Lavachebeadsman
Footballguy
Drafted him in the 2nd round of a very early draft league (before the knee surgery). Didn't get to watch the game today. Was he just horrible? Was Weeden so bad that there was 9 in the box? Someone please enlighten me.
Anything associated with the Browns offense will be a bust for the forseeable near future . They really suckDrafted him in the 2nd round of a very early draft league (before the knee surgery). Didn't get to watch the game today. Was he just horrible? Was Weeden so bad that there was 9 in the box? Someone please enlighten me.
Benching my 2nd round pick :face palm:Got intoxicated by the talent, should have known better.Horrible? No. He has talent. Was Weeden so bad that there was 9 in the box? Yes. Your only hope is that Weeden improves to the point that he can maintain drives. By what I saw, and based on the PIT, BAL, and CIN 6 games yet to be played, GLWT.
philly has an elite defense. that's part of itDrafted him in the 2nd round of a very early draft league (before the knee surgery). Didn't get to watch the game today. Was he just horrible? Was Weeden so bad that there was 9 in the box? Someone please enlighten me.
'werdnoynek said:my god people... it was his first game of the season with no preseason. in case you didn't notice they had no offense whatsoever. it's easy to go all chicken little after the first week but he will only get better. i think we should wait a few weeks before we start using the b word. to me he was the only bright spot on the whole offense. given the defense knew what was coming every play, he ran with power and decisiveness... there was just nothing there. the sky is not falling... wow.
and to add - after richardson being out the entire preseason, the other backs didn't receive a single carry. the only other carry was an end around to a wr, benjamin on a wildcat play. that's another glimmer of light/hope in the darkness that was week one. again, the sky. is not. falling. yet.'werdnoynek said:my god people... it was his first game of the season with no preseason. in case you didn't notice they had no offense whatsoever. it's easy to go all chicken little after the first week but he will only get better. i think we should wait a few weeks before we start using the b word. to me he was the only bright spot on the whole offense. given the defense knew what was coming every play, he ran with power and decisiveness... there was just nothing there. the sky is not falling... wow.This game seemed rather fluky, as in there were a total of eight interceptions thrown between Vick and Weedan. From the snippets I caught, it looked like one of the ugliest games ever played with neither team ever being able to find any type of rhythm. Using this game as some sort of barometer to judge Trich's future outlook would be a mistake.This was Trich's first game as a pro after accumulating a bit of rust in the preseason. There's no need to overact after the first week of the season. He faces CIN next week which looks to be an easier match up on paper. Please, wait before you hit the panic button.
What will change? Weeden? 8 man fronts? PIT, BAL,CIN on the schedule 6x? No outside threat? As I said, GLWT'werdnoynek said:my god people... it was his first game of the season with no preseason. in case you didn't notice they had no offense whatsoever. it's easy to go all chicken little after the first week but he will only get better. i think we should wait a few weeks before we start using the b word. to me he was the only bright spot on the whole offense. given the defense knew what was coming every play, he ran with power and decisiveness... there was just nothing there. the sky is not falling... wow.
this is the nfl, they're obviously going to make adjustments. to answer your other great questions... yes. yes. no. yes. ok, thanks.ETA: weeden had one of the worst starts in the history of the NFL... he can also only improve. i think 8 man front's will probably become 9 man fronts, but i think richardson can handle it once he finds his legs. their schedule isn't going to change, but i think you knew that. i think gordon and benjamin will start earning more time and will give them threats teams will have to respect. and in response to GLWT - luck is always needed in fantasy football, and will definitely have something to do with it.What will change? Weeden? 8 man fronts? PIT, BAL,CIN on the schedule 6x? No outside threat? As I said, GLWT'werdnoynek said:my god people... it was his first game of the season with no preseason. in case you didn't notice they had no offense whatsoever. it's easy to go all chicken little after the first week but he will only get better. i think we should wait a few weeks before we start using the b word. to me he was the only bright spot on the whole offense. given the defense knew what was coming every play, he ran with power and decisiveness... there was just nothing there. the sky is not falling... wow.
All great points above. For a guy who was trusted to carry the load as much as Shady did on the other end (Richardson's 19 carries to McCoy's 20), there seems the team has no doubt about Richardson's knee, and they are ready to give him all the opportunities he needs to make an impact.If anything, I am buying.and to add - after richardson being out the entire preseason, the other backs didn't receive a single carry. the only other carry was an end around to a wr, benjamin on a wildcat play. that's another glimmer of light/hope in the darkness that was week one.'werdnoynek said:my god people... it was his first game of the season with no preseason. in case you didn't notice they had no offense whatsoever. it's easy to go all chicken little after the first week but he will only get better. i think we should wait a few weeks before we start using the b word. to me he was the only bright spot on the whole offense. given the defense knew what was coming every play, he ran with power and decisiveness... there was just nothing there.
the sky is not falling... wow.This game seemed rather fluky, as in there were a total of eight interceptions thrown between Vick and Weedan. From the snippets I caught, it looked like one of the ugliest games ever played with neither team ever being able to find any type of rhythm. Using this game as some sort of barometer to judge Trich's future outlook would be a mistake.
