What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

The scapegoating of illegal immigrants (1 Viewer)

Crime, prostitution and drugs are all a boost to the economy. When thieves break a store front and steal stuff, they are helping redistribute income from rich merchants to the poor and dispossesed. Additionally, by breaking the store window they are providing employment for glaziers and glass making companies. It's all a plus.
Sarcasm?
This guy gets it. The problem with the economic argument for illegal immigrants, is that you can make the same type of economic argument for any illegal activity.
I didn't think I was actually seeing the broken window fallacy espoused as true. However, the cost-benefits with illegal immigration are a lot closer than many think. I have read several economic studies which says that it is so. Most of them ignore wage deflation caused by illegal immigrants though. The primary factor seems to be how much a government spends on services for them versus indirect taxes generated by them via business growth and spending. I would think that you would find different impacts in a state like South Carolina where we provide minimal services and a state like California where they provide large services. I have done some minimal research on the negative impact stricter legislation has on the business environments of states that enact them but like I said the actual cost is ambiguous when considering wage deflation and government expenditures. Just like all of the above mentioned 'crimes' of drugs and prostitution, I think we would have a large economic gain through legalization than through a stricter immigration policy. Though if we are to change our immigration policies now is the time to be granting more skilled worker visas a closed border a approach will only hurt our economy in the short and long run.

 
Some responses above.
I'd respond to your specific points but I have made myself a policy not to converse on this topic with anyone who throws out the "racism" or "xenophobe" term. It's an intimidation tactic used far too often in discussions about race and illegal immigration. I probably shouldn't even discuss this with Tim as he's done the same. It's a shame otherwise intelligent people have to resort to the race card in these types of discussion.
That's fine, but I don't see how the below statement can be interpreted in any other way but touching on racism. You could have made your arguments without resorting to that. If you want to hide behind that go ahead."Illegals don't assimilate. They form their own communities, don't learn English, and instead of trying to become Americanized they turn their areas in to the same cess pools they came from."

 
If anything, for the most part, illegals are a great benefit to the economy. Cheap labor is absolutely essential for many industries in America, without it we would see their demise the same way we have of unionized industries in America. Really the only negative is the amount of money they tend to transfer out of the economy but actually that eventually has a positive impact on our economy as it helps develop South and Central America with cash infusion.
This is certainly one of the arguments. Why is that inconsistent with closing our borders and regulating who is in this country?
 
Some responses above.
I'd respond to your specific points but I have made myself a policy not to converse on this topic with anyone who throws out the "racism" or "xenophobe" term. It's an intimidation tactic used far too often in discussions about race and illegal immigration. I probably shouldn't even discuss this with Tim as he's done the same. It's a shame otherwise intelligent people have to resort to the race card in these types of discussion.
You suggested a tactic to limit immigration in your other thread that was to run around yelling la migra to scare immigrant workers, you do not get to play the martyr shtick here.
 
Some responses above.
I'd respond to your specific points but I have made myself a policy not to converse on this topic with anyone who throws out the "racism" or "xenophobe" term. It's an intimidation tactic used far too often in discussions about race and illegal immigration. I probably shouldn't even discuss this with Tim as he's done the same. It's a shame otherwise intelligent people have to resort to the race card in these types of discussion.
That's fine, but I don't see how the below statement can be interpreted in any other way but touching on racism. You could have made your arguments without resorting to that. If you want to hide behind that go ahead."Illegals don't assimilate. They form their own communities, don't learn English, and instead of trying to become Americanized they turn their areas in to the same cess pools they came from."
Is your argument that illegal alien communities in the US are nice places to live or that poor areas of Mexico and South America are?
 
Some responses above.
I'd respond to your specific points but I have made myself a policy not to converse on this topic with anyone who throws out the "racism" or "xenophobe" term. It's an intimidation tactic used far too often in discussions about race and illegal immigration. I probably shouldn't even discuss this with Tim as he's done the same. It's a shame otherwise intelligent people have to resort to the race card in these types of discussion.
You suggested a tactic to limit immigration in your other thread that was to run around yelling la migra to scare immigrant workers, you do not get to play the martyr shtick here.
That was a joke. Sorry you don't have a sense of humor. Like they'd leave just by yelling "la migra" anyways. Sheesh. :confused:
 
Don't many of the illegal immigrants, by their own admission, send some of the money they make here out of the country to their families? I can't imagine that money is helping our economy.
You should be able to imagine it.Once the money is sent back home, what happens to it?
 
Some responses above.
I'd respond to your specific points but I have made myself a policy not to converse on this topic with anyone who throws out the "racism" or "xenophobe" term. It's an intimidation tactic used far too often in discussions about race and illegal immigration. I probably shouldn't even discuss this with Tim as he's done the same. It's a shame otherwise intelligent people have to resort to the race card in these types of discussion.
You suggested a tactic to limit immigration in your other thread that was to run around yelling la migra to scare immigrant workers, you do not get to play the martyr shtick here.
That was a joke. Sorry you don't have a sense of humor. Like they'd leave just by yelling "la migra" anyways. Sheesh. :thumbup:
My apologies, I know several people that anti-immigration views and say things like that seriously. That is why my sarcasm meter was turned off there. I should not have assumed that you were like those people based on that. Again, my apologies.
 
