I know it sounds absolutely ridiculous and I'm leaning no, but in my fortunate situation, I have a lot of talent on my bench.
12 team non-ppr, standard scoring.
Currently have:
QB- brady
RB - Elliott, Hunt
WR - Jordy Nelson, Tyreek Hill
TE - Coby Fleener
Flex - McCaffrey
Bench: Doug Martin, Mixon, Sterling Sheppard, Cole Beasly, Jamaal Williams (GB), D'Onta Foreman, Hunter Henry
I'm getting offered Gronk / Landry for Hunt / Sheppard. I don't think I would accept this trade outright, but is it worth exploring trading Hunt to upgrade my TE for someone like Gronk? TE is my only serious weakness IMO, and although it's nice to have some solid RB depth, I feel like I'm wasting Martin / Mixon on the bench. Obviously they both have to prove something, but I feel they are trending upwards.
Thoughts? I don't think I can give up the best player in fantasy, but it would certainly fill the hole in my TE slot. Hunt's value will likely not be higher than it is right now.
12 team non-ppr, standard scoring.
Currently have:
QB- brady
RB - Elliott, Hunt
WR - Jordy Nelson, Tyreek Hill
TE - Coby Fleener
Flex - McCaffrey
Bench: Doug Martin, Mixon, Sterling Sheppard, Cole Beasly, Jamaal Williams (GB), D'Onta Foreman, Hunter Henry
I'm getting offered Gronk / Landry for Hunt / Sheppard. I don't think I would accept this trade outright, but is it worth exploring trading Hunt to upgrade my TE for someone like Gronk? TE is my only serious weakness IMO, and although it's nice to have some solid RB depth, I feel like I'm wasting Martin / Mixon on the bench. Obviously they both have to prove something, but I feel they are trending upwards.
Thoughts? I don't think I can give up the best player in fantasy, but it would certainly fill the hole in my TE slot. Hunt's value will likely not be higher than it is right now.
Last edited by a moderator: