ceisenhower66 said:
Morton Muffley said:
Jax is moving the ball well and with ten minutes left you should probably assume that they'll be able to get a FG.
Are you freaking kidding me??? Were you watching the same game?????? Jax did not move the ball well all game. They barely had over 200 yards of offense before the Garrard run. Three of their TDs were set up by interceptions and MoJo's kickoff return.
At the point in the game where Tomlin was making that decision Jax had 8 Drives. Those drives had resulted in 3 Tds, 1 missed FG, 3 punts, and 2 Ints. I thought both Ints were poor throws/decisions that were uncharateristic of Garard and there fore did not think that Pitt/Tomlin should be counting on more of that. As such, I'd classify those eight drives as moving the ball pretty well. To make it clearer, I'm suggesting that this decision needed to be made with the understanding that Jax was gonna get at least two more possessions and the idea of them driving for a FG was more likely than not. With that belief, it's hard to see why one would think going for two from the twelve has a positive long-term expectation.For the record, I'm a Pats fan so I have no dog in this race. Just stating that I thought at the time that it was a bad decsion. So not trying to play the 20/20 hindsight game.