If anything, for the most part, illegals are a great benefit to the economy. Cheap labor is absolutely essential for many industries in America, without it we would see their demise the same way we have of unionized industries in America. Really the only negative is the amount of money they tend to transfer out of the economy but actually that eventually has a positive impact on our economy as it helps develop South and Central America with cash infusion.
There's no such thing as transferring money out of the economy. (You could burn it, but even that has no negative effect on the economy -- it just slows inflation.)You can't buy stuff with U.S. dollars in Brazil. Dollars that get mailed to Brazil still get spent in America (usually after being traded through a currency exchange place).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
A good way to stop the demand for immigration in Mexico, kill the Farm Bill. Every thread has a reason to kill the farm bill in it.

 
Don't many of the illegal immigrants, by their own admission, send some of the money they make here out of the country to their families? I can't imagine that money is helping our economy.
You should be able to imagine it.Once the money is sent back home, what happens to it?
They spend it there.
How?
"I'll pay you 1 American Dollar for 4 servings of Paella."OrExchange it to Pesos and "I'll pay you the peso equivalent of 1 American Dollar (I'm too lazy to look up the exchange rate) for 4 servings of Paella."
 
Some responses above.
I'd respond to your specific points but I have made myself a policy not to converse on this topic with anyone who throws out the "racism" or "xenophobe" term. It's an intimidation tactic used far too often in discussions about race and illegal immigration. I probably shouldn't even discuss this with Tim as he's done the same. It's a shame otherwise intelligent people have to resort to the race card in these types of discussion.
That's fine, but I don't see how the below statement can be interpreted in any other way but touching on racism. You could have made your arguments without resorting to that. If you want to hide behind that go ahead."Illegals don't assimilate. They form their own communities, don't learn English, and instead of trying to become Americanized they turn their areas in to the same cess pools they came from."
Is your argument that illegal alien communities in the US are nice places to live or that poor areas of Mexico and South America are?
Dictionary: cesspool2. A filthy, disgusting, or morally corrupt place.

Is your argument that all illegal aliens are morally corrupt?

 
Don't many of the illegal immigrants, by their own admission, send some of the money they make here out of the country to their families? I can't imagine that money is helping our economy.
You should be able to imagine it.Once the money is sent back home, what happens to it?
They spend it there.
How?
"I'll pay you 1 American Dollar for 4 servings of Paella."Or

Exchange it to Pesos and "I'll pay you the peso equivalent of 1 American Dollar (I'm too lazy to look up the exchange rate) for 4 servings of Paella."
OK. Then what happens to the dollar? My point is that it will ultimately end up back in the U.S. (Although even if it doesn't, the only effect on the economy is to slow inflation.)
 
Some responses above.
I'd respond to your specific points but I have made myself a policy not to converse on this topic with anyone who throws out the "racism" or "xenophobe" term. It's an intimidation tactic used far too often in discussions about race and illegal immigration. I probably shouldn't even discuss this with Tim as he's done the same. It's a shame otherwise intelligent people have to resort to the race card in these types of discussion.
That's fine, but I don't see how the below statement can be interpreted in any other way but touching on racism. You could have made your arguments without resorting to that. If you want to hide behind that go ahead."Illegals don't assimilate. They form their own communities, don't learn English, and instead of trying to become Americanized they turn their areas in to the same cess pools they came from."
Is your argument that illegal alien communities in the US are nice places to live or that poor areas of Mexico and South America are?
Dictionary: cesspool2. A filthy, disgusting, or morally corrupt place.

Is your argument that all illegal aliens are morally corrupt?
I don't really have an argument. I just asked you a question. If he just went with disgusting and filthy would you disagree with him?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Don't many of the illegal immigrants, by their own admission, send some of the money they make here out of the country to their families? I can't imagine that money is helping our economy.
You should be able to imagine it.Once the money is sent back home, what happens to it?
They spend it there.
How?
"I'll pay you 1 American Dollar for 4 servings of Paella."Or

Exchange it to Pesos and "I'll pay you the peso equivalent of 1 American Dollar (I'm too lazy to look up the exchange rate) for 4 servings of Paella."
OK. Then what happens to the dollar? My point is that it will ultimately end up back in the U.S. (Although even if it doesn't, the only effect on the economy is to slow inflation.)
So then why the whole "Buy American" thing? Just buy Japanese if the money still stays in our economy.
 
