Well, it's the first week of the season and no one is on bye, so I'm guessing he's got some healthy bodies to chose from me, like me.I have to sit x of these:BensonPetersonHoltBoldinMark ClaytonSantonio HolmesDarrell JacksonT.J. So, yeah, you could conceivably play it safe and sit T.J. moron.The dude has a really long name, that's gotta count for something.Unless you hear tomorrow or Sunday that he will be limited, start him. He should be good for 5 or 6 receptions, 75/80 yards & possibly a score. Seriously, who would you bench him for?
You don't think that ADP, Holt, M.Clayton or D.Jackson are as risky if not riskier than TJ this week based on their circumstances? You'd be crazy to start Mark Clayton over him. D.Jackson has chronic turf toe so under the most ideal situation I'd still start a healthy Houshmanzadeh over him. ADP only comes into the picture if you are considering Housh at Flex, but I do not see three other WR's that I'd start over him. I'd go with Boldin, TJ & S.Holmes, but then again I am a moronWell, it's the first week of the season and no one is on bye, so I'm guessing he's got some healthy bodies to chose from me, like me.I have to sit x of these:BensonPetersonHoltBoldinMark ClaytonSantonio HolmesDarrell JacksonT.J. So, yeah, you could conceivably play it safe and sit T.J. moron.The dude has a really long name, that's gotta count for something.Unless you hear tomorrow or Sunday that he will be limited, start him. He should be good for 5 or 6 receptions, 75/80 yards & possibly a score. Seriously, who would you bench him for?
Just looked at your profile and saw that the majority of your posts are WDIS or disguised WDIS start post/replies. I think I was very sincere in answering your question of "who would I start Houshmanzadeh over" on your lineup. Best of luck & have a great season.Well, it's the first week of the season and no one is on bye, so I'm guessing he's got some healthy bodies to chose from me, like me.I have to sit x of these:BensonPetersonHoltBoldinMark ClaytonSantonio HolmesDarrell JacksonT.J. So, yeah, you could conceivably play it safe and sit T.J. moron.The dude has a really long name, that's gotta count for something.Unless you hear tomorrow or Sunday that he will be limited, start him. He should be good for 5 or 6 receptions, 75/80 yards & possibly a score. Seriously, who would you bench him for?
totally uncalled for. sorry ur life sux so much that it causes you to be such a #####. actually, no I'm not... you obviously deserve it. good luck this year, genius.So, yeah, you could conceivably play it safe and sit T.J. moron.
I never said that those guys weren't risks as well. But I was just trying to make a point that this is a week where you could decide to sit T.J. if you weren't comfortable. He didn't play the opener last year, either, though I have no recollection of why.Penguin said:You don't think that ADP, Holt, M.Clayton or D.Jackson are as risky if not riskier than TJ this week based on their circumstances? You'd be crazy to start Mark Clayton over him. D.Jackson has chronic turf toe so under the most ideal situation I'd still start a healthy Houshmanzadeh over him. ADP only comes into the picture if you are considering Housh at Flex, but I do not see three other WR's that I'd start over him. I'd go with Boldin, TJ & S.Holmes, but then again I am a moroneagles2007 said:Well, it's the first week of the season and no one is on bye, so I'm guessing he's got some healthy bodies to chose from me, like me.I have to sit x of these:BensonPetersonHoltBoldinMark ClaytonSantonio HolmesDarrell JacksonT.J. So, yeah, you could conceivably play it safe and sit T.J. moron.Penguin said:The dude has a really long name, that's gotta count for something.Unless you hear tomorrow or Sunday that he will be limited, start him. He should be good for 5 or 6 receptions, 75/80 yards & possibly a score. Seriously, who would you bench him for?ETA: I thought I made a very good case for him. I said, "Unless you hear tomorrow or Sunday that he would be limited, start him." Of course if he is limited you seek other options, but if he's 100% I do not see how how bench him, he's a top 12-15 WR.
