rockaction
Footballguy
It seems to me that the "no politics" line is a little looser than it was, say, a year ago. Is that bad? I don't know and it ain't up to me.That's two posts about the perils of non-enforcement by the executive as a method of achieving policy aims, and both needed to be deleted by me as they were political or structural discussions. Summation: I think it's a really bad idea to start doing this on the reg. It wasn't a good idea when we started it (I won't name names), and it's not a good idea now.
I don't know about the line, really. I try to successfully toe it as often as possible and sometimes go over it. Then my posts get deleted. I'm trying to work on it so there's less work for everybody else. I started going deeper into the Constitutional structure of government, what the expectations of each branch are, and all that . . . I had to delete it. I wish I could have those discussions because they're part of who I am personally, but even I can see that there's no dice there if we're to have a civil board.