I understand that philosophy, but I figure if I ever drafted a Dynasty team, I would lean toward a younger team. I might sacrifice a little bit in year 1, but my team would be stacked with young talent from there on. Then while everyone is trying to play catchup in years 2 and 3, I'm loading up on future young talent or trading away with my depth. Unless you think Moss is going to seriously outperform guys like C. Johnson, S. Rice, Jennings, etc. for the next couple of years, why not take the younger guy who likely has an additional 5+ years of playing time.Which of two sample teams (only listing the first six picks) below would you rather have in a Dynasty league (I'm making the argument that you could draft either team equally as likely from a middle round draft spot in a 12 team league):Team A

. ManningD. WilliamsC. BensonR. WayneC. OchocincoT. Gonzalezor Team B:A. RodgersB. WellsJ. BestR. WhiteM. CrabtreeV. DavisNow, I don't have a Dynasty specific cheatsheet, but it seems you would have a relatively equal chance of drafting either team, probably a bit harder even to draft Team A. Yet, while Team B may sacrifice a little bit this year, and that's debatable, Team B will be crushing this team two years from now. Then while Team A is desperately trying to recover by drafting ready to play players and trade away aging players, I'm stockpiling more young talent for the next few years. Seems by sacrificing one, maybe two years upfront, you'd set yourself up down the road by always being ahead of the game.Anyway, never did a Dynasty league, but I always thought that would be my strategy. Takes me back to my initial point as to why someone would draft Moss over Fitzgerald, R. White, S. Rice, etc.I'd be curious to hear from someone in a Dynasty league who actually drafted (say a couple years ago) as I suggest and how that's worked out for him. Obviously, a lot of it depends on how successful you are in projecting unproven/younger talent.