If I go out and kill a mime, there'd be a lot of people who would say I had every right to do it, because honestly, who likes mimes? 5 - 10 years down the road, they may change the laws to make killing mimes legal. Heck, it might even replace baseball as our national pastime. But since it's illegal now, I would deserve to go to jail for it.
I don't think you'd necessarily deserve to go to jail for it. We're talking about mimes, for gosh sakes.Mime-killing and illegal immigration are hard cases, but there are easier cases like the former Fugitive Slave Act which demonstrate, IMO, that certain laws are bad, and that enforcement of those bad laws is a shame ... and that people punished for breaking them don't necessarily deserve, in any moral sense, to be punished.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Some responses above.
I'd respond to your specific points but I have made myself a policy not to converse on this topic with anyone who throws out the "racism" or "xenophobe" term. It's an intimidation tactic used far too often in discussions about race and illegal immigration. I probably shouldn't even discuss this with Tim as he's done the same. It's a shame otherwise intelligent people have to resort to the race card in these types of discussion.
That's fine, but I don't see how the below statement can be interpreted in any other way but touching on racism. You could have made your arguments without resorting to that. If you want to hide behind that go ahead."Illegals don't assimilate. They form their own communities, don't learn English, and instead of trying to become Americanized they turn their areas in to the same cess pools they came from."
Is your argument that illegal alien communities in the US are nice places to live or that poor areas of Mexico and South America are?
Dictionary: cesspool2. A filthy, disgusting, or morally corrupt place.

Is your argument that all illegal aliens are morally corrupt?
Not that I really want to get in to this discussion, but how did you transition from the definition of cesspool which defines the characteristics of a place to attributing those characteristics to specific people? I don't think that's a valid logical leap or conclusion.
 
Some responses above.
I'd respond to your specific points but I have made myself a policy not to converse on this topic with anyone who throws out the "racism" or "xenophobe" term. It's an intimidation tactic used far too often in discussions about race and illegal immigration. I probably shouldn't even discuss this with Tim as he's done the same. It's a shame otherwise intelligent people have to resort to the race card in these types of discussion.
That's fine, but I don't see how the below statement can be interpreted in any other way but touching on racism. You could have made your arguments without resorting to that. If you want to hide behind that go ahead."Illegals don't assimilate. They form their own communities, don't learn English, and instead of trying to become Americanized they turn their areas in to the same cess pools they came from."
Is your argument that illegal alien communities in the US are nice places to live or that poor areas of Mexico and South America are?
Dictionary: cesspool2. A filthy, disgusting, or morally corrupt place.

Is your argument that all illegal aliens are morally corrupt?
I don't really have an argument. I just asked you a question. If he just went with disgusting and filthy would you disagree with him?
Yes. Being poor does not necessitate that something is also filthy and disgusting.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Don't many of the illegal immigrants, by their own admission, send some of the money they make here out of the country to their families? I can't imagine that money is helping our economy.
You should be able to imagine it.Once the money is sent back home, what happens to it?
They spend it there.
How?
"I'll pay you 1 American Dollar for 4 servings of Paella."Or

Exchange it to Pesos and "I'll pay you the peso equivalent of 1 American Dollar (I'm too lazy to look up the exchange rate) for 4 servings of Paella."
OK. Then what happens to the dollar? My point is that it will ultimately end up back in the U.S. (Although even if it doesn't, the only effect on the economy is to slow inflation.)
So then why the whole "Buy American" thing? Just buy Japanese if the money still stays in our economy.
It's just politics, usually promoted by unions. There's no legitimate economic reason whatsoever to "Buy American." International trade provably benefits both countries. (A proof was first offered by David Ricardo, I believe.)Buying American cars just for the sake of "Buying American" does help American auto workers. But it hurts American wheat growers and American car buyers and the net effect on Americans is a negative one.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Some responses above.
I'd respond to your specific points but I have made myself a policy not to converse on this topic with anyone who throws out the "racism" or "xenophobe" term. It's an intimidation tactic used far too often in discussions about race and illegal immigration. I probably shouldn't even discuss this with Tim as he's done the same. It's a shame otherwise intelligent people have to resort to the race card in these types of discussion.
That's fine, but I don't see how the below statement can be interpreted in any other way but touching on racism. You could have made your arguments without resorting to that. If you want to hide behind that go ahead."Illegals don't assimilate. They form their own communities, don't learn English, and instead of trying to become Americanized they turn their areas in to the same cess pools they came from."
Is your argument that illegal alien communities in the US are nice places to live or that poor areas of Mexico and South America are?
Dictionary: cesspool2. A filthy, disgusting, or morally corrupt place.

Is your argument that all illegal aliens are morally corrupt?
Not that I really want to get in to this discussion, but how did you transition from the definition of cesspool which defines the characteristics of a place to attributing those characteristics to specific people? I don't think that's a valid logical leap or conclusion.
A "place" does not have morality. Only the people that live there do. By calling a place a cesspool, you are defining it's people that make it that as such.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Don't many of the illegal immigrants, by their own admission, send some of the money they make here out of the country to their families? I can't imagine that money is helping our economy.
You should be able to imagine it.Once the money is sent back home, what happens to it?
They spend it there.
How?
"I'll pay you 1 American Dollar for 4 servings of Paella."Or

Exchange it to Pesos and "I'll pay you the peso equivalent of 1 American Dollar (I'm too lazy to look up the exchange rate) for 4 servings of Paella."
By the way, let's consider a scenario in which immigrant workers mail their U.S. Dollars back home and those dollars really are never spent in America. Would that be a good thing for America, or a bad thing?The answer is that it would be awesome.

