What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Top 10 Players To Build Around in 2010 (1 Viewer)

Good stuff. It's a good idea to have a core group of players in different rounds before you enter a draft. A list like this early on is "living", it's going to change as the preseason progresses.

I like Romo but I play in leagues that are all 6 point passing TD's and QB's usually go early, every single year. There's no way I can wait to grab Romo in the 4th round, it's either grab him early or wait on the committee. I'm leaning towards waiting this year depending upon who else is there in those early rounds.

Like the J. Gaffney selection along with Heath Miller, both should live up to their ADP and then some. I think Floyd from SD could be in for a nice year, I also think his ADP rises from now until start of the season.

Not so hot on Nate Washington playing with Vince Young. I understand your reasoning since Britt isn't impressing heading into his 2nd year. Looking at his ADP it's not like you're risking a higher round pick on him or anything so I can't knock it too much I just don't think Nate Washington can be a consistent enough WR for an owner to insert with any confidence into his lineup. Maybe a better choice for your Survivor type formats where I could see this guy having a nice game 1 out of every 3.

Devin Hester, I can't see it. I'm in the minority I guess that thinks the whole Martz offense thing is overrated. I know what he did in St. Louis, but he also had HOF type players in the skilled positions. Kurt Warner was also a beast in the Arizona system. Marshall Faulk, Tory Holt and Isaac Bruce would have been monsters in other offensive systems around the league as well because they were simply great players, it wasn't just Martz.

So when Martz ends up going to a new team, I don't just automatically bump up all players as most seem to. I don't think the Bears have a very good offensive line and I think that's going to cause some problems again for Cutler. I know you mentioned the possibility in your article of Knox being the guy but you liked Hester because of his ability in open space but I like Knox to some degree. He impressed me last year and I think he can take a step forward to some degree. Not because of Martz but because of his own natural ability as a WR.

I really enjoyed reading your article as I read the Perfect Draft every year. You have sound reasoning behind your selections regardless if I or anyone else agrees with it. Thanks for staying up late to get it out.

Cowboy

 
Excellent work David. Me likee very much so not giving my opinions on the list as everyone will have one.

How about a 10 players to avoid list with the same excellent commentary? BUT PLEASE include those in the first round you think should be avoided.

Thanks, Steve

 
Love the Lee Evans call. Barring injury he should see 130 targets and that should mean at least 65 catches. There's upside to be had there, he's only a year removed from a 1,000 yard season and had 7 Td's last year with the same QB's he's saddled with this season. I like Evans as a solid WR3 with potential top-15 upside if everything falls into place.

 
Nicely done. I have been doing the same sort of thing pretty much since i started doing multiple leagues. I dont like to have the exact same team, but for those few players you feel confident about, you can have a very good season. I dont want to brag....well, maybe i do, but the last couple seasons i have raked in my fair share of dough getting guys like Miles Austin and Matt Schaub last year on almost all my teams. It works particularly good for later round picks, where a guy like Austin can literally win you multiple leagues by himself, and at almost no risk.

Im not comfortable even starting the redraft season until i have at least 4 or 5 of these guys. I have a few now that i would like to share, but i wont. I will say at least a couple on your list are/could end up being on mine.

Again, good job. :lmao:

 
Love the Lee Evans call. Barring injury he should see 130 targets and that should mean at least 65 catches. There's upside to be had there, he's only a year removed from a 1,000 yard season and had 7 Td's last year with the same QB's he's saddled with this season. I like Evans as a solid WR3 with potential top-15 upside if everything falls into place.
I like Evans as a WR3 too. A lot of people are sleeping on him but he is very talented. Having TO hurt him but he will get a ton of looks in 2010.
 
Heath Miller on the list surprised me a bit. With the hits they've taken on the OL, do you not fear he'll be asked to stay in and block more?

 
Build around?

This looks more like a late round sleeper/value play article, save Romo. these guys are all late round fillers and borderline bye week players

 
Sorry if this is slightly off topic, but why is Hardesty listed as a player to avoid here: http://footballguys.com/10top300.php?

I only ask because I agree with most of the other avoids (DeAngelo being a lesser exception), but Hardesty is a guy I could see being a diamond in the rough over there in Cleveland. That o-line should be decent at worst.

That being said, I am a big fan of the Bush/Evans/Hester/Maroney cluster. Made me think, "man, I'm glad I'm not in a league with this guy." We'd be fighting it out in the middle rounds. Good article.
He's not saying avoid Hardesty altogether. He's saying that Hardesty's ADP is 94. Dodds ranks him at 146. With such a huge difference in his ADP vs. Value, Dodds thinks he's a player to avoid at or around his ADP of 94 since he thinks there are another 51 players better than him at that spot. However, should he slide to you with the 146th overall pick, he's now fine to take.

 
Sorry if this is slightly off topic, but why is Hardesty listed as a player to avoid here: http://footballguys.com/10top300.php?

I only ask because I agree with most of the other avoids (DeAngelo being a lesser exception), but Hardesty is a guy I could see being a diamond in the rough over there in Cleveland. That o-line should be decent at worst.

That being said, I am a big fan of the Bush/Evans/Hester/Maroney cluster. Made me think, "man, I'm glad I'm not in a league with this guy." We'd be fighting it out in the middle rounds. Good article.
He's not saying avoid Hardesty altogether. He's saying that Hardesty's ADP is 94. Dodds ranks him at 146. With such a huge difference in his ADP vs. Value, Dodds thinks he's a player to avoid at or around his ADP of 94 since he thinks there are another 51 players better than him at that spot. However, should he slide to you with the 146th overall pick, he's now fine to take.
I still see the man-love for Garrard is on for 2010
 
bicycle_seat_sniffer said:
GDogg said:
MrTwo94 said:
Sorry if this is slightly off topic, but why is Hardesty listed as a player to avoid here: http://footballguys.com/10top300.php?

