David Dodds
Administrator
I stayed up late to get this to you guys. It represents our last free article for 2010. I hope you like it.
http://footballguys.com/10dodds_top10.php
http://footballguys.com/10dodds_top10.php
I like Evans as a WR3 too. A lot of people are sleeping on him but he is very talented. Having TO hurt him but he will get a ton of looks in 2010.Love the Lee Evans call. Barring injury he should see 130 targets and that should mean at least 65 catches. There's upside to be had there, he's only a year removed from a 1,000 yard season and had 7 Td's last year with the same QB's he's saddled with this season. I like Evans as a solid WR3 with potential top-15 upside if everything falls into place.
Decker may be getting more looks by week 10 or 11, but why would you draft him if you can get him on the waiver wire early in the season?Gaffney in nonPPR is worthless to me. I wouldn't be surprised to see Decker getting more looks by week 10 or 11.
He's not saying avoid Hardesty altogether. He's saying that Hardesty's ADP is 94. Dodds ranks him at 146. With such a huge difference in his ADP vs. Value, Dodds thinks he's a player to avoid at or around his ADP of 94 since he thinks there are another 51 players better than him at that spot. However, should he slide to you with the 146th overall pick, he's now fine to take.Sorry if this is slightly off topic, but why is Hardesty listed as a player to avoid here: http://footballguys.com/10top300.php?
I only ask because I agree with most of the other avoids (DeAngelo being a lesser exception), but Hardesty is a guy I could see being a diamond in the rough over there in Cleveland. That o-line should be decent at worst.
That being said, I am a big fan of the Bush/Evans/Hester/Maroney cluster. Made me think, "man, I'm glad I'm not in a league with this guy." We'd be fighting it out in the middle rounds. Good article.
I still see the man-love for Garrard is on for 2010He's not saying avoid Hardesty altogether. He's saying that Hardesty's ADP is 94. Dodds ranks him at 146. With such a huge difference in his ADP vs. Value, Dodds thinks he's a player to avoid at or around his ADP of 94 since he thinks there are another 51 players better than him at that spot. However, should he slide to you with the 146th overall pick, he's now fine to take.Sorry if this is slightly off topic, but why is Hardesty listed as a player to avoid here: http://footballguys.com/10top300.php?
I only ask because I agree with most of the other avoids (DeAngelo being a lesser exception), but Hardesty is a guy I could see being a diamond in the rough over there in Cleveland. That o-line should be decent at worst.
That being said, I am a big fan of the Bush/Evans/Hester/Maroney cluster. Made me think, "man, I'm glad I'm not in a league with this guy." We'd be fighting it out in the middle rounds. Good article.
He was a Pro Bowler sniff.bicycle_seat_sniffer said:I still see the man-love for Garrard is on for 2010GDogg said:He's not saying avoid Hardesty altogether. He's saying that Hardesty's ADP is 94. Dodds ranks him at 146. With such a huge difference in his ADP vs. Value, Dodds thinks he's a player to avoid at or around his ADP of 94 since he thinks there are another 51 players better than him at that spot. However, should he slide to you with the 146th overall pick, he's now fine to take.MrTwo94 said:Sorry if this is slightly off topic, but why is Hardesty listed as a player to avoid here: http://footballguys.com/10top300.php?
I only ask because I agree with most of the other avoids (DeAngelo being a lesser exception), but Hardesty is a guy I could see being a diamond in the rough over there in Cleveland. That o-line should be decent at worst.
That being said, I am a big fan of the Bush/Evans/Hester/Maroney cluster. Made me think, "man, I'm glad I'm not in a league with this guy." We'd be fighting it out in the middle rounds. Good article.
LOL how many AFC QB's said no before they took him?He was a Pro Bowler sniff.bicycle_seat_sniffer said:I still see the man-love for Garrard is on for 2010GDogg said:He's not saying avoid Hardesty altogether. He's saying that Hardesty's ADP is 94. Dodds ranks him at 146. With such a huge difference in his ADP vs. Value, Dodds thinks he's a player to avoid at or around his ADP of 94 since he thinks there are another 51 players better than him at that spot. However, should he slide to you with the 146th overall pick, he's now fine to take.MrTwo94 said:Sorry if this is slightly off topic, but why is Hardesty listed as a player to avoid here: http://footballguys.com/10top300.php?
I only ask because I agree with most of the other avoids (DeAngelo being a lesser exception), but Hardesty is a guy I could see being a diamond in the rough over there in Cleveland. That o-line should be decent at worst.
That being said, I am a big fan of the Bush/Evans/Hester/Maroney cluster. Made me think, "man, I'm glad I'm not in a league with this guy." We'd be fighting it out in the middle rounds. Good article.![]()
Only the good onesLOL how many AFC QB's said no before they took him?He was a Pro Bowler sniff.bicycle_seat_sniffer said:I still see the man-love for Garrard is on for 2010GDogg said:He's not saying avoid Hardesty altogether. He's saying that Hardesty's ADP is 94. Dodds ranks him at 146. With such a huge difference in his ADP vs. Value, Dodds thinks he's a player to avoid at or around his ADP of 94 since he thinks there are another 51 players better than him at that spot. However, should he slide to you with the 146th overall pick, he's now fine to take.MrTwo94 said:Sorry if this is slightly off topic, but why is Hardesty listed as a player to avoid here: http://footballguys.com/10top300.php?
I only ask because I agree with most of the other avoids (DeAngelo being a lesser exception), but Hardesty is a guy I could see being a diamond in the rough over there in Cleveland. That o-line should be decent at worst.
That being said, I am a big fan of the Bush/Evans/Hester/Maroney cluster. Made me think, "man, I'm glad I'm not in a league with this guy." We'd be fighting it out in the middle rounds. Good article.![]()
I'm not suggesting you draft Decker. Just trying to temper the Gaffney hype. He isn't the 77th best player. He's a mediocre possession receiver with no RZ value who could get replaced before the year is over. He's Housh with an even worse QB and less talent.JHuber77 said:Decker may be getting more looks by week 10 or 11, but why would you draft him if you can get him on the waiver wire early in the season?thriftyrocker said:Gaffney in nonPPR is worthless to me. I wouldn't be surprised to see Decker getting more looks by week 10 or 11.
i was thinking the same thingbicycle_seat_sniffer said:Build around?This looks more like a late round sleeper/value play article, save Romo. these guys are all late round fillers and borderline bye week players
The players in the article refer to picks generally after the 6th round (excluding Romo) - sometimes you have to read more than the first few paragraphs of an article. You must be a USA Today reader (short attention span).You want to build around a solid QB and a bunch of scrubs, good luck with that.
Dodds is defining "core players" differently than I do:i was thinking the same thingbicycle_seat_sniffer said:Build around?This looks more like a late round sleeper/value play article, save Romo. these guys are all late round fillers and borderline bye week players
But for his definition, this is a good article, I just wouldn't have named it the same title. It's more a "mid-round primer"Every year there are a few players that appear on almost every team I draft. I call these "core" players. It's players that I feel exceptionally strong about their situations against their perceived value (ADP). By design, my leagues are usually won or lost by these players.