Consider what it would mean. A bunch of foreigners are coming over here and doing work for Americans, and all they're getting in return are little green pieces of paper -- they are effectively getting IOUs which they will never collect on (from Americans). From America's standpoint, they are working for us for free. That's awesome.

(In real life, though, they do collect on the IOUs -- by spending the money in America or trading it to someone who will.)

 
Last edited by a moderator:
StrikeS2k said:
I can't believe I'm going to waste time on this, AGAIN. Tim, I thought you weren't going to start threads anymore and, on a topic such as this that has been debate over and over, couldn't you have just done a search and bumped one of the preexisting threads?

Anyways.....

The PROBLEMS with Illegal Immigration

1) They ARE a net drain on the system. Anyone who says different is a "progressive" like Timmy here. Hospital emergency rooms are closing at an alarming rate in border states. AFAIK the unanimous reason is the cost of illegals to their bottom line since anyone who walks in to an emergency room has to be treated by law. Illegals use the emergency room as their family practitioner and emergency room care is much more expensive than a regular doctor visit. Additionally, there is the cost of educating their children, some US citizens and some not, the cost of incarceration which is significant, the cost of social programs they are entitled to especially if they have kids here, the cost of the extra infrastructure needed to support 10% more people in the country, etc.....FAIR, an organization Timmy mentioned earlier, just came out with their latest study which shows that in CA illegals cost the state 13 BILLION dollars a year. That's a LOT of money, and that's just CA.

2) There are a lot of illegals in prison. People such as Tim pretend that the only law these people break is walking across the border to "make a better life for them self" but they do commit other crimes. Yes, it's not all of them but it's not an insignificant percent either.

3) Latino gangs have become a huge problem due to illegal immigration. Do a search on MS-13, a latino gang that was actually started in the US but does heavy recruiting in Latin America and brings those members here. It's a huge problem in this country and one of the most violent gangs we have of any race.

4) We NEED to have a secure border. Not only do illegal immigrants cross it but terrorists cross it as well. Also, our border agents are continually shot at and put in harms way.

5) Illegals don't assimilate. They form their own communities, don't learn English, and instead of trying to become Americanized they turn their areas in to the same cess pools they came from. Not to mention cultural issues. California now has a huge problem with #### fighting, which is illegal almost everywhere in the US. But it's common in Latin America so in areas with high concentrations of illegals you have a big problem with it. This may sound trivial but #### fighting leads to a lot of other issues, just as prostitution does. Not to mention it's completely inhumane.

6) One of the big problems that isn't talked about much is 2nd/3rd generation illegals. Any kids born of illegals while in this country are automatically US citizens. This should be changed as that was never the intent of this provision but that's another issue. The problem is, in states such as CA these children grow up and are then part of our voting population. They vote in very liberal ways and this, IMO, is one of the reasons CA has gone over the Abyss. These people are now in power and come from a culture where corruption in politics is status quo. About 5 years ago the State/Feds actually arrested basically the entire city council in a Latino community in the Los Angeles area for corruption. This is what they came from in Mexico and other Latin American cultures and, just like we learn what our parents teach us, it flows down the line with the illegals. Many of the people in state power come from this background and they vote for more and more pro illegal measures every year.

7) Identity theft. Illegals are being tied to identity theft more and more. They make up or buy SSN numbers of American Citizens and use it to work here. This causes a myriad of problems for the CITIZEN who actually owns that SSN number. I read about a lady in Iowa who TRIED to go on workman's comp. for a legit injury only to find out she couldn't because she was already on workman's comp!!!! An illegal using her SSN number had been on workman's comp. and then a few months later she got a hefty tax bill from the Feds for the illegal as well.

8) This will sound disingenuous coming from an illegal immigrant opponent but it's true. Our use of illegal immigrant labor for low paying jobs is human exploitation. People think everything is cheaper with the illegals so they don't care if they're being paid under the table in 3rd world wages but it's not only illegal, it's wrong. Anyone who thinks it's ok believes in human exploitation. I don't.

The FALLACIES of fixing the problem

Timmy and other "progressive" open border people cite problems with getting rid of illegals - "We can't deport 20 million people!!!! It's not possible."

1) We don't have to deport them. Go after the employers like we're supposed to. The federal government has a great database that many employers use to verify SSN numbers. Federal agencies are required to use it and many private employers use it as well. It's been in pilot for years and the pilot went very well. Illegal immigration apologists like Timmy here push against the use of this database, saying it can cause delays in employment and mistakes can be made. While this is true the issues in the pilot have been minimal and the benefits certainly outweigh the downside. In addition, targeted raids as have been happening with more frequency the last couple of years make a huge impact. You don't have to go into every workplace. Word spreads fast. If the illegals even THINK you might come after them they get scared. The problem is we do it so infrequently there isn't much threat.

2) If you go after the employers to make it hard for illegals to find work, most will go home. This has been shown by how many have left just due to the economic downturn. Hundreds of thousands of illegals have left in the last year alone due to problems finding work.

3) If you secure the border and go after employers it becomes difficult for the illegal to come back once he's out of the country. So, you've stopped the incoming flow.

