Too early to tell... Laurent got hurt... I think Bradford's favorite target will be his rookie TE eventually, but he got a high ankle sprain after his 1st catch and had to leave... Michael Hooman.....Clayton. He is a reliable veteran, and Bradford seems to like him. For a rookie QB, you always go with the WR whom he seems to like the most. And that is Clayton.
Depending on how many points you get for returns......in my league I have him ranked in the top 15 of all receivers, but we get 1pt/10yds on returns.What about return yardage leagues? Amendola has to be the best in those
Yikes!!Depending on how many points you get for returns......in my league I have him ranked in the top 15 of all receivers, but we get 1pt/10yds on returns.What about return yardage leagues? Amendola has to be the best in those
What about in 1pt/20yd leagues? Where does he rank?Depending on how many points you get for returns......in my league I have him ranked in the top 15 of all receivers, but we get 1pt/10yds on returns.What about return yardage leagues? Amendola has to be the best in those
What were the targets?Targets tell the story in my mind.
Don't know each WR's targets but Clayton in a landslide.What were the targets?Targets tell the story in my mind.
clayton is far from a reliable veteranClayton. He is a reliable veteran, and Bradford seems to like him. For a rookie QB, you always go with the WR whom he seems to like the most. And that is Clayton.
Clayton got 16, Amendola got 9Don't know each WR's targets but Clayton in a landslide.What were the targets?Targets tell the story in my mind.
That's the same question.I voted Robinson. Not inclined to change my pre-draft ranking of these guys after one game, especially not for Mark Clayton. Not ordering that Koolaid already.A better question. If you own any of the top 3 receivers, should you drop one of them for one of the other?
A better question. If you own any of the top 3 receivers, should you drop one of them for one of the other?
As a Robinson owner, I'm wondering if I should be doing the same thing. Clayton, for some reason, hasn't been picked up in my league, but I figure it's only a matter of time. I'm thinking, if I dropped Robinson for Clayton, Robinson would last on the free agent list for longer than Clayton would.I dropped Robinson for Clayton in 3 leagues. Clayton had way more targets.
While I keep looking at Clayton's name on the free agent list, this post is what the other half of me wants to believe. However, I keep hearing negative things affixed to Robinson's name - Clayton was better...Robinson is injury prone...etc.That's the same question.I voted Robinson. Not inclined to change my pre-draft ranking of these guys after one game, especially not for Mark Clayton. Not ordering that Koolaid already.A better question. If you own any of the top 3 receivers, should you drop one of them for one of the other?
smashingsilver said:I can't believe that nobody mentioned why Robinson's stat line was so poor. He was covered almost exclusively by DRC for the entire game. Robinson is a deep threat receiver and DRC does not allow deep balls. Period. Bradford didn't have much of a choice but to go for Clayton and Amendola. I think that you'll see Robinson get more targets in the weeks to come.
He looked good and even more importantly he made these mediocre to poor wrs good by throwing super accurate passes. There were like 18 times the db went for an int not believing he'd throw it so perfectly.Once he gets that respect bradford will have it a little harder. Cards were chomping at the bit to intercept the rook. Clayton is a decent possession wr and the ppr guy. They know each other through OU they had a previous repoire. Laurent has awesome potential but no production.Like so many good qbs he is going to hit those wrs and they'd better catch it or they'll sit. Its coming they had better be ready. I didn't think laurent was. I think amendola has been dying to have a qb dare him to catch it so much.Laurent may be a bust.He is a way better prospect than amendola but if he isn't in sync with bradford it won't matter.I had heard the giants wanted too much for a backup wr. I bet that gets revisited before the trade deadline. I don't think stl thought they'd be competetive right away. Catering to sam starts now. Even if its a 3rd rate lineman or some 4th string wr they'll cater to sam some.Btw jackson is the best receiverpittstownkiller said:A lot of talk about targets. Bradford had 55 attempts, doesn't that seem high to everyone...It has to skew the stats.