This was Trich's first game as a pro after accumulating a bit of rust in the preseason. There's no need to overact after the first week of the season. He faces CIN next week which looks to be an easier match up on paper. Please, wait before you hit the panic button.
again, the sky. is not. falling.
yet.
Every single one of your posts lately seems to have been about how little you like Trent Richardson, outside of being a #### in the QB having a baby thread. So I think it's safe to say that you're the furthest thing from an impartial poster that there is, and you're mainly talking to yourself. Nobody wants to engage you in discussion when this is all you bring to the table.....ever.Yes, trade him while there are still some owners out there foolish enough to pay for him. Sorry to say it, but you got burned.
i could understand if this was your first time seeing him play football, but there's reason to be, given his history, optimistic here. this was his first game back from surgery with no preseason, and first time playing against another NFL team taking hits and giving hits...I drafted him as my #3 but that offense looks epically bad. I see a lot of 15/30 games in the future.
No, I just know how easy it is for people to get caught in false hope with a nobody. See Mark Ingram last year. If I stopped just one person from ruining their season by drafting this scrub, or can convince just one person to trade this scrub while he still has some value then my job is done. You are correct, I am impartial. I am impartial against wasting perfectly good draft picks when there are much better players available. I have made a lot of good points that have gone largely ignored because too many people are letting their man-crush get in the way of reality.Every single one of your posts lately seems to have been about how little you like Trent Richardson, outside of being a #### in the QB having a baby thread. So I think it's safe to say that you're the furthest thing from an impartial poster that there is, and you're mainly talking to yourself. Nobody wants to engage you in discussion when this is all you being to the table.....ever.Yes, trade him while there are still some owners out there foolish enough to pay for him. Sorry to say it, but you got burned.
you've made a lot of baseless subjective drivel... you call him names and that's about it.No, I just know how easy it is for people to get caught in false hope with a nobody. See Mark Ingram last year. If I stopped just one person from ruining their season by drafting this scrub, or can convince just one person to trade this scrub while he still has some value then my job is done.Every single one of your posts lately seems to have been about how little you like Trent Richardson, outside of being a #### in the QB having a baby thread. So I think it's safe to say that you're the furthest thing from an impartial poster that there is, and you're mainly talking to yourself. Nobody wants to engage you in discussion when this is all you being to the table.....ever.Yes, trade him while there are still some owners out there foolish enough to pay for him. Sorry to say it, but you got burned.
You are correct, I am impartial. I am impartial against wasting perfectly good draft picks when there are much better players available. I have made a lot of good points that have gone largely ignored because too many people are letting their man-crush get in the way of reality.
No, I have made posts stating that he has 9 games against top 10 run defenses and that gets completely ignored. I have also stated, that if you want a RB with Adrian Peterson like talent you should just use your 2nd or 3rd round pick on Adrian Peterson himself. I have also said you should avoid rookie RB's, especially rookie RB's coming off of 2 knee surgeries who have missed the whole pre-season. You should really be directing your hate against the morans who keep sticking up for this scrub.you've made a lot of baseless subjective drivel... you call him names and that's about it.No, I just know how easy it is for people to get caught in false hope with a nobody. See Mark Ingram last year. If I stopped just one person from ruining their season by drafting this scrub, or can convince just one person to trade this scrub while he still has some value then my job is done.Every single one of your posts lately seems to have been about how little you like Trent Richardson, outside of being a #### in the QB having a baby thread. So I think it's safe to say that you're the furthest thing from an impartial poster that there is, and you're mainly talking to yourself. Nobody wants to engage you in discussion when this is all you being to the table.....ever.Yes, trade him while there are still some owners out there foolish enough to pay for him. Sorry to say it, but you got burned.
You are correct, I am impartial. I am impartial against wasting perfectly good draft picks when there are much better players available. I have made a lot of good points that have gone largely ignored because too many people are letting their man-crush get in the way of reality.
Sadly, almost everyone who drafted him.How many people passed on AP for this guy?
Even Ridley is 10x better and could be had 3-4 rounds later.Sadly, almost everyone who drafted him.How many people passed on AP for this guy?
Lol you guys are sitting here playing Monday morning quarterback while simultaneously overreacting to everything that happened in week 1. It's not very shark like.Even Ridley is 10x better and could be had 3-4 rounds later.Sadly, almost everyone who drafted him.How many people passed on AP for this guy?
No.... we have been saying this the entire pre-season and week 1 only adds more facts to the story. Yet the kool-aid drinkers just keep coming up with more excuses.Lol you guys are sitting here playing Monday morning quarterback while simultaneously overreacting to everything that happened in week 1. It's not very shark like.Even Ridley is 10x better and could be had 3-4 rounds later.Sadly, almost everyone who drafted him.How many people passed on AP for this guy?