4) After you've stopped the incoming flow and most have gone home due to workplace enforcement, you have maybe 10-20% of the problem remaining. Those are the ones we end up deporting. But we can do that as we come across them via local arrest or other means. We don't have to go door to door looking for illegals.

But We NEED them to do jobs Americans won't do!!!!

Another fallacy.

1) I posted a link to a study last year that showed that the average American family will see a $5 YEARLY increase in the cost of fruits/veggies if illegals weren't picking them. People such as Timmy like to suggest that prices would skyrocket if illegals weren't here to pick our fruits. This simply isn't true. This study was by a completely unbiased researcher and was NOT refuted by ANY illegal alien apologists.

2) Being able to hire illegals cheap has delayed the implementation of mechanized devices for picking fruits. We can build a car with robotics but can't pick an apple from a tree? Not true. There's just no reason to deploy such means when illegals are cheap.

3) If we do want/need some immigrant labor we need to be in control of it. We need to secure our border and remove as many as possible. Then we can consider some type of guest worker program if still needed. What we can't have is illegals just walking across the border with us not knowing who is in our country and being in control of when they come and go.

There simply is no reason NOT to deal with this issue, including getting rid of those already here. Amnesty is not an option because is rewards coming here illegally while millions of people sit in other countries waiting to come here legally.
:confused: :lmao:
 
Don't many of the illegal immigrants, by their own admission, send some of the money they make here out of the country to their families? I can't imagine that money is helping our economy.
You should be able to imagine it.Once the money is sent back home, what happens to it?
They spend it there.
How?
"I'll pay you 1 American Dollar for 4 servings of Paella."Or

Exchange it to Pesos and "I'll pay you the peso equivalent of 1 American Dollar (I'm too lazy to look up the exchange rate) for 4 servings of Paella."
By the way, let's consider a scenario in which immigrant workers mail their U.S. Dollars back home and those dollars really are never spent in America. Would that be a good thing for America, or a bad thing?The answer is that it would be awesome.

Consider what it would mean. A bunch of foreigners are coming over here and doing work for Americans, and all they're getting in return are little green pieces of paper -- they are effectively getting IOUs which they will never collect on (from Americans). From America's standpoint, they are working for us for free. That's awesome.

(In real life, though, they do collect on the IOUs -- by spending the money in America or trading it to someone who will.)
MT, I am very grateful to you.In all the time I have spent defending illegal immigration, it never once occurred to me that the argument "they don't spend their money here, they send it back to Mexico" could be debunked so easily and in such a logical way. I learn something new every day I participate in the FFA.

 
Don't many of the illegal immigrants, by their own admission, send some of the money they make here out of the country to their families? I can't imagine that money is helping our economy.
You should be able to imagine it.Once the money is sent back home, what happens to it?
They spend it there.
How?
"I'll pay you 1 American Dollar for 4 servings of Paella."Or

Exchange it to Pesos and "I'll pay you the peso equivalent of 1 American Dollar (I'm too lazy to look up the exchange rate) for 4 servings of Paella."
By the way, let's consider a scenario in which immigrant workers mail their U.S. Dollars back home and those dollars really are never spent in America. Would that be a good thing for America, or a bad thing?The answer is that it would be awesome.

Consider what it would mean. A bunch of foreigners are coming over here and doing work for Americans, and all they're getting in return are little green pieces of paper -- they are effectively getting IOUs which they will never collect on (from Americans). From America's standpoint, they are working for us for free. That's awesome.

(In real life, though, they do collect on the IOUs -- by spending the money in America or trading it to someone who will.)
MT, I am very grateful to you.In all the time I have spent defending illegal immigration, it never once occurred to me that the argument "they don't spend their money here, they send it back to Mexico" could be debunked so easily and in such a logical way. I learn something new every day I participate in the FFA.
I'm surprised you haven't heard this argument. Maurile's made it at least 3 or 4 times previously in threads like these. Perhaps you don't read that many immigration threads.
 
Some responses above.
I'd respond to your specific points but I have made myself a policy not to converse on this topic with anyone who throws out the "racism" or "xenophobe" term. It's an intimidation tactic used far too often in discussions about race and illegal immigration. I probably shouldn't even discuss this with Tim as he's done the same. It's a shame otherwise intelligent people have to resort to the race card in these types of discussion.
Strike, I think you're both right and wrong about this. For what it's worth, after reading your very intelligently made arguments on this subject, I don't believe your position is racist at all. If I once implied that it was, I apologize for that.On the other hand, whenever this subject is discussed, there are always racist overtones on the anti-illegal side. You're correct that those on "my side" probably seek them out too quickly, not necessarily in order to intimidate but because it makes us feel more self-righteous. I recognize that weakness in myself, and I try to curb it whenever it arises. But the overtones are there some of the time, and it would be irresponsible to ignore them when they arise.
 
Don't many of the illegal immigrants, by their own admission, send some of the money they make here out of the country to their families? I can't imagine that money is helping our economy.
You should be able to imagine it.Once the money is sent back home, what happens to it?
They spend it there.
How?
"I'll pay you 1 American Dollar for 4 servings of Paella."Or

Exchange it to Pesos and "I'll pay you the peso equivalent of 1 American Dollar (I'm too lazy to look up the exchange rate) for 4 servings of Paella."
By the way, let's consider a scenario in which immigrant workers mail their U.S. Dollars back home and those dollars really are never spent in America. Would that be a good thing for America, or a bad thing?The answer is that it would be awesome.

