What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Two potential trade offers do I make the deal (1 Viewer)

DarkKnightsGuru

Footballguy
Rbs Alex Collins 

Wendall Smallwood 

Chris Mcafrey 

Melvin Gordon 

James White 

Tarik Cohen 

Wr 

Mike Thomas 

Benjamin 

Jermain kearse

Copper kuup

Marqis Lee

Trade wendall Smallwood for Sammy Watkins or Chris Mcafrey for Watkins 

Another deal could be Mcafrey and kearse for Hogan ..

The first deal is more likely to happen 

PPR league 

Yes worth 10 points 

Thoughts 

 
Nope, you are too thin at RB to do it but all your guys have a lot of potential. Gordon is injury suspect,  Collins and Smallwood are still unproven as to their usage. Cohen, White and McCaffrey all have potential in PPR but are all a week to week gamble, but since you don't have any automatic guys besides Gordon I'd hang onto them all til it becomes more clear who is steady. Watkins had one big game, one average and 2 duds so he isn't the guy you should be targeting. In trade 2 you shouldn't have to give up 2 players for Hogan-one should do it. RB's are more valuable than WR's. I'd look at trading with the teams that just lost Cook and Carson to see who they may offer up.

 
Nope, you are too thin at RB to do it but all your guys have a lot of potential. Gordon is injury suspect,  Collins and Smallwood are still unproven as to their usage. Cohen, White and McCaffrey all have potential in PPR but are all a week to week gamble, but since you don't have any automatic guys besides Gordon I'd hang onto them all til it becomes more clear who is steady. Watkins had one big game, one average and 2 duds so he isn't the guy you should be targeting. In trade 2 you shouldn't have to give up 2 players for Hogan-one should do it. RB's are more valuable than WR's. I'd look at trading with the teams that just lost Cook and Carson to see who they may offer up.
I know im thin but have u seen my wr there ultra thin other than Thomas i have no true second guy .. my league is tuff to trade 

 
I know im thin but have u seen my wr there ultra thin other than Thomas i have no true second guy .. my league is tuff to trade 
A bad trade is worse than no trade at all. Stay with what you have and work the waiver wire...or as I said, find trading partners that have a need where you can deal from strength.

 
Sammy Watkins isn't a solution to your WR woes.  He is very inconsistent as beerbuff pointed out.  Don't force a trade just to trade.  

I also agree that McCaffrey should be plenty to get Hogan in a deal although I don't really know if Hogan is much of an improvement over the other WR's you have.  He is up and down as well.  Seems like he would just muddy up the WR waters a bit more. 

 
I would make the move for Hogan. I'm not a huge fan of McCaffrey and while Kearse did well early on, Robby Anderson is getting the deep shots, Austin Seferian-Jenkins is off suspension and getting some targets and the Jets are focused on running the ball (rightfully so). Kearse's ROS value isn't very high. McCaffrey seems to be more of a decoy than anything, considering his snaps and the amount of touches he's actually getting. Perhaps we see a change in that in the future. 

In the NE offense you have Cooks as the deep threat, and really doesn't do a whole lot unless he's significantly faster than the DB. Amendola isn't getting a ton of snaps because he's an injury waiting to happen. He plays on critical downs and gets a lot of clutch first down throws from Brady. Then there's Hogan, who should eat up a lot of targets from Brady. I think he's a strong play ROS.

I wouldn't want anything to do with Watkins. In fact, I dropped him yesterday in my 10 team league. Good riddance.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top