What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

TJ Housh (1 Viewer)

TD5150

Footballguy
Does anybody know what he did to his knee?

This came out of no where, he didn't practice Wed or Thurs and was limited today.

I know he is probable but even if he plays how effective is he going to be?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ho can anyone know how effective he will be when the game has not been played. Only TJ knows how TJ will play.

He is probable, and di practice some today.....if you would normally bench guys who are only probable, then bench him, but IMO, you start him and live with the consequences.

 
The search function will usually help you find threads that already cover most topics. You'll get more info here than in a new thread since people have already discussed it.

 
The dude has a really long name, that's gotta count for something.

Unless you hear tomorrow or Sunday that he will be limited, start him. He should be good for 5 or 6 receptions, 75/80 yards & possibly a score. Seriously, who would you bench him for?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The dude has a really long name, that's gotta count for something.Unless you hear tomorrow or Sunday that he will be limited, start him. He should be good for 5 or 6 receptions, 75/80 yards & possibly a score. Seriously, who would you bench him for?
Well, it's the first week of the season and no one is on bye, so I'm guessing he's got some healthy bodies to chose from me, like me.I have to sit x of these:BensonPetersonHoltBoldinMark ClaytonSantonio HolmesDarrell JacksonT.J. So, yeah, you could conceivably play it safe and sit T.J. moron.
 
The dude has a really long name, that's gotta count for something.Unless you hear tomorrow or Sunday that he will be limited, start him. He should be good for 5 or 6 receptions, 75/80 yards & possibly a score. Seriously, who would you bench him for?
Well, it's the first week of the season and no one is on bye, so I'm guessing he's got some healthy bodies to chose from me, like me.I have to sit x of these:BensonPetersonHoltBoldinMark ClaytonSantonio HolmesDarrell JacksonT.J. So, yeah, you could conceivably play it safe and sit T.J. moron.
You don't think that ADP, Holt, M.Clayton or D.Jackson are as risky if not riskier than TJ this week based on their circumstances? You'd be crazy to start Mark Clayton over him. D.Jackson has chronic turf toe so under the most ideal situation I'd still start a healthy Houshmanzadeh over him. ADP only comes into the picture if you are considering Housh at Flex, but I do not see three other WR's that I'd start over him. I'd go with Boldin, TJ & S.Holmes, but then again I am a moron :goodposting:ETA: I thought I made a very good case for him. I said, "Unless you hear tomorrow or Sunday that he would be limited, start him." Of course if he is limited you seek other options, but if he's 100% I do not see how how bench him, he's a top 12-15 WR.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The dude has a really long name, that's gotta count for something.Unless you hear tomorrow or Sunday that he will be limited, start him. He should be good for 5 or 6 receptions, 75/80 yards & possibly a score. Seriously, who would you bench him for?
Well, it's the first week of the season and no one is on bye, so I'm guessing he's got some healthy bodies to chose from me, like me.I have to sit x of these:BensonPetersonHoltBoldinMark ClaytonSantonio HolmesDarrell JacksonT.J. So, yeah, you could conceivably play it safe and sit T.J. moron.
Just looked at your profile and saw that the majority of your posts are WDIS or disguised WDIS start post/replies. I think I was very sincere in answering your question of "who would I start Houshmanzadeh over" on your lineup. Best of luck & have a great season.
 
So, yeah, you could conceivably play it safe and sit T.J. moron.
totally uncalled for. sorry ur life sux so much that it causes you to be such a #####. actually, no I'm not... you obviously deserve it. good luck this year, genius.
 
Penguin said:
eagles2007 said:
Penguin said:
The dude has a really long name, that's gotta count for something.Unless you hear tomorrow or Sunday that he will be limited, start him. He should be good for 5 or 6 receptions, 75/80 yards & possibly a score. Seriously, who would you bench him for?
Well, it's the first week of the season and no one is on bye, so I'm guessing he's got some healthy bodies to chose from me, like me.I have to sit x of these:BensonPetersonHoltBoldinMark ClaytonSantonio HolmesDarrell JacksonT.J. So, yeah, you could conceivably play it safe and sit T.J. moron.
You don't think that ADP, Holt, M.Clayton or D.Jackson are as risky if not riskier than TJ this week based on their circumstances? You'd be crazy to start Mark Clayton over him. D.Jackson has chronic turf toe so under the most ideal situation I'd still start a healthy Houshmanzadeh over him. ADP only comes into the picture if you are considering Housh at Flex, but I do not see three other WR's that I'd start over him. I'd go with Boldin, TJ & S.Holmes, but then again I am a moron :lmao:ETA: I thought I made a very good case for him. I said, "Unless you hear tomorrow or Sunday that he would be limited, start him." Of course if he is limited you seek other options, but if he's 100% I do not see how how bench him, he's a top 12-15 WR.
I never said that those guys weren't risks as well. But I was just trying to make a point that this is a week where you could decide to sit T.J. if you weren't comfortable. He didn't play the opener last year, either, though I have no recollection of why.
 