You forgot to call him a moron again. That will help to drive home your point.I never said that those guys weren't risks as well. But I was just trying to make a point that this is a week where you could decide to sit T.J. if you weren't comfortable. He didn't play the opener last year, either, though I have no recollection of why.Penguin said:You don't think that ADP, Holt, M.Clayton or D.Jackson are as risky if not riskier than TJ this week based on their circumstances? You'd be crazy to start Mark Clayton over him. D.Jackson has chronic turf toe so under the most ideal situation I'd still start a healthy Houshmanzadeh over him. ADP only comes into the picture if you are considering Housh at Flex, but I do not see three other WR's that I'd start over him. I'd go with Boldin, TJ & S.Holmes, but then again I am a moroneagles2007 said:Well, it's the first week of the season and no one is on bye, so I'm guessing he's got some healthy bodies to chose from me, like me.I have to sit x of these:BensonPetersonHoltBoldinMark ClaytonSantonio HolmesDarrell JacksonT.J. So, yeah, you could conceivably play it safe and sit T.J. moron.Penguin said:The dude has a really long name, that's gotta count for something.Unless you hear tomorrow or Sunday that he will be limited, start him. He should be good for 5 or 6 receptions, 75/80 yards & possibly a score. Seriously, who would you bench him for?ETA: I thought I made a very good case for him. I said, "Unless you hear tomorrow or Sunday that he would be limited, start him." Of course if he is limited you seek other options, but if he's 100% I do not see how how bench him, he's a top 12-15 WR.
Penguin said:Just looked at your profile and saw that the majority of your posts are WDIS or disguised WDIS start post/replies. I think I was very sincere in answering your question of "who would I start Houshmanzadeh over" on your lineup. Best of luck & have a great season.eagles2007 said:Well, it's the first week of the season and no one is on bye, so I'm guessing he's got some healthy bodies to chose from me, like me.I have to sit x of these:BensonPetersonHoltBoldinMark ClaytonSantonio HolmesDarrell JacksonT.J. So, yeah, you could conceivably play it safe and sit T.J. moron.Penguin said:The dude has a really long name, that's gotta count for something.Unless you hear tomorrow or Sunday that he will be limited, start him. He should be good for 5 or 6 receptions, 75/80 yards & possibly a score. Seriously, who would you bench him for?
You forgot to call him a moron again. That will help to drive home your point.I never said that those guys weren't risks as well. But I was just trying to make a point that this is a week where you could decide to sit T.J. if you weren't comfortable. He didn't play the opener last year, either, though I have no recollection of why.Penguin said:You don't think that ADP, Holt, M.Clayton or D.Jackson are as risky if not riskier than TJ this week based on their circumstances? You'd be crazy to start Mark Clayton over him. D.Jackson has chronic turf toe so under the most ideal situation I'd still start a healthy Houshmanzadeh over him. ADP only comes into the picture if you are considering Housh at Flex, but I do not see three other WR's that I'd start over him. I'd go with Boldin, TJ & S.Holmes, but then again I am a moroneagles2007 said:Well, it's the first week of the season and no one is on bye, so I'm guessing he's got some healthy bodies to chose from me, like me.I have to sit x of these:BensonPetersonHoltBoldinMark ClaytonSantonio HolmesDarrell JacksonT.J. So, yeah, you could conceivably play it safe and sit T.J. moron.Penguin said:The dude has a really long name, that's gotta count for something.Unless you hear tomorrow or Sunday that he will be limited, start him. He should be good for 5 or 6 receptions, 75/80 yards & possibly a score. Seriously, who would you bench him for?ETA: I thought I made a very good case for him. I said, "Unless you hear tomorrow or Sunday that he would be limited, start him." Of course if he is limited you seek other options, but if he's 100% I do not see how how bench him, he's a top 12-15 WR.
You forgot to call him a moron again. That will help to drive home your point.I never said that those guys weren't risks as well. But I was just trying to make a point that this is a week where you could decide to sit T.J. if you weren't comfortable. He didn't play the opener last year, either, though I have no recollection of why.Penguin said:You don't think that ADP, Holt, M.Clayton or D.Jackson are as risky if not riskier than TJ this week based on their circumstances? You'd be crazy to start Mark Clayton over him. D.Jackson has chronic turf toe so under the most ideal situation I'd still start a healthy Houshmanzadeh over him. ADP only comes into the picture if you are considering Housh at Flex, but I do not see three other WR's that I'd start over him. I'd go with Boldin, TJ & S.Holmes, but then again I am a moroneagles2007 said:Well, it's the first week of the season and no one is on bye, so I'm guessing he's got some healthy bodies to chose from me, like me.I have to sit x of these:BensonPetersonHoltBoldinMark ClaytonSantonio HolmesDarrell JacksonT.J. So, yeah, you could conceivably play it safe and sit T.J. moron.Penguin said:The dude has a really long name, that's gotta count for something.Unless you hear tomorrow or Sunday that he will be limited, start him. He should be good for 5 or 6 receptions, 75/80 yards & possibly a score. Seriously, who would you bench him for?ETA: I thought I made a very good case for him. I said, "Unless you hear tomorrow or Sunday that he would be limited, start him." Of course if he is limited you seek other options, but if he's 100% I do not see how how bench him, he's a top 12-15 WR.
![]()
Calm down.Bump to keep on page one...perhaps we can get a pinned thead on tj?