I only ask because I agree with most of the other avoids (DeAngelo being a lesser exception), but Hardesty is a guy I could see being a diamond in the rough over there in Cleveland. That o-line should be decent at worst.

That being said, I am a big fan of the Bush/Evans/Hester/Maroney cluster. Made me think, "man, I'm glad I'm not in a league with this guy." We'd be fighting it out in the middle rounds. Good article.
He's not saying avoid Hardesty altogether. He's saying that Hardesty's ADP is 94. Dodds ranks him at 146. With such a huge difference in his ADP vs. Value, Dodds thinks he's a player to avoid at or around his ADP of 94 since he thinks there are another 51 players better than him at that spot. However, should he slide to you with the 146th overall pick, he's now fine to take.
I still see the man-love for Garrard is on for 2010
He was a Pro Bowler sniff. :thumbup:
 
bicycle_seat_sniffer said:
GDogg said:
MrTwo94 said:
Sorry if this is slightly off topic, but why is Hardesty listed as a player to avoid here: http://footballguys.com/10top300.php?

I only ask because I agree with most of the other avoids (DeAngelo being a lesser exception), but Hardesty is a guy I could see being a diamond in the rough over there in Cleveland. That o-line should be decent at worst.

That being said, I am a big fan of the Bush/Evans/Hester/Maroney cluster. Made me think, "man, I'm glad I'm not in a league with this guy." We'd be fighting it out in the middle rounds. Good article.
He's not saying avoid Hardesty altogether. He's saying that Hardesty's ADP is 94. Dodds ranks him at 146. With such a huge difference in his ADP vs. Value, Dodds thinks he's a player to avoid at or around his ADP of 94 since he thinks there are another 51 players better than him at that spot. However, should he slide to you with the 146th overall pick, he's now fine to take.
I still see the man-love for Garrard is on for 2010
He was a Pro Bowler sniff. :thumbup:
LOL how many AFC QB's said no before they took him?
 
bicycle_seat_sniffer said:
GDogg said:
MrTwo94 said:
Sorry if this is slightly off topic, but why is Hardesty listed as a player to avoid here: http://footballguys.com/10top300.php?

I only ask because I agree with most of the other avoids (DeAngelo being a lesser exception), but Hardesty is a guy I could see being a diamond in the rough over there in Cleveland. That o-line should be decent at worst.

That being said, I am a big fan of the Bush/Evans/Hester/Maroney cluster. Made me think, "man, I'm glad I'm not in a league with this guy." We'd be fighting it out in the middle rounds. Good article.
He's not saying avoid Hardesty altogether. He's saying that Hardesty's ADP is 94. Dodds ranks him at 146. With such a huge difference in his ADP vs. Value, Dodds thinks he's a player to avoid at or around his ADP of 94 since he thinks there are another 51 players better than him at that spot. However, should he slide to you with the 146th overall pick, he's now fine to take.
I still see the man-love for Garrard is on for 2010
He was a Pro Bowler sniff. :lmao:
LOL how many AFC QB's said no before they took him?
Only the good ones

 
Assuming VJax does not play first 6-10 weeks, just how well does Malcolm Floyd perform? Definitely a big mystery heading into regular season.

 
Nice picture in the avatar David. You're much prettier than i remembered.

I can't agree with Gaffney though. I think he's fool's gold, starting off fine but taking on a reduced role week by week beginning after the first 4 games or so, until by playoff time he's back to the scrub he's always been.

I also expect less from A Bradshaw that you do. I think durability issues are a concern, and Jacobs' return to health from nagging injuries last year will allow him, not Bradshaw, to have the larger share of the RBBC pie.

But part of the fun is having differing opinions, ya?

Best of luck to you this year, and thanks for all that you do every year.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
JHuber77 said:
thriftyrocker said:
Gaffney in nonPPR is worthless to me. I wouldn't be surprised to see Decker getting more looks by week 10 or 11.
Decker may be getting more looks by week 10 or 11, but why would you draft him if you can get him on the waiver wire early in the season?
I'm not suggesting you draft Decker. Just trying to temper the Gaffney hype. He isn't the 77th best player. He's a mediocre possession receiver with no RZ value who could get replaced before the year is over. He's Housh with an even worse QB and less talent.
 
Good call on Bush. He is the key to your fantasy season, or so I've heard.

I'm gonna go ahead and disagree with your Maroney recommendation. He's not a guy you can trust.

 
bicycle_seat_sniffer said:
Build around?This looks more like a late round sleeper/value play article, save Romo. these guys are all late round fillers and borderline bye week players
i was thinking the same thing
 
You want to build around a solid QB and a bunch of scrubs, good luck with that.
The players in the article refer to picks generally after the 6th round (excluding Romo) - sometimes you have to read more than the first few paragraphs of an article. You must be a USA Today reader (short attention span).
 
bicycle_seat_sniffer said:
Build around?This looks more like a late round sleeper/value play article, save Romo. these guys are all late round fillers and borderline bye week players
i was thinking the same thing
Dodds is defining "core players" differently than I do:
Every year there are a few players that appear on almost every team I draft. I call these "core" players. It's players that I feel exceptionally strong about their situations against their perceived value (ADP). By design, my leagues are usually won or lost by these players.
But for his definition, this is a good article, I just wouldn't have named it the same title. It's more a "mid-round primer"
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top