Consider what it would mean. A bunch of foreigners are coming over here and doing work for Americans, and all they're getting in return are little green pieces of paper -- they are effectively getting IOUs which they will never collect on (from Americans). From America's standpoint, they are working for us for free. That's awesome.

(In real life, though, they do collect on the IOUs -- by spending the money in America or trading it to someone who will.)
MT, I am very grateful to you.In all the time I have spent defending illegal immigration, it never once occurred to me that the argument "they don't spend their money here, they send it back to Mexico" could be debunked so easily and in such a logical way. I learn something new every day I participate in the FFA.
I'm surprised you haven't heard this argument. Maurile's made it at least 3 or 4 times previously in threads like these. Perhaps you don't read that many immigration threads.
I do, but somehow I missed it.
 
Don't many of the illegal immigrants, by their own admission, send some of the money they make here out of the country to their families? I can't imagine that money is helping our economy.
You should be able to imagine it.Once the money is sent back home, what happens to it?
They spend it there.
How?
"I'll pay you 1 American Dollar for 4 servings of Paella."Or

Exchange it to Pesos and "I'll pay you the peso equivalent of 1 American Dollar (I'm too lazy to look up the exchange rate) for 4 servings of Paella."
By the way, let's consider a scenario in which immigrant workers mail their U.S. Dollars back home and those dollars really are never spent in America. Would that be a good thing for America, or a bad thing?The answer is that it would be awesome.

Consider what it would mean. A bunch of foreigners are coming over here and doing work for Americans, and all they're getting in return are little green pieces of paper -- they are effectively getting IOUs which they will never collect on (from Americans). From America's standpoint, they are working for us for free. That's awesome.

(In real life, though, they do collect on the IOUs -- by spending the money in America or trading it to someone who will.)
That's silly. Working for free is working for no payment. Those "little green pieces of paper" aren't IOUs anymore as we went off the gold standard a long time ago. They represent currency, something the Payer gave to the Payee. If they truly worked for free, the Payer would still have them and as such would spend them on something else, maybe newer tools or hiring more workers, whatever. Point is, the worker is paid. I know you're using the 'work for free' schtick to make some sort of point, but I don't think it's nearly as effective as you and Timmy seem to think it is.The point of the 'sending US dollars back home' argument, is that a dollar spent in the US is taxed by the US and counts towards the profit of a US company. A US dollar spent in Mexico is taxed by Mexico and counts towards the profit of a Mexican company. It's really that simple.

 
In all the time I have spent defending illegal immigration....That's just sad and disgusting
I've always found it happy and wonderful, myself! :rolleyes:
Can you boil down in 3 or 4 one-line bullet points the reasons for your position on this issue?
I believe:1. Illegal immigration is overall a benefit for America.2. There is no practical way to prevent illegal immigration that would not cause many more problems than it would solve.3. Illegal immigrants are an easy scapegoat for people, especially in times of economic hardship.4. While not all arguments against illegal immigration are racist, far too often racism rears its ugly head whenever this issue is discussed.
 
In all the time I have spent defending illegal immigration....That's just sad and disgusting
I've always found it happy and wonderful, myself! :lmao:
Can you boil down in 3 or 4 one-line bullet points the reasons for your position on this issue?
I believe:1. Illegal immigration is overall a benefit for America.
Sorry, I should have been clearer with my request. Your position is that illegal immigration is overall a benefit for America. Can you boil down in 3 or 4 one-line bullet points the reasons for your belief that illegal immigration is a net positive? Thanks.Edit: I'm not trying to trick you or anything here. I'm just trying to get a sense of where you are coming from. Are you arguing for open immigration, where there is little to no restriction on labor (the benefits of which would be lower prices resulting from depressed wages, additional sales and property taxes, etc.) or are you arguing for illegal immigration (the benefits of which would be additional captured income taxes without the subsequent draw on benefits such as social security and medicare, even more depressed wages, etc.)?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If anything, for the most part, illegals are a great benefit to the economy. Cheap labor is absolutely essential for many industries in America, without it we would see their demise the same way we have of unionized industries in America. Really the only negative is the amount of money they tend to transfer out of the economy but actually that eventually has a positive impact on our economy as it helps develop South and Central America with cash infusion.
This is certainly one of the arguments. Why is that inconsistent with closing our borders and regulating who is in this country?
It is not! I am a big supporter of establishing a guest worker program as well as further enforcement of immigration laws and border security. There are several issues that each party would have way different views on that make this very hard to come by. One, as an example, would be- would the guest workers have the same wage laws enforced? I would say that the min wage would need to be reduced for guest workers but you know that Democrats and unions would have a heart attack about that.
 
