problems for NYG
[*]BAL - I think is a notch below PIT (I know they are 2-0 vs. PIT) but probably better than NYG.
[*]GB - Barely beat NYG and certainly couldn't stop their offense.
[*]NO - Has beat the Giants like a drum for the last few years.