Penguin said:
eagles2007 said:
Penguin said:
The dude has a really long name, that's gotta count for something.Unless you hear tomorrow or Sunday that he will be limited, start him. He should be good for 5 or 6 receptions, 75/80 yards & possibly a score. Seriously, who would you bench him for?
Well, it's the first week of the season and no one is on bye, so I'm guessing he's got some healthy bodies to chose from me, like me.I have to sit x of these:BensonPetersonHoltBoldinMark ClaytonSantonio HolmesDarrell JacksonT.J. So, yeah, you could conceivably play it safe and sit T.J. moron.
You don't think that ADP, Holt, M.Clayton or D.Jackson are as risky if not riskier than TJ this week based on their circumstances? You'd be crazy to start Mark Clayton over him. D.Jackson has chronic turf toe so under the most ideal situation I'd still start a healthy Houshmanzadeh over him. ADP only comes into the picture if you are considering Housh at Flex, but I do not see three other WR's that I'd start over him. I'd go with Boldin, TJ & S.Holmes, but then again I am a moron :football:ETA: I thought I made a very good case for him. I said, "Unless you hear tomorrow or Sunday that he would be limited, start him." Of course if he is limited you seek other options, but if he's 100% I do not see how how bench him, he's a top 12-15 WR.
I never said that those guys weren't risks as well. But I was just trying to make a point that this is a week where you could decide to sit T.J. if you weren't comfortable. He didn't play the opener last year, either, though I have no recollection of why.
You forgot to call him a moron again. That will help to drive home your point.
 
Penguin said:
eagles2007 said:
Penguin said:
The dude has a really long name, that's gotta count for something.Unless you hear tomorrow or Sunday that he will be limited, start him. He should be good for 5 or 6 receptions, 75/80 yards & possibly a score. Seriously, who would you bench him for?
Well, it's the first week of the season and no one is on bye, so I'm guessing he's got some healthy bodies to chose from me, like me.I have to sit x of these:BensonPetersonHoltBoldinMark ClaytonSantonio HolmesDarrell JacksonT.J. So, yeah, you could conceivably play it safe and sit T.J. moron.
Just looked at your profile and saw that the majority of your posts are WDIS or disguised WDIS start post/replies. I think I was very sincere in answering your question of "who would I start Houshmanzadeh over" on your lineup. Best of luck & have a great season.
:football: Somebody needs to find their way to the A.C. forum, and stop pissing in here.
 
Penguin said:
eagles2007 said:
Penguin said:
The dude has a really long name, that's gotta count for something.Unless you hear tomorrow or Sunday that he will be limited, start him. He should be good for 5 or 6 receptions, 75/80 yards & possibly a score. Seriously, who would you bench him for?
Well, it's the first week of the season and no one is on bye, so I'm guessing he's got some healthy bodies to chose from me, like me.I have to sit x of these:BensonPetersonHoltBoldinMark ClaytonSantonio HolmesDarrell JacksonT.J. So, yeah, you could conceivably play it safe and sit T.J. moron.
You don't think that ADP, Holt, M.Clayton or D.Jackson are as risky if not riskier than TJ this week based on their circumstances? You'd be crazy to start Mark Clayton over him. D.Jackson has chronic turf toe so under the most ideal situation I'd still start a healthy Houshmanzadeh over him. ADP only comes into the picture if you are considering Housh at Flex, but I do not see three other WR's that I'd start over him. I'd go with Boldin, TJ & S.Holmes, but then again I am a moron :unsure:ETA: I thought I made a very good case for him. I said, "Unless you hear tomorrow or Sunday that he would be limited, start him." Of course if he is limited you seek other options, but if he's 100% I do not see how how bench him, he's a top 12-15 WR.
I never said that those guys weren't risks as well. But I was just trying to make a point that this is a week where you could decide to sit T.J. if you weren't comfortable. He didn't play the opener last year, either, though I have no recollection of why.
You forgot to call him a moron again. That will help to drive home your point.
:football:
 
Penguin said:
eagles2007 said:
Penguin said:
The dude has a really long name, that's gotta count for something.Unless you hear tomorrow or Sunday that he will be limited, start him. He should be good for 5 or 6 receptions, 75/80 yards & possibly a score. Seriously, who would you bench him for?
Well, it's the first week of the season and no one is on bye, so I'm guessing he's got some healthy bodies to chose from me, like me.I have to sit x of these:BensonPetersonHoltBoldinMark ClaytonSantonio HolmesDarrell JacksonT.J. So, yeah, you could conceivably play it safe and sit T.J. moron.
You don't think that ADP, Holt, M.Clayton or D.Jackson are as risky if not riskier than TJ this week based on their circumstances? You'd be crazy to start Mark Clayton over him. D.Jackson has chronic turf toe so under the most ideal situation I'd still start a healthy Houshmanzadeh over him. ADP only comes into the picture if you are considering Housh at Flex, but I do not see three other WR's that I'd start over him. I'd go with Boldin, TJ & S.Holmes, but then again I am a moron :loco: ETA: I thought I made a very good case for him. I said, "Unless you hear tomorrow or Sunday that he would be limited, start him." Of course if he is limited you seek other options, but if he's 100% I do not see how how bench him, he's a top 12-15 WR.
I never said that those guys weren't risks as well. But I was just trying to make a point that this is a week where you could decide to sit T.J. if you weren't comfortable. He didn't play the opener last year, either, though I have no recollection of why.
You forgot to call him a moron again. That will help to drive home your point.
:lmao:
:popcorn:
 
So what is the latest here? Many of us will have to make a call before noon. I saw that he practiced to some degre with a brace on yesterday, but that is about it.

 
Last I read (heard) was that he was probable and ready to go. This is my first year owning him but hearing that he played through some injuries late last season I'm convinced he's a go.

 
Bump to keep on page one...perhaps we can get a pinned thead on tj?
Calm down. :2cents: There is not going to be updated news on him in the short-term. the game is MONDAY. I understand you may need to make a decision on putting someone in. But he's Probable and that's all we'll know between now and the Sunday games, I am willing to bet. No reason to stick another pinned thread on him now. And, I have him in a league.edit to correct bad typing. :lmao:
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top