If anything, for the most part, illegals are a great benefit to the economy. Cheap labor is absolutely essential for many industries in America, without it we would see their demise the same way we have of unionized industries in America. Really the only negative is the amount of money they tend to transfer out of the economy but actually that eventually has a positive impact on our economy as it helps develop South and Central America with cash infusion.
There's no such thing as transferring money out of the economy. (You could burn it, but even that has no negative effect on the economy -- it just slows inflation.)You can't buy stuff with U.S. dollars in Brazil. Dollars that get mailed to Brazil still get spent in America (usually after being traded through a currency exchange place).
Transfer of 'wealth'. I should have known the technical police would be out in force in this thread.
 
In all the time I have spent defending illegal immigration....

That's just sad and disgusting
I've always found it happy and wonderful, myself! :)
Can you boil down in 3 or 4 one-line bullet points the reasons for your position on this issue?
I believe:1. Illegal immigration is overall a benefit for America.

2. There is no practical way to prevent illegal immigration that would not cause many more problems than it would solve.

3. Illegal immigrants are an easy scapegoat for people, especially in times of economic hardship.

4. While not all arguments against illegal immigration are racist, far too often racism rears its ugly head whenever this issue is discussed.
For the record: I don't know StrikeS2k, and I will give people the benefit of the doubt more often than not, but making a broad generalization like his statement "Illegals don't assimilate. They form their own communities, don't learn English, and instead of trying to become Americanized they turn their areas in to the same cess pools they came from." is disgusting. The vast majority of Illegal immigrants are good people trying to take care of their family. His post paints them as drug dealers, gangsters, and generally undesirable and immoral criminals, and that just isn't true. Their are logical arguments against Illegal Immigration, some of which he made, but the overall tone of his post went far beyond those logical arguments. If you don't want to be accused of racism, then don't make statements that border on it.
 
Some responses above.
I'd respond to your specific points but I have made myself a policy not to converse on this topic with anyone who throws out the "racism" or "xenophobe" term. It's an intimidation tactic used far too often in discussions about race and illegal immigration. I probably shouldn't even discuss this with Tim as he's done the same. It's a shame otherwise intelligent people have to resort to the race card in these types of discussion.
That's fine, but I don't see how the below statement can be interpreted in any other way but touching on racism. You could have made your arguments without resorting to that. If you want to hide behind that go ahead."Illegals don't assimilate. They form their own communities, don't learn English, and instead of trying to become Americanized they turn their areas in to the same cess pools they came from."
Is your argument that illegal alien communities in the US are nice places to live or that poor areas of Mexico and South America are?
Dictionary: cesspool2. A filthy, disgusting, or morally corrupt place.

Is your argument that all illegal aliens are morally corrupt?
I don't really have an argument. I just asked you a question. If he just went with disgusting and filthy would you disagree with him?
Yes. Being poor does not necessitate that something is also filthy and disgusting.
Have you been to these places?
 
In all the time I have spent defending illegal immigration....

That's just sad and disgusting
I've always found it happy and wonderful, myself! :thumbup:
Can you boil down in 3 or 4 one-line bullet points the reasons for your position on this issue?
I believe:1. Illegal immigration is overall a benefit for America.

2. There is no practical way to prevent illegal immigration that would not cause many more problems than it would solve.

3. Illegal immigrants are an easy scapegoat for people, especially in times of economic hardship.

4. While not all arguments against illegal immigration are racist, far too often racism rears its ugly head whenever this issue is discussed.
For the record: I don't know StrikeS2k, and I will give people the benefit of the doubt more often than not, but making a broad generalization like his statement "Illegals don't assimilate. They form their own communities, don't learn English, and instead of trying to become Americanized they turn their areas in to the same cess pools they came from." is disgusting. The vast majority of Illegal immigrants are good people trying to take care of their family. His post paints them as drug dealers, gangsters, and generally undesirable and immoral criminals, and that just isn't true. Their are logical arguments against Illegal Immigration, some of which he made, but the overall tone of his post went far beyond those logical arguments. If you don't want to be accused of racism, then don't make statements that border on it.
Or he could do exactly what he typed earlier and ignore those posters that so quickly decide to toss in the race card. Back to the topic, although there have been many other threads about this issue I do appreciate reading the various opinions from everyone. Threads such as this that contain good discussion back and forth are one of the great things about the FFA.

 
Some responses above.
I'd respond to your specific points but I have made myself a policy not to converse on this topic with anyone who throws out the "racism" or "xenophobe" term. It's an intimidation tactic used far too often in discussions about race and illegal immigration. I probably shouldn't even discuss this with Tim as he's done the same. It's a shame otherwise intelligent people have to resort to the race card in these types of discussion.
That's fine, but I don't see how the below statement can be interpreted in any other way but touching on racism. You could have made your arguments without resorting to that. If you want to hide behind that go ahead."Illegals don't assimilate. They form their own communities, don't learn English, and instead of trying to become Americanized they turn their areas in to the same cess pools they came from."
Is your argument that illegal alien communities in the US are nice places to live or that poor areas of Mexico and South America are?
Dictionary: cesspool2. A filthy, disgusting, or morally corrupt place.