You may be right, you may be wrong, that isn't the point. Thinking you can come to any concrete conclusions after only one week of games is a mistake. It's too small of a sample size. Saying "OMG they/we should have taken X player over Y" when we've only seen 1/16th of said players total output is just ludicrous. I don't usually pass any real judgment until I've seen at least a quarter of the season play out. Even then, things can change in an instant.No.... we have been saying this the entire pre-season and week 1 only adds more facts to the story. Yet the kool-aid drinkers just keep coming up with more excuses.Lol you guys are sitting here playing Monday morning quarterback while simultaneously overreacting to everything that happened in week 1. It's not very shark like.Even Ridley is 10x better and could be had 3-4 rounds later.Sadly, almost everyone who drafted him.How many people passed on AP for this guy?
I completely agree it is only 1/16th of the story and stuff can and does change.... but every single week is important as there are only 16 of them (and only 13ish to get you into the playoffs). There is a fine line between being patient and being proactive, this is not like fantasy baseball where it just goes on forever.You may be right, you may be wrong, that isn't the point. Thinking you can come to any concrete conclusions after only one week of games is a mistake. It's too small of a sample size. Saying "OMG they/we should have taken X player over Y" when we've only seen 1/16th of said players total output is just ludicrous. I don't usually pass any real judgment until I've seen at least a quarter of the season play out. Even then, things can change in an instant.No.... we have been saying this the entire pre-season and week 1 only adds more facts to the story. Yet the kool-aid drinkers just keep coming up with more excuses.Lol you guys are sitting here playing Monday morning quarterback while simultaneously overreacting to everything that happened in week 1. It's not very shark like.Even Ridley is 10x better and could be had 3-4 rounds later.Sadly, almost everyone who drafted him.How many people passed on AP for this guy?
If you had to pick one for the rest of the season right now, who would you pick? A rookie on a terrible offense, or Ridley on a terrific offense? This isn't Monday morning quarterbacking. It's quite obvious, even after one game.You may be right, you may be wrong, that isn't the point. Thinking you can come to any concrete conclusions after only one week of games is a mistake. It's too small of a sample size. Saying "OMG they/we should have taken X player over Y" when we've only seen 1/16th of said players total output is just ludicrous. I don't usually pass any real judgment until I've seen at least a quarter of the season play out. Even then, things can change in an instant.No.... we have been saying this the entire pre-season and week 1 only adds more facts to the story. Yet the kool-aid drinkers just keep coming up with more excuses.Lol you guys are sitting here playing Monday morning quarterback while simultaneously overreacting to everything that happened in week 1. It's not very shark like.Even Ridley is 10x better and could be had 3-4 rounds later.Sadly, almost everyone who drafted him.How many people passed on AP for this guy?
Guppies wait 4 games to make a decision. Sharks make the right call after 1 game.You may be right, you may be wrong, that isn't the point. Thinking you can come to any concrete conclusions after only one week of games is a mistake. It's too small of a sample size. Saying "OMG they/we should have taken X player over Y" when we've only seen 1/16th of said players total output is just ludicrous. I don't usually pass any real judgment until I've seen at least a quarter of the season play out. Even then, things can change in an instant.
Seriously. You have to love that even coming off the injury where there were rumors of how many touches he'll get going into the game that he got the full load. He may end up having the most lopsided touch ratio of any back in the league this year. He's a rookie with no preseason coming off an injury. Sounds like those that are disappointed had completely unrealistic expectations. He needs to get up to game speed and he'll be fine. Relax.'werdnoynek said:my god people... it was his first game of the season with no preseason. in case you didn't notice they had no offense whatsoever. it's easy to go all chicken little after the first week but he will only get better. i think we should wait a few weeks before we start using the b word. to me he was the only bright spot on the whole offense. given the defense knew what was coming every play, he ran with power and decisiveness... there was just nothing there. the sky is not falling... wow.
I'm holding out hope because MJD managed to lead the NFL in rushing last season with Blaine Gabbert playing like Weeden.LOL. Sounds so much like the Mark Ingram threads from last year. And how has Igram improved your team? LOL!The problem is not Richardson's talent. The problem IS he plays for the Browns. They will have the #1 draft pick this year.Weeden is a 28 year old from a college spread offense. Should have known he would be the suck in the NFL. Weeden will handicap that entire offense. Little, Massoquoi, Gordon...nobody has value on that offense.Weeden had one of, if not THE WORST, rookie QB openers in the history of the NFL. And he gets to play PITT, BAL, and CIN 6 times. YAY!
If you weren't able to predict this situation with a rookie QB, you kinda deserve to be burned here.'PlasmaDogPlasma said:He was swarmed in the backfield on a high percentage of his carries. When he was able to actually get started he was fine.