Trade Mostert/Diggs for Ceedee/Ekeler? PPR (1 Viewer)

[Silkk1211]

I'm 3-0 and looking to sell high on Mostert and buy low on Ekeler. Would the slight downgrade from Diggs to Ceedee be worth it? Other RBs are Barkley, Kyren Williams, Warren, and Hunt. Other WRs Deebo, Myers, and Dell.

 

[Gally]

I think with your RB's you need to keep Mostert and use him until your other RB's get healthy or actually playing. Trading for Ekeler who seems to not have much injury info out there to go with and injured Barkley, a 50-50 Warren, and Hunt who doesn't have a role yet seems not ideal.

 

[Silkk1211]

I think with your RB's you need to keep Mostert and use him until your other RB's get healthy or actually playing. Trading for Ekeler who seems to not have much injury info out there to go with and injured Barkley, a 50-50 Warren, and Hunt who doesn't have a role yet seems not ideal.

Maybe I’ll try and snag Achane and pair him with Mostert and offer Deebo instead of Diggs. Ekeler should be a ppr monster once he’s back especially with big Mike out.

 

[Gally]

I think with your RB's you need to keep Mostert and use him until your other RB's get healthy or actually playing. Trading for Ekeler who seems to not have much injury info out there to go with and injured Barkley, a 50-50 Warren, and Hunt who doesn't have a role yet seems not ideal.

Maybe I’ll try and snag Achane and pair him with Mostert and offer Deebo instead of Diggs. Ekeler should be a ppr monster once he’s back especially with big Mike out.

So now you want to trade Achane, Mostert, Deebo for Ekeler/Lamb? I would just hold tight.

 

[Silkk1211]

i like Moster and Achane but if they’re sharing the load odds are it’s going to be tough deciding which to start on a weekly bases and my guess is starting both weekly isn’t going to pan out most weeks like last week. I like Lamb over Deebo so I would also be getting an upgrade at WR. Am I thinking wrong?

 

[Gally]

I see that rationale. I just think the Dolphins offense is unstoppable and Mostert/Achane will be the beneficiaries. And if one goes down (both could happen) you have an RB1. If both stay healthy I think they split them enough that they are both RB2's All that to say, I would trade one but not both.