Is your argument that all illegal aliens are morally corrupt?
I don't really have an argument. I just asked you a question. If he just went with disgusting and filthy would you disagree with him?
Yes. Being poor does not necessitate that something is also filthy and disgusting.
Have you been to these places?
Hispanic communities in the United States - YesMexican and South American Towns & Villages - No, but I have discussed it at length with a number of people.

You seem to have the misconception that all illegal immigrants are from the dregs of Mexico. While some may be, many of them come from your normal everyday Mexican villages, and they had normal everyday jobs there just like people do here. I have met immigrants that had jobs in Mexico such as carpenter, musician, truck driver, farmer, and cook. They are normal everyday people that just can't find enough work in Mexico, so they come here to try to make more money. I have seen pictures of their houses with vegetable gardens and pots of flowers at their front doors.

 
Don't many of the illegal immigrants, by their own admission, send some of the money they make here out of the country to their families? I can't imagine that money is helping our economy.
You should be able to imagine it.Once the money is sent back home, what happens to it?
They spend it there.
How?
"I'll pay you 1 American Dollar for 4 servings of Paella."Or

Exchange it to Pesos and "I'll pay you the peso equivalent of 1 American Dollar (I'm too lazy to look up the exchange rate) for 4 servings of Paella."
By the way, let's consider a scenario in which immigrant workers mail their U.S. Dollars back home and those dollars really are never spent in America. Would that be a good thing for America, or a bad thing?The answer is that it would be awesome.

Consider what it would mean. A bunch of foreigners are coming over here and doing work for Americans, and all they're getting in return are little green pieces of paper -- they are effectively getting IOUs which they will never collect on (from Americans). From America's standpoint, they are working for us for free. That's awesome.

(In real life, though, they do collect on the IOUs -- by spending the money in America or trading it to someone who will.)
That's silly. Working for free is working for no payment. Those "little green pieces of paper" aren't IOUs anymore as we went off the gold standard a long time ago. They represent currency, something the Payer gave to the Payee. If they truly worked for free, the Payer would still have them and as such would spend them on something else, maybe newer tools or hiring more workers, whatever. Point is, the worker is paid. I know you're using the 'work for free' schtick to make some sort of point, but I don't think it's nearly as effective as you and Timmy seem to think it is.
No, you're not following.In the real world, an illegal alien from Mexico will be paid $100 for his labor, and then he'll spend the money on hot dogs and apple pie (or he'll trade the dollars to a fellow Mexican who will use them to buy hot dogs and apple pie).

Under that real-world scenario, there's a fair trade. By nationality, the Americans have gotten the benefit of some labor from the Mexicans, and the Mexicans have gotten some hot dogs and apple pie from the Americans. It was a trade -- labor for hot dogs.

But consider the make-believe scenario under which the Mexican takes his $100 and makes them vanish from the U.S. economy, sending them home and ensuring that they'll never be used to purchase American goods or services. Under that scenario, the Americans have gotten the benefit of some labor from the Mexicans, and the Mexicans have gotten . . . some pieces of paper from the Americans, but no goods or services to speak of. Just pieces of paper, which the Americans can print more of whenever they want. So it wasn't a trade, it was more of a gift -- labor for nothing.

The make-believe scenario doesn't exist. But if it did, it would work to America's benefit, not to its detriment.

The point of the 'sending US dollars back home' argument, is that a dollar spent in the US is taxed by the US and counts towards the profit of a US company. A US dollar spent in Mexico is taxed by Mexico and counts towards the profit of a Mexican company. It's really that simple.
U.S. dollars aren't spent in Mexico. They're traded for pesos and then spent in America. To think that they're not spent in America is to subscribe to the make-believe scenario described above -- in which America quite clearly comes out ahead.
 
If anything, for the most part, illegals are a great benefit to the economy. Cheap labor is absolutely essential for many industries in America, without it we would see their demise the same way we have of unionized industries in America. Really the only negative is the amount of money they tend to transfer out of the economy but actually that eventually has a positive impact on our economy as it helps develop South and Central America with cash infusion.
There's no such thing as transferring money out of the economy. (You could burn it, but even that has no negative effect on the economy -- it just slows inflation.)You can't buy stuff with U.S. dollars in Brazil. Dollars that get mailed to Brazil still get spent in America (usually after being traded through a currency exchange place).
Transfer of 'wealth'. I should have known the technical police would be out in force in this thread.
I wasn't making any kind of distinction between money and wealth; and my point was a fundamental one, not a technicality.
 
So the whole stimulus thingy is all screwed up.

What we need to do is send all the $838 billion to Mexico. That way, the Mexicans can send it back to us.

 
I can only tell you from anectodal evidence what I've seen:

I live in a "gentrified" neighborhood. (Meaning: Tear down the projects / crack houses and put up $400K TownHomes). I see Latina workers busting their hump every day keeping the place clean, working construction, landscaping, moving...
Spanish chicks in hard hats? Priceless!
 
I have always proudly stood up for illegal immigrants, and over the past several years this has been the minority opinion. Now I'm afraid there's going to be a tidal wave of anti-illegal bias, like nothing that's been expressed before, as a result of the worsening economy.
:confused:

 
This is a good thread. I'm proud to have started it. I have started many threads on this same issue, and will likely start many more.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top